Good morning. The meeting will come to the friday meeting of the government audit and oversight committee. Chairman mar joined i have vice chair peskin and commissioner haney. The commit room is closed pursuant to declarations and directives. Committee members will hold meetings virtually. Both cable channel 26 and sfgov. Tv are streaming the Public Comment number across the screen. Comments are available via phone by calling 415650001. The i. D. Is 1451064576 and press pound and pound again to be committed to to the meeting. Youll be mute and listening mode only. When your item of interest comes up press star followed by 3. Call from a quiet location and speak slowly and turn down your radio or device. Alternatively you may submit Public Comment to me by emailing me. If you submit Public Comment by email it will be included in the legislative file and it can be sent to city fall timely, mr. Chair items will appear on the supervisors agenda july 7, 2020 unless other wise stated. Thank you, mr. Clerk. Ordnance 7420 to temporarily require drug stores and on demand Delivery Services to provide Health Precautions and you can call the Public Comment number 4156550001. Enter the meeting i. D. Of the queue to speak and finally a memo from your desk requesting the ordinance be agendized and potentially sent to the supervisors next tuesday, june 30. Thank you. Thanks, again mr. Clerk. Supervisor, haney the chair is yours. Thank you for convening the meeting and support of the ordnance and your partnership and cosponsor of it. We are still very much in a Public Health emergency and pandemic and there are essential workers out there every day putting their own health at risk for all of to us deliver food, to work in grocery stores, to staff at restaurants or other essential services and we have to make sure that our laws protect them and protect their health and rights. With that in mind, we enacted this emergency ordnance for increased employee protection for grocery store, drug store and on demand delivery. This will expire june 30th. It strengthens the workers protections during covid19. Giving workers an additional level of protection and mechanism to file a complaint with the office of labor standards and enforcement. I want to thank pat mulligan here from the office of labor standards and enforcement for their partnership. The legislature requires gloves, masks, hand sanitizer, soap, water and disinfectant in the workplace and on demand delivery employees must be reimbursed and the Service Delivery service must be paid for time spent cleaning vehicles or equipment on shift and delivery platforms have to offer the option of executing a nocontact delivery any time during the state of emergency. Fourth, for employees to request a work schedule for any reason under the paid sick leave ordnance during covid19. Fifth, on demand Delivery Services they must keep employees up to date how to comply and lastly and importantly, number six, no ret ret retaliation for exercising rights protected under this emergency ordnance. The pandemic is not over and the workers are on the front line of helping the city and residents getting through it safely. Ignoring the safety of these workers will cause an outbreak affecting all of us. Lastly, i want to thank uscw local 5 and local 648, the San FranciscoLabor Council and San Francisco human rights committee, uesf, the Chinese Progressive Association for support. We needed this a few months ago. We ton need it now and continue to need it now and i want to thank supervisors mar and peskin for your support and advocacy for workers and leadership in putting forward your own legislation as well to make sure workers are protected. Its been an under reported but essential part of how weve been able to control the spread of this virus which is not just putting protections for our residents but actually being explicit about the robust protection that needs to be there for workers and i do think it has made a big difference and we continue to need it. Thank you for work on this and your leadership on the issues. I was at a protest and they thanked us for this action. Its an important protection for them and they were asking if it was going to expire. We told them wed make sure we reenacted it so thank you for sponsoring the reenactment ordnance. Thank you. Supervisor peskin, do you have questions or comments . Why dont we go to Public Comment. Mr. Clerk, are there callers on the line . Clerk operations to see if theres callers in the queue. Please let us know if there are callers ready. For those who already connected please press star then 3 to be added to the queue to speak on the item. For those in the queue the system will say quote, your line has been unmuted, unquote. For those on cable channel 26 or via streaming link on sfgov. Tv if you wish to speak on the item please call in by following the instructions on the screen dial 4156550001 and meeting i. D. 14510 1451065676. Has anyone connected to our call . I have one caller in the queue. Clerk thank you. Caller thank you were grateful for your leadership on this and the cosponsors. Its a vital piece of legislation. Now more than ever at this critical time when we see cases rising across california and businesses opening back people are going back to work and serving essential function you need to take care of their safety and the safety of their families and the community. Its critical not only for workers rights but the Public Safety. Thanks again. Clerk thank you for your comments. Do we have any more callers . That completes the queue. Clerk mr. Chair. Thank you. Hearing no further callers, Public Comment is now closed. Supervisor haney would you like to make a motion . Id like to move it to the full board with a positive recommendation and report. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, please call the roll. Clerk the motion stated by supervisor haney. [roll call]. Clerk you have three ayes. Commissioner is there further business. Clerk that concludes the business. Thank you for your work on this. Our pleasure. Good morning, everyone, everyone. The meeting will come to order. This is the june 10th, 2020, regular budget and Appropriations Committee meeting. Im sandra lee fewer, chair of the budget and Appropriations Committee. Im joined by committee members, supervisor shamann walton, and supervisor shamann walton, and good morning. Welcome to the june 25, regular meeting of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services committee. Im supervisor rafael mandelman. I chair this committee. Supervisor walton has not been able to be here today. Our clerk is john carroll. I want to folks at sfgov tv for creating this meeting. Mr. Clerk, do you have any announcements . Thank you very much. In order to protect Board Members and public during the covid19 health emergency. Board of supervisors legislative chambers taken pursuant to all local, state and federal orders. Committee member will attend the meet thuing through video conference. Public comment will be available for each item on the agenda. Both cable channel 26 and sfgov tv. Com are streaming the Public Comment number across the screen. Comments are your opportunity to speak during Public Comment and they are available by via phone. Once connected and prompted in the meeting i. D. The i. D. Is 145 8532772. Press pound and pound again to be connected. You will hear the meeting discussion. Youll be muted in listening mode only. When your item of interest comes up, dial star and three to be added to the speaker line. Best practices are to call from a quiet location, speak clearly, slowly. Everyone should account for potential time delays and speaking discrepancies between live coverage and streaming. You may submit Public Comment. You may email me im the clerk of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services committee. If you submit Public Comment by email, i will include it in part of the legislative file. You could also send your written comments to our office in San Francisco city hall. Our address is room 244, one dr. Supervisor mandelman i want to make a motion to excuse supervisor walton for the entire meeting an. Call the roll call. On the motion to excuse walton and ronnn until she arrives. Aye. There are two ayes. Superve rk, please call the first item. [agenda item read] supervisor mandelman back in october 2018, you will remember, mayor breed and i introduced legislation authorizing the city to opt into new state law which allows San Francisco, san diego and Los Angeles County for small number of people suffering from Mental Illness who might not otherwise qualify for Traditional Co conservership. It reflected the concerns and the intention that this be a pilot. After months of stakeholder meetings, two city hearings and series of amendments on june 11, 2019, just over a year ago n ags board approved implementation. Enabling San Francisco to conserve individuals under the new program. I want to recognize the challenge in bringing any new program like this online. I want to acknowledge the incredible work our department of of health do everything for to care for the most vulnerable in our city. More than a year after hard fought battle, i am perplexed, very perplexed that not a Single Person in San Francisco has been conserved under this new law. Throughout the fall, we were advised that the first petition for sb1045 conservatorship will be submitted by end of the year. I believe at that time, i was frustrated about how long it was taking. Earlier, this year, prior to pandemic time, the Housing Conservatorship Working Group issued its first report. Which we will be discussing here today. Among other things, it shows city has not conserve anything with sb1025. Since then, number of media reports draw attention to issue noting that the city has yet attempt to try a sb1025 with one individual while any trip out into the streets of San Francisco will reveal many folks intoxicated, psychotic, continue to deteriorate. We know that relatively few individuals that was attempt to pilot. The estimates were that as many as 100 people might be eligible. I believed it will be far fewer. As i said over the last few years, its still worth trying. That does presume it will help at least one person. Im hoping that todays presentation and conversation can illuminate to get this program implemented. And how some understanding how we can make progress on these issues when each small progra programmatic change seems to take so long to actually put in place. Were going to hear from angelica from justice and Behavioral Services at the department of Public Health. Wit i believe i am sharing my screen. Everyone able to see that okay . Yes, we are. Perfect, thank you. Thank you so much supervisor mandelman. Appreciate to be here today to get a report out on implementation how the conservatorship and the activities of the working group. Supervisor mandelman, you noticed that you reviewed some of this. Just to to give a brief overview, were experiencing methamphetamine and opioid pandemic but not only in San Francisco but nationwide. These are situations where serious Mental Illness is by Substance Abuse and people are deteriorating in our communities. Unfortunately x existing laws tt we have do not account for active substances and have not had the tools to intervene in these cases. As you identified housing conservatorship was designed to be a tool to help address this gap. Allows for us to place individuals on a conservatorship for six months for individuals who meet strict Eligibility Criteria which in San Francisco is estimated to be 50 to 100 individuals. Weve had multiple opportunities to engage in voluntary services. Senate bill 1045 was signed by Governor Brown in 2018. It was adopted by board of supervisors in june 2018. In october 2018 Governor Newsom signed senate bill 40 which added some important clarifications and additions to patients rights and due process protection to the legislation. This included clarification of the role of assisted outpatient treatment. The addition of a temporary conservatorship, reduction of the conservatorship length of time to be from 12 months to 6 months and additional due process protections and noticing of individuals that they are on their pathway towards the housing conservatorship. Im happy to be here to provide update on implementation of housing conservatorship as was noted. It takes lot of time to implement a new piece of legislation and particularly one that is as different as our existing conservatorship laws as housing conservatorship is. We used this opportunity to have regular meetings between the department of Public Health and department of disability and aging services. We worked closely with San FranciscoGeneral Hospital. Both of these entities develop standard work flow ace talk about individuals on the pathways towards conservatorship and identifying other less restrictive options. Theres been a great deal of coordination between the superior court of california and City Attorneys Office. One of the important pieces to move forward with this legislation has been to both develop and have the court approve paperwork that is needed to be filed in these cases. There have been some unexpected delays around having that. Im happy to report, as of last week, this paperwork has been approved. We have been working closely with zuckerberg San FranciscoGeneral Hospital to serve individuals who is on pathway towards conservatorship. Starting at that will be eligible more housing conservatorship, we have to serve individuals 5150 to notify them theyre on pathway to housing conservatorship. I think this really speaks to the work that weve been doing leading up to this point in working with our pattern partneo ensure an effect streamline process. Were hopeful well use this tool in the near future to support individuals. Moving on to the activities of the Housing Conservatorship Working Group. As you will know, this was established in the health code. We had report that was due and submitted in january 2020. This group contains 12 members who are appointed by department head, board of supervisors and the Mayors Office. The goal of this working group is to evaluate the effectiveness of the legislation. Subsequent report will be submitted in january to both the board of supervisors and Mayors Office and starting in january 2021, we have reports that we have to submit to the state legislature. Many of the data points for this report focus largely on individuals who have been placed under conservatorship. As previously indicated, that has not happene happened in San Francisco. We use this opportunity to focus on two data points that look at the landscape of 5150s in San Francisco. And in situations where the police were the ones placed an individual on 5150 and why that was the case. The data for this report is focused on fiscal year 1819. This gives a brief overview of the data we had available to us and ill talk about the limitation and the work that were doing to have a more robust report and Data Analysis and evaluation. This looks at data from the Care Management system. Which pulls information from zuckerberg San FranciscoGeneral Hospital and Psychiatric Emergency Services as designated crises facilities. We also were able to gather information from the San FranciscoPolice Department and i think what was important about this opportunity is that we were able to get client level data from both of these events to remove duplicates counts for individuals. There were roughly 3800 unique individuals that have been placed on a 5150 during fiscal year 1819. Of note, 35 of the cases seen as p. E. S. Are brought in by the Police Department and 64 of the cases that the Police Department shared with us were individuals placed on 5150 were treated at other facilities outside of Psychiatric Emergency Services. This could be for a number reasons. Including that an individual has comorbid medical conditions that need to be treated at the nearest emergency department.