Attractions. This would require approval under the charter. Port staff work with the city at minimuadministrator. If submitted and approved, they would delegate authority to the agreement audio cutting in and out. . This ordinance will be introduced in june. Next slide, please. So in summary, we recommend the commission approve the extension of the broadbase rent referral through july 31st. We want one minor amendment that is attached on your staff report. On the second page of the resolution, the second clause should be rewritten to read, whereas on may 17th, the Health Officer earne issued a nw order to shelter in place. Staff is looking forward with relief measures with the commission and our tentants. Next slide, please. So in terms of the next steps, we envision taking the Optin Program and the discussion on continuing the discussion on rent forgiveness on june 9th. If approved, we would launch the optin application period of the extented perform from june 15th and july 15th. On the july 14th commission meeting, we would continue discussion on further rent relief. On july 31st, this wont be the closing of the broadbased Deferral Program and august 1st, the launch of the rent deferral and then in the summer, we could take potential action on further rec relief as contemplated today. Next slide, please. Im here to answer any questions that the commission or members of the public may have on this item. Thank you for your time. Commissioner, is there a motion . To moved. Second. Open it up for Public Comment on 8c and members of the public who are joining you on the phone. The operator will provide instructions now for anyone on the phone who would like to provide Public Comment. Thank you, president brandon. We will open the cue for anyone on the phone who would like to make Public Comment on item 8c. Operator the conference now in question and answer mode. To summon each question, press 10. You will be entered into the cue. Dial 10 if you wish to make Public Comment. Is there anyone on the phone . Operator question, it looks like three callers on the line at this time. Thank you, please open the line to the first caller. You have three questions remaining. Is there a caller on the line . Operator caller, your line is open. We cannot hear you. Caller, can you try to dial 10 to exit the cue and 10 to reenter. Shall i move on to the next caller at this time . Yes. You have two questions remaining. Hello, president brandon. Can you hear me ok . Yes. My name is drew harper and i entered a letter in the Public Record at the last Port Commission meeting and i hadnt heard anything back and thought it be wise to speak to you today. Ive been a tenant of the port for 35 years, having paid millions of dollars of rent for two Small Businesses at south beach harbor, a Sailing School and excursion company. These are uncertain and stressful time for all tenants of the port, many generating revenues of over the sunny monthsfus of the year. Your tenants have no opportunity to make money and little opportunity to afford steep rents the port charges for water access. We also find ourselves in an unusual situation that the port is in the city and county of San Francisco and we cannot operate or businesses paying 100 of our rent. Theres no legal precedence, it is very unusual situation to have the landlord tell you that you cant do business, yet require you to pay all of your rent. I dont see any agenda items specifically releasing the relief. Though i appreciate the conversations pressing forked that. Toward that. The rent deferment will push hundreds of your tenants to file for bankruptcy. Were not asking for free rent but recen relief. The fact they can remain whole seems unlikely because none of us will remain whole. I, along with many port tenants have spoken to port attorneys. And i think it is up to the port to which attorneys were afforded to have the conversations with. Anecdotally, i thought you should know pier 39 had not charged rent since the sip order went into effect and this is as per my colleague. On that alone in my 40 years of doing business, you have many rural tenants who have provided extraordinary amount of income to port of San Francisco and please do the right thing to help your tenants survive this pandemic. Thank you very much for the opportunity to speak and i hope you and yours right main healthy and safe. Thank you, mr. Harper. Next caller, please. Operator you have one question remaining. Yes, hi, my name is john valeer. I run can everybody hear me . Yes. Ive been running a nonalcoholic company for the past ten years and ive been with the port since that time. Weve been paying our rent on a month to month basis and weve been good at it. During this pandemic, we lost about more than 80 of our business, restaurants are closing down, bars and its been very devastating on our end. And we also have inventory issues. We have inventory that is expired and about to be expired the end of this month in the month of june and a total of 30,000. We have a bunch of customers which all of the restaurants and the bars in downtown San Francisco that has not paid since february and this goes up to 60,000. We are still operational 15 to 22 and we are hoping to get forgiveness for the past couple of months and who knows what will happen in the future and anything helps. We are very fortunate that we did not getn get any grants fron francisco. We did get ppe, but that was just available and that doesnt cover the losses that were having today. Thank you for your time and i appreciate it. Hopefully we get some positive news from you in the future. Thank you. We really appreciate your comments and im sure youll be hearing from the port. Thank you. Any other callers . President brandon, no other callers wishing to make Public Comment. Seeing no callers on the phone, Public Comment is closed. Thank you for the presentation and this has been an ongoing discussion and i know a difficult one and i think you and your colleagues on staff have been thinking through this issue very carefully as we do. I think one of the things we should move forward with the things you have discussed here, but we know that as the tenants before us just mentioned their difficult situation, i think in order for us to have a full picture as Port Commissioners, theres one thing, unfortunately, none of us wanted this pandemic and its something were all victims of. And we already said that under normal circumstances, we had hoped to have a revenue of 98 million and weve lower the the forecased theforecast to 75t know what it would be if the team took a look at it. What im interested in knowing, knowing that it is dallaire we e to share the pain but, unfortunately, were not the federal government, so that we just cant print money and have stimulus that way. We are not in a position to do that from the standpoint. But we sh what i need to know, e talk about further discussion on rent relief or forgiveness, i need to know how the port is going to fiscally sustain itself during this period of time, because at some point, what is our cash position . What is our cashflow position going to be if we look at some of these programs. We need to look at both sides of the equation. Where will our cashflow come from to sustain us and the tenants through this difficult time . I dont have that part of the equation at the moment and katie, youre in the hot seat and im sure at some point, you can give us a clear picture. I think we should answer that as we consider all the other measures Going Forward because we have to have a balanced picture. If we did some things that have been proposed, would we be able to sustain that on the longtem . Longterm . We need need a balanced view because we cant put ourselves out of business but i dont think it will be that dire but i dont have enough facts to be comfortable to consider more measures until we have some facts is figures in front of us to balance out how this should work Going Forward in the longer term. The Program Makes sense, but as we go forward, we need to have the port side of the equation put in front of us before we make further decisions to didno forward. We need to know at the end of the day, our mission is to sustain ourselves longtem. Longterm. We have to cut back as a result of this and thats painful. Im not concerned about the operational side but i need a projection that shows us what other pain can we take to help or tenants. There will be a point, perhaps, where we can not go all the way and so, we need to explain that to our extents and stakeholders in a fair and transparent way exthats what we should be doing for the city of San Francisco. I concur with commissioner owhos comments. That should be forthcoming. I do support the proposal before us. In totality. I would like staff to do is t to if we know now you can answer this, will we cut individual deals with tenants or is our plan to group tax associate with tenants and implement inequity to the tenants on a certain set of facts . Commissioner, at this time, theres no set. audio cutting in and out . I will say that a proposed fd39 bill does present some challenges, the way that the bill is drafted would require to negotiate in good faith with each of our tenants and so, i imagine that we will be watching this very closely as we it is our desire to have a Relief Program because some sectors have been struggling more during this time than others. I would like to see if well treat the sector groups the same or are we going to negotiate each one to the best of ourability anourability and a gr with a good team may get a better deal than someone without a team negotiating by themselves. All of our leases will be public and well have tenants look at better deals that have been cut than their own deals and do we want to be in that position of negotiating good faith but at a net result being challenged that we werent forthright. When its all over, if they gave someone a better deal, will they give that better deal to all of our tenants . I would like us to walk through this because the leases will all be public at the end. I have shifting a little bit, i have some interest in doing sector programs and having a policy that would affect all of the tenants equally. For example, taking the restaurant sector and ill call out to the parking lot sector is two and deleting their minimumbased rent each month and only collecting the percentage rent that their lease calls out for and we would set it in my example, it would be for a year. All of restaurant leases would be adjusted to their base minimum no minimum resident, just their percentage of business and we would be their partner and we would do that in my example for a oneyear term and were treating every single restaurant equally across the board. A decision like that would actually mean no rent or the actual shutdown from february 26th to the day its lifted. I would like us to have these types of discussions so we know how we want to innerface with individual tenants and the collective results that we hope to get out of this. That concludes my comments, madam president. Commissioner bealman. First of all, thank you so much for the report. I want to reiterate that commissioners comments, im in alignment with them. I want to expand on what i would need to move forward from this in what i would think would be a good conversation. I agree with the sectorbysecker approach. Sectorbysector approach. We node these approaches. When you look at the stack report and the information you gave us, particularly on page 4 and then even geographically on page 5, each sector is reacting to the pandemic in very, very activity ways andifferent waysde restaurants in parking as an example where we have high participation, its very different than our harber facilitys rent and im using this to illustrate a higher percentage of payment. So i want to see the staff break down from a sectorrer approach of how well provide relief to the tenant. I think we should be grouping large projects like pier 70 and mission rock into separate categories due to their size in scope. If theyre seeking rent relief. And i do think we should be exploring some of the comments made from the letter be received, the ability to do new terms, the example that about raising base rent so that we are in this together. I dont think any of us can assess when the public is going to feel comfortable returning to the waterfront to engage in businesses in a meaningful way. We will see a rush in the beginning when the restaurants are allowed to do Dinein Service and i think knowing the answer to that and i think that we knee to be in partnership and we dont want a rash of our businesses going under. And i think we also need to weigh the fact that while were an enterprise department, were part of the city and county of San Francisco and do we want to be putting this is a question from my fellow commissioners. I dont have an opinion formed yet, but do we want our businesses applying for loans to turn around and be providing that money to the port . I just called that as a question to play to the larger ecosystem with the city and resources that are available. And i agree with you we need to track carefully the 939. It could have a major impact on us and i think port staff should reach out to the Mayors Office to understand what the city and countys overall position is since it would have a broader effect. Those are my comments to the things i would like to see discussed with some of the information. I would like to see when we enter that conversation and also sector by sector projections of what those if we were to do rerent reef relief, what the nus would look like and how they tie back to the port. Thank you. Vice president adams. Wow i definitely want to proceed with caution going down this row. Road. I see all of the Major Companies here filing for bankruptcy, like jc penny and pier 1. I have so many questions and i agree with the commissioners, theres a lot of questions and im about to supporting, but we have to use a lot of caution because all of our business will be like an open book and someone would think they got a better deal than someone else and to negotiate a lot of different things, we have an obligation to help and i want to know, will we be getting federal stimulus money or any money from the state. But i think this is a painful conversation and i dont think i can support this today, but i think this is a long, long discussion. This is one of the biggest decisions this commission has to made since ive been on the commission to to that and it cannot be taken lightly and this cant be for public servants. I have to take it lightly as we go down this path. Im done, president brandon, thank you. Thank you so much for your participation and i know a lot of thought has gone into this. And i support what we are discussing here today. We definitely need protection to understand how were going over this. We have to add it sector by sector. We have to take into consideration as commissioner adams said the local support. Theres a lot that goes into this and i the Port Commission said, this will be a huge issue and effort. So the more commission we have, the better and maybe more than one conversation. This may be a continued conversation. This is so fluid and things are changing and there no one size that fits all. There will be a lot that goes into making this decision thank you so much for all that you have done to date. Any other comments, commissioners . A motion and a second. A role call vote. Pair operato. role call . The motion is unanimously and 2077 is adopted. Item 9 is new business. Commissioners . , any new business . Seeing none, can i have a motion to ajourn the meeting. Motion to ajourn. All in favour. Aye. Role call vote. Pair thanthank you very much. Announcer youre watching coping with covid19. Hi, im chris manus and a you are watching coping with covid19. Today joining us is Susan Girardeau of the california Pacific Medical center. And mow to cope with emotional stress of a major daf. Shes here today to talk to us about how to help Young Children cope with this ongoing pandemic. Dr. Girardeau, welcome to the show. Thank you very much. Lets start by talking about some of the issues that 5 to 11yearolds might be facing. What are some difficultties they might be experiencing during this pandemic . The biggest difficulties that all children experience is fear and anxiety and its displayed in a variety of different ways. The kids have a fear of a Family Member getting sick or themselves getting sick. They have a fear of separation. Obviously with our quarantine, all of us at home, children still have a fear of separation in own home, which means from room to room, that they cannot be home alone without a parent. It is very difficult and even at night to sleep in their own bed can be a problem and an issue that is under the umbrella of anxiety. The other parts that play into it is the anxiety of when will this end . As we know currently, we dont know and that is the most difficult. And all kids, their peers, are an important part of their development. So it is often asking when can i go to school . At this point, they are very tired of online school. When can i take my friends and when can i see extended family . Right. What kind of indicators are there that a young child is struggling right now . Particularly behaviors that are really across the age spectrum of 5 to adolescence is sleep disturbances and increase in nightmares and in the younger kids, night terrors. Woe see across the age speck trup, fear of the dark. The other behaviors that we are seeing is the regression in their normal developmenttal tasks. For the younger child and as i referenced sleeping in their own room. Other types of behaviors that parents or caregivers might see are meltdowns over relatively minor issues. Often were seeing a decrease attention and focus, especially with online school. Were also seeing headaches, stomach aches that we typically see when there is stress and trauma. I see. Lets say weve realize add child is having difficulties. Are there specific ways we can talk to them