Examining to your neighborhood and that is the city. Im also aware that San Francisco mohcd had all these references that when people were from the western edition back in their date they are whether or notes and seniors from preferences so why am i saying the world we need, a simple table. All the of the information is here and we can help you figure this thing out. We identify what we mean by pre dda and adjust all this stuff that youve identified here, they are listed on the post dda you mentioned those dda are advisory and i they we need to qualify for the public so that everybody is on the same page, what does advisory rules are and where the obligations are. They need to be stated. We coming up next putting the numbers and this is essential and this is essential because even for the board of supervisors i know, i will not vote anything until we have that and because, these people here reading all the the documents and theyre technical and out there when you live in front of city hall we will be bomb card and why are you evicting people at Treasure Island and why are you providing this and you are not doing that and how many have you read that and if we take the time based on the information we have to pel out what is it were doing here on this column, one or two pages, they have have a copy and everything and its a document and it will make my job easier and it will make everybodys jobs easier here because the way that people are interpreting this is basically they dont have that and i dont blame them and no Background Information just a sound advice and we can as an agency continue to do that so this is what im going to ask that the information is all the supported documents with you need to have this table of content where we can translate it to the Treasure Island so its a way of this resolution they are aware of the advisory roles because we all have this staff and again to be com barredded and they will understand and also i need for you to secretary board of supervisors, the city and county of San Francisco again has all this obligations and what does that mean even though the residents are going to be here with no demolition in five years. What about the Affordable Housing that San Francisco is building there and if im on Treasure Island, what that implies that i should wait to five years now to put my name on the list when they are building in mission bay and around the places this is a question that we all need to be up front with so that opposed dda, no, they have many options and they are San Francisco residents and that they are certain laws in place because they are out bound by the pre dda so this can help us and we can do the resolution but i think a lot of education also needs to be ironed out here by the board of supervisors and also when we get to a next meeting on the island, people are going to be coming out there to be up front what it is were doing and where the obligations are so that its very clear to everyone. Thank you. So just a couple questions. Prioritizing the post qualifying dda residents for the placement in affordable units does that put them ahead of the Mayors Office of housing list where there might be people that have been waiting for Affordable Housing longer than they have been waiting but its just because the benefit that theyre on the island and theyre going to get ahead of those folks . So the city lottery list is that and there are a number of preferences that exist within that and slightly responsive to one of the questions about you know other opportunities off of the island that might be available to post dda residents and one of the things that we can do is make sure that anybody who is a resident what would income qualify get their name into the system because there is other Development One of the steps in the mohcd process is a neighborhood reference which is based on supervisor redistrict and we know theres a lot of development in district 6. So, it is possible that if we work with residents and get them registered they may be place offtherecord of the island but, in response to your question, this would set up a preference because we need to vacate this housing and we will need to demolish is, it would set up a priority that if someone was an income qualifying post dda resident they would transition on the island so that we could empty existing units and move forward with the demolition process. It would just, my only concern would be if i was off the island and just waiting for something and i was on that list longer than someone who was post dda and part of their lease was that i shouldnt expect to have that opportunity i mean, i think its great and i would just be concerned are we being fair to everybody. That is waiting for an affordable unit. Understood. I have one more question. So, if the resolution passes the board and comes to tight end, is this proposal then. Supervisor haneys resolution is non binding so to define some transition benefits and so it is whatever we develop hopefully, we are developing recommendations that would address the supervisors concern and fulfill the intent of the board of supervisors resolution. So, i mean, i guess a little bit. I feel like almost, and i know were not voting on this today. But you know are we a little bit putting the card ahead of the horse should we wait until this supervisor mainlys recommendations through a resolution comes to us and say does this address it is it in the spirit of it and then we can move forward. Supervisor haney couldnt be here today but we have to continue dialogue with his office. As i mentioned, its expected that the resolution will be referred to the Land Use Committee so there will be an opportunity for discussion at the Committee Level about what were proposing as potential solutions to address the resolution and receive feedback at least from those three Board Members in addition to supervisor haney. Last question is i guess at this early stage, we wouldnt have any idea how this might effect budget or cost or anything like that . It would depend on the proposals that we have put forward shouldnt effect we will need to develop an outreach plan as weve done with post tda residents with some costs associated with that. But this isnt materially alter the cost of construction of the replacement units and if we were to offer a transition unit to all post tda residents regardless of income qualifications, that would have very significant cost implications and that something that would not only require tida board approval and board of supervisors approval. Thank you. Make just pigging backing off of your last statement i want it to be clear for everyone here. I heard you say that because the proposal is to allow for post residents who were income qualifying mean they would have normally qualified for a bmr unit anyways to also have priority in the lottery system, this would result in no net new cost impact for the city. Yes. For the development. So thats the clarification i want which is some of the Affordable Housing developers target a specific a. M. I. Level or demographic max and perhaps theyre going after funding that is earmarked for certain demographic types. With this new lottery preference, which perhaps opens up the demographic type create complications for the funding for the developer . Each lottery is conducted according to the income eligibility requirements for that building at the time it becomes available for occupancy. So if that building is utilizing Funding Source thats restrict income eligibility to 40 to 06 of a. M. I. , those only only those households that meet that window would be eligible for participation. If it allowed income up to 80 , then people of higher slightly higher incomes would. Anybody who is put into a lottery for placement in a unit would need to be in line with the income requirements with that unit. So, somehow, some depending on the aia of the existing post household they may participate in some lotteries but not others. Got it. Its very clear ask its great to hear its not going to create more competition thats are unintended. Can you remind us of i know over all, we are basically delivering about 2,000 units of below market rate units on the island. When we subtract out the tie die units and the pre dda units, how many more bmr units do we have in this pot . So, we have 435 tie die units and one Treasure Island units. That covers the transition of 250 existing households. If we look at all other households, and ill just talk pre and post dda, i think were at about 340 right now. Total households 190 pre dda and mixed and 150 post dda. So that is 340 universe so the 435, which only 250 of those are needed to transition existing households. Added 30th 340, assuming no one purchased a unit or took an inclusionary affordable unit, it could be 340 and 435 or 785. We would still be building 1100 additional affordable units above and beyond that only tida parcels. Thats really great to have. Its context. In your presentation you mentioned you consulted with weve had initial conversations, yes. Its very important at least for me before we have to take any action on housing policy that we have very clear buyin or response from ocd about their official position on this because ultimately theyre the department who will be handling the processing of all of this and i just want to make sure that we completely understand our perspective and then just same thing with Affordable HousingDevelopers Making sure that weve already i think youve done a thorough job of thinking this through but in the off chance that we missed something i want to make sure we invite them to comment on this as well. Ms. Shiffrin. I just had a couple clarifying questions. Of the post dda population, which you said was 241 which included the mixed households. It was 151 post dda and 91 pre dda so roughly 251. So 242 households that includes some post dda residents. So, of that population, do you have a sense of how many of those are income qualified . We havent conducted interviews with any of these households yet. We believe its a reasonable assumption that our post dda residents fall into roughly the same economic distribution as our pre dda residents and in our pre dda residents, roughly 40 of them would income qualify for some form of Affordable Housing. And some that dont, the offering that this amendment proposes is to be included in the pre Market Opportunity. Yeah. Exclusive to that. Where as the pre dda folks have the pre Market Opportunity and the inlieu fee. Inlieu option and they are promised a transition unit regardless if they chose not to take advantage of a pre marketing opportunity or take the inlieu payment, theyre promised a transition unit even if they dont income qualify for it. I just want the highlight again that means that theyre occupying a unit that would otherwise be an Affordable Housing unit and the city is paying significantly more to construct that unit than if it was being occupied by an income qualifying household and i highlight that because if we extended that same benefit to post dda, we would actually be taking units that would be available to people that have been on that city wide wait list giving them to people that dont qualify. When you look that theres no real material cost change to the proposal that you had sent . Did you look at what it would be if you did include the inlieu option for the non affordable option . Well, right now theres a the inlieu payment benefit is a formula that it follows and i can give you background on that. As an example, for the eight households over the last four months, our average payment to those households has been 26 to 27,000. Were done and its incredible. On that, what happens later on when the development because its going to be several years before those developments. Is everybody then who moves to the island then given those rights as well . Well, no. Any benefit that we established today, the ad advice is that nes to be for individuals whose residency was established within a specific window. The starting of that window is pretty easy. Its june 29th, 2011. The end date of that window, i included january 1st of 2020 thinking that if the board adopted this at the december board meeting, that that would be kind of an Effective Date in relative proximity to the adoption of the board. So then, anybody who moved in after that Effective Date,. And theres no length of residency . Someone could have moved in one month before the date and still qualified . As opposed to the dda residents . That was consistent with the way that the original thr and rs were formed. If they moved in prior to the Effective Date of the thr and rs. Regardless of how long theyve been there . Regardless of how long they were going to be eligible for that replacement unit and now the benefits. And there were residents see thats were established in may of 2011. Yeah. That are benefit eligible. Its something we need to consider and maybe to think about just simply is it a definite timeline. It was one timeline set in 2011 . So we set another timeline in 2019 . Are they obligations to people who move in after 2019 and how much do we extend those benefits to those people. Thats where i alluded to at beginning of this. By the time we have to vacate all of the housing, another decade will have passed. And we may have residents who have been living on the island for nine years at that point in time. Members of the board of supervisors, members of this board at that time, may conclude that they need to do something similar to what were doing today. Its difficult but or they may chose at that time to offer inlieu payment or some other form of compensation. There will be a class of people who come to the island just if for no other reason because roommates move in and roommates move out. They will not able addressed by what we do today. I think the focus has to be, to those who really need the assistance because they are because they qualify for the affordable units but if theyre people who are wealthy enough for the market rate unit, rent or for sale, its an obligation by this board to assist those households. Thats for further discussion and these are just questions im bringing up so we can have weight to discuss and answer them. Thank you. Again, i think commissioner lais suggestion to bring mohcd here is a very critical one. We can ask questions. I want to go back. Hearing non binding and im also hearing subordination does not take a preference. So again, the implementation, having the post dda. What benefit . Everything has to be delineated. Thats why its so important. If i am a post dda candidate, what benefit am i having here just to lift me of pre marketing but at the same time its non binding on. All we do here is pass policy. But the interpretation and the interpreters, mohcd which are bound by all these preferences they go by, that needs to be spelled out for us here. Even at this juncture anticipating 10 years from now and down the road we have to do our due diligence, cross all the ts and dot all the is so weve done our work here where before, we passed the can down the road so at every stamp, everybody understands, i still need to know what the benefits are for the post dda. A primary obligation legally binding are the pre dda. So, we still need to go to this exercise. How the mohcd will interpret a non binding resolution that is subordinating because i hear that we have to attain and attend the pre dda, what does it mean . I understand now. Its a very simple process. Implication. Its a very simple process. We can build that in and invite them in and they can tell us what and how they implement a non binding resolution. Thank you. Thank you. Are there any comments . If not, next item, please. Item number 9 resolution establishing an ad hoc nominating consisting three members of the Authority Board of directors to nominate officers to serve a one year term. I would like to propose that the ad Hoc Nomination Committee be linda richardson, sharon by and paul. Can i have a resolution by the board. Moved, second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. The ayes have it and then next item. Item number 10 discussion of future agenda items by directors. I would just like to note, bob, i just spent a week with the new York Botanical gardens and were so impressed with the operations they had in terms of their native plantings and their establishment of a native ecosystem and what theyre doing about the soils and about high drol gee, about composting and Pest Management and the right native plant at the right place and the education that theyre doing. Next item, please. Move to adjourn. Before we adjourn, id like to give it over to linda, who would like to make a dedication. Yes, thank you. It is a heavy heart. I, this morning, lost a very key member of my family. My brotherinlaw in nigeria. Dr. Carter was very young and all his life he was a humanitarian. He used his medical practices in providing pro bono working in villages and rural places for the disadvantaged and unfortunately we lost him this morning. I will be honored to adjourn this meeting in his beloved memory. Thank you. Im so sorry for your loss, linda. And we will adjourn in his memory. Thank you. Adjourned. Shop dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges residents to do their shop dine in the 49 with within the 49 square miles of San Francisco by supporting local Services Within the neighborhood we help San Francisco remain unique successful and vibrant so where will you shop dine in the 49 my name is jim woods im the founder of Woods Beer Company and the proprietor of woods copy k open 2 henry adams what makes us unique is that were reintegrated brooeg the beer and serving that cross the table people are sitting next to the xurpz drinking alongside were having a lot of ingredient that get t