Across the bottom of the screen. Comments or opportunities to speak during the Public Comment period are available by calling that number 888 2733658. When you are connected and would like to speak on an item that is up for Public Comment press one and then zero to be added to the queue. Each speaker will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. When you have thirty kekds secos remaining eum hear a chime indicating your time is up. Best practices are to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly, mute the volume on your television or computer. Id like to call roll at this time. War ba. ralroll cal. roll call . Thank you everyone. First on your agenda is items for continuance. Descritionary review. Items 2a and b discretionary review and variance are proposed for july 30th. Staff was requesting that we actually continue it just one week to july 23 and add this matter to the consent calendar. All parties will be advised that if this falls off of consent on july 23 if so continued it will be placed at the end of the agenda or need to be continued into september. Further commissioners under your descritiodiscretionary review cr item 14a the discretionary review has been withdrawn. Item 14b, just the variance portion will need to be continued by the assistance Zoning Administrator. I have no other items proposed for continuance. We should take Public Comment. your conference is now in question an answer mode. this is your opportunity to call in to the eight hundred number. Press one then zero to enter the queue. you have two questions remaining. hi. Im sorry. Point of clarification. Whats happening with the 590 items. Its being pushed to july 23 does that mean were not discussing that today anymore. plans that satisfied staff, were continuing it one week. okay. Im sorry. What indefinite continuance means. Are we discussing that today or not anymore. it will be on the agenda next week. If you are opposed it may not stay on the consent calendar. It will be on next weeks agenda for consideration. okay. Is it on this weeks agenda still or not. Im sorry. it is not. It is on this weeks agenda but being proposed for continuance. okay. It is still on the agenda today well have an opportunity to talk about it today this is your opportunity to speak to the continuance right now only. okay. just to the continuance of one week. im absolutely against it. Im really concerned about the impact on the pregnancy i wan tt to have. I dont understand entirely what the continuance means. Id like the opportunity to discuss this matter today if thats possible. it is being proposed for continuance for one week to jul. we would rather discuss it today. i understand that. Thank you. thank you. lets go to the next caller. you have one question remaining. hi. I called to see if i can request for a delay of the hearing one2 project. It was scheduled for july 23 due to lack of public notice. It was scheduled for today due to the error in scheduling. People are supposed to enter the meetingotherwise they wont know. They will miss opportunity to speak out. It causes trouble to our neighbors. My question is that can we reschedule the meeting for this fall. Because of the corona virus pandemic. Thank you. you have zero questions remaining. sorry. Commissioners. If i could get a point of clarification. I dont think we received a notice for elizabeth being withdrawn. we all received an email that it was withdrawn. yes. david and elizabeth were withdrawn. 219 has been withdrawn. as well as elizabeth. i will add 219 as being withdrawn as well. The matter is now before you. wish to continue items as noted. second. thank you, commissioners. Continue items as proposed. sorry. Including acknowledging that elizabeth and missouri has been withdrawn. roll call so moved commissioners that motion passes unanimously search to zero. The assistant zoning commissioner can comie chime inn those variances. item 14b continue item to the next regular variance hear hearing. This is also a remote hearing and a link will be available on the Planning Department website. The intent is to have this item heard to approve the revised plan dated july 15th 2020 the corresponding conditions of approval. Thank you. you also needitem 2b. also continue that to the date specified. now we will be on your consent calendar. All matters listed here are considered to be routine and may be enacted upon by a single roll call vote. You should open Public Comment to see if anyone wishes to take either of these items off of consent. This is your opportunity to call into the 800 number to get into the queue. We only need to wish if you wish to remove either of the two items on consent off of consent to be heard on the regular calendar today. you have one question remaining. this is john on behalf of the project 355 bay shore bulled. There was a condition of approval. I want to confirm whether that has been resolved or not or take it off to ensure. all i know is that staff has a revised motion before the hearing earlier today. I do not know if it include the revised motion that you are referring to. In order to take this matter up we have to pull it off of consent. just to be clear that we got the hours of operation correct and not needing to come back to the commission. Iedz like tid like to pull it. It shouldnt take long. very good. Well take it off of consent. thank you. you have one question remaining. is the member of the public im so sorry. The terminology is a little confusing to me. Should the people who are on line talking about 592 avenue, is that not being discussed today anymore . it was on the calendar for continuance. thats all i needed to know. it sounds like its not going to be on next week either. okay. Thank you. okay, commissioners. The matter is now before you. I will remind you that bay shore has been pulled off of consent. Its only item five. It sounds like we can take bay shore first under the regular calendar. move to approve the van necessarness on the consent cal. thank you on that motion to approve item five under your consent calendar. Awe. Clerk seeing no other requests to speak, we can move on to item 7, department matters. I am here for director hillis who is out of the office this week. There are a couple of items that i wanted to share with you that the department is engaged on postcovid work. Director hillis has told you about the marriage Recovery Task force. Hes cochairing an Economic Working Group with the office of Economic Development and wo workforce and this group is focussing on Housing Production and Small Business recovery. They are planning on presenting ideas to the economic Recovery Task force in early august so we can look forward to seeing the benefits of that work. Number two i know you are familiar with the citys shared Spaces Program that mayor reed launched in may. Wanted to give you a little update on this one. This is a program that helps support neighborhood particularly neighborhood businesses for the business and community activities. This is the reallocation of the public rightofway, sidewalks or part of streets and Public Police in a safe distance and with fresh air. You have probably seen restaurant pick up and at this point were pleased to share over 800 applications for the permits. And to make the need and i want to let you know that Planning Department staff for current planning and the key role and the city wide design group is managing and coordinating the program for the city at large. And we also have Planning Department staff with the department of economic and Workforce Development putting together the Equity Program and insure full participation in communities. So far we have given updates to the Small Business commission and the Entertainment Commission and if this commission is interested, we could share more with you about these efforts in the future. So that concludes my update for you. We can review past events board of supervisors and there is no record from the board of appeals. The Historic Preservation commission did meet yesterday. The land use amendment and also called the hub and recommended on approval with modifications and the commissions modification and the department and the board to pursue a nexus study and in response to the commissions action and the mayor introduced june 9 during the land use hearing and expressed during Public Comment and improved by the commission and encouraging supervisors to move forward with the legislation. The other was a request to put the legislation on told until further equity work is complete. After Public Comment there was not significant discussion on the proposed plan by the committee members. They continued the item until july 20. The rules Committee Held a hearing on the mayor Ballot Initiative and save our Small Business or s. O. S. And the lack of controls and certain destination type uses and uses not impacted by the online competition and general entertainment, movie theaters and arts activities and remove 311 neighborhood notification and principally use. And these controls have to stay in place after which time to change them. And less restricted in the time period. And supervisor ronen had the most questions for staff and the Planning Department and oewd. Supervisor ronen stated the support for most of the items and questioned why the changes are not being done for legislative process as could be done legislatively. The mayor worked at the board and would have been able to fine tune the legislation that is more foes kued. Public comment was fairly split and supported legislatively and through the emergency ordinance and others supported the initiative and could get a far reaching changes like these through. I would note it is not clear if any of the changes could be done the emergency ordinance as those are usually reserved for more restrictive controls. As of just a hearing and the mayor can place the initiative without board approval, at the end of the hearing the Committee Filed the item and didnt take further action. The board considered supervisor peskins ordinance that would allow the expansion of the Central Police station and the north beach and that passed the first reading. That is all i have for you today. They adopted a resolution centering preservation planning with racial and social equity similar to what the Planning Commission had done and adopted recommendation for the approval for the planning Code Amendment on your agenda later today regarding continuation of certain nonconforming parking lots in the Mission Street and supporting 1315 waller street. Seeing no questions, we can move on to general Public Comment. At this time members may address the commission. With respect to agenda item, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. When number of speakers exceed the 15minute limit, general Public Comment may be moved to the end of the agenda. Lets open up the Public Comment line. [instructions] again, members of the public this is the opportunity to call 800 number and press 1 and 0 to enter the queue. Caller hi. My name is katie and i am a counselor at hoover middle school, and im calling in support of prop e, Affordable Homes for educators and families. San francisco is in a severe housing crisis right now and were in desperate need of Affordable Housing. Every year at my school we have about 20 from our educators and have to leave the city because they can no longer afford to keep their family in San Francisco. This is devastating for us and the complete presentation as we know relationships are how we keep the students engaged in the classroom and these relationships are broken every time an educator has to leave San Francisco. I currently own below market rate condo. It is essentially a studio and the standing family and i am looking to move so i can live at an affordable rate. We need more solutions here in San Francisco. If i moved in navado and i am one example of so many educators being forced out of the city. We spend all of our time every day and youth in San Francisco and as an educator and support they need for other educators and in the city and we need your support to make sure there were opportunities that are educators who want to expand their opportunity to have opportunity to do so. And specifically i am interested in hearing about two bedroom and three bedroom condos and apartments for rent for that part of thing. We spend all of our time educating San Francisco youth and keep relationships and not hearing them down for our educators and families in San Francisco and expand their families. Thank you. Caller during the recent decades the loss of existing housing has been a significant issue of San Francisco land use, unchecked, such housing laws have have profound effect on neighborhood character and on the financial accessibility of housing. Now, those are not my words. Those o your words and they are in the summary of the updated and revised part of implementation document for section 317 and they have been there since 2009 since that document and the 2010 version and to the june 2010 version. And as i said, this is updated and i dont know if the staff alerts you to this and i sent you a copy of the summary page in an email about an hour and a half ago. With a little note attached. As i said, it is revised in the clarifications have been revised and nevertheless, even with the revised clarifications that does not negate the reality that they should be adjusted. I hope that you read it and the staff alerted you to it and updates you on how they updated it and take care, be well, be safe. Thank you. Goodbye. You have four questions remaining. Good afternoon, commissioners. With the Neighborhood Council and coalition. About a month ago you had a case on your agenda that was continued indefinitely and that was regarding 4211 26th street in noi valley. I continue reminding the planner as well as you during the general Public Comments that this is not a Single Family home and two units where there were tenants living there that the staff keeps representing this as a Single Family home that is being demolished to make room for yet another Single Family home. This is not the case. And after i brought it up to the attention of the staff and there were two Water Department meeters and there is a history of tenants living in the unit in this building and back because there was no record of two units, with the d. B. I. And the planning is not going to consider this two unit building. Even though this director shows that this is the two unit building. Fast forward to today when we have another construction project and this time the director shows this is a oneunit building and nevertheless, they show there is work to be done for a twounit building. So i am asking you, commissioners, for help on this front. We need to have a standard being applied to these reviews at the Planning Department. How do you expect the public to react to this . One, when we bring it up to your attention that depending on the planner and we are not getting anywhere. We do need to have some standards in the planning staff when they review the buildings and the projects and determine whether or not these are Single Family homes and this is really important also and the developers gamed the system and thereby the project is worry and merits your approval. Thank you. In most cases these are multiunit families that are being demolished and by technicality being declared by rhyme or reason and come together in a Single Family home. And i am asking you to intervene in this matter and require the standard or declaring whether or not the house is a Single Family home or is a multiunit. Thank you very much. Caller i am the policy and planning manager at tenderloin neighborhood unit cooperation. And back in 2019 we were definitely excited and a supporter of prop b and the historic ballot measure and our city believes in the need to build and increase Affordable Housing and the trailing legislation amendment and to allow extra height on the parcels and for what can be Affordable Housing across the city. More importantly, the fine tunings to prop b are relevant to the viability for Affordable Housing development and vetted with the Affordable Housing developers and finance experts and purchased a project and in the Due Diligence phase for another potential site in the sunset and streamline approval and