Can we have the bla report . Yes, this contract approved resolution approved the 11th modification to the contract with the faith group to related services to the Airport Security infrastructure program. The Airport Commission approved a twoyear extension to this contract through december of 2021. That corresponds to a change in the program in which they are adding additional cameras and different design build contractors to complete the program over the next two years. The increase in the contract amount is 3. 3 million from 14. 1 million up to 17. 4 million. Page 3 item ten of this report. We consider this to be a reasonable expenditure. We recommend approval. Thank you very much. Lets open this up for public comment. Any members of the public like to comment on item number three. Public comment is now closed. I have one question for you. This is about cameras and actually installing more cameras is this to meet the faa standards, or is this actually exceeding the faa standards . I dont believe this is a an faa standard. Component that would have to do with the faa. This is throughout the entire airport. It is consolidating our Security Camera infrastructure system into one point of access. There may be an faa component on the perimeter, but this is an overall Airport Security program update. Thank you very much. Any comments or questions for my colleagues . I would like to move this with a positive recommendation to the full board. Thank you very much. Madame clerk item number four. Item four, 191111. Resolution approving an exclusive negotiating agreement ena with mercy housing california, a california nonprofit Public Benefit corporation, for a proposed ground lease of city Real Property at 155 grove street, 165 grove street, and 240 van ness avenue assessors parcel block no. 0811, lot nos. 016, 019 and 021 , with an annual lease payment of 15,000, under the jurisdiction of the real estate division, subject to several conditions; affirming the planning departments determination under the ceqa; adopting the planning departments findings that the transaction contemplated by the ena is consistent with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1, and that the transaction contemplated by the ena is not defined as a project under ceqa guidelines, sections 15378 and 15060 c 2, subject to citys discretionary approval after the completion of environmental review; and authorizing the director of property to execute documents, make certain modifications and take certain actions in furtherance of the ena and this resolution, as defined herein. Thank you. Before you is a property across the street on grove. The city owns a tshaped property consisting of 240 vanness, 155 and 165 grove street. About 9,000 square feet. The two buildings that are improved on the site have been deemed not historical, are registered in the vacant abandoned yielding program and are generally unsafe from seismic performance standpoint and are not occupied. The garden was located at 1625 grove street i was a collaboration between the city and two nonprofits. Currently it is unused today. All of the properties were declared surplus in 2015. In 2016, the analyzation of suitability for development as 100 Affordable Housing, pursuant to the Surplus Property regulations i found them to be infeasible for then in 2017, the city provided notice to local and state organizations as an opportunity for Affordable Housing development with no response. Under the direction of then mayor ed lee, the city was invited to participate in a global Net Zero Energy develop a program hosted by the sea 40 climate city Leadership Group known as reinventing cities. The city included the subject properties and to the competition. The city received three strong proposals for the use of this property in may have 2018. And a team of ten experts including some in the city and some outside of the city, including architects and housing experts rated the proposals in the spring of this year. Following a subsequent vetting of the two remaining highest ranking proposals, before you is the final recommendation for reward of an exclusive negotiating agreement. The most responsive bidder is a team led by the kelseys, supported by mercy housing on the architectural firm. Their proposal is to develop 102 units of affordable inclusively designed rental housing on the site in a building of six stories over basement that would be no heavy vicki akil are parking bikes. Twentyone of those units will be set aside for the disabled which would be a substantial increase of new construction, affordable units tailored specifically to the disabled community. Fiftyone of the units would be priced for occupants at no more than 100 of ami, 30 units at 80, and ten for disabled only at 50 and 11 for disabled only at 13. The unit mix would be 90 studios , five one, five twobedrooms. In addition to the Inclusive Housing for the disabled which is the kelseys founding mission, staff supports this project due to the extreme affordability levels achieved, the integrated garden design and as well as seeing all the energy and sustainability targets which was the focus of the global competition. Laying out the milestones to ensure the proposal remains fiscally viable while the project enters the entitlement phase. The proposal assumes no initial funding from the city and anticipates the use of our standard longterm ground lease we deploy routinely for Affordable Housing projects. The negotiation term of the ena is 45 months. During which the Development Team must meet the Community Outreach design, entitlements and fundraising goals as stated in the agreement. If they remain in conformance to have the opportunity to secure ground lease from the city. That ground lease will come before the board, and the mayor for approval. I will be prior to two advancing the project. The current for late 2023. If you have any questions i am a from the kelsey. Could we have the bla report please . The proposed resolution would approve an exclusive negotiating agreement between the city mercy housing for surplus City Property on grove street and van ness avenue. We are reporting on this because the negotiating agreement does set the rent for the future ground lease which is subject to board approval of 15,000 per year. Considering this to be low market rent. It is consistent with the city policy to have ground lease set in these terms. We will be reporting further on this project when it comes forward for the actual ground lease including any kind of city finance that might be added to the project. We recommend approval of this resolution. Thank you very much. If it comes back to final approval for the ground lease, at a later date, is that the term that at 15,000 . So we are being made aware of what the ground leases being proposed that we still have to prove it at a later date gulf that is correct. Okay, i happen to, two nights before this made public i happened to bump into a family that was talking about what the city was doing on behalf of the disabled community and what we could do to build more housing and more accessible housing. I was really encouraged and excited to see this announcement made public right after that. Make sure to refer them to this. Obviously it is a few years out. I think the location has been sitting there for some time. What a wonderful way to provide something for a community that is completely, almost invisible even in the Affordable Housing world, right . We have very little of the housing. I think there is one site south of market. To have this in an area on civic center that is accessible to many Different Things in transportation as well as a seat of government, i think is a im really hopeful that everything will be done to expedite this process. We appreciate the department of real estate putting this offer proposal and negotiating good faith in them mercy and kelsey coming forward with a great proposal. Hopefully we will be able to realize this very quickly. Thank you very much. Lets open this up for public comment. Any members of the public like to comment on item number four . Public comment is i would like to make a motion to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. Thank you very much. Madame clerk can you please call item number five. Item five, 191110. Resolution retroactively authorizing the department of Public Health to accept and expend a grant in the amount of 350,000 from the San FranciscoPublic Health foundation to participate in a program, entitled California Community reinvestment grants program, for the period of october 1, 2019, through september 30, 2021. Thank you very much. Thank you. This is a Grant Program that applies partnership with the San FranciscoPublic Health foundation a total of a twoyear grant for 650,000. 300,000 will go to the San FranciscoPublic Health foundation and grin of 50,000 to the department of Public Health. The population this will serve is the present rancheria population and in partnership with transitions clinic network. They are both here to answer any questions you might have. The source of original funding from this is in california, the adult use of marijuana act, proposition 54 passed in november of 2016. It created the program to provide local communities that were heavily impacted by the war on drugs with grants Reinvestment Program to help those communities. The funding is the cannabis and tax excised revenue. The program is building on existing partnership between the clinic network, the San Francisco department of Public Health. Who has long supported this programming. The funding will allow the department of Public Health to hire. For approximately 200 transition clinics in new and existing clients. They will recruit new patients within 12 months are released from state or federal prison through the transitions clinic behavioral care and Health Worker services. The project funding at the San FranciscoPublic Health foundation, 300,000 over two years will provide or allow the establish of the Community Advisory board rancheria wellness group. Job support such as 100dollar muni cards. As well as finding some of the admin straight of overhead. As a department we would use the three and a 50,000 to fund 1. 0 full time social worker and this would be a temporary exam position. There would also be about 1,400 for reprocessing training for those clinical social workers. 17 indirect rate. Please let us know if you have any questions or would like further information. No bla report on this . Any questions or comments by colleagues . Seeing him. Any Public Comments on . Seeing him. I would like to move this to the bar with a positive recommendation. We can take that without objections. Madame clerk any other business before us today . I would like to correct the statement that i made earlier, at the beginning of the meeting. Items acted upon today will appear on the december 10 board of supervisors meeting, not december 3. No further business. Thank you very much. We are adjourned. Hi. My name is carmen chiu, San Franciscos elected assessor. In our seven mile by seven mile city, we have over 210,000 properties and close to 90 of their are residential like the homes you and i live in, so you might ask, how can we possibly value all these properties . Well, to better understand our work, we need to explain the states proposition 13 law. In 1978, california voters passed proposition 13. Under prop 13, we value your property at market value when you first buy it. Every year after, that value goes up by the c. P. I. Or the California Consumer price index. But if the c. P. I. Is more than 2 , prop 13 caps the increase at 2 . Well walkthrough the maximum increases prop 13 would allow. Lets take a home with initial value of 400,000. In the second year your assessed value grows by a maximum of 2 , growing from 400,000 to 408,000. In year three, that 408,000 is increased by 2 to roughly 416,000. Every year, the value grows by the maximum rate of 2 , and that is called your prop 13 value. Keep in mind as time goes by your prop 13 value may not be the same as market rate. What do we mean by that . Lets say over the last ten years, home prices in San Francisco have gone every roughly 10 every year. Despite that, your prop 13 value is capped at 2 growth creating a difference between your market value and prop 13 value. Know that the value recessed when theres a change in ownership. A change in ownership means that the property has a new zoner. Maybe through a new owner. Maybe through a sale, a gift or adding or dropping names through title. At that time the home will be assessed a new market rate. That value becomes a new starting point for the property. Just like before, the Growth Continues to be limited at 2 until the next transfer happens. Remember, the new owners are responsible for paying taxes at the new level from the first day that they own it. Value might also be added when construction happens on your property. That would be another instance when growth in your value might exceed 2 . Here, we would add the value of construction on top of your existing prop 13 value. Every july, well let you know what your assessed value is by sending you a letter called a notice of assessed value. You can use that information to estimate your property taxes early. Please note that a separate office called the treasurer Tax Collectors Office will send you a letter in october and theyre responsible 230r collections. For more information, visit our website, shop and dine in the 49 promotes local businesses, and challenges residents to do their shopping within the 49 square miles of San Francisco. By supporting local services in our neighborhood, we help San Francisco remain unique, successful, and vibrant. So where will you shop and dine in the 49 . I am the owner of this restaurant. We have been here in north beach over 100 years. [speaking foreign language] [ ] [speaking foreign language] [ ] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [ ] [ ] manufacturing in cities creates this perfect platform for people to earn livelihoods and for people to create more economic prosperity. Im kate sosa. Im cofounder and ceo of sf made. Sf made is a Public Private partnership in the city of San Francisco to help manufacturers start, grow, and stay right here in San Francisco. Sf made really provides wraparound resources for manufacturers that sets us apart from other Small Business support organizations who provide more generalized support. Everything we do has really been developed over time by listening and thinking about what manufacturer needs grow. For example, it would be traditional things like helping them find capital, provide assistance loans, help to provide Small Business owners with education. We have had some great experience doing what you might call pop ups or temporary selling events, and maybe the most recent example was one that we did as part of sf made week in partnership with the city Seas Partnership with Small Business, creating a 100 Company Selling day right here at city hall, in partnership with mayor lee and the board of supervisors, and it was just a wonderful opportunity for many of our smaller manufacturers who may be one or twoperson shop, and who dont have the wherewithal to have their own dedicated retail store to show their products and it comes back to how do we help Companies Set more money into arthur businesses and develop more customers and their relationships, so that they can continue to grow and continue to stay here in San Francisco. Im amy kascel, and im the owner of amy kaschel San Francisco. We started our line with wedding gowns, and about a year ago, we launched a ready to wear collection. San franciscos a great place to do business in terms of clientele. We have wonderful brides from all walks of life and doing really interesting things architects, doctors, lawyers, teachers, artists, other like minded entrepreneurs, so really fantastic women to work with. I think its important for them to know where their clothes are made and how theyre made. My name is jefferson mccarly, and im the general manager of the Mission Bicycle company. We sell bikes made here for people that ride here. Essentially, we sell city bikes made for riding in urban environments. Our core business really is to build bikes specifically for each individual. We care a lot about craftsmanship, we care a lot about quality, we care about good design, and people like that. When people come in, we spend a lot of time going to the design wall, and we can talk about handle bars, we can see the riding position, and we take notes all over the wall. Its a pretty fun shopping experie