Good morning. This is the wednesday i novembee budget and finance committee. I am chair sandraly fewer. I am joined by the clerk ms. Linda wonk. I would like to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting this. Please silence your cell fens. Phones. Cell phones. Items today will be on the november 19th agenda. Thank you. Can you please call item 1. Resolution approving the First Amendment between the city and sunset scavenger company, golden gate disposal and recycling company doing business as recology San Francisco, increasing the total amount from 40 million to 48 million with no change to the term that expired on november 30, 2020. You might remember we continued this item from last weeks agenda. Can you please remind me. Did we have a bla report at that time . We did not. Thank you very much. We are back, i believe you gave a presentation last week so right now could we hear from the bla, please. Good morning, budget analyst office. The board of supervisors is being asked to amend the existing contract to increase by 8 million from 40 million to 48 million to cover the contract costs to the end of fiscal year 1920. As we show in table one there is an increase from 12 in actual monthly expenditures from 12 to 14 over the initial years of can contract. The increases are now due to increases in the rate cap, increases in City Department services, some other Rate Adjustments that we outline on page 3 of our report and we recommend approval. Thank you very much. Lets open this up for Public Comment. Any members of the public like to comment . Seeing none, it is closed. Colleagues, i had questions last week. I understand it now. I want to thank the controller and lisa for coming and giving me an in depth explanation about the nuances of the contracting that happens. Colleagues any comments or questions . Seeing none, i would like to move with a positive recommendation if we can take that without objection. Thank you for joining us. Thank hthank you very much. Item two an ordinance retroactive office of the Financial Empowerment in the amount of 365,000 for implementing the kindergarten through College Program for september 1, 2019 through augus. Amending the annual salary of one granted class for is the Senior Management assistant position. We have eric here from the treasure and Tax Collector. I am the sponsor of this item. I just want to say how wonderful the kindergarten to College Program is. I will talk about how wonderful it is. Good morning. Thanks for having me here this morning. Eric with the office of treasure and Tax Collector. I am to present an ordinance authorizing the office of the treasure and Tax Collector to accept 365,000 from the Mott Foundation to support the kindergarten to College Program. As we were talking about we launched this in 2011 based on research that shows kids with savings with a College Savings account are up to seven times more likely to attend college than those without. Since 2011 this has automatically opened more than 42000 accounts for sfusd students who enter kindergarten. It is automatic. There is no paperwork to fill out, no Social Security requirements, no minimum balance requirement. The city provides the initial 50 deposit and private funds are used to incentivize families to continue to save. The incentives work. Families have saved more than 4. 6 million of their own money for college, and more than 50 of the families who save qualify for free or reduced price lunch. This grant money will fund a position focused on increasing outreach to families, students and teeners and to continue to encourage families to save in those accounts. We are seeking retroactive approval. It is consult to get it into the budget for fy1920. We moved as soon as possible when it was signed. Any members of the public to comment. Seeing none, it is closed. Any comments or questions on this . This is a great program. I want to be say as we try to close our financial gap, it is our job now as city and county to close the racial achievement gap and prepare everyone for college. I would like to move this to the board with a positive recommendation without objection. Thank you. Can you please read item 3. Resolution for a Program Grant 488,000 from the federal Management Agency through Emergency Services for phase two of the switchyard slopestylization from august 6, 2018 through april 30, 2020. Thank you very much. We have susan howe. From the San FranciscoPublic Utilities commission. Good morning supervisors. I am to accept and expand the fema mitigation grant. This was passed through the california Governors Office of Emergency Services for an amount not to exceed 488,259 did. Phase two of the project. So the early switchyard is a facility of the San FranciscoPublic Utility Commission water and Power Division located on the river on groveland california. The switchyard transmits electric power to kirkwood and home powerhouses to the city. In 2013, the rim fire severely burned the slopes adjacent to the switchyards as you can see. This increased the rock falls and landslides which could damage the switchyard and impact power transmission. At that time we declared a major federal disaster applying the fema grant funds for this project. In 2014, the San FranciscoPublic Utility Commission submitted application for the project and the project is divided to two phases. First is preaward of grant and environmental studies and engineering design. Second is where we are today the construction and closeout. If you recall in 2017, the board of supervisors approved the 404,208 for phase one work completed as of today. This is a timeline showing the activities. I am not going into detail. Last month we received reimbursement for phase one. This shows the timeline for phase two work. Currently line item 3, septembed construction. It is in progress. Our goal is to complete by january 2020. We will submit for phase two by april 2020. Today i hope the budget and finance committee can recommend the switch funds for the project in the amount of 488,259. Thanks for your attention. Project manager and i will be happy to answer any questions you have. Any comments or questions . Could we have a bla report, please . Thank you. They approve the grant from fema for stabilization subsequent to the rim fire the total project cost is shown in table two on page 7. 1. 7 million including contingency. In addition to the grant the Power Program will fund the balance. There is currently sufficient money in the budget to cover these costs. I recommend approval. Thank you. Open for Public Comment. Any members of the public to comment item 3 . It is closed. A motion to move to the board with positive recommendation. If we can take that without objection. Thank you. Can you call item 4. Resolution approving the port of San Francisco to number one between ch2m hill engineers for the planning, engineering, Environmental Services for the seawall resiliency project to increase the contract amount 19. 9 million not to exceed 59 million. Good afternoon, we are here to request your recommendation to the full board of supervisors for an amendment to a contract between the port and ch2m hill engineers in the amount much approximately 19 million. This is for the embarcadero seawall and other efforts. In todays presentation i want to provide a update about the sea wall where we are with the army corps of engineers flood study and give an overview of the contract amendments. As you know, we focused our initial resilience work at the port along the embarcadero seawall three miles from the aquatic park to the ballpark. Since then we received direction to extend the efforts portwide the entire 7. 5 miles of port jurisdiction. What started with an effort to focus on 500 million phase one is a much larger program. It could be up to 1 billion. We are really happy to be in the southern waterfront with these discussions with those communities. This is a multibillion dollar effort over decades to help the public understand the phase nature of the program. We have a resilient framework focused on strengthening the initial investments to protect life safety and facilitate the citys Emergency Response after a disaster and adapt plan to adapt to mid century sea level rise, and we know that with two 100 water levels of five or more feet of sea water rise we need a new water front. We want to envision 2100 resil ient waterfront not for now but so we know what we are building to. Where we are with the sea wall program. We are grateful for proposition a in november 2018. We have been engaged in Robust Community engagement since passage of the bond. Our focus now is on the risk assessment. We are trying to understand the seismic and flood risks on the water front. We have a geotech any cal program over 100 borings to understand the soil conditions in the area. There is complex work underway. We are not just interested in seismic or flood risk, but the consequences of those hazards for people. How does it affect the embarcadero network, Disaster Response . We have a district significantly dangedamaged. We have assets on the waterfronts. We are trying to understand the consequences of the damages and the citys recovery time. We expect to be able to review results with policymakers and city staff in early 2020. We will be back with briefings for supervisors and staff. Public results are expected in the Second Quarter of 2020. We will do outreach to port tenants to be able to explain the effect of these damages on their leaseholds and businesses. Damages will be expressed typically in terms of economic losses and casualties that we project. Our phase one focus, as we told you before, is live safety and Emergency Response. There are some areas that deserve additional study. The ferry area is complicated. There is very deep mud in the area. This contract amendment has 1 million for advanced study in the Ferry Building area. In terms of the Army Corp Flood study we have been through a robust scoping study to do a Flood Control study. We estimate 20 million study cost over five years. 50 federal and 50 local share. That 50 local share will be paid for through this contract amendment. We are in the process of evaluating flood damages on the entire waterfront. We will engage in robust Public Engagement to develop a tentatively selected plan in september 2021. If there is a federal interest in the project, money request to congress would happen in 2024. The federal government would pay twothirds of the project cost. To the contract amendment a 20 Million Contract amendment. I want to credit Port Commission president kim brandon pushing the team to have a high l. B. E. Participation rate in the amendment of 29 . It will fund the ports share of the flood study, almost 10 million of in kind services, adapt and envision and Public Engagement, advanced Ferry Building analysis. We are standing up l. B. E. Support services and Work Force Development program when we are ready to bid contracts we are welt positioned to well positioned to share with the disadvantaged communities and local businesses and project management as well. Funding to date for the Overall Program including the contract and staff is 31. 5 million. Sources include the citys Revolving Fund of 9 million loan, port contributed 15point 5 million including the appropriation. The Planning Department contributed 2 million with a 5 million state grant. We are teeing up the first bond sale. The litigation is holding it up right now. We had a favorable lower court ruling. We are teeing up arguments in the apple lat court. That appellate court. That completes my presentation. Any comments . The bla report then. The proposed resolution approves amendment to the existing contract for planning, engineering and Environmental Services for the seawall. Originally 40 million through 2027. It is now increased to 60 million. The increase as we understand is for the extent of the program from the three mile northern waterfront to the entire 7. 5 miles waterfront. This equals 12 of the total seawall phase one budget of 500 million. Our understanding is that the 12 contract cost for planning, engineering and Environmental Services is within industry standards. We do give detailed outline of the increased costs on page 13 and reremember approval. Thank you very much. Supervisor mandelman. Question for mr. Benson. Can you talk about the commissions thinking in expanding out the project and what the cost and benefits of doing that are . I assume my guess i is a fulr picture what to do and start actually doing stuff later. Our major seismic risk is in the northern waterfronts, the embarcadero seawall. We have dense seawalls. We have the transportation and utility infrastructure on the embarcadero. That is where the earthquake risk is highest. It was appropriate place to start. Thinking about flood risk. It is hard to isolate that area, that area on the southern portion dips to Mission Creek, mission bay and Mission Creek are very lowlying areas. It is hard to design flood defenses that end at the ballpark. We wanted to see the flood Risk Management work extend to the southern waterfront area including the creek. Fortunately, the Army Corp Flood study came to the city with the ability to go 7. 5 miles. There is a funding strategy for the expansion. We need to resource that study, which is a major reason why we are here today. I think the Port Commission is looking at resilience as a portwide responsibility. Thank you. Okay. Public comment. Any members of the public to comment on item 4 . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. I think we collectively when we hear about the sea wall, it puts the fear of god into everybody. Mother nay turhas the last nature has the last word on this. I would make a motion to move to the board with positive recommendation if we can take that without objection. Thank you very much. Madam clerk please call item 5. Resolution approving modification number one much the use and agreement between Alaska Airlines and the city to interpret the space into the Lease Agreement with an estimated rent of 20. 8 million for the remainder of the lease terms to commence upon approval. President item 6 is between very genamerica with earlies due to the merger to commence on the first day of the month following board approval. Today we have. First off i would like to say happy birthday to super visor stefani. The airport is here requesting approval of modifications to two leases resulting from the merger of alaska and very again airlines one to the 2011 lease will incorporate 12. 6000 square feet in terminal 2 formally occupied by Virgin America. Modification one provides early termination. If approved alaska will occupy approximately 19. 3000 square feet of exclusive use space and joint lose space. In addition to the 3. 7000 square feet of joint use soace currently occupying in the international terminal. Based on these occupancy levels, alaska will play approximately 20. 8 million in rent for the period of december 2019 to june 2021. I am here to answer any questions. Thank you for hearing this item. Could we get a bla report, please, on items 5 and 6. Item 5 approves amendment with the Lease Agreement with Alaska Airlines allowing them to expand and a tem6 approves the termination with the lease with very r Virgin AmericaVirgin America. The revenues to the airport under the modified lease on page 17 is about 20. 9 million over the remaining terms through jun. As stated in other meetings, the Lease Agreement will need renegotiated in 2021. Remember approval. Thank you very much. Open this up for Public Comment. Any members of the public to comment on item 5 or 6 . Public comment is now closed. I would like to move these to the board with a positive recommendation if we can take that without objection. Thank you. Please call item 7. Item 7 resolution retroactively authorizing the juvenile Probation Department to accept and expands a grant in the amount of 734,000 to augustment the S