Commission and joseph duffy representing the department of building inspections. And we will have someone from the sentences go public works. The Board Meeting guidelines are as follows. We requested that you silence all cell phones and Electronic Devices so they not disturb the proceedings. Please carry on conversations in the hallway. The rules of the presentation are as follows. Appellants, permit holders and respondents are given seven minutes to respond and three minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the seven or three minute periods. Members of the public have up to two minutes each to adjust address the board and no rebuttal. Please speak into the microphone for rehearing requests, parties get three minutes each with no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of minutes, your aspen not required to submit a speaker card when you come up to speak. Four votes are required to grant an appeal or a rehearing request if you have questions about requesting a rehearing, the board rules or hearing schedules , please speak to board staff during the break or after meeting or call and visit the board office. This meeting is broadcast live on San Francisco government tv, cable channel 78 and will be rebroadcast on friday at 4 00 p. M. The video is available on our website. It can also be downloaded. Now we will swear in or affirm all those who intend to testify. Please note any member of the public may speak without taking an oath pursuant to the rights under the sunshine ordinance. If you intend to testify at any of tonights proceedings, on you want to have evidentiary weight, stand if you are able, raise your right hand, and say i do. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony youre about to give will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth . Thank you, please be seated. We are now moving on to item number one which is general Public Comment. This is an opportunity for anyone who like to speak on a matter within the boards jurisdiction that is not on tonights calendar. Is there anyone here for Public Comment . Please approach. Please do not start my time until i am ready. Please speak into the microphone. Im not ready. Please do not start yet. They dont understand what they are measuring or how they are measuring it. In fact, you guys dont even own the proper antenna for your radio meter in order to get Accurate Information to the citizens who request it. You must understand that microwave radiation is a series of peaks of power, electrical power that goes through the air in seconds. It goes up very high and it comes down to zero, and very high and it comes down to zero. And you get maybe 20,000 of those in a second. Pulse after polls, 24 7, 365. This is the definition of a poison. It is a toxin. How do we know . Study of this was assigned to the National Toxicology program. They studied poisons and when they do, they study the total dose of poison that you get. When we measured this, a lot of people made a little trip and they said, hey, lets just talk about the rate of the poison coming at us, not the total poison that we get over time. We will base it on the rate only and then when we do it, we will hide those all those peaks and we will only measure average because averages average is going to be 10,000 times lower than what the body actually experiences which is 20,000 bullets a second and really high levels. So when you ever measure this for real, in your city must do this through the proper probes and going through the proper steps, half hour measurements in order to show what is really going on with frequency radiation. When you do, maybe the understanding will increase. Let me give you a simple metaphor. I will ask you today that we will expose you to poison. Imagine in your hand that beaker will have poison into these speakers and at two drops a second. Which one do you want to drink . What i want to say is i will give you the rest of the information and i will be done. Two drops a second for ten seconds and two drops a second for 24 hours. Which one dude do do want to drink now . Were putting this in front of your house so you are forcing people to drink one. You will drink the one with this marriage. That is driving past the cell phone tower. The full beaker is living next to the cell phone tower. If im on the second or third story, i am drinking five the beakers. That is what is really happening but it is not being measured. Thank you very much. I would invite you to present documentation to the department of health who has asked and mandated this board to update the report of 2010 to current and we provide them copious data that we have collected from good members of the community to help in that matter. Thank you very much. Thank you. I did reach out to the man who measures it and we will recommend they get the proper probe. I also submitted calls. Is there anyone else here for general Public Comment . Okay. We will move on to item number two, commissioner comments and questions. Commissioners, any . Thank you. Okay. We will move onto item number three, the adoption of the minutes. Before you is a discussion of the adoption of the minutes of the september 18th, 2019 Board Meeting. I move. Motion. Is there any Public Comment on that motion to adopt the minutes . We have a motion from commissioner honda to adopt december 18th minutes. That motion. [roll call] that motion carries 30. We are now moving on to item number four. This is a rehearing request for appeal number 19070 subject property at 2620 lid do laguna street. They are requesting a rehearing. At that time, the board voted 3 02 to deny the appeal and uphold the permit on the basis that it was properly issued. The determination holder is gd mobile net out of california. We will hear from the appellant first. May i ask a per lemon or question . Sure. I understood from the opening remarks that it would require four commissioners to grant my hearing. That is correct. And since three commissioners only are present, if i open my mouth, i have lost before i have said a word. I request that my matter not be heard until commissioner wallace arrives otherwise it is futile. The procedure under the board rules is if the vote of a missing commissioner would have made a difference, the matter will be continued for a full vote. But it is not fair. It is impossible for three commissioners to grant my commission. Right, but the commissioners here tonight if they are in favor, or even if two are in favor, the matter will be continued so that the absent commissioners can participate in the vote. Why cant we hold my appeal until after commissioner lazarus arrives . Commissioner lazarus is recusing herself from this item because she owns property close. Oh,. If you like to proceed pursuant to the board rules, if the vote of a missing commissioner would make a difference, the matter would be continued. I see why. I didnt need to be impolite. Not at all. Before i was fired 30 years ago, i was a practising lawyer. I am concerned about those details. Thank you. Good evening, this board board denied my appeal by assuming that s. C. C. Regulations permitted all local health and safety jurisdictions. [indiscernible] housing many Vulnerable People including Young Children and pregnant women. I have attached to my rehearing brief a verizon brochure showing thats known pollution of our environment with hidden microwave carcinogens. This new document is an admission of pollution and a validation of thousands of scientific studies which have overwhelmingly shown that all wireless out of valves are the epicenters for cancer clusters and other serious and Chronic Health problems. All public agencies are legally obligated to pertain public Healthy Health and safety. Moreover,. [indiscernible] without their informed consent is an International Crime against humanity. Contrary to this boards incorrect assumption, it protects the health and safety of its citizens. Plus their team mobile a decision that emphatically inform San Franciscos right to regulate rightsofway that might cause negative Health Consequences or create safety concerns. Moreover, the precautionary principle ordinance applying to all City Projects and purchases was never preempted by long outdated 1996 s. C. C. Health guidelines, only regulating microwaves. It preempts a Constitutional Rights against uncompensated taking of property or deprivation of human rights without due process. No san franciscan wants to live near a cell tower. They should not be forced to accept any more dangerous or unnecessary cell towers when fiberoptic his now afford much saved her, faster, and economically probable alternatives. I urge this board to conscientiously follow that golden rule by enforcing the precautionary ordinance to prevent further irreparable injury to health and safety for a dangerous cell tower at 2620 laguna street. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. We will now hear from the attorney for the permit holder. Good evening. I will be very brief. We dont believe there is any new evidence or manifest injustice that would justify this rehearing request. The policies and insurances is not relevant and is not new. We ask you reject this. Thank you. Thank you. We will now hear from the department. Anything to add . Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item okay. How many speakers will be speaking on this matter . Please line yourself up on the left side. Good evening, welcome. Hello, my name is cheryl hogan. Commissioners, on april 3rd, 2019, seven separate cell tower appellants attended at 2298 pacific avenue, filed with this board a 64 page appeal brief which i have here with over 1200 pages of attachments which credibly accused representatives of fraud and possible crimes. That appeal was originally scheduled for hearing tonight, but on august 12th, 2019, verizon noticed notified the appeal board that it was withdrawing its permit. So on august 13th, 2019, they administratively dismissed the appeal. Thereby verizon avoided a public hearing on 2298 pacific credible up you occupations of rising fraud and possible crimes in obtaining San Francisco cell tower permits. Before deciding the appeal, i urge you to read carefully the 20 do 98 pacific brief and to discuss his credible accusations of verizon fraud and probable crimes with the San FranciscoDistrict AttorneyDistrict Attorney and city attorney. And tonight, i support his 2620 laguna appeal on grounds cited in his briefs in the 2298 pacific brief and in my view five to 29 at sacramento appeal brief. Thank you very much for listening. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening. Hello, board of appeals. Thank you for your time. According to many websites, there is proof that cell towers cause issues to all living beings. Study results may vary depending on who pays for the study. A doctor, president of the American Academy of environmental medicine states that people who live near cell towers and antennas are in jeopardy. Enclosing, i have a native American Indian quote. Only when the last tree has been cut down, the last fish has been cut, in the last stream poisoned will we realize we cannot eat money. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Welcome back. Hello, board members. My name is michael. I live in San Francisco under the irradiation of 5g and four g. It is harmful to my health. If something isnt going to protect us, this will be a legally prohibited cell assault against us. And a dangerous and unavoidable tragedy. As explained to you by the briefs, the city and county of San Francisco has the right and responsibility to protect the health and safety of its citizens. And to object the false acclaimed overreaching powers of the s. C. C. This was also explained in 2298 pacific appeal brief that was originally scheduled tonight until verizon withdrew the cell tower permit. Of greatest importance to this board as it updates its risk report, there is a confirmation by all involved parties including the wireless manufacturers, that the radiation is a pollutant that are described by the Environmental Protection agency, the f. D. A. And the who. They provide graphic evidence of the overwhelming concentration of pollution. With each company vying overhead, please. To wireless coverage. The amount of pollution increases each day. Why would we want each house to be painted in lead paint . Why would we want each home to have heat ducts surrounded by asbestos . We seem to reduce pollutants, not increase the density and harmful effects until even the healthiest of us fall victim to this. The board has been railroaded by fear and faulty assumptions that the industry has a monopoly of legal authority. It wrongly says that article 25 in the 1996 Telecommunications Act preempted precautionary principles. The legal right and responsibility to protect the safety of citizens cannot be preempted by admitted wireless pollution in endangering life. This places the board on equal liability. And untested and experimental 5g is unleashed and becomes manifested throughout the city. Immediate harm will appear. The pocket the precautionary principle ordinance protects the Environment Health and wealth of San Francisco. Now is the time to come to the aid of citizens of San Francisco and reject another cell tower at 2620 laguna street. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Welcome back. Thousands of citizens took to the streets on nasa took to the streets last sunday to say no. During our american right resolution, this goes handinhand. We know when you organize against you and we got a knocked out program that the meter had nothing to do with selfmonitoring electric gas usage. We knew it would be central to the internet of things. Everything we buy will be indebted with chips to transmit increasing amounts of data about us directly to the smart meter and onto Company Headquarters via 5g. It is applying to become a tech company. Recognition is banned here in San Francisco, but for how long . Much of the rest of the country already has it. How long before social Credit Scores come to hear, to america, as this country becomes more tightly ruled by technology and a fascist cryptography behind it our democracy is almost a sham. The industry is tightly woven within our militaryindustrial complex that lobbies generously and extensively with other shenanigans to extend his multitrillion dollar empire. Its passed is cleared lee spelled out in a brief that was dismissed by verizon. They didnt want their ugliness spelled out so clearly so they shushed it. They shift it with intimidation, fears of litigation, actual integration and lies. The frequency was developed by the military for crowd control. Officially called the active denial system, egg can be turned onto cause irreparable physical harm. Soon there will be an exodus from San Francisco to counties and towns that have banned residential 5g. Cities come and cities go, empires fall. Could this be the beginning of the end of western civilization . A compromised, sick population does not lead to a Cohesive Society or dynamic economic growth. Commissioners, i believe you fear litigation for yourself in the city of San Francisco and you have deferred to the San Francisco department of health. I am hopeful but sceptical that it will review the scientific studies without being unduly influenced by industry studies and a pulpit from the s. C. C. I believe you can be a force for good, for positive change. You have listened more attentively than ours. We would say, let the force be with you. It will be grossly sensitive to 5g in front of this apartment. Please give him this appeal. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. I am here to support the appeal because not only the 5g but the four g. Is hazardous. These antennas were designed with that 1996 federal guideline for macro towers which are 200 feet in the air and 3,000 or more feet away. We will take a little step down memory lane so you can understand the intention, the congressional intent and the writing of the 1996 tca and understand that the city of San Francisco has the power to lower the power output from these towers. There is not a single standard, there is the ability for San Francisco to uphold its local values. That is what the t. C. A. Says. Which is easier . I recommend you go to this page because you will find the link to this pacific avenue brief. It is the public record. It should be available to everyone. We preserved it and put it there what do you see there . You see the penultimate version of the bill. That is what existed in 1995. It took these lobbyists two or three years to write this bill. And on the righthand side, you see the 1996 version in february of 1996. What you will see when you look at the citing clause is it is very similar in every respect expect except there is a missing link. The conclusion is, both those cities never have the operation of cell phone towers preempted from their powers. That is the truth. Why do we know that . When you look on the left, you can say what we want to do here is an effective policy regarding state and local regulation operation for the provision by mobile services. That is the wish list. They wanted all four. They didnt get that. Our senators talked and it wasnt acceptable. There was a conference report that was all published. So when you read, now it says, nothing in this to limit or affect the state or local government. It all remains with you, except for decisions regarding placement constr