Maritime. Points to maritimel evaluation criteria will get poe reality is they may impute it. T a requirement from the pointing. On page 12 of the staff repoe the scoring criteria with more e saw on the slides. And if you ld 1e under quality of design devet submittal, 1b talks about perfot objectives which includes marite calls out this balance that comr makras is pointing out. I agreet talk about how they are weightee is called out. So how many people are goinge panel. At least four. And its in tt plan or include just a momen. I saw that. But is four a go . Dont you usually need an odd n . Well, theres scoring so i me was a tie i guess having a fifte good. And we left it open. But , it has development expert, porty member and person representing r regional interest. We thought in additional need, we could add ar expertise if needed. When is that decision going . Who is going to be included on . We would in our schedule g to begin to put names out there, have the rfps out on the streeta final panel. When are you going to let thn know . Any involvement in who is. We could do that. We could ra panel. I could send you so if forming a panel, theres the isf expertise but also the time como sometimes its hard to find pand especially the quality and calif panelists we want here. So whats write you a memo of who we are o put on the panel and if thereso wants a hearing or wants to tal, you could let me know in new bue could put that step in. Can you give me an example ou mean by city or regional repres. As an example, there might be group, a maritime individual ths all the maritime business that r another one might be an open spe in another consideration thatsg at just a neighborhood or distrt but really looking at regional e interest. Okay. And within the timelind you think we should put the preo the commission . Im the wrong person to ask. Y think im looking at rona, bs legal have a point of view on te you have been more advisory to o you think it should be before ts together or after the scores are second one. Legal thinks it shor the scores are done and embargon interesting word im choosing. E embargo scores . No. I thought sorry, i thoughy experience contracting with thet until you inform the respondentd be embargoed. The department ofh and Mayors Office of housing oe scored decided internally and tt notify anyone until like a monty are embargoed. For the city attorneys offit have in front of me but i thinks once the scoring is completed, t to sunshine. So once the score , the names of the scores and scos are subject to sunshine. I thini think its a great discussion. T you are struggling with is yk what you are struggling with isr you to have information and undt the panel is doing and the neede panel be in this very controlleo they can make sure that everyond fairly. And when you have a pren here, you know, theres really t necessarily fairness. So someboe for five minutes, somebody elsed talk for six minutes. So when ye panel to be in a very controllet and the public forum is not a cd environment. So those are the tt the staff is struggling to presh options to meet your needs witho competing objectives. Could we say in the rfp thate commission will hear presentatil proposals after the scoring, hot to word that but make it an opti scored only 20 points after thad work, i could choose to come yee commission or choose not to shoe staff do the fiveminute present that project was. So to the poie trying to get a level of transpw to the Community Everyone who at would be unlikely for folks whoy scored might come use it as a fa Public Comment to argue their ct youll have some natural drop o. I think the city attorneys s that the scores should be done e public, the uncontrolled publicm happens. So theres no possibile panel could be influenced by who the hard part of that is figurio get the larger group to come tof thats what you want to do. Theo problem in having the scores doe presentation made, the scores d see the scores, you have as mans you want. At that point you cout the top five, we want anyone whr 90. Because then the scores aree hard part is getting the peoplec forum before that happens. So it sounds like the suggest we would do is we would illa letter to you talking about whol would be, we may provide an infl memo just saying who came in thw the process is going, then welo item at the commission where sce complete, where all the proposee mq have their seven, ten minutet to you. Then right after that, r info item where we explain whatl did, the work of the panel and s preferred or sequence, somethin. I didnt think we would be gr into the rfp. I actually have at take for the panel. I think thee director should pick the panelit think the bidders should know we panelists are. And i think thatd be one meeting, whether it be ag or not, with their instructionse limited to one meeting where eva meeting, so everyone as a ratere rules and theres no influence n tell you why. When the names ar, the private world is going to fo those panelists are. They will d to payload their presentation tn and try to get under their thine most favorable response just tao panelists. And i think that we e the project tailored to the gro. And that is a better way to get. I think the oral interview sn person. I dont think the phones acceptable. I think you need toy language. Im saying for the panelistsy talking about the panelists. Fi. Can we. Im okay with it being face. Can the panel do their work,s with the informational presentae everybody gives their presentatn the panel gives their recommendd thats the informational presenn that happen . I think that could happen. If making the presentation just tol the panelists comments. Thats fine. Thats fine. Th. No, no, no. So i think maybe what im hes that do you want to go or doe to . I wanted to make sure mike ue proposal. Thats what i wanted. What i wasnt clear with wasu were thinking that would happene meeting or two. One. One. One informational meeting. So agenda item 1 is. Presentation. Presentation from all propos. Yes. Item number 2 is. Comes up, Public Comment hapf item. Staff panel recommendations. Then we get up, we summarize. But then you cant have any n material. So by the time we have the il hearing where everyone presentse scoring is done, under sunshines public record, so everybody is e walking in the room knowing the. Thats what i heard the attorneo us. So we are saying look, we wr from all of you if you want to , because we are curious what yous are. We havent voted on who yor into your negotiations with, wee an award but the scores are pubm actually supportive if we have g meeting where this is the focuse do. And we might have some peopy upset with their scores. And the because its part of being trane can hear that and understand th. Informational. It just seems like we have te recommendation which is actuallc because the staff report is pub. Thats right. Right . But the scores have an public in any presentation whenn the staff report, its always pn they present. So its a little m i coming to present . No. They ao present before the staff reporte panelists recommendations. They have options to present. Thats part of the proposal e a summary, because we dont want someones proposal in our own we have that part of it where we ar a short summary, executive summa respondents arent opting to prf can summarize those who did notd share with the commission their. The city attorney, its not r staff report. The minute that ps everything and hands them to the technically can be sunshine to o submitted them, even if thereso our meeting. Unless you are inside an app. Right. So thats why they ary public, like when the work is di guess thats what i understood y attorney to say. Our meeting coe weeks later, and people will str scores. So i think what we are descrs certainly workable from our peri think commissioner gilman has tf between friday and tuesday, evel have a list of those scores. Ife commission is comfortable with t know that i see a weakness. Ite flipside of not seeing the scorg like if you are going to have en front of you and you are going e public in front of you as well. T concentration of information mao you, i think i dont see a prob. It allows us to compress that ph is a good thing. Well ask for e summary, and that will form thet staff report. Well directly cu. So we are not putting words in. And if they dont show up, welo walk through that executive sumi think the tenor of the presentag to be very pointed in terms of s arent as good as me. But i this where. But theyll want to show up t because we still have the optiog the recommendation. Exactly. We have other rfps. And they may want to set up r the next set of pier projects. K this amended proposal works qui. So just to highlight a questo theres no action that day. Correct. Just information. Everythings information. With an action item on the r. Right. And i assume we are going tow this framework for the next two2 and when we do the northern fin. I feel like if this is a disast [laughter]. I think we should reserve jul we go through this process firsn decide if this is ongoing. Becaa change from the past. And letso everything at once. So i would suggest we are gon and propose this process for 30e are coming in two weeks. We wonn the success, but we have said wd back on the northern historic pe nonwinning proposers can go tht seems like a natural time to fi. We will be using for 3032 a. We will be proposing that sot here in three weeks. Any other comments. All in favor with amendment. With amendment. Resolution 1943 has been aph amendment. To remind everyone to pleaser electronic devices. Item 10a, rt approval of issuance of port ofo series 2020 refunding bond in te Principal Amount not to exceed n with an Interest Rate not to ext per annum to refund the remainig balance on the port commissione bonds to form a supplement to if trust between the port and a tr, the sale of the 2020 bond negote pursuant to a purchase contracte form of a bond purchase contrace preliminary form of the officiat relating to the bonds and the df the statement. Six, the form ofe continuing disclosure certificat and execution of the contract. E form of the escrow agreements. S resolution number 1942. Thank you. Katie, before youw we had an informational present, and i know that everybody fully. So can you just go over the higf what has to be presented today. Brandon. I appreciate this s. So the highlights are staff is k the commission to approve a revd refunding of nearly 30 milliond outstanding 2010 bonds. We are g authority to issue up to 27 miw bonds. We expect to only use e about 23. 5 million in new bonde estimating that the port will re approximately 13 million in sam this refunding with the net valf 7. 9 million. The maturity basee bonds would remain the same. Thg that i just want to tell the cos afternoon is that we are askingo approve a resolution authorizinf 2020 bonds in an amount not to d 27 million. We are asking the o approve a third supplement to bf trust, a bond purchase agreemena preliminary official statement g disclosure certificate and escrs one for each of the series of ts that are being refunded. If yous item today, we will be introducg legislation at the board of supt tuesday. And we hope to have thn concluded and all of the outstas repaid by march 1 of 2020. Thaty presentation. Thank you so much. Can i hav . I will move the item. I second. Is there any Public Comment . Any questions or comments . All . Resolution 1942 has been approd thank you so much. Item 13, new business. Is there any new business . Iy Public Comment on new business . Item 14, adjournment. Can i have a motion to adjou . I make the motion to adjourn. All in favor. Aye. Adjourned at 5 35 p. M. Good morning, everyone. What an exciting day in the city of San Francisco right here on jefferson street. I want to thank you all for coming out like they say. It takes a village to really come up with a great project and this project is a great project that involved many people from many City Departments, many years ago. It started with the fishermans worth plan and there were many agencies that were involved. I see john brown from the Planning Department is here. Harlan kelly from p. U. C. , our friends from the port are here. The San FranciscoTransportation Authority is over there, and many agencies, of course, public works. They are part of this project. And when this project first started, it was a five block project and we could only find funding to do the first part in the first part was from hyde to jones. But we also had to do it in quick time, in under six months we were able to build the only the first part of jefferson street before the americas cup and i can tell you that project has been a fantastic project. So this phase two is also going to be done in record time, under a year, starting today after this groundbreaking. With that said, i would like to introduce someone that has been a champion for Pedestrian Safety , implementing vision zero , and really making our safety the beautiful city that it is, im making sure that well work together. Lets welcome our mayor london buried. [cheers and applause] london buried. Thank you to all the Community Members who are here today to celebrate phase two of four phases of really changing the future and the landscape of fishermans worth in this area, which is not only visited by people from all around the world , theres actually an Incredible Community of merchants, of people who live here and who walk these streets every single day. We want to make sure that it is safe, it is walkable, it is enjoyable and people have incredible experiences when they come to visit San Francisco. Today we ordered the sun to shine so that people can happen even better experience. This project is an example of how when City Departments come together for a common goal, with Community Members and the fishermans worth, Community Business district in the San Francisco chamber, thank you, rodney, for being here today, that we can make incredible things happen. Im excited that public works and the port and the Planning Department and so many of our agencies have made this a priority. We know that money generated from tourism actually helps to support so many incredible things that we do in San Francisco so we want the experiences to be that much better. And looking at how we are taking a street that used to be a oneway, turning into a two away , widening the sidewalks, making it more clean and more green, and at the same time, thank you to harlan kelly, the director of p. U. C. For digging into the ground, and we are taking around the fiberoptic cables that all the things that we need to do to make sure that the pipes and infrastructure is working so that we dont have to go back into the ground is absolutely how we should be working on public projects like this. Im excited. It took a lot of money, yes from a lot of different resources, and i want to say a special thank you to david chiu for his work in providing resources, working along with supervisor aaron peskin and supervising estate resources to make this project a reality. It does take a village. It does take a lot of money and here we are at the end of what is phase two to make something incredible happening for this particular neighborhood. Thank you do all the folks involved and im excited that mohammed has promised to do this in record time and within budget we will be watching very closely because that is what i care about the most. I know that one of the most fiscally conservative persons on the board of supervisors cares about that as well. Ladies and gentlemen, your supervisor, aaron peskin. [applause] thank you. Good things come to people who are patient. As down from the port to knows, this goes back to 2003 when the community gathered with the port and started a community plan. Some years later, the Planning Department stepped in even before the days of john ram and graham and that led to phase i. Lets be real, there was a little concern. Rodney will remember, back in the days when he had the wax museum, widening of the sidewalks was going to inhibit vehicular transportation here even though we all knew it was going to actually make fisherman s worth wharf keep up. Years ago they brought the f. Line in here and that was a boom to Fishermans Wharf and it is beloved around San Francisco and around the world. After that, we expanded the sidewalks. Fishermans worth is the goose that lays the golden egg for San Francisco. Year in and year out. It is high time that San FranciscoCity Government reinvest so that Fishermans Wharf will continue to be the envy of the world. 600 million in retail sales, 250 million related to hotels, millions and millions, 16 Million People come here every year. Thirtynine is the number one tourist attraction in the city and county of San Francisco. Investing 16 million of city and state funds makes perfect sense for this fiscally prudent supervisor, including, and i am wearing now my hat as chair of the San Francisco county Transportation Authority, not only 1. 2 million of your half cent sales tax, but each of the members of that body get 200,000 to invest. I put my 200,000 into this project. It is just a little bit, but it helped make it go. Congratulations to all the departments and particularly the community that made this happen. Thank you so much. [applause] next, from the port of San Francisco, we are on port property until you get in the middle of that street, then youre on mohammeds property, but we are on the lands of the port of San Francisco. Its executive director, elaine forbes. [applause]. Thank you so much supervisor peskin. Thank you to mayor breed for prioritizing safety and Economic Development and helping this neighborhood thrive. You have heard f