Continuance. Item one, Residential Care facilities, planning care amendment is moved to novembe november 7th. The second is proposed for continuance to november 14. Item 3rds,aa belcher strategy, proposed ford you continuanc fo. Item 4, conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance to december 5th, 2019. Item 5 at 16 seacliff avenue, discretionary review has been withdrawn propert. Item 18, 20190050cua at 2934 caesar chavas street, conditional use, i have received a request to continue this until november 21, 2019. Item 20, 19012253drp at 463 castro street, discretionary review must be reviewed due to a noticing error, proposed for continuance to october 24t october 24th and im pleased to inform you that item 22, 9175 drp, discretionary review has been withdrawn. I have to other items for continuance and i do know there was one gentleman who wanted to speak to Caesar Chavez in opposition, not in continuance. So if anybody wants to comment on the items proposed for continuance, and this would be to the continuance, come on up now. I am leanne fetter and im asking if you postpone the dispensary, i would ask to comment today because weve taken off work. If we could add our comments, that would be appreciated. Im here for the dispensary at 2934 and i would like to know why it would be posted and i would like to have it heard today. Are you project sponsor . I am. Thank you. Any other items . Public comment. John kevling, on behalf of 55 bellcher street. Its going to be a story of accommodation. We continued this hearing for a month from june to july and to work further with dtna. We got that resolved. We agreed to october 3rd, to work with the adjacent neighbor. We are at the point where weve got updated floor plans, reduced roof deck and were trying to decide between through facade designs, but were essentially done. Well come back with a corporate rental restriction and right now, the next available hearing is november 21st. I just ask the commission that you consider accommodating this project sponsor considering theyve been through. I think more than three weeks is enough time to get this wrapped up. Any other Public Comment on the continuance calendar . Public comment is closed. Commissioner . Motion to continue items entered into the record. Seconded. Thank you, commission. On that motion to continue items as proposed poweso moved and that passed 4. For the community who is here for chavez, the auto was item ws continued to allow for more negotiations between the project sponsor and community. So we will take your comments into advisement and would encourage you do some work with the project sponsor so that we are ready to hear it next time. Thank you. Commissioners, that will place us under your concept calendar. All matters are considered to be routine for the Planning Commission and may be acted upon by a single role call. There will be no separate discussion unless a member of the commission, the public or staff so requests, in which it shall be removed and considered as a separate item. Item 6, case 2019000362cua 150a, conditional use authorization 7, case 201 201005402, beal street, case 201839163 855 garry street, item 9, 00416cua through 1062 sanchez street, 201900521c at 298 munich street, i have no speaker cards. Thank you, do any members of the public wish to comment on the consent calendar . Any commissioners want to take items off of consent . Commissioner . Motion to approve 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. Thank you. On that motion to approve items under your consent calendar it passes unanimously. September 12, 2019. Do any members of the public wish to provide comment on the draft minutes . With that, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner . Motion to approve minutes for september 12, 2019. Second. Thank you, commissioners. On that motion, then, to adopt the minutes for september 12 and september 19, commissioner . That mission passes. Comments and questions on item 12 . Im sorry, sir, did you want to provide Public Comment on something . I just had a quick announcement, folks. As many of you know who follow us on tv, in the consequence au. We solicited comments about the qualifications for our next director of planning who will fill some very, very large shoes and im happy to report that we were able to incorporate most everyones comments and the Job Description is listed as of today on the citys dhr website. So please help us circulate far and wide. We will be following our process and hopefully can have a smooth transition. Thank you. I just wanted to say, commissioner fung, specifically, for having help drafted the Job Description. Thank you. We can move on to item 13, directors announcements . No new announcements today, except to say that i do hope, also hope, theres a smooth transition in the coming months and ill do my best to make that happen. Review of past events at the board of supervisors, board of appeals and the Historic Preservation commission. Aaron star, manager of legislative affairs. We heard the landmark designation for 2301 bush street and we voted to recommend approval. Fundamentadesigned in the meditn revival style, this is significant from the association with the social, cultural and educational enrichment of japanese enrichments in San Francisco. It was the home of the Cultural School of kin ma and one of four who was funded by the japan town. The building is associated with the incarceration of japanese disseptember during world war ii following president roosevelts order, it was used as a Processing Center where citizens and noncitizens of japanese ancestry would report and relocated to concentration camps across the united states. Its significant for the association with Community Activist among africanamericans as the home of the booker t. Washington center from 1942 to 1952. During the hearing, three speakers spoke in favor and supervisor peskin he be added as cosponsor. The Community Voted unanimously to recommend the designation to the full board. At the rules committee this week, the committee reviewed supervisor haineys ordinance to create the committee. Commissioners, you heard this on september 19th and voted to recommend approval with modifications to reduce the residency requirement for the stoma stablization cia and proposed am amendments. Supervisor there are two speaker of the ordinance to the full board with a positive recommendation. At the full board, the board voted mandelmans position with a use of Residential Care facility to another uses this would last for 18 months or until permanent controls are off adopted. This was the item heard at last weeks Land Use Committee which obtained a recommendation of approval. That concludes my report. Thank you, mr. Star. Theres no report from the board of off peels appeals. The Preservation Board did meet to hold a meeting on the advice from the city attorneys office. In addition, what might be of interest is that they considered supporting nominations to the National Register of Historic Places for the grand orient philippino hotel and japanese ywca, the womens building and adopted resolutions in support of both of those buildings. Great thank you. Did you have something . I had not been aware of that building in japan town that was discussed yesterday. I had no idea it was designed by julia morgan. It was designed by the most famous woman architect in the state, if not the country of that era, so that was great. Very cool. Thank you. So we will now move on to Public Comment . General Public Comment. At this time, members may address the commission that are within the subject jurisdiction except agenda items. With respect to the agenda, that will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. You may address up to three minutes. I have two speaker cards. I have georgia shutus and anyone ha wishe who wishes to pe general Public Comment may do so right now. Hi. Good afternoon. On january 27th, 2015, i wrote an email mainly to mr. Sanchez but cced a bunch of people projects have extensive remodeling, like alteration and facade from scrutiny of the staff at the untake and so should a simultaneously expansion in the front rear side, horizonally and vertically of any project to attract greater scrutiny. Square footage, regardless of the fact maybe within the code attract greater scrutiny which there should be an alert put on the premandatory notice and simple english for all neighbors who may be a novice to the planning process i is to have tt actively encourage questions or call the planner or building department. When a project sponsor makes an application, arent they affirming that what theyre submitting on the plans and in the description of the permit application is true . Dont they sign a sheet attesting to that . Shouldnt this be more than just a piece of paper someone signs . I went on to say about the crisis of affordability and it seemed like a modest problem and it may be lost as relatively Affordable Housing but theres existing housing in the portola and bayview and sunset and richmond that needs attention from this insidious remodeling. That was 2015. Since then, i made a list which ive given you and you will give it to you in a minute of the buildings and the number of buildings that have expanded exponentially, so enough so that its like 150 million worth of value from the time they bought the property to the time it was resold. Thats the total value, average 3. 5 million in increase and sales price. A year ago, i ask that you please consider adjusting the demo caps which hasnt happened and i have sheets that show how you can adjust them because the number has been adjusted for the rh1 and numerical criteria and ive given you that sheet. The new official sheet is out, even though it happened in july from the za, where its 2. 2. So anything below 2. 2 is gone. And here is my demo that has been of adjusted four times. Theres one from you and now ill stop talking. Thank you very much. Thank you, miss shudish. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Im from the Neighborhood Consortium manager. What i wanted to do today, you may have read the litigation between our concertu consortiume city regarding the central soma plan. What i wanted to today today was to give to the secretary for the Public Record of this commission a full copy of the executed settlement agreement, first with the city, which director ram executed and the that collateral agreements and the straa investment that was a part of the entire package. Its important, we think, for these to be on the Public Record so that all of their contents are available to anyone and none of our agreements are confidential. Unfortunately the other settlement agreements are confidential and weda know what they say. Also in the package is the copy of the citys, attorneys title and summary for the proposition, the ballot measure addressing prop m that we will submit for voters action next march. Our signature collections are on the street today. This is the first day of signature collection and i wanted to be sure that you had the full text and the appropriate documents in the Public Record, as well. You may, perhaps, want to have the staff update on these matters since they are consequential with regard to the central soma plan, in particular, and citywood in c n general. What remains are two pieces of trading legislation. You just heard an update. You have the Community Advisory committee that has cleared committee and will be finalized this month. What is still pending and pending Technical Work is the good jobs program. When you yourselves were discussing this, there was a programme and never finalized and still hasnt been finalized. This is complicated technically and supervisor haineys office is work on that with community members. If you do have this on the calendar, to get into some depth with the staff and so on. You might afford us two or three minutes to provide us with the tale as the organiz originator e documents. I had another speaker card from the valley association. Come on up. Im bill hoover with the merchants association, a board member. And im here today merely to bring awareness to the commission that the valley commercial district is depressed. Were actually in crisis. What i would like to introduce is, id like to review and change the commercial district zoning and certain items. Again, what i would like to ask is your assistance on how to get the ball rolling on reviewing these items that have a negative impact. Of course, the purpose is to revitalize the valley. And so, i ask your assistance on how to continue. Thank you. Any other Public Comment . Good afternoon, commissioners. Im jeremy paul. Im pleased i was able to withdraw discretionary review for 3610 washington street, but the case is about 317, not really about this particular project and sort of an odd nexus of ideas weve been hearing about these de demolitions and radiremodels and where that line falls and i would encourage this commission to study section 317, try to address some o of the issues and close the loop because the problems with this section are legend. Thank you. Thank you, are paul. Mr. Paul. Any other general Public Comment . Public comment is now closed. Commissioner fung . Commissioner who talked about the valley neighborhood commercial, you were genetic and general in your discussion. Give me some examples of what changes youre talking about. There are restrictions on the number of restaurants titled for the neighbor. Actually, id like to find out where i can get ahold of all of the restrictions and conditions of that neighborhood . Where would i go . To. It would be in our planningc, i would encourage you to work with your supervisor. Ok. To start the process because obviously, the valley merchants associationlies iassociation lin ecosystem with neighbors. Scott process to start bringing everyone together. My supervisor in district 8. Super mayes. And thank you very much for your work. Seeing nothing further, commissioners, we can move on to your regular calendar. For the benefit of the public, if youre here for 18, Caesar Chavez, that was continued to november 21 and castro street to october 24. Case 2415, 4 this is an informational presentation. Thank you and good afternoon. Im with the Department Staff. So as the Commission Secretary noted, this is an informational hearing that satisfies a conditional of approval. This Commission Approved this project in september 13th of this last year and added this condition. It relates to the exterior facade and the condition number 12 amount of this motion, number 20281 state as follows. Prior to ear issuance of the sie project, they shall resign the lower levels of the southeast corner of the project to eliminate the existing 450 farrell street c facade and replace it with a design that maintains the devices to the features of the surrounding district. , including the storefront height, the facade composition, organization of building into vertical masses, punched window openings and material uses and sharing the compatibility with the tenderloin district i in terms f size and scale. The project sponsor is ready today to share with you the revised design. As i noted, this does satisfy this condition of approval and im available for questions. This extends the building to shannon. Theres three more things to mention about Building Design. One is we extended the precast masonry panel, the heavy precast masonry to the street instead of having the plaster building in its place. The second thing we did in terms of Building Design was to create a heavier panel to help define the twostory element along with sidewalk in keeping with other buildings on that block in the area and we broke up the storefront which you see more typically of the neighborhood to maintain that character. We worked back and forth with planning and a year later were back with the resign developments. Im here for any questions. Thank you. Thank you very much. Do we have any Public Comment on this item . Public comment is closed. Commissioner fung . This question may be either either by staff or by the project sponsor. And i wasnt hear for the previous entitlement, but when i read this condition, two things stad out, when you talk about tripartide building order, this building doesnt have one. When you talk about punched buildings, this does not have punched window openings. So i hope you have a discussion of where this came from. If you. Im the Department Staff and this condition arose from the initial design, maining mainta portion of the existing building. The ultimate goal was to not include the existing facade into the final design. The project sponsor could actually bring the design. One moment and ail hav and ill. The commission. Oh, the commissioner didnt like it, i see. If we could have the overhead, please. [ laughter ] so this is the zane tha desin reviewed in september and you can see that some of the precast masonry structure is in this original design. If we could see the revised, please, thank you. The rendering is eluding to the punch windows in this district. The base middle top, we believe, are included in this tripartide design. There is a storefront is distinct and the precast is extended to provide an additional definition such not replicating but references the cornices in this district. It would help to put up the elevation if you have that handy. Some of us who are older have a different definition for tripartide. [ laughter ] the top is the wooder coursing, if you will of the tower. So i think our take was that it was kind of a pretty good kind of contemporary take on that threepart arrangement and tha