Perhaps we should orchestrate thats what happens before we go to the planning commission. That is my thought. That would be great. That would be great. If we could see some draft policy framework statements that is intended to go before planning, that would be great. Thank you. Any Public Comment on this item . I have a card for you. Commissioners, 300 years ago, the state team that was mentioned this list for the california Natural Resources agency, the California Environmental protection agency, the state water board, the department of water resources, the department of fish and wildlife, none of them existed 300 years ago. The tribes, the native americans have been there for 13,000 years this is a very convoluted subject. Im going to stick to the river. We abuse that river for a long time. Now we are pretending to do something, but they are doing nothing, and the way we do nothing is by saying, you know, we dont have the authority, the state has the authority. This commission has been so backward in not having some Firm Policies that one the Planning Department asked you all for something, you didnt have it ready. So then you rush at the 11th hour. I am watching the deliberation and most of you are not doing it so what is happening here . Let me stick to the river. In the year 2019, we are flushing our toilets with clean drinking water. In the year 2019, we dont have the decency to invite to the native american tribes who preserve them and protect this area for a long, long time for thousands of years. You dont have the decency to invite them to the table. You need to have the certification, you need to have this knowledge, you have to have access to data, you have to have access to computers, you have no spirituality. If you had no spirituality, you will fall flat on your face, like it is happening right now. Now, finally, you have to make up your mind that all the skyscrapers that are being built , they have to pay more for clean drinking water. This millennium building, the millions and millions of gallons that were sucked from the watershed and put into our sewer system and not brought to our attention, we have to have a hearing. We need to have a hearing, a very holistic hearing. Who owns this land . Kansas city the city doesnt have a single document to say that the tribes were handed one square inch to them. It was stolen. Thank you very much. Thank you. Any other Public Comment on this item . General manager, next item, please. The next item is clean power s. F. s a. G. M. , barbara hill. I apologize for the delay. I am the assistant general manager for power. Today, im here to present our first clean power s. F. Quarterly update. A report on customer enrolment and service status. Efforts to secure longterm power commitments from renewable resources, and job impacts of clean power s. F. First, our enrolment and service to customers. Clean power s. F. Continues to serve customers successfully, meeting our customer needs and our regulatory requirements. We conducted our last nature auto enrolment process this past april, so it is a good time for us to recap our Overall Program enrolment. We also want to share with you what we heard from the customers to opt out and why they chose topped out. Our program popped out percentage over the life of the program, from its may 2016 start , is threepoint for is threepoint four . We experience in 96 retention rate. That is 6,300 accounts electing to receive 100 renewable like electricity from us. At previous meetings, youve asked us to bribe information on the reasons customers opt out the clean power s. F. Program. We had approximately 280,000 customer accounts enrolled during the april enrolment period. About 10,000 of those folks opted out. Customers that choose to opt out of the program are asked why. The primary answer it if primary answers given or rate or customer concerns, dislike with being automatically enrolled, and declined to answer. We are required by state law to automatically enrolled customers so theres really, you know, not much we can do about addressing that concern, and of course, we respect customers choices to decline to answer why they opted out. The most frequently cited reason at 30 6 of customers who opted out is rate or cost concern. They pay less then bundled customers. When electricity cost is a customer concern, clean power s. F. Should be the preferred choice. We are discussing with our communications folks how to ensure that our outreach improves Customers Trust that when we say we are competitively priced, we arent steering them wrong. We have some work to do their. The second item i want to report to you today is with respect to our efforts to secure longterm power supply commitments. Yesterday we issued a new Renewable Energy solicitation inviting Renewable Energy to clean power s. F. And to customers from new or operating Renewable Energy resources located in Northern California with a preference for energy and resources located in the nine bay area counties. That is what we have traditionally characterized as our local resource area. We are inviting bids with a minimum annual Energy Deliveries of 50,000megawatt hours a year. That is that would equate to about the annual energy from a 20megawatt Solar Project, for example, and a maximum of 600,000megawatt hours per year, which equates to about a 200 megawatt Solar Project. We are inviting offers with and without battery storage. For proposals coming from newman noble energy resources, we are requiring prevailing wage with a preference for projects that commit to project labor agreements. Our initial delivery date ranges from january 2021 to december 2023, with terms of up to 25 years. We are including an option to include Community Benefits in these bid packages. Were expecting to receive bid submittals on august 28th. We estimate that power purchase negotiations and contract approvals will occur in the october to december time frame. We will be reporting to you more on that as it develops at the next quarterly report. That brings me to job impacts. Power purchase agreements like i just said we are hoping to make under this new solicitation really induce construction. Since we launched clean power s. F. , we have now entered into three longterm power purchase agreements to buy Renewable Power from plants to be constructed in california. Those plants include a 100 megawatt project which just began commercial operation. The succeeding megawatt Solar Project which will commence operation in september of 2020, in the 47megawatt of voyager four wind project which is slated to become commercially operational in december of 2020. In total, these projects are representing about 209 megawatts of new Renewable Energy capacity in california. It will create about 750 construction jobs. As i mentioned, the san pablo raceway project just became operational, completing construction in july. I have some slides that i would like to show you from a trip the members of our staff, together with the developers, had in june , together with the construction team. There was a visit to lancaster, california, so that we could see the project the progress on the plant. Let me queue those up and ask the t. V. Folks to show that. Robin, who is the p. U. C. s head photographer, went along and took some great photos of the projects and the workers installing solar panels. In total, 350 workers built the project over a six to seven month period. Construction jobs are an important part of the clean power s. F. Job story, his or the desk jobs created by the program about 20 Staff Members have been added to the p. U. C. To support the implementation and operation of the clean power s. F. Program. This includes new stuff and power enterprise operating groups, as well as p. U. C. Bureaus including accounting, customer service, external affairs, and Human Resources. We anticipate bringing on an additional nine positions before the year is over, about 27 in total this fiscal year. The upcoming budget year, we will be focused on converting temporary positions, established to support the launch and growth of clean power s. F. Program, and to permit permanent Civil Services positions. Those are clean power careers. With that, im happy to take any questions you might have. Thank you. Commissioners . I have a couple of questions. Im still a bit curious about the people who are opting out. Yes. It is interesting that you characterize it maybe it is true that it might be a trust issue, because what first came to my mind is possibly they just dont know that it is cheaper to enrolled with clean power s. F. And i think they have implications for communication strategies. When a customer is talking to a Live Customer Service representative about their interest in opting out, if they say that they are worried about the price, that is reviewed with them, the fact that we are less expensive. That is why i am talking with the clean power s. F. Staff and the communications folks. We came to a conclusion that maybe what we have here is more of a trust issue. And i would also say we are very careful we dont want to mislead customers. What we characterize for them is the fact that our rates are competitive. We dont typically say we cant promise them that our rates will always be whatever they are cheaper today forever when a customer is making their decision. We emphasize that we lead with affordability and competitive prices is what they will receive i just wanted to put it in perspective. Out of 100 of everyone we opted in, 90 7 are out of 3 , you say 34 came up with affordability thirtysix . I just want to put it in perspective. Yes, we are working to be the best. I just think it is a communications opportunity, shall we say and maybe it is a two prong approach, one is a trust issue and the other one is to remind them that it is a more affordable project. Yes. Im happy to say that often. Just you get additional points so if you are going to create jobs, and you are going to build a plant . We have a preference, but we are not restricting it to newly constructed plans. It will not be renewal constructed either. Correct. We want to make sure that we have a mix in our overall portfolio. We know that we need initial deliveries as early as january of 2021. We dont know what the overall capacity of new projects being constructed are and whether, you know, how many of those will be ready to deliver on january of 2021. So we need to be open to both projects that we are that are constructed and projects that are getting constructed. And frankly, some of the projects that we have come to contracted with overtime, you know, they may have been fairly newly constructed, but are coming off their first set of contracts and are looking to sell. We dont want to strand an existing, you know, performing resource, either, so these are the considerations as we go through the process. I think that, you know, what i have been hearing is there could potentially be, and is even a supply issue that the state is going to be coming up against as it tries to meet and exceed its renewable goals. It would be interesting to continue to get feedback reporting from you on how many of these agreements are new construction, because that has an additional benefit of a job, or whether and how that will continue to help us meet supply and the state meet its goals, as well. Yes. I am happy to keep reporting on that. The last question i have is around the job spee his. He said 750 construction jobs. Once those are constructed, is it a new workforce that then comes in to maintain and operate , or are those 750 jobs go away . Most of those jobs will just be temporary construction jobs. There will be a workforce that manages the maintenance and ongoing operations. They are not necessarily the same. Right. It probably wouldnt be the same numbers, it probably it wouldnt be 750. It wouldnt be anywhere near 750 to continue to operate and maintain. It be great at some point have a big picture of clean power s. F. Even in a ten year period, or maybe it is after you have awarded these contracts, be able to say that over the next ten years, we will be seeing, you know, 750 construction jobs, you know, 100 maintenance jobs, ten jobs inhouse, just to kind of have that is a big dashboard for us i think would be helpful. We can pull together on that. Great. To the chair, if i can make a couple comments, every industry that people work at have different conditions. Whether it is firefighter, janitor, bricklayer, or what have you, and i come from the construction industry. I never worked on the same job for more than a year. That is just the way it goes. I might work on the dam for six months, and then i will go and work on some hotel in downtown San Francisco. That is where the construction jobs are. There is maintenance, there is no doubt that there is maintenance stuff that happens. The sitting county of San Francisco has plumbers and electricians who work at munimobile and the p. U. C. , and what have you, but that it is not like, somebody was promised a job, 750 of them to do something here in town, and then they think that is your career decision. That is just not the way it works in construction. People actually do work many jobs. That is just the major that is just the nature of construction. I would like to know how that works because people do have misconceptions about how, oh, boy, i got a job at, mother, and i will work there with the rest of my life. No, that is not the way it works you will go many places. I just wanted to put that in the record as a difference the difference between a permanent job versus the vagabond nature of the construction industry. Thank you. Any other comments . Any Public Comment on this . Thank you. This situation of clean power should be clarified once and for all. At one of my offices, supposedly [indiscernible] who do i pay . If i have problems, who do i call . If i have to upgrade electricity and bring higher power from outside to inside, paying thousands of dollars, who do i go to . It is b. S. You know, about having solar farms and all. We, the people, back in 1999, we bagged sfpuc we bagged sfpuc. The only person, two people who agreed with us or mr. Edwards and he passed away. Commissioner richard straw. Two decent human beings. Sfpuc, and all this bull should that you hear has perturbed us a lot. From the sierra club, they go to , and you know why . We do not have a hearing. I can ask okay, who do we pay . So what is your role . Instead of clean s. F. Power, blah blah blah, what is this . If i ask you commissioners, i want Critical Data on the socalled s. F. Clean power, and they want Empirical Data on the stats and where we are getting it from. And if you find out that 40 is dirty, why are you calling it clean . This is b. S. This is like feel that you put in your car, and then you add the mickey mouse comedy, and then you watch that, anything everything is okay, everything is not okay. Again, the state is now passing legislation that they are going to have control, just like water and electricity. We, the people, need to have information about this. We, the people pay the salaries of all these people who make over 250,000 plus benefits. We, the people count. Thank you. Any other Public Comment on this item . Hearing none, next item, general manager . Charles pearl to give an update on the quarterly update and Performance Review report. Good afternoon. Im the deputy chief financial officer. This is our quarterly visit to review the audit and Performance Review report that gives you an overview of the various activities that are going on in the agency is a relates to oversight. If i could have the slides, please . Here is a high level view of the prior year. This update is for last fiscal year which ended june 30th for fiscal 19. As you can see, we had 42 audits that were on the table. We completed 22 of them and we have another 15 that are currently in progress and another five that her upcoming. And a word about those, those will be wrapped up early in the current fiscal year 20. So thats very, very typical for how these audits work. And just a word on the number, 42 is a fairly standard amount of audit work that happens at the sfpuc throughout the year. The last quarter, that would be the cue four for fiscal 19, we had seven audits that were started as noted here, our annul physical inventory account which is standard look at our warehousing to make sure that the physical numbers of things match with what our control and audit documents say, we do that invents of our final Financial Statement work. [please stand by] then we looked at Community Benefit benefits, overall dashboard and evaluation framework, healthy and safety performance assessment, then royalties lease audit which ill go into in a little more detail. The links to all these audits are noted on the agenda and the website if you want to look at any more of these details. In terms of a little more detail on one of these audits, we had a review of a quarry lease and we are a big agency and one of the things that we do is lease land and as a part of that lease we take a royalty and we want to make sure through these audits that we are being paid for the appropriate amount as included in the lease. As noted here, the results of the lease confirmed the amount of revenue, a little over 55 million, which is a significant amount of money, from the period of january 1 through june 30 of 2018. The audit actually told us that we were overpaid, and that was a function of just looking at what the details of the lease were, what the payments that were made, and there was a reconciliation to make sure those two things were in alignment and there was an overpayment. One of the audit findings or recommendations is that a credit will be provided to the lessor. So there were six recommendations coming out of this audit and a lot of these will be Lessons Learned for us as w