They are walking the street to kill again. What do we do . I am asking for help. Thank you. You still have a quorum. Line item 9 whether to disclose discussion on item 8. Code section 67. 12a action. Is there a motion. So moved. Second. Is all in favor. Public comment . There is no public. All in favor. Opposed. I assume the motion was not to disclose. Yes, that was my motion. Line item 10 adjournment action item. All in favor. Aye. Public comment. Thank you. One more statement. We are the one. That is our first single that we made. That is our opinion. I cant argue with you. You are responsible please do not know his exact. [ ] [ ] [ ] i had a break when i was on a major label for my musical career. I took a seven year break. And then i came back. I worked in the library for a long time. When i started working the San Francisco history centre, i noticed they had the hippie collection. I thought, if they have a hippie collection, they really need to have a punk collection as well. So i talked to the city archivist who is my boss. She was very interested. One of the things that i wanted to get to the library was the avengers collection. This is definitely a valuable poster. Because it is petty bone. It has that weird look because it was framed. It had something acid on it and something not acid framing it. We had to bring all of this stuff that had been piling up in my life here and make sure that the important parts of it got archived. It wasnt a big stretch for them to start collecting in the area of punk. We have a lot of great photos and flyers from that area and that. That i could donate myself. From theyre, i decided, you know, why not pursue other people and other bands and get them to donate as well . The historic moments in San Francisco, punk history, is the sex pistols concert which was at winterland. [ ] it brought all of the punks on the web west coast to San Francisco to see this show. The sex pistols played the east coast and then they play texas and a few places in the south and then they came directly to San Francisco. They skipped l. A. And they skipped most of the media centres. San francisco was really the biggest show for them pick it was their biggest show ever. Their tour manager was interested in managing the adventures, my band. We were asked to open to support the pistols way to that show. And the nuns were also asked to open the show. It was certainly the biggest crowd that we had ever played to. It was kind of terrifying but it did bring people all the way from vancouver, tee seattle, portland, san diego, all up and down the coast, and l. A. , obviously. To San Francisco to see this show. There are a lot of people who say that after they saw this show they thought they would start their own band. It was a great jumping off point for a lot of west coast punk. It was also, the pistols last show. In a way, it was the end of one era of punk and the beginning of a new one. The city of San Francisco didnt necessarily support punk rock. [ ] last, but certainly not least is a jello be opera. They are the punk rock candidate of the lead singer called the dead kennedys. If we are blaming anybody in San Francisco, we will just blame the dead kennedys. There you go. We had situations where concerts were cancelled due to flyers, obscene flyers that the city was thought that he thought was obscene that had been put up. The city of San Francisco has come around to embrace its musicians. When they have the centennial for city hall, they brought in all kinds of local musicians and i got to perform at that. That was, at in a way, and appreciation from the city of San Francisco for the musical legends. I feel like a lot of people in San Francisco dont realize what resources there are at the library. We had a film series, the s. F. Punk film series that i put together. It was nearly sold out every single night. People were so appreciative that someone was bringing this for them. It is free. Everything in the library is free. It it is also a Film Producer who has a film coming out. Maybe in 2018 about crime. What is the title of it . It is called San Francisco first and only rock n roll movie. Crime, 1978. [laughter] when i first went to the Art Institute before the adventures were formed in 77, i was going to be a painter. I did not know i would turn into a punk singer. I got back into painting and i mostly do portraiture and figurative painting. One of the things about this job here is i discovered some great resources for images for my painting. I was looking through these mug shot books that we have here that are from the 1920s. I did a whole series of a mug shot paintings from those books. They are in the San Francisco history centres s. F. Police department records. There are so many Different Things that the library provides for san franciscans that i feel like a lot of people are like, oh, i dont have a library card. Ive never been there. They need to come down and check it out and find out what we have. The people who are hiding stuff in their sellers and wondering what to do with these old photos or old junk, whether it is hippie stuff or punk stuff, or stuffestuff from their grandpar, if they bring it here to us, we can preserve it and archive it and make it available to the public in the future. Pleted cop speaker car future. Pleted cop [gavel]. Chair ronen good morning, everyone. The meeting will come to order. Welcome to the july 11 special meeting of the rules committee. Seated to my right is rules Committee Member supervisor shaman walton, and to my right is supervisor mar. Our clerk today is victor young, and id also like to thank corwin and colea for staffing at sfgovtv. Mr. Clerk, do you have any announcements . Clerk yes. Please silence all cell phones and electronic devices. Completed copies of any speaker cards should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the july 16 board of supervisors calendar unless otherwise suggested. Chair ronen can i have a motion to take items 1, 2, and 3 together . Supervisor walton so moved. Chair ronen thank you. So moved. [gavel]. Chair ronen mr. Clerk, can you please read items 1, 2, and 3 together. Clerk yes. [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read]. Chair ronen thank you so much. We have kate connor from the Planning Department and kate hartley from the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development to make brief presentations, but before they do, colleagues, would you like to make any opening remarks . Nope . Oh, supervisor fewer . Supervisor fewer thank you, chair ronen. So i just wanted to say good morning to my colleagues, and also to our audience. Im excited to talk about our Affordable Homes for educator and families now initiative, along with my cosponsor, supervisors walton, peskin, and haney. We can all agree that in this Affordable Housing crisis, we desperately need to create more Affordable Housing in every part of the city. San francisco is on track to exceed our rena goals, though we are fall far short of our goals for low and moderate Income Housing. As of last year, the city had already produced 96 of the units needed to meet our goal by 2022. However, this year, we have only produced 31 of the units needed to meet our goal for low and very lowIncome Housing units. So we are including legislation i recently authored and passed which allocates 50 of excess eraf funds that the city receives from the state for additional housing. This will continue to add tens of millions of more supervisor fewe supervisor fewe supervisor fewer waiving density restrictions and allowing up to three stories of extra height through the state and local density bonus programs, which helps to make Affordable Housing programs more financially feasible, creating an educating Housing Partnership programming that doesnt lock new programming in the city charter, but evolves as teacher demand changes, using the same equation that voters will be asked to approve in the november housing bond to keep educators in the city, eliminating the conditional use authorization process for 100 Affordable Housing and educator Housing Projects, and requiring that projects be approved in 90 days. My office began working on this earlier this year. This initiative is based on Lessons Learned from Housing Developers with deep roots in the communities that they serve. My colleagues also worked with the united colleagues of educators in San Francisco that would serve a wide range of educators in San Francisco. I am proud to have partners with them on this. As a former school board member, i know meeting the Housing Needs of an educators is an important teach in teacher recruitment. Since the mayors introduced her Charter Amendment, many proponents have said it s purpose is to stream line 100 Affordable Housing projects. Regardless of what you have read, this is simply not true. Affordable Housing Projects can already qualify for buy right approval through senate bill 35. There havent been any appeals for educate i dont remembor py into effect in september 2018. What the charter will actually do is raise requirements to 181880 of area Median Income. Every single unit in a socalled Affordable Housing project could be for people making 140 of the area Median Income. What does that mean . It means that 140 of area Median Income for were the area . The monthly rent for a rent restricted studio at 140 a. M. I. Is 3,018 a month. That means that under this new definition of the Charter Amendment would be a studio that costs over 3,000 per month. We need to ask ourselves as a city who are we leaving behind . The Mayors Office says removing the requirement that 100 Affordable Housing requirement is to encourage developers to build lowIncome Housing, but we can still build moderate and middleIncome Housing while still including lowincome. Wh how can we call this 100 Affordable Housing with a straight face when it excludes the vast majority of our residents and communities of color who need it the most . Once again, who are we leaving behind . In addition to locking this warped definition of 100 Affordable Housing into the city charter, this would also lock in another definition of 100 teaching projects that would be unaffordable for most 25e67ers and allow buy right on public leoned land. Despite the mayor referring to those projects as 100 Affordable Housing, the definition requires less than 44 of the project be for teacher housing, with onethird of the entire building reserved for nonresidential uses and onethird of the residential units as market rate housing. These definitions should not be set in stone in a city charter, and we should not be granting buy right projects to local developers under the guise of calling it Affordable Housing. This would extend buy right approvals to any Housing Development in the future. This means it opens the door to making all development, including luxury condos eligible for buy right approval with no public review whatsoever. Again, i ask you, who are we leaving behind . It is important to note some of the key differences between our proposals and the proposal the mayor put forward. Our proposal upholds the 2015 prop k mandate to keep projects in peoples hands. It does not redefine housing income levels. It allows Affordable Housing in all neighborhoods, including those currently restricted to singlefamily homes. It is flexible and can be adjusted to accommodate changing needs over time without having to go to the ballot. We have a choice today to regulate human greed and mandate that developers build at all level of income. As you listen to public testimony today, i think what you need to ask yourself is, who are we leaving behind . Thank you. Chair ronen supervisor peskin. Supervisor peskin thank you, chair ronen. I would like to associate myself with the comments of pri supervisor fewer, but i want to thank everybody whos been working on a legislative path for Affordable Housing and rezoning in the last few months, and particularly supervisor fewer, whos been a champion for Affordable Housing on the less dense west side of our city, frankly saying that the city should prioritize every Housing Project there. District four has 273 . The press will no doubt classify this as an ideological debate between the mayor and the board, but i think it is a shared battle on all sides to build for Affordable Housing for the people of the city and county of San Francisco. Having worked on these for a long time, ive been privy to a number of hard fought community struggles to bring about some pretty profound wins. I stood with supervisor mark leno almost 20 years ago when he created the citys first inclusionary housing law. We stood with the community when they corrected the huge mistake of locking in inclusionary rates in the charter, which supervisor fewer said is locking in 140 of a. M. I. , the definition of affordability in the charter. We, i think lost hundreds, if not thousands of units that could have been affordable had we not locked in the inclusionary definition in the charter when the market went crazy starting as we came out of the great recession, and it wasnt until 2015 that we were able to take that out of the charter. That was a profound mistake, but we stood with the the city when they needed to cough up millions of dollars for Housing Project. We stood with the city when they came up with the r. A. D. Program for thousands of units of housing. We stood with the city when developers and some deeppocketed interests put prop p and u on the ballot to pit our most vulnerable populations against middleclass communities. It was a wholly unnecessary fight. The right thing prevailed, and i think we have shades of that again today. When we start publicly subsidizing market rate housing, we not only force most of of those at risk for displacement to compete with this housing, but we give developers the right to build what is going to make them the highest profit. Unfortunately, as supervisor fewer i think very well articulated, the mayors amendment seeks to do this. The red herring of stopping d. R. S has been moot, and i think supervisor said that since sb 35 passed, but also before sb 35 passed, 100 Affordable Housing projects were rarely, if ever, the subject of discretionary reviews. If were going to gut Community Process and can first remind benefits on a developer, it is better we should really do what the Community Asks for, which is have the most deeply Affordable Housing projects that are possible, so id like to associate myself with the comments of supervisor fewer and look forward to the comments of the members of this panel and members of the public. Chair ronen thank you. Supervisor mar. Supervisor mar thank you, chair ronen. I just wanted to make some brief remarks. Since joining this board in january, like all of you, ive made Affordable Housing one of my top priorities, in fact just actually deciding to run for the board of supervisors, one of my main motivations was to try to bring what i could to the table to try to address the Affordable Housing crisis in our city to ensure particularly on a personal level that my daughter and other kids in this city are able to continue to live here in the future. And besides working with all of you on important citywide efforts like the Affordable Housing bond, ive been working with my constituents, the Mayors Office of housing to develop a housing plan to develop housing in the sunset district. Weve identified four public sites and dozens of privately held sites with potential Development Opportunities and were moving forward on our first Small Sites Acquisition Program in the sunset district. And additionally, ive been actively supporting the first and thus far only educator Housing Project in San Francisco, which is at the Francis Scott key annex in the sunset district. Its critically importan