Transcripts For SFGTV Government Access Programming 20240713

Our clerk is ms. Linda wong. I would like to thank those from s. F. Gov tv for broadcasting. Can we excuse supervisor fewer. Please make sure to silence all cellphones and electronic devices. Completed copies of any documents to be included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. Items will appear on the next minutes. Can you please call item number 1. Clerk lease amendment lexington lion San Francisco, lp 350 rhode island streetnorth 2,600,000 rent credit. I would like to make a motion petitioner this to be continued for one more week. Before that i will take Public Comment. Are there any members of the public who would like to comment on item 1, seeing none, that item is closed. I would like to make a motion to continue the item to october 16. Clerk item 2 is resolution retroactively authorizing the department of Public Health, Behavioral Health services to enter into a multiyear organized Delivery System Intergovernmental Agreement for Substance Use Disorder Services with the state department of health care services, in the amount of 171,714,918 for the term of july 1, 2019, through june 30, 2022. Thank you. I have been working on this contract for about 27 years. Please continue. The first thing i want to point out is that the contract is retroactive. The source of the retroactivity was we first received the agreement for our perusal on october 20. There are changes in the funding since the Crime Prevention Public Safety act of 2011. It involves them work through centers of medicare and medicaid services. Our services get back and forth before signed, so its not unusual that theyre slow. Okay. Having said that, not guilty 1922, all of the amendments to this will be retroactive to july 1st. So theyll all be retroactive contracts. Anyway, this contract is practically the same as it was last year. The big changes came two years before. Its really a pretty straightforward contract. Basically what it is is the rules and regulations and procedures for billing if one successfully follows those rules, you get paid whatever your legitimate costs were. So its delightfully straightforward. Okay. Colleagues, any comments or questions . Good morning. The board is being asked to approve a Grant Agreement from the state department of Healthcare Services for Substance Use Disorder Services. This is 171,000,000 grant. The city would be reimbursed by the state. The amount in each year is shown on table 1 of 57. 2 million. I think you probably know historically in each year of the grant is the state budget changes. They do come back for an amendment so the second and thirdyear amount could potentially change from the amount in this agreement. We recommend approval. Thank you very much. Any members of the public like to comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. This is moved to the board with a positive recommendation. Madam clerk, can you please call item number 3. Clerk resolution retroactively authorizing the office of the treasurer Tax Collector to accept and expend a grant in the amount of 962,892 from the California Student Aid Commission every Kid Counts College Savings Program for the office of Financial Empowerment kindergarten to College Program for conducting outreach to families and provide incentives for families to contribute to College Savings accounts for the period of may 1, 2019, through june 30, 2021. Again, eric mankey with the office of the treasure and Tax Collector. Im here to seek an approval for our office to spend 926,000 for the California Student Aid Commission. This funding will go to support the kindergarten to College Program. Just as a way of background, this was started in 2011 based on research that shows kids with College Savings for up to seven times more likely to attend college if they have a College Savings account. Since 2011 kindergarten to college has automatically opened more than 42,000 accounts for students when they begin kindergarten. Including we just opened 11,000 new accounts this year. The city and county provides 50 as an initial deposit into that account, and we use private funds to incentivize families to further save. The incentives work. Since the inception of kindergarten to college, families have saved 4. 6 million into those accounts. If you include the city funding we have a total of 7 million in those accounts. What this grant will do is allow us to continue to do outreach and continue those incentives. As you see, we are seeking retroactive approval. This is because being a state grant we didnt receive the information and the grant approval from the state until the end of may as the budget was closing. So we decided to hold off since we couldnt get it in our budget submission for 2019 and 2020. Thank you very much. Lets open up for Public Comment. Any members of the public like to comment on item 3 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Colleagues, any comments or questions . Seeing none we will move in to the board without objection. Clerk item 4 resolution retroactively authorizing the department of Public Health to accept and expend a grant in the total amount of 2,300,400 from the California Department of state hospitals to participate in a program, entitled pretrial Felony Mental Health diversion, for the threeyear budget period of september 15, 2019, through september 14, 2022. Thank you very much. Good morning, supervisors. As is also stated, we are requesting the ability to accept and spend a threeyear grant from september 14, 2022, from the department of state hospitals that would Fund Services for those who qualify for Mental Health diversion. This is a Pretrial Diversion Program for those competent to stand trial on felony charges who also have a mental illness. This grant would fund intensive Case Management services as well as funding for stabilization rooms and a Behavioural Health clinician that would work in the jails to support evaluation for the courts to admit people into the program as well as expeditiously making refers into treatment. Of course im happy to answer any questions that you may have. Seeing no comments or questions, there is no b. L. A. Report on this. Are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item 4, seeing none Public Comment is closed. I would like to make a motion to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. Taken without objection. Thank you very much. Clerk item number 5 resolution declaring the intent of the city and county of San Francisco city to reimburse certain expenditures from proceeds of future bonded indebtedness; authorizing the director of the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development director to submit an application and related documents to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee cdlac to permit the issuance of Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 56,700,000 for 410 china basin street i am a senior project manager with the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development. The resolution before you will authorize an application for bond proceeds to pay for the construction and related Development Costs for Mission Bay Block south 9 and to approve the hearing that the city conducted already to comply with the federal tax equity and financial responsibility act. This project is located within the Mission Bay South redevelopment plan area and its administered by the office of Community Investment and infrastructure. The block 9 team is comprised of Bridge Housing and Community Housing partnership who have formed a limited partnership. The project will provide 141 units, including a managers unit, of affordable rental housing for formerly households. Units will be all studios and a portion of the studio units will be sized to accommodate inhome care support and medical equipment. The project will receive operating support through the local subsidy program. The building includes a large courtyard and adjacent community room, lounge, closed bicycle parking. The project also includes a Community Garden that will be operated by a nonprofit organization. This bond does not require the city to repledge the bond. If approved the sponsors will submit an application to the Planning Committee in january. We anticipate that well return to the board of supervisors in march of next year to approve the issuance of the bond. The project is scheduled to begin construction in june of next year and will be ready for occupancy in september of 2021. This concludes my presentation. Im happy to answer any questions you may have. Im joined by a representative from the development team. Thank you. Thank you very much. There is no b. L. A. Report on this. Are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item number 5 . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Clerk resolution authorizing the issuance and delivery of multifamily housing Revenue Bonds in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 26,967,500 for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a 67unit, affordable multifamily rental Housing Project located at 385 eddy street good morning. Im from the Mayors Office of Housing Community development. Item 6 is a resolution to approve of the issuance of the 28. 9 million in taxexempt bonds for the rehabilitation of an existing single room occupancy development. The issuance of the bonds will allow the project to be acquired and undergo a significant rehabilitation, which would include systems and unit work. There will not be tenants will have a right to return to those units. There will be internal relocation within the portfolio. The units will continue to serve hopefullies at the 60 line and below. We ask for the committee today to recommend approval of the resoluti resoluti resolution. And the project sponsor is here if you have any additional questions about the project. Thank you very much. Any comments or questions . Seeing none there is no b. L. A. Report. Any members of the public that would like to comment on item 6 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. If we can move this to the board with a positive recommendation. Clerk item 7 resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of a multifamily housing revenue note taxexempt in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 76,680,000 and of a multifamily housing revenue note taxable in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 30,000,000 for the purpose of providing financing for the construction of a 167unit multifamily rental Housing Project located at 242 hahn street resolution approving and authorizing the director of the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development to execute an amended and restated Loan Agreement with block 6 housing partners, l. P. , a california limited partnership, for a total loan amount not to exceed 18,647,014 to finance the construction of a 167unit multifamily rental Housing Development for lowincome households. I am the senior project manager with the Mayors Office of Community Housing development. I am here to present on item 8. For item 7, the transaction fundamentals have not changed since the presentation was presented in april of this year. The issuance is still a conduit and financing. The project is in compliance with all city requirements, including prevailing wage and l. B. E. Requirements. Since then, the developer has secured a debt limit allocation from sidlak and with the cityidentified Financing Team, including a lender, equity investor, bond counsel, other attorneys and the citys municipal adviser. The Financing Team has met several times and pretend the package before you today. For item 8, this is to enter into a loan of 18 million. The block 6 project is the first onsite affordable Housing Development for sunnydaily hope s. F. The development adjacent to the site was completed construction last week. Were excited about that. And it will soon house families. Block 6 is going to consist of 167 units, of which 125 of them are public hufing replacement units. The other will be tax credit units and all of them are under 60 tax credit a. M. I. The 125 replacement units will be subsidied by project vouchers. Affordability is maintained at a 99year ground lease with the Housing Authority that continues to own the land. Construction closing for block 6 is expected at the end of november when the documents before you today would be executed. Blocks 6 construction will start soon after that with completion expected in december 2021. Here with me is the director of hope s. F. We will be glad to answer any questions you have about the project. On behalf of this project, we would like to thank you for your consideration and ask for continued support of the project. Thank you very much. Any comments or questions from my colleagues. There is a b. L. A. Report. Can we hear that. We reported on item 8 which is the 18. 6 million on gap financing. In terms of sources of funds, we showed that in table 1 on page 11 of our report, and then these funds would be used specifically for the nonconstruction costs, the Development Costs, for this project. The total project, as youre going to see here summarized is 148. 7 million including other sources of funds other than city funds. City funds total on page 12. They add up to about 129. 6 million. In terms of the policy consideration, we call out in our report that the perunit cost of this project is now about 890,000 development cost. The citys share is in table 2, which is 177,000. But the overall cost is 890,000. We consider this high. Weve seen over the years the housing cost construction has gone up. We do recommend that you request from the Mayors Office of housing a report back on the drivers of these housing costs. We are revising it a little bit to have the report back for december 9, 2019, to allow them to have the work. Otherwise we do recommend approval. Thank you very much. Are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item 7 or 8 . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Colleagues, any comments or questions . Yes, supervisor mar. Thank you, chair fewer. I know theres a recommendation from the b. L. A. For a report to the board on with more explanation about the high the relatively high perunit cost of this project. I was wondering if you could touch on that a little bit right now. So in regards to the overall costs, one of the things we need to think about as well is the amount of city subsidy in this project. In general we see on average about 229,000 per unit in subsidies. This particular project which has infrastructure costs associated is at 171,000. So it is less than most of our projects in our pipeline. One of the reasons its so expensive is general, its a hope s. F. Project, the topography of the. Its very difficult because its sloped and they are grading issues. We also have relocation issues to move the residents on site to this new housing. Thats an additional cost. Were also building parking which is not something we would see on any of our infill sites. Those have assisted in keeping these project costs lower. Had there been other projects where the cost per unit is in a similar range of 890,000 . Yeah. Youll see it on other hope s. F. Projects. Youll see some of our projects that are higher density. We will put the reasons in our report. Thank you so