Resource allocation so you guys arent caught off guard. We notice that its not just the intensity, but the sales are hitting us from different angles. The prediction is for San Francisco in general, it may say 0. 25 at city hall. But a sale may come at other over an inch. We have a plan to do better. Thanks, we love to learn more. Thank you so much for your work. Thank you. Any Public Comments on this item . Hearing none, next item. That concludes my report. Any Public Comments on the report overall . Hearing none, we are now going to call item number 9 before number 8. If there arent any objections, and then we will move on to number 8. If you wouldnt mind calling item number 9. Item 9 is update on the Disaster Recovery and resiliency planning as it relates to the Sewer System Improvement Program. Good afternoon. Youre going to get a full sweep of discussion today on Emergency Planning. I will keep this very brief. This is a follow up to a memo you had in your board package, i think about two meetings ago on this same topic. This is just elaborating it at the commissions request. Got it . There we go. Okay, so what were going to cover here briefly is how the ssip program, the project Development Process incorporates Emergency Planning and recovery standards for the infrastructure. Heres what were going to briefly go through. Were going to use the seismic reliability, and what the high level of service is, and the supporting objectives for that. So what you see here is the five objectives related to the seismic reliability. The first objective is straightforward. It says we design all our facilities to meet the seismic design event, which is a 7. 8 magnitude earthquake. Then the three objectives, two, three, and four are where we take that high level objective and we bring that down into the design and other elements to make sure that we can actually achieve it once the system is built. So those three objectives in the middle, objects two, three and four. These all deal with how we recover from a major seismic event in terms of restoring the critical service. Im going to briefly recap those. So objective number two is what happens immediately after the emergency event and through the first 72 hours when we are taking steps to assess the system and protect Public Health and make sure that we are beginning recovery mode of certain facilities. The second one is that within that 72 hour window, or at the end of it, were able to start conveying and pumping flows to the Treatment Plant. The third objective, which is number 4 up there, pardon me, is that the plant themselves can provide primary treatment and disinfection of the waste water flows prior to discharge. So again if you put all three of those together, that captures our expectation of how the system performs following a major seismic event. So, well delve into those a little more. On objection number 2, minimizing the Public Health and safety impacts. I wont go into that in detail. It boils down to we will go through and rely on the primary conveyance routes in the city. Ill show you those on the map and we rely on the storage in the transport storage boxes, which i think everyone is familiar with, and in most cases, those have enough storage to hold between 1. 5 to 3 days of dry weather flows from the system. You can envision those acting like giant storage tanks to the first one to three days of the event. Im not going to go through this in great detail in the interest of time. I think there is more information here than we need to get into. Of course, well come back and delve into this in more detail at the commissions request. So this just gives you a schematic. I think you seen this in different forms a number of times of the location and layout of the transport storage boxes and the Treatment Plants. Again, at a certain point, if those storage boxes became full, then we would be relying on essentially discharge through the combined sewer discharge out fall structures. That wouldnt be ideal. You would have waste water flows to the receiving waters, and we recognize that is obviously a permit violation but think this is under emergency recovery for the city and you think of whats our least bad choice . Its to have that waste water flow if it needed to go through the structure. So what youre looking at here is a map that we use and we are actually very active on this right now. Sorry. Just before on that first objective, there is no other alternative . Not for that first two to three days after the event. This is a point where youre not sure you have power and yeah, youre in a very youre trying to meet the very minimums for Public Health and safety at that time. So what you see here are two different maps side by side. One of those has the major waste water and storm water conveyance pipelines. The one on the right shows you also the primary street routes that d. P. W. Will also use in a post emergency situation. We have active plans to work in conjunction with d. P. W. And other city departments to go through those routes and do post disaster assessments of those pipelines as part of the post emergency activity. In the third objective, as i mentioned earlier is to make sure that the Treatment Plants themselves can provide at least primary treatment and disinfections so this is where we get to a much more acceptable condition in terms of what were discharging to the receiving waters. This graph shows you, even though we have a number of pump stations around the city, there are five of those pump stations that account for about a little over 99 of the flow. So when you look at emergency recovery and where we want to invest in resiliency, we dont have to cover every single facility to get the biggest return on our investment, so to speak. Its those large pump stations where we want to make sure we have reliable service. Now again, well go through these future analyses that were planning. This shows you the southeast Treatment Plant and this is post ssip. So youre seeing a schematic of the new bio solids and head works layout. So when we talk about meeting the level of service here, this is where were currently drilling down a little further into the planning, so that we dont try to cover every possible need of that facility. Again in that post 72hour window, we want to have just enough ideally or at a minimum i should say, operational capacity to bring the flows into the system of head works, run them through primary treatment only, provide disinfection and then provide discharge to the out fall. So, many of the facilities you see there, we wouldnt necessarily be focused on in that post Disaster Recovery. We would want to make sure we have chemical supplies, power reliability, staff, et cetera, to just meet those operational minimums of again primary treatment and disinfection. This is a similar schematic of the oceanside detail. It gives you an idea of what were focused on. Lastly, the Emergency Planning topic is really front and center right now for a whole host of reasons, one being the recent developments with the pg e Public Safety power shut offs from we havent experienced those yet. The city is planning for them. What it does say is that we have a need to focus on the back up power supply reliability to our facilities. If were relying as we currently do, we call it a duel feat. We have two Power Supplies coming to the plant from two independent substations. That has been our plan in terms of power reliability, but if the entire grid is down, then neither one of those substations is functioning. That strategy may not be as effective in the future. So thats something were delving into. And i just wanted to highlight as a backdrop to all of this. There is a number of planning related mergemergencies going o this is a substantial update. Were working on a staff recall plan currently. In most cases we dont want it to work in a post disaster situation, but we want to communicate how to get them to work. We want to utilizing the Collection Division has used for the wet Weather Operations effectively in the past two seasons. Were also working on chemical procurement strategies and fuel needs. Also, its not on this list, were working on the update and coordination with the rest of the city departments in the continuity of operations plan. You can think of that as a high level citywide plan that overarches the different departments within the city. We can talk about any of this in the future if there is interest on the commissions part. That is the presentation. Ill be happy to answer any questions. Im still kind of stuck on this notion of releasing the sewage into the receiving waters as you say. I would just love some creative thinking as it evolves on a potential plan b as an alternative. Absolutely. Any other comments or questions commissioners . Thank you very much. Any Public Comment on this item . Hearing none, next item madam secretary. Number 8. Number 8 is an update on San Franciscos Sea Level Rise action plan and next steps. Good afternoon commissioners and if i could have my slides. Im a member of the citys Sea Level Rise committee and i wanted to say i really enjoyed sister robinsons answer. Which answer . About Climate Change. Im here today as a member of the coordinating committee to provide a brief overview of the vulnerability and consequences development that was in the action plan and to let you know that the document is expected to be published some time early next year. Im joined by brian strong by the chief resilience officer. After my presentation, they will provide an overview of the hazards and Climate Resilience plan, which includes Climate Change adaptation planning. His presentation illustrates how the city is transitioning to a combined Climate Resilience planning effort so city departments can maximize efficiencies and the con Co Investments of our dollars. This committee brought together representatives from city agencies that work on or have vulnerable assets within the sea level vulnerability zone, including the sfpuc. This group worked together to create the 2016 Sea Level Rise action plan, which called on city departments to Work Together to delineate the impact of rising sea levels and developed strategies to protect our shorelines and assets. Where are we in the process . We are finalizing the Data Collection phase and are about to publish the Sea Level Rise vulnerability and consequence report. This report was a large multiagency, multiyear effort to collect data so we can identify and georeference or map vulnerable assets, identify key findings, and outline next steps. This report does not provide policies or strategies. The analysis, which was based on the rising tide framework completes steps two and three and assessing the citys vulnerability to coastal flooding. It assesses the risks or consequences of that vulnerability on people, the economy, and the environment. As the first step we completed a mapping exercise and determined which assets were illustrated here by a blue line. This map shows a do nothing vulnerability zone. In other words, no shoreline protection has been included in the analysis. With that information, we were able to determine which assets were exposed to flooding. Next we assessed vulnerability. Vulnerability is a function of sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Sensitivity describes the degree to which an asset is effected and adaptive capacity describes the ability of an asset to be modified, to reduce or eliminate the effects of flooding. Finally we assessed the consequences sorry, what the consequences would be to the people, economy, and the environment. We applied this analysis to different structure types and systems described here, including waste water and public power. We also developed the series of neighborhood profiles for all neighborhoods bordering the bay or ocean that describe the affected public assets in this neighborhood and the People Living and working here. Once we completed the analysis, we were able to identify some key findings. Again, these are based on a scenario which the city has taken no preventative action. Impacts to local and regional transportation systems, including portions of bart, muni, caltrain and caltrans infrastructure. Loss of recreational spaces as flooding risks in lowlying areas such as mission bay. We were able to develop these key findings not only by looking to impacts of individual assets but analyzing how entire neighborhoods would be affected. This map shows Fisherman Wharf are 77 inches of Sea Level Rise. That is a Tipping Point where large areas of shoreline is overtop. We see the overtop and white line indicates areas of no overtopping. This is another example moving further south. Mission creek and mission bay and some of our lowest lying areas built largely on fill. This map represents 52 inches of Sea Level Rise. As you can see, there would be substantial flooding due to a low level shoreline. That gives you some insight on how the overall analysis was done. Now i like to focus on sfpuc assets, first off the water enterprise and the type of facilities that could be impacted. As you know, San Francisco relies on a Regional WaterDelivery System. Even though this analysis was focused on San Francisco proper, we recognize that key components of the water Delivery System are outside of San Francisco. Therefore, it needs to be included in this analysis. As an example, key components are located near the dumbarton bridge. Flooding in this area may impact sensitive control systems and electrical equipment, which could disrupt Water Delivery Service for millions of people. Within the city limits, most of the infrastructure is buried. However, as an example, the bay bridge pump station is within the citys Sea Level Rise vulnerability zone. An impact to this facility could keep water from leaving treasure island. Now a few slides on the waste water enterprise. Similar to the water enterprise, the waste water enterprise has buried assets that are less vulnerable to the impacts of Sea Level Rise. We do have treatment plans, combined sewer discharges and pump stations that could be vulnerable to flooding. To understand which assets were vulnerable, we did an assessment of all the potential pathways where flood waters could enter the facility. Lastly, we looked at the power enterprise assets, which may change with everything thats going on. The power enterprise asset and pg e assets are intertwined to provide a reliable and consistent power supply. Because of the interrelation between the two systems, the consequences of power disruption due to Sea Level Rise could not be separated. Pg e is conducting their assessment and we will coordinate with them with our adaptation projects as the city moves forward. So that concludes my brief overview of the work that has been completed, which is mostly focused on understanding the problem. Before i finish my presentation, i want to talk a little bit about what the steps the city has taken or will take to address Sea Level Rise. For example, as we continue to increase our understanding of how Sea Level Rise would affect the city, we are already moving forward with adaptation planning for some of our most vulnerable areas. These are examples of watter front projects that are building adaptation strategies into their programs by elevating streets and infrastrungture infrastructu infrastructure. We have the ocean beach Climate Change adaptation project, the u. S. Army corps of engineers sea wall program. On the previous slide, i mentioned the ocean beach project. Im the project manager for this project, which is a Climate Change project, which is led by the sfpuc. This is addressing chronic erosion of ocean beach. We completed the report at the end of september and are now in the design phase. This is, if not the first, one of the first projects statewide implementing a manage street approach to accommodate Sea Level Rise. In order to achieve this goal, we will be removing the great highway by skyline. In order to do this, we plan to construct a low profile wall to protect the waste Water Infrastructure in this area. We anticipate this project will go to construction in 2023. So what are our next steps . What are we doing to ensure assets that are being built now, while larger adaptation strategies are developed, consider Sea Level Rise . First, the city has their Sea Level RisePlanning Guidance that was originally adopted in 2014. That requires city sponsored projects incorporate Sea Level Rise into thei