Illegally, and disarm a national guardsmen, at gunpoint, as a very likely, wrongly imagined they are avenging thank you. Next speaker, please. Mr. President i will add, before the next speaker. Any other members of the public that would like to address the board during general Public Comment, step up to your right hand side. Otherwise this will be the last speaker. Business in chinatown for 50 years, after hearing naming the station either chinatown or rose pak, my opinion, since ive been here for 50 years, do not name it after anyone. Leave the station as chinatown. Like i said, rose is a great person and the present, but in the past she has a dark side. I am here 50 years, and we dont choose. Thank you. Thank you. That will conclude our Public Comments for today. Madame clerk, please call for adoption of our Committee Agenda items 6165. Clerk introduced for adoption without reference to committee, unanimous vote is required for resolutions today right alternatively any supervisor may require a resolution to go to committee. Supervisor yee would any of my colleagues like to sever any items . 62. 61. I just want to make sure im added as a cosponsor to 52 62. Supervisor yee and, 65. Okay. 63, 64. Supervisor yee i think we need to take roll call. I see somebody missing. Supervisor haney, are you around. Clerk item 63 and 64, supervisor haney. Im sorry, mr. President we need a roll call. Go ahead. [roll call] [please stand by]. Ease stand by] supervisor mandelman to implement ab 1784, so id like to make a motion to add that language. President yee okay. Theres a motion to amend. Is there a second . Seconded by supervisor peskin. If theres no objection, then well take these amendments outlined. [gavel]. President yee colleagues, can we take this item, same house, same call, as amended . Seeing no objection, then, this resolution passes unanimously. [gavel]. President yee number 62. Clerk 62 is a resolution to support the rights of San Francisco veterinary specialists. President yee supervisor ronen . Supervisor ronen yes. I am so proud to have the cosponsorship of every single colleague on this board. Thank you so much for standing by these workers. As i stated last week, sfvs is owned by v. C. A. , a company that owns 800 animal hospital. In 2018, v. C. A. Was purchased by mars, the candy company. The next step is for the company and union to negotiate a contract. That started 14 months ago, but unfortunately has resulted in delays, not a contract. Colleagues, bypassing this resolution unanimously, we are sending a strong message to marsv. C. A. And San Francisco veterinary specialists that we expect them to honor the law and do right by their employee. They need to know that San Francisco is a strong union town that will always fight for justice. President yee okay. Colleagues, can we take this same house, same call . Okay. With no objection, this resolution is adopted unanimously. [gavel]. President yee number 65 . Clerk 65 is an authorization to written ballot arguments for submittal to the voters for the 2019 consolidated municipal election. President yee okay. Colleagues, the amendments to the motion have been distributed to authorize preparation of ballot arguments for the november 2019 election as follows. Number one, president yee to write the proponent argument for the Charter Amendment regarding the disability and ageing Services Commission and department. Number two, mayor breed to write the proponent argument for the g. O. Bond regarding affordable housing. Number three, mayor breed to write the proponent argument for the Initiative Ordinance regarding the tax on net rider fares. Number four, supervisor fewer to write the proponent argument for the initiative regarding the Affordable Homes for educators. Number five, supervisor mar to write the proponent argument for the Initiative Ordinance regarding prohibitions on campaign distributions. Number six, supervisor walton to write the opponent argument for the petition Initiative Ordinance on vapor products. Can i have a motion for on these amendments . Motion by supervisor walton, and seconded by supervisor fewer. Then, without objection, these amendments are adopted. [gavel]. President yee on the resolution, can we take this item, same house, same call as amended . Without objection, this amendment is approved unanimously. [gavel]. President yee madam clerk, lets go back to item 60 which was scheduled pursuant to motion m19. Clerk this is where Public Comment to enter into closed session was taken for the board to convene in closed session for the purpose of receiving advise or conferring with the City Attorney in a case which pacific gas and electric is an adverse party. President yee okay. Weve already had Public Comment on that, and well go into closed session. [inaudible] president yee members of the public, we ask that you exit the chambers and the sheriffs to lock the doors behind them. We will open. President yee okay. We are back in open session. May i have a motion that the board finds that it is in the best interest of the public that the board elect not to disclose this closed session deliberations. Motion made by supervisor ronen, seconded by supervisor mandelman. Then without any objection we will not disclose our closed session deliberations. Madam clerk, please read the in memoriams. Clerk todays meeting will be adjourned in memory of the of the following loved individuals, motion made a supervisor walton by the late mr. Walton, sr. , and on behalf of Clifford Benjamin henry, on behalf of supervisor brown on behalf of the late hannah sigri, and on behalf of supervisor stefani, on behalf of the victims of the gilroy shooting. President yee colleagues, that brings us to the end of the agenda. Madam clerk, is there any further business before us today . Clerk that concludes this session. President yee this is our last meeting before our recess session. Have a great summer, and we are done with the agenda. [gavel] our clerk is erica major who is delighted she will not see us for the next month. Do you have any announcements. I guess sf gov tv has to run the title. Okay, there is no fine for this. Do they have to run the title . Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good shape. It is an honor to be your cosponsor. Does mr. Sanchez, nothing from planning, is there any Public Comments on item number one . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. If there is no objections, we will finally send this to the full board with a recommendation , without objection. Madame clerk would you please read the next item . Item number 2, 190702,e amending the planning code to permit new floor area or building volume on the rooftop of a noncomplying structure that is designated as a significant building under planning code, article 11, located on assessors parcel block no. 3707, provided that the rooftop has an existing parapet at least 17 feet in height along the primary building frontage; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. This is a sitespecific piece of legislation. I authored a very similar one, a few years ago for a rooftop terrace on an article article 11 designated building. This is the same for the first building, which is undergoing, the subject of a renovation to a hotel that preserves the significant features, it has gone before the Historic Preservation commission which recommended i believe unanimously. On behalf of the department. Good afternoon. Planning department staff. Item number two before and as an ordinance. A floor area or building volume on the rooftop of a noncomplying structure at five jik third street. It will confer office space into a Tourist Hotel on the first 12 floors and demolish the existing top structure. The project would maintain approximately 11,000 square feet of retail use of the basement and ground floors. The Historic Preservation commission presented this item on march 20. The Planning Commission heard this item on april 25, 2019. During both hearings the commissions recommended approval of the ordinance. This concludes my presentation. I am available for questions. Are there any members of the public you would like to speak to item number two . Sounds like a good plan. I want to caution you about these rooftops. Rooftops are not made for weight , for entertainment, and the use of putting a lot of weight on top of them. In the event that the roof is not calculated to be Strong Enough to carry excess weight, you are putting the lower level section of the building at risk for collapse. I think you should do engineering measurement, and pressure test on that structure before you start adding a ton of weight on top of any building that you want to perform this type of noncompliance structure design. Thank you, mr. Wright. I will just say, for the record, that there actually rooftop structures there now, and the proposed rooftop structure is very modest, mostly consists of a canopy. This is just to allow that use on the rooftop on an article 11 building. The floor is yours ms. Gomez. Good afternoon supervisors. Weve come to the Planning Commission, and various subcommittees, for the past several years with regard to this project. We have a longstanding relationship and a very productive collaborative relationship with the developers of this project. They have proactively come to us early, early on and signed agreements that would ensure thats whatever workers are employed at this hotel, including who served drinks, or beverages on the rooftop bar will have a fair process. Its very important to us, and for that reason we have continued to support this project. We are asking for approval with regard to the rooftop to be presented today. If you have any questions, please feel free to get in touch. Next speaker, please. Connie ford from the good jobs for our program. I am here to proudly say, about 1. 5 hours ago we finished our negotiations with the developer, and actually i have to sign it, i have not signed it yet. We are very happy with it. We are trying to keep all of this development that is happening in our city accountable. In serving the needs of disadvantage communication is a barrier to get these in a level jobs and all of this good development, particularly. We are working really hard, we are really happy and we are here to recommend that this go forward and we look forward to working with jama ventures on establishing the program that we are talking about. Thank you so much. Congratulations. Any other members of the public here on item number two. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor haney, this is an district number six, the. Supervisor haney thank you. I was really excited to hear that there was such strong collaboration from a very early stage on this project. Folks from local 2, ms. Gomez on ms. Ford from the good jobs for all coalition. Im glad there was able to be, all of the development that is taking place, whether its hotels, housing court, or commercial space. We want to make sure that those are available to the people in community. They are good jobs. The developers are investing in training on the front and. Im very happy that we were able to come to an agreement on this project. Im also excited about the rooftop, i think rooftops are great in San Francisco. Rooftops have gone up very successfully on rooftops. Not just putting a lot of people to work on i think its good for Tourism Industry and generally for economic developments. I am excited about this project. Im very happy and thankful to this developer and the folks in the community for coming together for an agreement. There are some minor, technical amendments. Some of the existing text in the code has sons headed, we have drafted the no amendments to add that text back in. It looks like a big amendment, but its actually just replacing existing text with the same language. If i may, having just read this for the first time, and i think i was actually the author of the previous text that did sunset for a similar project that was never built. The language sons headed sun set. You change it to 5 third street. Is there a reason, are you just doing that in the short title so people know where it is . That is right. I am not sure whether that short title change was recommended by the Clerks Office or by someone in my office. Yes, that is the purpose of the short title change. Supervisor peskin in so far that there is nothing in here that correlates the short title to the long title, either in the short title it should say 5 third street for assessors parcel block 3707, or in the long title it should say 5 third street. The two so far do not cross reference each other. Fairpoint. We can make the change to the long title to reflect the address. Thank you. Sorry for being such a nit picker. This is not substantial. All right, we have had Public Comment. Supervisor haney, would you like to make a motion to adopt the amendments described . Supervisor haney forward as amended. Supervisor peskin we will take the amendments and send the item with a recommendation to the full board of supervisors without objection. Madame clerk could you read the next item. Item number 3, 190594,e amending the planning code to revise the zoning control tables of the chinatown mixed use districts to make them consistent with those in articles 2 and 7, to apply the use definitions in section 102, to set an abandonment period for use size maximums, and to allow general entertainment and nighttime entertainment uses with conditional use authorization; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under supervisor peskin colleagues , this is part of aarons stars favorite job, and life mission to reorganize the code and they have now gotten to article eight , in the chinatown mixeduse districts. This is similar to a number of other pieces of legislation that mr. Starr has brought, and the commission has recommended in this case. I believe it was unanimous recommendation on may 9 of this year. I do have one very minor addition, which i believe staff is aware of, and i will talk to you about in a minute. But first, i would like to give mr. Starr the opportunity to regale us with his lifes work. Thank you, supervisor, i like to think of it as my elbows. Aaron starr, manager of legislative affairs, this is part three of the code reorganization project. It brings consistency to the code by consolidating all use the definitions in the code and standardizing these control table formats. This phase focuses on chinatown. The first phase focused on article two which include our residential pdr and downtown Zoning Districts. The second one focused on zoning seven. The next phase and final phase will reformat the remainder of article eight. Supervisor haney, i will be coming after you next. Which includes our easter neighborhoods district. I would just like to note that the new Zoning District that was created by central selma uses a centralized definition of format. The commission heard this item on may 9 and recommended two of approve. We do have one proposed amendment today. Supervisor peskin which was discussed by the commission and does not require re referral . It narrows what the commission approve so it does not need a throwback. Supervisor peskin before we open it up for Public Comments, i want to explain to my colleagues, and the public, what that small amendment does on page three, which is to accept from the maximum use size abandonment provision, a change of use for legacy business or institutional use, or legacy business or institutional use after after the abandonment timeframe. That is set forth on page three. With that, why dont we open this up to Public Comment. First speaker, please. This is a good way for me to get my point across to you. I want all of you to pay close attention to this. You set rules and regulations that gives preferential treatment to yourselves, and people in the same income brackets as yourselves. You have a redevelopment rule that says 15 of all brandnew housing, is supposed to be for low income, very low income, and moderate households. You have the audacity to talk about the homeless issue, act like you want to help. By the same response, peskin, even you when you point out your proposal, pertaining to the congestion in San Francisco, you include the homeless in your conversation to try to make it act like your proposal is going to help the homeless situation. Those two apartment buildings in your