Thats it . Great. Are we ready for a motion . Yes. I move that we conditionally approved the revised Schematic Design for block 52 in Hunters Point shipyard phase one. I second the motion. [roll call] design approved. Schematic design. Thank you. Please call the next item. The next order of business is item g, conditionally approving Schematic Designs for development of agency housing parcels on blocks 52 and 54 of Hunters Point shipyard phase 1, which consists of 112 affordable rental housing units; approving a density bonus allowing additional height and density for proposed development on block 52; and providing notice that this approval is within the scope of the Hunters Point shipyard phase 1 reuse final Environmental Impact report, a program eir; and adopting environmental findings pursuant to the California Environmental quality act. Discussion and action. Resolution 172019. Madam director . Thank you. Im just going to turn it over to elizabeth carmella. This is the same area, same phase, phase one within the Hunters Point shipyard. I will have elizabeth present on this item. Good afternoon commissioners to get i am Senior Development is a list with the Housing Division area i am here to see seek approval for this medic designs for block 52 and 54, the affordable project and hunters hunters. Shipyard phase one. First i want to orient you quickly to the location. This is the entire shipyard. You can be locked 52 and 54 outlined on the hilltop. Both of these blocks include Market Rate Development. The Market Rate Development on 54 is complete and the development on 52 is currently in the design phase as you just heard. these are relatively smaller blocks, we are offering them together as one project to take advantage of economies related to the financing operations of the project. This is a nice aerial shot of the hilltop with box 52 and 54 highlighted in yellow. That triangular lot between lot 52 is the market rate thought you just heard about. This is a little bit of background on phase one. Lila covered it well, so i will not go into all of the detail again. I just want to say that these are the first two blocks of five blocks on the hilltop and hillside that ocii will fund area they are standalone Affordable Housing blocks of these are the first two. A bit of background on the project is self. In september of 2017 ocii issued a press for proposals or an rfp. In march of last year after Selection Process, Commission Approved the selection of the Developer Team. In august of last year Commission Approved a Development Loan and exclusive agreement with the selected developer. Instead the team has been hard at work as the design team you see today. That Developer Team is Mccormick Baron salazar or mbs. Also act as a service provider. The Developer Team includes John Stuart Company as manager and architect. Since developer selection the team has added Kerman Morris as architect and contractor. As you might remember from devious visitation, direct the previous, lennar will as a result of the change in design. [reading notes] [reading notes] as i mentioned, the two blocks would be developed and are designed to operate as one project to get since they have different dimensions and because block 54 is a significantly smaller site. For this reason it makes sense to Cluster Community management and Services Functions in the larger building a block 52. Which allows the building layout on block 54 to be as efficient as possible while providing for the important functions and shared bases necessary to serve the residents. Both locks will include open air lobbies, laundry lounges. Block 52 will have a Large Community room with a kitchen, a fitness room, Tenant Services offices and a Conference Room along with property manager offices get heres a quick summary of the contract and compliant to date to professional services to get the project is at 87 Small Business enterprise, of that 81 are San Franciscobased, 25. 7 are womenowned businesses and 6. 5 are minority owned businesses to get as i mentioned previously, the developer has selected being navy. It is not included in the percentages i just mentioned as a contract has not been finalized and subcontractors have not been it out. We are still in the design phase. Lower back before you with the permitted loan we will have more complete numbers on s. You have a full description of the cac recommendations on Community Outreach of the object in your memo. This highlights the meetings we have had since the developer Selection Process yet we took into account feedback we had during the first Community Outreach. As a result of the meetings this year where we presented our smart develop. As with all prior votes related to the project, both the housing subcommittee, the cac unanimously voted to recommend a ruble of these Schematic Designs. With that, i would turn you over to dan solomon, and his team to provide you with the details on the Schematic Design. Thank you, elizabeth area greetings to the members of the commission. We are very happy to be here with something that is very close to our heart which is the development of these two affordable sites. We begin this presentation with two images that we put together. One we chose the city on the relationship of the shipyard to the city both the disk from the iconic parts of the city and the sense of connection and view that it has. It has been very much the intention of ocii redevelopment prior, and travertine to make the shipyard part of the city and to build a neighborhood that is like part of the city in all respects area i guess i advanced with this. Within the buildings we are trying to create, we want to read a sense of community for low income families formerly homeless families and for certificate holders, but to have a ways which is more than a unit, but really part of a community and its open cases and it is common spaces. The two site that elizabeth identified ours somewhat different from one another, they are a block apart. The idea has been to create two buildings that are significantly different in the organization and program but are similar in there is not too historic San Francisco architecture and in their character that identifies them as one integrated community. I will talk about block 52, the larger of the two site. My associate will walk you through block 54. Block 52 consists, the organization into lshaped wings that create a large communal courtyard and an entry space. In the z shape, the secondary courtyard which helps to animate the alley behind. The ground floor plan shows on for two this cluster of functi function, first a parking level which talks into the grade and enters the site at the lowest point on the site. So the parking garage is mostly submerged at the rear. At the front there is an entry courtyard and the entry courtyard serves tenant servic services, the project administrator offices, the Community Room, fitness room and the lobby that serves all of the housing above the section which is now nicely of cured by the dialogue here, shows the courtyard with significant little structure with a trellis at the entry which is researchbased for the Community Room which is behind the word struck her. And then a second courtyard, or an extension of the courtyard above the parking podium on the second level. The second level and shows the upper level of the courtyard, the trellis at the entry, and in a typical low floor than which is common to each of the four floors at a residential. There is daylight at the end of each corridor and the capturing of city views wherever possible. This perspective is from the corner of gerald which is what you see when you enter the neighborhood. If i stop talking, you could see what the image shows which is the Community Room for both building at the corner, with the four stories in the housing above. In the building in the series of vertical proportions segments. Further articulated by color by an off black on and off white. Down the street the entry courtyard welcoming the people from the other building a block away. To the cluster of Community Services and social services to get the entry courtyard with a quite grand stair to the second level podium and the search space for the Community Room and your standing at the entrance of Tenant Services here. Going up the street, there is a bicycle shop and storage that animate the corner and the services of utilities and mechanical bases tucking into the grade as it goes up the hill with the parking behind. This also shows a very discrete entrance to the parking garage, which is tucked into an articulation of the mass of the building with balconies above. Around to the back of the site where we try to be Good Neighbors to our new neighbors that we just saw to the south with the development of the massing of the building and the facing of avocet which is very much treated as a front sonata back. Thank you commissioners, i will be walking you through block 54 building which is the collar of the parcels for the two buildings are good block if t4 is organized similar to block 52 with the taught vertical dimensions. Its also organized around outdoors bases. As dan mentioned, these buildings are Community Spaces for the residence. It is important to provide space for a variety of uses to get at the center of the block is the green mass see there. That is what we are referring to as the jewel building. On the top of that we have a green roof located for the residence to look down on. It also helps with our storm water management. Here on the ground floor plan you can see the organization of the building is the march of 52, parking and nurses are taught back in their, so that the street frontage is activated is much as possible. The residence will enter through a double height lobby days. To their right they will have a combination loud lounge laundry space. There is a treat court with informal play but meant play spaces for the children to go play while their parents are doing laundry. There are two groundfloor units anchoring the corner of the ground floor. The residential levels above, the unit cluster around a common courtyard and the elevator lobbies always have a view of this courtyard space area every time the residents get out like dan mentioned, having windows from the corridors having windows of the neighborhood is important to keep people oriented to where they are, and also make that connection to the city beyond. Up on the fifth floor plan you can see how we have carved back the building at the Property Line condition to reflect the light wells of our neighbors on block 54, the exist parcels there and to also allow sunlight into our Property Line fourdoor there. At the north corner of this floor plan is the comments bases for the residence. It is the roof terrace that we ended up we are intending the buildings around to take advantage of this view and visited the parcels area parcels. This picture is from that drone shot. When the residents get off the elevators at the fifth floor they see San Francisco in the distance, the iconic downtown. The connection to the city that they are part of the city is reinforced. Going through the reit level renders of this welding. This is the level you will be as you enter the hilltop neighborhood. He was see this mauled green jewel building there like dan mentioned on the street level courtyard at the center of the block. At the corner of furred ellen hudson you can see the double height and trend. You can also see towards the left how we have tapped down the building as a heads up hud to better be neighbors to our neighbors to the south there. We have a sample of typical unit layout that we have within the project. There is a wide range of unit type on this project. A lot of archer unit that will accommodate families to get we take care and laying out these units so there is adequate living base with the exterior materials we are focused on, as dan mentioned, a simple palette that ties the buildings together, primarily offwhite and off black the primary materials area and the we reserve special materials for the special places of the building. Where we are looking to use glazed and rick products. I will handed over to elizabeth now. Id just wanted to touch on our conditions of approval which are strikingly similar for what you saw her block 52. I will not go into great detail. They give our staff an opportunity to ensure we are keeping with the design intent as the design continues are area continues. I wanted to touch on the density bonus that i mentioned before which is part of your requested approvals today. As i meant. A density bonus for block 52 pursuant to the redevelopment plan and the design for development for phase one. Ocii may approve a density bonus for moderate income residential units including up to three concessions from some of the defined guidelines. It also allows for density and raises up to 25 . In this case the developer is requesting a density bonus to allow for height and use on the southern portion of the block to bring the entire building to five stories versus dubbing it down, and an increase in density allows for anchor of about 1 . Due to relatively low capacity of both of these locks which we would do would be difficult to finance. Staff recommends approval of this request. Our current schedule which is subject to change, has us coming back to Commission Next spring to request approval for permanent loan of the project. The fall of 2020 we expect to be back before you with a ground lease closing financing and starting construction. If we keep to that schedule construction will be complete by the end of 2022. Finally, i would like to introduce the Developer Team. Before that i want to thank laura with ocii design team. She did all of the heavy lifting on the Schematic Design review. From the Development Team. [reading notes] we are all here to answer any questions you may have. Thank you. Do we have any eager card . Yes, we have one speaker ca card. Eric sandoval. Good afternoon commission. I am a San Francisco shipyard homeowner. This is going to be a reminder, as you may or may not be aware, block 52 and 54, these blocks are the pieces of land that travertine promised us when we were buying our homes that they would be parks. Because they refused to own up to its lies in race except response abilities for fraudulent misrepresentation and this commission refused to hold the partner, namely travertine accountable for its missed deeds, over 25 families have had to bring a lawsuit against lennar which is currently pending. But, that is not the main reason im here today. The main reason why im here today, believe it or not, is to thank the Development Team, particularly elizabeth, for including the shipyard homeowners and the development and design process of these buildings. We were able to have a thoughtful dialogue with the ocii, architects and developers. The team made adjustments to the design based on our conversations. While those accommodations were relatively all, it was evident that the Development Team recognize, acknowledged and appreciated the important of including the input of neighbors because when the design process. We thank them for that. The result before you today appears to be two you designed buildings. We, as homeowners, are quite concerned by the sheer size of these buildings. So big in facts, that ocii is having to ask for an exception to the height restriction for at least one of these buildings. Our fear is that these buildings will dwarf the already built adjacent to a nearby nearby townhomes and condos which are our homes. I like to think of it, when these are built, it is going to be a moby dick whale next to my nemo clown fish townhome and that concerns me. We understand the importance of maximizing every bit of days available when buildings are dust really needed for Affordable Housing of this type. We appreciate the designers did what they could within the confines in which they had to work. Im not sure there is anything that can be done, at this. Because, but desperate sizing occurs when buildings are designed and built like this at different times with different teams having different goals, namely travertine and ocii. That is something perhaps to keep in mind for future project. Finally, one outstanding issue that is not addressed directly in the presentation it was discussed here a little bit is the fact that soil testing has not been done to confirm that there is no radioactive contamination present. Historical documents suggest that no contamination occurs on parcel a, and the cdph revealed nothing, Community Members are still conc