The units still left to be relocated and will be part of the internal relocation. You see those units there. The Space Available for a re stack are the spaces that are being occupied currently on the east wing by the units that are moving out as well as the medical examiner, the d. A. , the police basis and some commission the proposed use for the restack and these are preliminary, for the 19. 2 million in project cost , will be using the medical examiner to has a units that we see in the right. We will be using information from the d. A. For Police Investigation and the commissioner and auditorium rooms are for police overflow and other needs within the building. That concludes my presentation. I would like to thank supervisor peskin for his sponsorship of items 11 and 12 and the mirror mayor for her sponsorship of 11 through 14. I also want to thank the b. L. A. For their hard work on this item , and we concur in their recommendation. That concludes my presentation. Thank you very much. I see you have the report for items 11 and 12 and a separate one for item 13 and 14. Thats correct. Item 11 is the authorization that shows the participation in the amount of 94. 6 million for to repay the shortterm debt that was used to pay for the purchase of the bryant Street Properties next to the hall of justice and pay for the purchase of 1828 egbert avenue. All of these properties, the board of supervisors has previously approved these. At that time it was understood that it would be issued to pay for the purchase. We summarize on table one of our report the total appropriation. The board has previously approved the appropriation of 60 million for the bryant Street Property purchases, and would be approving 70. 6 million for the purchase of egbert street. In terms of the overall impact of the discussion about the debt to cost, the city policy is to limit debt to 3. 2 5 of general funds. Our understanding is that the legislation before you today, not just the 94 by 6 million, but the 62 million, would fall within that debt policy. Total debt service, if you combine both of these pieces of legislation, these are general fund costs. The other point that i think is very important is that the city s capital plan calls for 1,301,000,000 in project costs in 2020 for hall of justice projects, so item number 12, the appropriation of funds for egbert street and bryant and six threet, will cost 79 million towards that hundred 21 million that was approved within the capital plan. For these two pieces of legislation, we recommend approval. Then 13 and 14, item 13 is approving the issuance of 62 million. It is appropriating these funds. This is sort of a new legislation before the board. If you look at page 27, table one of our report, again, of the 62 million, 51 million our project costs. This is part of the overall 1,301,000,000 that was anticipated in 2020 and the city s capital plan. As we have talked about previously, the 62 million would be combined with the 94. 6 million and costs would be about 11. 6 million in general Fund Debt Service each year. It is within the citys debt policy. And his its terms of the specific projects to be approved , i will skip to the 19. 2 million, table three, page 29. This is for relocating existing functions within the hall of justice and other locations. This is a preliminary look at this. There is the current use here in the first column and the plan to use, and the relocation and the cost of the relocation. The relocation costs are based on public works and the estimates. We have reviewed the costs for square foot and we found them to be reasonable. We are recommending approval. If you go back to table two on page 28, this is for the construction of Holding Cells in the hall of justice. These are not new jail cells. These are Holding Cells for people coming from san bruno who have court dates and have to be held for a number of hours at the hall of justice. The cost of the construction of these Holding Cells is based on 2017 estimates that were made by the Consulting Engineering firm and were escalated for 2019, 2020 costs. In terms of this, out of the project cost of 19. 6 million, there is an additional 6. 8 million in contingency. And while we recognize that projects of this magnitude is complex, it will have a lot of uncertainty. We actually had concerns about the contingencies that equaled about 35 of the total project. Our recommendation is to place 618 million on the budget and finance committee to the extent that it would be need to be used we recommend approval as amended thank you very much. Are there any members of the public who would like to comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Any comments or questions . I have a couple. I understand that it has moved into the hall of justice as we are trying to get people out of the hall of justice. Can you talk to that . I was just made aware of that fact myself very recently. We are in discussions with the Police Department to see if we can rectify the situation. It is not, unfortunately, uncommon for city departments to take over a vacated space. As soon as one unit moves out, before i can move another unit in, someone will take squat the space. I think this is a different situation. I think we are trying to get everyone out of the building. We see hundreds of millions of dollars and people trying to do that. When it moves in, it is a little concerning because, quite frankly, my next question is, is this Budget Committee going to be expanded to prove approve expenditures to relocate the unit . If i can interrupt, i share that concern and we are in discussions with the Police Department that they will have to sell their space needs elsewhere and we cant, as part of the ho jay exit, absorbed that cost. So they moved into the building without my knowledge or permission, and we are working with them to try to resolve that situation, but it is not anticipated that real estate or this committee would be asked to solve so how is it that we move into the hall of Justice Without your knowledge or permission . Just to fact check, i heard this number yesterday also. If i could just read the information that we provided about what has been going on. It was january of 2019. We increased by 16 to extend the hours of healthy Street Services to 11 00 p. M. The total number was 43. As of september 2019, the total number assigned was reduced to 40. They stated that they do want to vacate the hall of justice and understand the need to do so and did not validate this number. I think people who have personnel on that building know there are 80 people. I have heard this, not just from one source. I just want to say, could you please fact check that . And the idea that they could actually put people into this building that we are trying to vacate. It is somewhat frustrating considering that we are asked to approve millions of dollars to relocate people and then we put new people it is a crazy thing. And how are they doing that without our permission . There is a lack of control about who is allowed to move in there and who is not allowed to move in there. And what is are we not putting new units in there, or are we deciding that yes, we will put new people in there, but if you are going to make those decisions, i think we should be notified before we are asked to approve these expenditures. You are absolutely right. I share that concern. The situation that we have is the Police Department control certain spaces within the building, and then as we are moving certain units to other areas, they backfill with some units. We try our best to control that, but we cant be everywhere, and we dont know exactly what personnel they have in the building so it is a little bit hard to wrap your fingers around it but it is a problem we recognize and that we are trying to address. Thank you. I appreciate it. I just want to say, for the record, we dont blame you. Can you please tell us who composed that email to you . That was d. C. Greg year from the Police Department. Now we know. Thank you very much. So we have had Public Comment now. Colleagues, this is a huge expect huge expenditure. As we have heard, we have already agreed to by these places, so i would like to move items 11 and 12, and 13 to the full board with a positive recommendation. Fourteen has an amendment. Items 11, 12, 13, and 15 to the full board with a positive recommendation and we can take that without objection. Thank you very much. Item 14, i think we heard, we called all the items together. Is that correct . Yes. Would you like to hear more on i. To 15 . Okay. I rescind that. Without objection can we rescind that . Thank you very much. Item number 15, please. Thank you, supervisors. I am with the office of Public Finance. Item 15 is a resolution that approves the preliminary official statement and final official statement which are offering documents to disclose the current Financial Information in order to comply with federal securities and Exchange Commission regulations. If approved, the resolution will allow the controller to distribute these documents to prospective vendors bidders and investors as it relates to the upcoming sale of the c. O. P. Related to the 49 south van ness project. By way of background following the boards 2017 authorization for the 321 million in c. O. P. 449 south van ness, the controller has issued commercial paper in approximately 140 milliondollar income to balance the project. In order to refinance these notes and finance the remaining portions of the project, the office of Public FinancePublic Finance intends to sell these later in october. The financing parameters previously authorized by the board have not changed and our intention is to sell them within the not to exceed authorization amount, in terms of project updates, the project is about 70 complete and is scheduled for completion in may of 2020. Im available to answer any questions related to the finance piece. Okay. Good, i think we are all good are there any members of the public would like to comment on item 15 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. I would like to make a motion to move items 11 and 12, 13 and 15 to the board with a positive recommendation. We can take that without objection. Thank you very much. I would like to make a motion to approve the recommendation from the budget legislative analyst to put 3 million on reserve for contingency for construction of the holding cell. Is that correct . It was 3 million. 3 billion. Thanks. Here we go. Can we take that without objection . Thank you very much. I would like to move item 14 as amended to the full board with a positive recommendation. Thank you very much. Are there any other items before us today . There are no other items. Thank you very much. We are adjourned. San francisco and oakland are challenging each other in a battle for the bay. Two cities. One bay. San francisco versus oakland. Are you ready to get in on the action . Im london breed. And i am oakland mayor libby schaff. Who will have the cleanest city . We will protect our bay by making our neighborhoods shine. Join us on september 21st as a battle for the bay. Which city has more volunteer spirit . Which city can clean more neighborhoods . The city with the most volunteers wins. Signup to be a bay protector and a neighborhood cleaner. Go to battle fo hi. My name is carmen chiu, San Franciscos elected assessor. In our seven mile by seven mile city, we have over 210,000 properties and close to 90 of their are residential like the homes you and i live in, so you might ask, how can we possibly value all these properties . Well, to better understand our work, we need to explain the states proposition 13 law. In 1978, california voters passed proposition 13. Under prop 13, we value your property at market value when you first buy it. Every year after, that value goes up by the c. P. I. Or the California Consumer price index. But if the c. P. I. Is more than 2 , prop 13 caps the increase at 2 . Well walkthrough the maximum increases prop 13 would allow. Lets take a home with initial value of 400,000. In the second year your assessed value grows by a maximum of 2 , growing from 400,000 to 408,000. In year three, that 408,000 is increased by 2 to roughly 416,000. Every year, the value grows by the maximum rate of 2 , and that is called your prop 13 value. Keep in mind as time goes by your prop 13 value may not be the same as market rate. What do we mean by that . Lets say over the last ten years, home prices in San Francisco have gone every roughly 10 every year. Despite that, your prop 13 value is capped at 2 growth creating a difference between your market value and prop 13 value. Know that the value recessed when theres a change in ownership. A change in ownership means that the property has a new zoner. Maybe through a new owner. Maybe through a sale, a gift or adding or dropping names through title. At that time the home will be assessed a new market rate. That value becomes a new starting point for the property. Just like before, the Growth Continues to be limited at 2 until the next transfer happens. Remember, the new owners are responsible for paying taxes at the new level from the first day that they own it. Value might also be added when construction happens on your property. That would be another instance when growth in your value might exceed 2 . Here, we would add the value of construction on top of your existing prop 13 value. Every july, well let you know what your assessed value is by sending you a letter called a notice of assessed value. You can use that information to estimate your property taxes early. Please note that a separate office called the treasurer Tax Collectors Office will send you a letter in october and theyre responsible 230r collections. For more information, visit our website, shop and dine in the 49 promotes local businesses, and challenges residents to do their shopping within the 49 square miles of San Francisco. By supporting local services in our neighborhood, we help San Francisco remain unique, successful, and vibrant. So where will you shop and dine in the 49 . I am the owner of this restaurant. We have been here in north beach over 100 years. [speaking foreign language] [ ] [speaking foreign language] [ ] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [ ] [ ] so good morning and welcome. Im jack gardner and president of the John Stewart Company. On behalf of our related partners in california, San Francisco housing corporation, and ridgepoint nonprofit housing corporation, its my great pleasure to welcome you to the grand reopening of Hunters Point west and westbrook. Give it up. [ applause ]. Hunters point eastwest in westbrook are two of the citys rental assistance demonstration projects. The Overall Program consisted of transferring 29 of the Housing Authority profits to local nonprofit and private housing organizations for recapitalization, renovation, and private management. More detailed information is available if youre interested. This mammoth Citywide Program which included almost 3500 units of Affordable Housing throughout San Francisco required the collaboration of a host of public agencies, developers, consultants, contractors, funders, and, most importantly, the residents of Hunters Point eastwest and westbrook themselves. The program demonstrates the citys commitment to leaving none of its residents behind and we are very proud to have been part of it. None of this would have been possible without the vision and leadership of our local elected and appointed officials, many of whom are here today and well do some shoutouts a little bit later. Thank you for celebrating with us. Lets get started. It gives me special pleasure to introduce our first speaker. Ill tease you a little bit here, see if you can think about who that would be. Shes a native san franciscan. A former Redevelopment Agency and Fire Department commissioner. Former executive director of the africanamerican art and culture complex in the western addition. President of the board of supervisors. You might be getting it. Presently our current and future mayor. So a steadfast champion of Affordable Housing, community empowerment, and the creation of a more just and equitable San Francisco for all. Great pleasure to bring to the stage our very own mayor london breed. Mayor. [ cheering and applause ]. Mayor breed thank you. Hello, everyone. I am really excited to be here today because this is a long time coming. When we first set out on a path to just reenvision Public Housing throughout San Francisco, it wasnt easy. I remember when i first became a member of the board of supervisors and i went to our mayor ed lee and talked about our priorities, i made it clear that Public Housing was my number one priority. He supported those efforts. In fact, i grew up in plaza east in the western edition, where i lived in Public Housing for over 20 years of my life. Those conditions were very challenging. It wasnt just sadly the poverty and the violence that existed in my neighborhood. It was also the actual physical conditions of where i lived. The mold, the bath