Transcripts For SFGTV Small 20240702

Committee meetings. Going forward Public Comment will be taken in person with Remote Access only provided for those who require ada accommodation. Public comment will be taken on each item. When your item comes up and Public Comment is called, please line along the curtain to your right, my left. You may submit Public Comment in writing email to myself, the Budget Finance Committee clerk at brent. Julipa sfgov. Org. If you submit via email it will be forwarded to the supervisors and part of the file. You may also send to city hall, 1 dr. Carlton b goodlett place, room 44, San Francisco california 94102. For those in attenance during the meeting please make sure silence cell phones and Electronic Devices and should you have documents to be included as part of the file should be submitted to myself the clerk. Items acted upon today are expected to appear on the board of supervisor agenda of october 31, unless otherwise stated. Thank you. Before we call the items and go forward with the agenda we need to excuse supervirez mandelman and want to clarify that board president peskin is joining us for this committee. As a member so we have quorum. On that motion to excuse vice chair mandelmanmember peskin, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Thank you. The motion passes. With that, i would like to just kind of let everyone know in the general public and our Department Staff that for the items we have budget and legislative Analyst Reports, which are items 1, 2, 4 and 611 on todays agenda for these items we will have Department Presentation first and follow by the budget and legislative analyst and then take questions and Public Comment and with that, mr. Clerk, please call item 1 and 2 together . Items 1 and 2, resolutions approving amendments to contract for the following programs and city and county acting by and through department of children youth and families with board approval. Item 1 approves a 4th amendment to contract for the Japanese Community Youth Council opportunities for all Intermediary Program between the Japanese Community Youth Council to increase to 3. 4 million for total not to exseat of 13. 7 million and no change to the grant item. 2, resolution approving the 7th amendment to a contract for the ymca urban service truancy assessment Resource Program to increase grant amount by 606 thousand for total not to exceed of approximately 4. 4 thousand and to grant term for one year from july 1, 2023 for new term of july 1, 2013 through june, 30, 2024. These items were heard last week and have questions and i know Department Children youth and families is here to answer questions, but we also have dr. Davis here, director of Human Rights Commission also available for questions. I think today is that if we could have a little bit more update and information about the data that we have requested for from dcyf. I apologize are, one more time. Hello. There we go. Great. Hello chair chan and supervisor peskin. My name is [indiscernible] the director of Strategic Initiative for dcyf. We are going to provide Additional Information for you. We have a presentation about opportunities for all, item 1. We do not is a presentation for item 2, but available for any additional questions. So, we have a power point we provided and while that is pulled up, i am going to note we have directive davis with us today a partner, the lead of this initiative and are going to have her start us off with our first slide. Then ill come back and do the other. You are supposed to pull it up on your computer. Am i . Yes. No one told me that. Apologies. While hes pulling that up, ill say a few things about opportunity for all. 2018 the Program Initiative launched. The contract was leveraged with dcyf. In the initial launch with the program we accepted less then a thousand young people would par tis ticipate. We had over 1200 young people. Jcyc helped to advance and pay those young peopleism this summer we had over 2700 young people going through opportunities for all, specifically through that grant, and it has grown since 2018 to that number. Each year we have had shortfall. Jcyc has leveraged their own dollars and private dollars that had been received for that. We are trying to make sure to make jcyc whole because they make sure the overage of young people get paid during the summer. One thing we are working on collectively is to better coordinate the data. The Human Rights Commission staff and the partners at jcyc are managing and supporting the activation of opportunities for all, and we just need to do a better coordinated effort how we track the data and share that data out. There are additional dollars that we cover outside of even just this grant that support the peep who organize and oversee that come through oewd dollars. I will be more then happy to come back and give more comprehensive report and explanation of the fullness of the opportunities for all programming, but this is just sharing the work done through dcyf and jcyc contract which is under funded and leveraging outside dollars about they are in the hole and like to make sure they are made hole to cover this program the last 5 years. Thank you. Good morning. Nick monard from budget legislative analyst office. So, these two items were at the last budget finance meeting. They were continued because we did not have complete information about program performance. Particular on the opportunities for all grant, we did get revised data from the department of children youth and families and i appreciate their ongoing engagement and providing that data. The initial data showed 800 children participating in the program in fiscal year 22 and about 1200 in the program in fiscal year 23. That was data from Japanese Community Youth Council to dcyf to us. Then we got new data from the Human Rights Commission that showed over 2200 people in the program each fiscal year, so we hadthere is a substantial revision in the number of participants, and in the correspondence from dcyf, the explanation was hrc has been directing jcyc to pay people in the program the past couple years, but hasnt been reporting the participant data to the grant holder, dcyf and we dont have data on the number of hours people participated in the program in the fast two fiscal years. What is going on here is that, there is 3 million paid that exceeded the annual grant budget for this agreement that is now being added to the contract funded by the work order from oewd. This is a kind of very goldburg like contraption of a Government Program owd is funding a program but employer of record is jcyc under a grant from dcyf. I think the entire structure makes it hard to produce high quality data. I think it reduces accountability for actually managing the program, and im concerned that there isthe numbers have changed so much that i really dowe have a updated recommend here that the Controllers Office under take a financial audit of this program to examine whether the financial controls are sufficient and if they arent, to do transaction testing, because i dont feel like i havei think the program is well intentioned, i dont have high confidence the money going out the door13 million is accurately dispersed. For item 2, the ymca program, we did get updated data from dcyf. It shows they have in fact in the program increased the number of participants between fiscal year 22 to 23. We also got updated participation data for 2223 and it shows that people are participating in the program. I will say the objective what counts as full participation is reduced by 70 percent, so it was 15 hours in fiscal year 22, it is now 5 hours in fiscal year 23, so they are high numbers, but the bar has been lowered in terms of what counts as full participation. I think given the comprehensiveness of the data we got, i do feel comfortable recommending item 2 for approval, just clarifying that this resolution approval is retroactive. We have a recommendation to make that amendment. Before i call on supervisor peskin for further questioning, i want to put in context both referencing last week and also in the past when these contracts came before this body and let me start with the easier one i would say is the contracts about the ymca one that specifically about truancy, Intervention Service and it is with the recognition that what is deemed now as truancy for the San Francisco Unified School District during the pandemic has been challenging. I really want to first recognize that. The truancy by definition has significantly changed for the Unified School District, so i understand how this also has changed when it comes to the performance evaluation. Now, when it comes down to the jcyc contract, when it first came before this body because department of children youth and families recognized that the contract with jcyc with Japanese Community Youth Council was supposed to come to the board for approval both in terms of the dollar amount of the contract and terms, the length of the term and duration of the contract really according to charter 9. 118 should have really come to the board for approval first before you continue on with this contract of the continuation of this contract. It is that recognition this contract first came before this body last year, and with that said, building on that, i think it is a continuing reason why it is difficult for it budget and legislative analyst to say this isthat they can recommend this and that it isnt a policy decision of the board. Clearly it is the policy decision of this body to say that we will accept retroactive nature of this contract all together, and with that supervisor peskin. I realize this Committee Heard this before and thankfully i did actually read the item and it was briefed by the budget legislative analyst, and i apologize if this was asked at your last meeting, buti understand there is this goldburg situation here with a lot of cooks in the kitchen. Can anybody dcyf explain why the first set of numbers of 800 and 1200i understand when they are off by 5 percent or 10 percent, but i dont understand how they could be off by a hundred percent. Well, so i think it is helpful to understand the context of the work order and the reason why we have the projection and the actuals look the way they did when we came before you a couple weeks ago, the work order was supposed to come over for fiscal year 2122 and 2223 and supposed to support placement in staffing for jcyc. Now, those dollars did not make it into this grant during those fiscal years and there was several reasons for that. Some of them are process related within our department. We are extending all our grants agreements for over 400 contracts because we added a year to the funding cycle because of the pandemic that created a large backlog. The timing when the dollars came to us had us push into the subsequent fiscal year. While that was the case, jcyc projected numbers on discussion with jcyc. The projections in the system are based on expecting to receive the funds. They are invoicing on the dollars in the grant and pulling the number of par tis paints based on the dollars. The numbers from jc i rks c because we want today show they are paying more then what they are reporting to us. They report what they are paid to do, which is dollars in the contract. These additional numbers really come about as a result of the fact they are actually working with the total number of youth that they were directed to do by hrc, but only reporting to us based what they had within their contracts. Those delays stretched out two years so wewe are in 2324 now, so thats basically the reason the numbers look so different and i think it is important to note what is our cms system is just for the grant itself. It doesnt represent the totality of the opportunities for all initiative. Even the numbers that the bla received from hrc represent the total number hrc works with and there are other cbo that pay young people under ofa as well. The numbersrupt the numbers they paid. The numbers from hrc are the totality of opportunities for all and the numbers in cms are what is reported relative to the grant dollars in the contract now. Maybe this is a question for mr. Osaki. How did jcyc manage to plote this major amount of money without going upside down . So, i think it is also good to note jcyc has been a partner on these programs decades. They have a large capacity to be able to essentially float dollars against all Employment Contracts because they are cost reimbursement based so they have lines of credit and other Funding Sources they use and as a partner on these initiatives, they have a understanding that contracting issues and other things can delay the money going into those contracts. I think thats part of the reason for willingness to continue to work with this initiative. They run the mayor Youth Employment program and San Francisco youth program. Those came about through mayors. They have experience working in these type of conditions and a commitment essentially to provide these type of services. I think thats a large reason for why they were able to do that and willingness to do that. Do you know, did they have to call on a line of credit in order to float this additional Million Dollars . Thats what i have been told, yes. And the cost of that money we reimburse them for because a line of credit aint free . We reimburse for the amount of dollars paid out to the young people. Our expectation is we reimburse for the wages they pay. Having a line of credit is something they maintain regularly. Mainly because they have to float large amounts of money mainly in the summer time when they employ thousands numbers of young people. There are private dollars we have been trying to leverage that is supposed to help with some of these things that we could potentially on the back end help cover some of the cost absorbed from the cost of doing business with city and county of San Francisco. Thank you. I like to have mr. Devon mccally from the Controller Office to help us understand as how we fulfill the recommendation from the budget and legislative analyst. Good morning. Devon mccally, budget manager. The controller Audit Division will be happy to look into this and follow back up with the committee. Thank you. I think the expectation is also please correct if im wrong, but the issuethe rfp for this has gone out the summer of 2023, the expectation is we will have somethingyou will have results of the new rfp in 2024 and i see director sue wants to answer this question. Thank you for the question chair chan. I do want to speak to how complicated this coordinated system is as with most coordinated systems it is quite complicated. What we wanted to do was to move this effort as fast as possible to insure young people had access to all these job opportunities, and as dr. Cheryl davis was building out the Human Rights Commission to hold and manage this work, we partnered together because dcyf can do grant makeic so that is the partnership. Through this rfp, we are going to transfer the management of this work over to hrc primarily because hrc over the last several years has built out the capacity to manage this work now, and this is what we do in City Government and city departments, because we help each other. And thats what this whole initiative is about. We look forward working with the Controllers Office so as they dig into how this initiative was managed, hopefully they see the partnership between the three city departments, including the office of economic and Workforce Development in making sure that we all have a role in supporting our young people in the city. Thank you. I think i want to also flag, for the audits, i think part of the goal is also to figure out i think vice chair mandelman last week indicated and agree, a structurally it is problematic, which resulted in sort of the disconnect between what the numbers submitted by hrc and jcyc as well as with dcyf. There is disconnect between the system reporting back and so i hope that through the audit it is also to reflect back what we can do better as a city with the new rfp going out and to continue to track participation rates and reimbursement rates. With that, supervisor safai. Thank you director. I think you hit on a couple points i wanted to make. I think that it is good intentions departments coordinate one another, but it seems in this situation there wasnt enough transfer quick enough. When i hear more children are served then what were contracted for, i think that is a good thing. I think it also puts non profits in a very difficult situation because they are essentially asked to bear the burden of a initiative that the mayor has and the city has to employ children, which is a worthy initiative, but with haste comes mistakes and so i think that is the importance of having this audit done because i dont think anyone believes there was anything nefarious done, but it is in your wheel house director sue to help work non and have better accountability, but it sounds the responsibility is shifting over to hrc to do direct work with jcyc. I worked with jcyc for years. One of the best organizations in the city that serves youth and so i just want to say that on the record. Really appreciate the work they have done over the years, but it sounds there were too many cooks in the kitchen so need to remove some of the cooks and hand it over to one group to manage and hopefully reimburse jcyc for the work theyve done as quickly as possible given the fact we are facing half a billion dollar budget deficit. There isnt a lot of money that will be handed out as in past years. It will be a lot less. People will be asked to do more with less, so hopefully we can get them reimbursed and have the money to them as quickly as possible and have this program go forward in an accountable way. Thank you. Thank you. I think as dcyf going through this process, rfp, opening up for the next 5 years and along with supervisor ronan and board just passed legislation offered which is really figure out multiyear contract inclusive of cost of doing business. This is the part i recognize jcyc, we are very fortunate this has been a i would say very community leading and champions like that, tradition all most of the San Francisco community service, and thats like this is someonean organization with the capacity to have line of credit. I dont think any other Community Organization with less of the statue and the ability would be able to sustain a two years without cost of doing business adding to that. I hope that it is a lessen for all of us and just wanted to fight for the upcoming budget year is cost of doing business calculated into all the contracts we are considering. Thank you and open to Public Comment. Disconnected youth. It has also during the pandemic reached out to kids who had to support families through this income and so, a lot of those kids work during the pandemic when a lot of agencies were shut down. They provided one to one service in tutoring to kids disconnected with school through the latino task force. These kids were the supporters of their families. I want to emphasize how very important this program is. There are kids who didnt have proper paperwork to work through osa and they made ways to actually do that. These kids have been amazing. They are leaders. They are the future leaders of San Francisco and jcyc has been providing this service, hrc, dcyf for many years. I myself am a product of Youth Employment and through pic and later became [indiscernible] through jcyc through horizon unlimited. I want emphasize how very important these jobs are and the need to get the money released to jcyc so they can continue to serve kids so the kids can continue to lead our city. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good morning. It is fine yes. Good jcyc. You have to restore trust because there is a [indiscernible] everybody is trying to make the most of any situation because [indiscernible] grab the money. Have good intention, but [indiscernible] at some point it becomes hot air. Sorry for the world. Thats what exactly what is going on and we the city wont get away with it for too long. We have to restore [indiscernible] contracts are fine, sure, but thank you much. Seeing no other speakers, madam chair. Seeing no more Public Comment, Public Comment is now closed. Because this item that is i think that we will be requesting the controllers to do performance audit, which i also think dcyf accepted to reduce not to exceed by 400 thousand. For item 1, i would like to amend according to the recommendation provided by budget and legislative analyst. With that, roll call, please. On that motion to amend the resolution on item 1, not to exceed amount to 13. 3 million member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Thank you, motion passes. With that, i want to say again, just it has been clearly as a policy matter for the board. I look forward seeing how the problem will fix and result of the audit. Item 1 will bemaking the motion to move item 1 to full board without recommendation and with that, roll call, please. On the motion to move item 1 to the full board without recommendation, member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. Two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Thank you. Motion passes. I like to move item 2 to full board with recommendation. Roll call, please. On that motion for item 2 forwarded to full board with positive recommendation, safai aye. Chan, aye. Two ayes. Thank you. The motion passes as well and mr. Clerk, please call item 3. Item 3, resolution accepting a gift of design documents with estimated value at 1. 3 million from friends of harvey milk plaza to assist public works in redesign of harvey milk plaza and affirming the Planning Department determination under the California Environmental quality act. Madam chair. Sorry, thank you. With that, we have i believe San Francisco public works here. Good morning supervisors. My name is [indiscernible] im sorry, if you can speak directly if to the mic. Thank you very much. Ill start again. [indiscernible] project manager with San Francisco public works and managing the harvey milk redesign. We are here to request approval of resolution to accept the design document gift from the friends of harvey milk plaza and the value of the design is 1. 275 million. This would help us continue to advance the design to construction documents for the project. Im going to take us through milestones in the project. This is redesign of the harvey milk plaza and memorial to harvey milk and this would improve safety and security and also Landscape Elements to the plaza. Im not going through the key elements. The milestones, back in november last year, we got the Historic Preservation Commission Approved the relocation on the project categorical exemption for ceqa, and the 16th of november, we got approval of the certificate of appropriateness for the relocation of the [indiscernible] for the project. March 21, 2023 the state grant for 1. 5 million was executed and june 2023 we requested a 12 month extension from the state. August 2023 the state confirmed no objections to the time extension. So, as of now, which is june 2023, we public works assembled a team of asneeded consultant to continue to advance the project and the first phase with the Program Validation phase based on the design from the previous design from the friends of harvey milk plaza, august 2023 a Program Validation report issued. October 2023, the asneeded consultants were authorized to proceed advancing design. And this is projected timeline when we will move forward and how we move forward with design. Between march 2024 and june 2024 we would have 90 percent of the construction documents and june 2024 to september 2024 would have pricing and the permit package for the project. That ends the presentation. Ill be here if you have any questions. Thank you. With that, lets go to Public Comment on this item. Thank you. Members of the public who wish to speak on this item number 3, line up now along those windows and all speakers have 2 minutes to speak. First speaker, please. Good morning. My name is brian springfield, executive director of friends of harvey milk plaza. On behalf of the boards, the members of honry and Advisory Committee and all the friends supporting the work it is my pleasure to endorse the resolution to make a gift of conceptual design to the city. We began the process Holding Meetings to learn how the community wanted to see harvey milk honored. We listen along with Design Partners responded so this gift comes with endorsement of the major groups. Thats a lot of consensus from these Community Organizations that is all most unprecedent. Also proud have endorsement from Community Leaders like cleave [indiscernible] and harvey nephew and milk family spokesman, stuart milk. I believe this is reflection of all the good built into design being gifted so we maximize investment at the site. One thing we heard from people who use the transit station is did not want transit functioned compromised and this achieves that and improves the transit functions. In addition, it creates opportunities for visibility and representation at the historic intervention for historically under represented groups including. Providing gathering space for onglowing engagement around social justice and drive foot traffic to Main Business corridor. On top of all this and most important it celebrates harvey milk and movement he lead. Harvey milk acts a a world wide ambassador for the best our city has to offer. Thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. Hello. Im amy [indiscernible] policy and education at the San Francisco Parks Alliance in support of the gift from the city friends of harvey milk plaza. We partner with community and agencies to [indiscernible] welcome and belong to everyone. Therefore we are excited about the [indiscernible] redesign of harvey milk plaza. Incorporating newly accessible pathways, pedestrian seating and new pedestal to overlook market and castro street. This design embodies Community Focused legacy. This project also celebrated and reflects long impactful history of lgbtq plus community in the castro through [indiscernible] worked tirelessly since 2016 Incorporated Community input and efforts to redesign this important historical plaza. It is our pleasure to support them in this exciting new phase for this important public space providing locals and businesses with innovative accessible space in a San Francisco neighborhood. Thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. When are you reading a script . The script doesnt come from you. I can tell. You cant . So, [indiscernible] what happened . [indiscernible] create a situation . I dont know. Basically, declare conflict of interest. Then it it becomes transparent. We know what we are doing and we are doing it better. Thats the goal, do things better. Thank you for addressing the committee. Seeing no further speakers, madam chair. Public comment is now closed. I just want to express my gratitude for seeing this design for the harvey milk plaza. The last time i remember is having this board really dedicating our airport terminal to be the harvey milk terminal and that was very significant in groundbreaking for this city, even as progressive as we are, and just to seeing finally it is time to memorialize the space in honor of former supervisor harvey milk. I like to be added as a cosponsor of the resolution and accepting this gift and just express again my gratitude. With that, i like to send item to full board with recommendation and roll call, please. On that motion to forward resolution to full board with positive recommendation, member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Thank you, motion passes. With that, please call item number 4. Item 4 is resolution approving Emergency Declaration of the San Francisco Public Utility Commission pursuant to administrative code to Contract Resources to perform sewer main water main on fillmore between green street and union street which were damaged by a water main failure with total estimated cost not to exceed 5 million. Madam chair. Thank you. Today we have mr. Steve ritchie assistant general manager for water from sfpuc for our San Francisco Public Utility Commission. Thank you and tell us all about this one. Steve ritchie, assistant general manager for water here speaking on the fillmore and green 16 inch water main break which in 14 years is probably within the top 3 in terms of community disruption, so this was a very big deal. Just background on the San Francisco water system. We actually have 24 pressure zones throughout the city. This map shows those pressure zones and where all the water mains are. There are about 1250 miles of water mains serving all most a million residents and workers in San Francisco during the day, so a very long complex system we have. The main break occurred on the evening of september 10 and 11. There was a break on 16 inch water transmission main. The transmission is supplying water and keeping pressure up. Distribution goes straight to houses. The break was on the 16 inch main and also disrupted the 8 inch disbution main. The release of water undermine the fillmore and green intersection. The red hatched area there is the area that was physically disrupted in the streets and the blue where it runs down hill effected a number of properties which are work ing with the sit City Attorney office on claims they have. We basically have been working 7 days a week to replace and restore the utilities as well as the pavement there. You can see it started with fixing the 16 inch water main that night. The sewer main on fillmore from green to union, we avoiding work in the union intersection which would have dragged out the work longer over time. Sewer laterals needed to be reconnected to properties from the sewer main. Pg e had a 2 inch gas line in the area that didnt need replacement but as long as the street was open they can get in quick and do that. Sewer catch basins and culverts and 8 inch water main needed to be replaced as well as restoring the paves and sidewalks and looking for completion of all the work midnovember. The diagram on the left shows completed for many things for number of the activities, it does not show that the water Main Replacement is complete. It was completed last night, so that water main is in place. About a week earlier then projected, so that is a good sign. We have been working hard with all the parties involved to make sure this works and working hard to make the Community Feels supported throughout. Some of the photos, when you have a big water main break you have a lot of disruption, so the left hand photo shows the initial damage there that concrete thing in the middle is the riser from the sewer from below, so it was still stable there, but you see all the soil is washed around that so the very first thing we had to do starting oon the 11 is bring in a bunch of sand to help provide support for all the work that would go on. Progressively the slides show the trenching and sewer work going on and pg e gas line replacement and ultimately the last bit of work we had here underground, the water main work that we just completed last night. The estimated cost to replace all these, the 8 inch water main lateral, the sewer main lateral, catch basin and culvert, curb ramp and pave. Work the estimate is 3. 5 million and we seem to be on budget for that, which is a very good thing. People have been working very hard to make that happen. Pg e gas main is not part of our work, but there may be a claim from pg e to the City Attorney office for replacement of that, so thats where we have been working and as i said, been working really hard with the neighbors and all the people involved. I like to call out the work of puc staff, dpw staff, mta staff because parking has been a mess in that area as well, and the City Attorneys office, pg e throughout all this and in close contact with supervisor stefani and one individual i like to appreciate here is allison of my staff who has been coordinating all this with daily Conference Calls and it is the definition of herding cats about the cats are coop itive and got through it and close to done. Happy to answer questions. Thank you. Always good to hear a week early, bla report. Item 4 is resolution approving the Public Utility Commission Emergency Declaration related to a water main break in the marina that resulted in flooding in that neighborhood. The resolution includes a 5 million not to exceed amount which we detailed the project work on page 14 of our report. It is about 3 and 3 and a half million of work, the bulk has been contracted out to three firms, and the contracting in this case because it is a Emergency Declaration is exempt from chapter 6, 12a, 12b, 12c and 14b of the administrative code. The cost of the work is funded by water revenue bonds, and there is about 1. 4 million in contingency built into not to exceed amount to account for project delay s, which we call out as a policy consideration. We also note that this water main that broke was considered a low priority and puc priority plan for replacing and maintaining water pipes, which is a function of how old they are and whether there is water breaks nearby, and earthquake data,b and so i think that it was low priority but still caused a disaster. I think there is a couple ways to move forward. One is that, the board could request puc to revisit the way it prioritizes maintaining pipes. I also think this could be addressed in the budget in may. Puc will come back for the capital and operating budget. 50 million this year allocated to water pipe maintenance according to information we received from the department during the reporting process. I think what we could do in may is identify how much in the capital plan is allocated to this kind of maintenance and make adjustments to their budget to put more funding in. We do recommend approval of item 4. Thank you. Will that be a consideration when you do come before this body in may to be ready to discuss your maintenance upkeep funding and be able to have an analysis that whether your current budget is sufficient . Yes are, absolutely. We will speak to that in the budget process. Great. Love to put a note to that. It is one of those like, yellow tag or tag it and when you come back in may we look forward having that discussion. Thank you and with that, lets go to Public Comment. Members who wish to speak should line up now. You have 2 minutes to speak. I dont know how much money you put in the project. The water is important. I thinki knroe the goal is to replace the pipes that exist. Replace the material that it is made of from whatever it was made of to [indiscernible] thank you for addressing the committee. With no further speakers, madam chair. Thank you. With that, seeing no more Public Comment, Public Comment is now closed. Like to move to full board with recommendation. Member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Motion passes. Item 5 please. Hearing to consider the Labor Agreement executed the annual report for fiscal year 20202021 through 20222023 highlight the efforts accomplishments and challenges encountered and preliminary high level methodology developed to evaluate whether the pla promoted the efficient economical timely completion of pla covered project, the cost covered project and impact on local Business Enterprise and local workforce. Madam chair. Thank you. I will lead for supervisor safai for his remark. Thank you madam chair. Well ask for this to be continued until the i believe november 15. Yeah. All parties involved that wanted to participate and let departments know we would ask for the 15 if thats okay i make a motion to continue to the 15th. Sounds good. Well open for Public Comment on the motion to continue. Yes, members who wish to speak on the continuance of the hearing line up to speak now. Continue. Thats it. Thank you much. If we have no more speakers, madam chair. Public comment is now closed. With that, like to roll call the motion proposed by supervisor safai to continue the item to november 15. Yes. On that motion offered by member safai the hearing continue to november 15 meeting, member safai aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Thank you. The motion passes. With that, mr. Clerk, can you call item 6 and 7 together . Yes madam chair. Item 6, resolution supplementing the resolution number 19620 authorizing issuance and sale of special tax bonds for the city and county special tax district number 20201 for mission rock facility and service in the principle not to exceed approximately 58. 3 million to be repaid from Development Special tax office of special tax and shoreline special taxes in tax zone 1 of special tax district. Approving related documents including statement of supplement to special tax related agreement. [indiscernible] bond Purchase Agreement and continuing disclosure certificate interpreting the rate and method of special tax determining other matters. Item 7 is resolution approving documents and actions related to a pledge agreement by the city and county infrastructure financing district number 2 or port of San Francisco and Development Special tax bonds for city county of San Francisco special tax district number 20201 mission rock facility and services and determining other matters in connection. Madam chair. Thank you mr. Clerk. We have Wyatt Donnelly here from San Francisco port. Thank you chair chan. Good morning supervisor safai and president peskin here to present on mission rock cfd bonds. This is fourth series of bonds and ill touch oen the first 3 previously approved. There are 2 resolutions, the first authorize the issuance of the bonds up to not to exceed of 58. 3 million and second approves the pledge from the infrastructure financing district to the cfd bonds and ill talk about the [indiscernible] just to walk through what ill talk about. Ill talk about the project itself and phase 1. Give a update on where we are with construction then the project financial structure as background, talk about special tax district. You may hear me use the Term Community facility district, special tax district and [indiscernible] then talk about the sknraunds next steps on selling the bonds. First, mission rock itself, the plan for phase 1 was 4 buildings and 5 acre park. Two buildings totaling 537 units and 199 Affordable Housing units. There were two Office Buildings totaling 550 thousand square feet. 65 thousand square feet of retail and 5 acre Waterfront Park in china basin park. This was several years ago we started talking about phase 1. Today we made significant progress. To give a update on that, parcel a known as the canyon is complete and there are residents moved in. The first moved in june 2023, 283 units including 102 affordable, includes a District Energy system and currently undergoing leasing for market rate and affordable with both residents having signed leases and moved in. Parcel b is [indiscernible] there is 254 apartments including 97 affordable. The target is for it to receive a temporary certificate of occupancy summer 2024 with residents moving in during that time. Parcel g is the future visa global headquarters. China basin park, 4. 4 acres will be complete. There is a water portion completed at a later phase and that is estimated to open early to mid2024. Now to move to the financial structure of the project. There are three main sources that go into funding the horizontal project, which is all the Infrastructure Associated with it. Streets, roads, parks, sidewalks, sewer water, all those elements are funding. The first is developer and port equity mostly developer equity. They put in the money fronting it to build all this infrastructure and then receive 18 percent return for their investment to build that. The port puts in land value to offset the cost. The final source is the Community Facility district special tax district and isd which captures increased property tax value, so those are the final sources to repay the project. Going back to what the developer and port for investment. We want to limit the developer return and capital on this and maximize the [indiscernible] which is why we issuing the bond. We expedited the issuance for this. Taxes came on the roll this year and want to get through as fast as possible because it is one of the best things we can do to make sure the project succeed financially. The special tax district has 4 special taxes, Development Special tax,er office, shoreline special tax and contingent service mpts the first 3 fund infrastructure, the last is operation of of the sites. The bonds are based on the first 3. Previously we issued 3 series of special tax bonds on Development Special tax. That is backed by the tax increment. The other two just started this year, which is why we can issue a new bond series. The office and shoreline tax just started [indiscernible] there are two major considerations we need to look at for this bond issuance. The first is the appraised or assessed value. There is a value to lien ratio the city has a policy of achieving, 3 to 1. Meaning the value of the site must be 3 times the debt oen the site. Far excess of that. Have all most 700 million in appraised value so that isnt the limiting factor. It was previously. The limiting factor is the tax revenue. We will fully leverage all the taxes within phase 1, the 4 vertical parcels are paying [indiscernible] that is what allows us to issue up to 58. 3 million in bonds. I will jump into is a series of additional slides. For time ill jump through these quickly and make a few references. The first thing just want to highlight on the slide is all the proceeds will reimburse the horizontal expenses and return associated with those. We are expecting around total bonds of 47 million after different fees and cost of issuance. We will have about 39. 5 million expected to go into the project. You will see the number is lower then 58. 3. That is in case Interest Rates go down, we can issue more bonds so dont want to come back and say we can issue more then that and have to requestwe want flexibility to deal with rate changes. This table also shows the good faith estimate for the bonds as of september 5, 2023. This slide highlights different risk factors for these bonds. They are land secured which is special type bond. [indiscernible] the security for these bonds is backing them is the site. They are payable from the mission rock cfd and tax increment generate bide the ifd, they are not liability of the general fund or port harbor fund. This goes over the preliminary official statement, which is a document that describes the bonds and we will post to [indiscernible] provide information. There are various terms and different requirements about the disclosure. Just this is our timeline just one thing ypt to highlight, we are targeting late november early december to actually close on the bonds. I am available for questions. Particularly if you have questions about the reference slides and joined by colleagues, bridget cats with office of Public Finance and josh cane from Port Development and Development Partners with mission rock. We have representatives here. I thank the bla for the work on this report. This is a very complicated financial structure and they jumped in and understood it excellently. We are here for questions. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate the complication. Thank you. Item 6 and 7 are two resolutions related to special tax bonds related to the Mission Rock Development area that authorize 58. 2 58. 2 million of special tax bonds and also changes to the pledge agreement which allows the Port Infrastructure financing district revenue to be used to pay for the bonds. The bonds are not obligations of general fund, they are repaid like i just said from incremental property tax revenue generated within mission rock as well as special taxes within the mission rock area. We know and the bonds will be used to repay developer costs for horizontal equity in phase 1 of the Mission Rock Development area. This is the 4th such issuance of these kind of bonds, but there is still after this issuance 48 million of developer equity used to pay for horizontal infrastructure that remain even after these bonds are issued, so, those cost there is no phase 1 Funding Sources left to pay for those costs. They have to be paid for by phase 2 Funding Sources, but there is no start date to phase 2 because it is delayed due to the Interest Rate environment and commercial real estate environment, so that is contributing to overall increase in project cost originally anticipated, but again the project cost are born entirely by mission rock revenues. We recommend approval of item 6 and 7. Thank you. I just want tobased on that, seeing that there is 48 million waiting and for phase 2 to begin so we can actually cover those funds, but also i think during your presentation the mention about the true Interest Rate at according to the presentation 5. 86 percent, but also in the presentation or verbal presentation you mentioned sounds like you do anticipate that that percentage may change and maybe lower. It sounds to me that is with what we you are indicating. Can you walk us through that . Sure. We hope Interest Rates will be lower. So do i. Realistic we are seeing increasing trends since then so might be lower. I think that is a big challenge is the Interest Rates with wildly change the proceeds available to the project and one of the contributors is the funding gap i mentioned, so we are monitoring it and i [indiscernible] please. Hi, bridget cats, Deputy Director for the office of Public Finance. The 5. 86 percent true interest costs was part of the good faith estimate based on the market as of early september, and we estimate that based off current rates that rates are approximately 75 basis points higher then when we ran those numbers in september, but we do allow for flexibility in the not to exceed amount in the event that rates kind of do go down in the opposite direction, but yeah, we have seen rates come up since those estimates were run. Thank you, and with that, i dont see anymore questions. No name on the roster therefore, lets go to Public Comment. Yes madam chair. Members of the public who wish to speak on items 6 and 7, please line up now. Thank you. It is money, but money doesnt matter. It is the accomplishment that matters. There is a rushanother project, 48 million, fine. There is a rushwhen do you understand that you must first fix the problem that of San Francisco here . When do you first understand you need to fix the problem of homelessness . Who is going to want to live in San Francisco if you dont fix that first . This is very tiring. Thank you much for your comments. Seeing no more speakers, madam chair. Thank you. Seeing no Public Comment, Public Comment is closed. I like to move the two items with full board with recommendation and roll call. On that motion for items 6 and 7 to be forwarded to full board with positive recommendation, member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Thank you. Motion passes. Please call item 811 together. Items 811, item 8 and 10 are resolutions determining declaring the Public Interest and necessity and cost necessary convenient for purposes to finance through bond not to exceed 300 million authorizing landlords to pass 50 percent of the resulting property tax increase to residential tenants undrp the code providing for levy and collection of taxes to pay principle and interest on bonds affirming the determination under the California Environmental quality act and finding that the proposed bonds are consistent with the general plan and 8 policies of the planning code. Items 9 and 11 are associated ordinances calling and providing for a special election to be held in the city and county on tuesday march 5, 2024 for the purpose of submitting to the voters the propositions. Item 8, Public Interest necessity demand construction, reconstruction, Development Acquisition improvement rehabilitation, preservation and repair of rental Affordable Housing projects and expansion of Home Ownership opportunities for the down payment assistance loan program. 10, determine and declare Public Interest necessity demand construction, development, acquisition and or rehabilitation of rental Affordable Housing project in not to exceed of 300 million financed subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audit. Madam chair. Thank you mr. Clerk. We will start with president peskin who is the sponsor of two of the four items. Thank you chair chan and supervisor safai. By way of background and no news to you, San Francisco has a mandate, state mandate to build 46 thousand new Affordable Housing units over the next 8 years, but that has not been accompanied by any state or for that matter, federal and the ongoing source of funds for the development of Affordable Housing have been local funds. As you all know, the consistent source of funds over time have been funds that have come both from general Obligation Bonds issues approved by voters as well as funds from our inclusionary housing laws in the city and county of San Francisco. The board of supervisors after long conversations and deliberations ultimately passed a reduction, temporary reduction in the amount of inclusionary rates and fees and as parts of that discussion, the mayor and Capital Planning committee and this board of supervisors, rejigered our bond schedule to bring forward an Affordable Housing bonds originally scheduled for november 2024 to the march 2024 ballot that before us today. There are two versions of that before us. They are very very similar and in discussions with the Mayors Office as we were evolving both very similar pieces of legislation, which both by the way do not increase any property taxes by virtue of passage or issue, the latter 2 set forth as items 10 and 11 i believe the Mayors Office and my office are in agreement on, and so i would like to propose some amendments to items 10 and 11. The resolution and ordinance that are before you today and speak to what that 300 million bond does. We will hear more from the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development and more from the budget and legislative analyst, but top lines is that this is a 300 million general Obligation Bond for the development of new Affordable Housing, and construction of new Affordable Housing in San Francisco as well as for the preservation rehabil itation of existing housing and includes funding for extremely low to moderate income households to address Workforce Housing needs and expand housing opportunities for middle class households set forth in the ordinance. The amendments that im proposing today are the result of convursations and input that we have received from the tenants community as it relates to the passthrough and one would assume that if property taxes are not increasing that passthroughs would not increase, and so there are some amendments here that reflect that and you will see that the words, if any are accompanied, it says tax increase, if any, but this will also be accompanied by trailing legislation to chapter 37 of the administrative code that actually deals with the passthrough formulas to correct a historic deficiency and thank you to mitchell and [indiscernible] and ben roseenfield bringing to our attention and how to solve it. The balance of the changes that you will see in the resolution at pages 4, 5, 6 and 7 are recitals that address the high importance of job quality and training opportunities and Skilled Labor that address the citys commitment to the Climate Action plan as set forth in the environment code and also state the importance of building housing for our senior population as well as for our women population and those findings are set forth in items 10 and 11. That is high level view of the item that is before us, and is part of our ongoing effort to provide what the state and federal government is not providing, which is a source of funds to meet our 46 thousand unit mandate, and with that madam chair, i will hand it back over to you, but eric shaw, the head of mayor office of housing and Community Development is here and i want to thank the board for their unanimous adoption of the revised capital plan and thank and acknowledge the mayor and her staff for working collaboratively to bring this forward. Thank you. Before i call on director eric shaw i want to first recognize the hard work put into the amendments that are before us today, and that the ability to make sure that we recognize our seniors, but also particularly women and who are homeless and including those experiencing violence on the streets in need of shelter and housing and i think that is really what the public dollars should go to support our most vulnerable on our streets that in need of housing and shelter at this moment, and because we know the market rate can continue to build for market rate housing, but for those that really need housing rely on public dollars and city leadership to provide the housing. With that, i will be adding myself as a cosponsor to this and madam chair, while we are acknowledging folks i want to acknowledge my chief of staff, sonny who labored long and hard on this and the amendments that are before us and also just want to point what set forth in the budget legislative Analyst Report well hear from later, but this would help build 1500 units of Affordable Housing in San Francisco, new rental preservation victim and survivor rental for the Women Community for total of about 1500 units of additional Affordable Housing. Thank you. Just want to clarify for mr. Clerk that only indicating cosponsorship for items 10 and 11. With that, director shaw, the floor is yours. Thank you very much members of committee. My name is eric shaw, director of San Francisco mayor office for housing and Community Development. I want to thank my team, sheila on Government Affairs, brian strong from Capital Planning committee and a lot of our staff [indiscernible] and their hard work providing the analysis to get us to this crucial point. My presentation today is actually mirroring what was shared with the Capital Planning committee in august and previously in september i mean in july. Would love to make sure we have the appropriate context here and thank you for your support and continuing to make the investment in Affordable Housing. Since 2015, san franciscans supported more then 1. 2 billion in Bonds Investment for Affordable Housing. This is produced and protected more then 4 thousand units of Affordable Housing rchlt 300 million bond proposal produce more then 1500 units of new Affordable Housing. Preserve 60 and provide 120beds for survivors domestic and street violence and Human Trafficking proposed by president peskin. Few projects will utilize multiple bonds sources. This project utilizing both 2015 and 2019 bond funding on potrero sunnydale hope sf [indiscernible] hope sf utilized 2019 bonds may utilize 2024 bond proceeds and 2022 projects will [indiscernible] in 2015, we issued our first go housing bonds and you see most of the projects funded were cons centrated in the eastern and southern parts of San Francisco, Home Ownership programs which we invest provide 87 loan were scattered across the city. Seen evolution in this and advancing geographic diversity with the oat bonds that have come through. In 2019 the 600 million fund thun units and all funds dedicated to pipeline project. The third issuance of the dollars is expected next year. Support production and preserve vacation alt range of income with funded allocated to seniors and educators. The snapshot of the 2015 bond, 310 million funded more then 1500 units and these funds are expended next year. As you can see, dollars support production and preservation at a range of income levels. 2019 bond funds are distributed throughout San Francisco supporting the Housing Element goals to provide Affordable Housing opportunities in diversity of neighborhoods. The lessen learned from our 2015 and 2019 bonds are informing the proposed 2024 bonds. Project schedules are less certain today then they used to be and important bond funding remain flexible and nimble to responsive to the opportunities as they arise. As construction operating cost increase our local dollars are supporting fewer projects. Rising Interest Rates and cost risk require flexibility. Sb35 and legislation has simplified the entitlement process, removing what use d to be barrier to production of Affordable Housing so outside the entitle project financing is the most significant challenge. Middle Income Housing struggled to leverage state funds because they danot meet state policy goals while it may be goals for the city. 2024 we made sure to incorporate Racial Equity goals. Before you, we have suggested that we provide housing opportunities in high resource areas, continue to stabilize communities within priority geographies. Continue to have and produce and preserve a range of unit size and location to meet diverse Housing Needs of the population and as mentioned by president peskin and by my fellow colleagues from the planning office, we want complete alignment with our Housing Element goals, especially in the area of production. So, as we shared before, the go bonds are the most reliable Funding Sources for Affordable Housing in San Francisco. Most other local Funding Sources are generated by private development and thereforeflect flect wait with the market. Federal and state funding is less predictable but stillless predictable provide a bulk of the funding leveraging cityp funds a at a rate of 1 to 2. Funding falls short of what is needed billionsfunding is falling short by what is needed by billions annual. We understand the need for 19 billion to address but continue to work to leverage both state and federal funds and incorporate other resources leveraged with go bond funding and also right now High Development cost particularly hard cost are undermining several housing goals. Local funding is a crucial source of dollars for Affordable Housing. As you can see, bond funding is more then a third of the budget. Inclusionary fees had been the second largest source of fundsing but since the pandemic the fees are shrinking. We invested over 1 billion of Affordable Housing and need to maintain the numbers rchlth the numbers last year were 550 million in deals we invested in. Also our local dollars are one piece of the funding picture. Every local housing dollar leverage all most 2 state and or federal housing dollars, so from 2018 to 2022 San Francisco spent a billion dollars on Affordable Housing and leverage 2 billion in other funding and local dollars allow to pursue and win other state funding. The local funding trends are challenging so local fundsing is volatile and we are working hard to support and educate our communities and sponsors around the nature of this money, how we deliver on this and how we are working to make sure one time allocations are meeting those needs. As we noted, we have seen drop in inclusionary fees and once we have right now is the funding available is programmed to deliver Pipeline Projects so we have with the addition of the nofa, about 11 thousand units of housing. And we have spike in local spending last year receiving infusion of state funding for projects that stalled but the projects received predevelopment funding and other funding from the local government to get them ready. Construction ready, build ready for receiving the state financing from the state accelerator fund. So, we want to acknowledge the 2024 bond proposal include funding 3 categories. 3 categories. The initial240 million for production of low Income Housing. 30 million for preservation. The initial file said down payment assistance loan and understand as amended by president peskin, 30 million for survivors of domestic abuse. 240 million for new construction supPort Development projects in the pipeline that received city funds for predevelopment or newly acquired parcels. To meet goals in the coming 6 years we need 900 million and so this local bond is a important step. New construction will focus on delivering products in the predevelopment or newly acquired sites. Projects totaling more then 1400 units will be1500, would be distributed around the city. Available to houses earning between 15 and 80 percent ami. May include public housing, low income, preservation and Senior Housing and most products include 20 percent set aside for homeless households. 30 million in preservation funding support the acquisition of 60 units at risk of losing affordability and stabilizing vulnerable tenants. Acquired with goal of geographic diversefy and funding go towards acquisition of buildsings with 6 or more units. These products support a range of house incomes from 30 to 120 percent ami and product houses across the widest range of incomes. Also invest in critical repairs to our existing houses stock. As shared by president peskin and the amended legislation, 30 million used for develop housing for victims and survivors of domestic, street violence, abuse or human traffic and likely transitional housing coupled with programmatic subsidies. Trying to understand impact of these products financed through tax credits because of fair housing and lease requirements, but will be coordinate with the City Attorney and staff and hsh on this and we understand the placement would occur likely occur through coordinated entry and also we are working with h is rks h on understanding how that would work. Once again, for the spending timeline, we believe the 250 million in new construction close 120 million in the loans 2425 and additional 120 million in loans in fiscal year 2526. Some of the funds are providing Gap Financing so contingent upon availability of state funds but we have been working hard because of our Racial Equity and geographic diversity initiatives within our procurement to get state funding. We believe we can expand the 30 million in preservation funds by 2526 and for survivor housing as we work out the policies and this program would be new, we anticipate fully expend those funds by q1 of 2728. We also acknowledge the same time working closely with bofa to understand there is another important bond measure in 2024 and this possible bond measure may be on the 24 ballot and provide up to 10 billion for regional assistance for Affordable Housing and 1. 2 billion for San Francisco. If both are passed by voters that we will be using both resources to make sure we are accelerating the pipeline within our housing and meeting our housing goals. With that, i want to thank you all once again for your leadership, excited to the opportunities to bring to the voters Additional Resources to meet the housing goals and with that, i am joined by sheila, [indiscernible] and by brian strong, the head of Capital Planning committee. Thank you very much. Thank you. Items 811 are two sets of legislation that essentially provide for 300 million general Obligation Bond to be put on the march 2024 ballot for voters approval. We detailed the different proposals on page 29 of our report, which shows the differencesthere are four programs funded new rental housing, preservation of existing housing, down payment assistance and victim and survivor housing and the difference between the two proposals and mayor proposal, 12 million for down payment assistance and president peskin proposal that is removed and allocation for new affordable rental housing is reduced to then create a bucket of 30 million for affordable rental housing for victims and survivors of violence, broadly defined. Thenia see later on that page the number of units these allocatedfunding would produce across the different programs. You see there is a range for the victim and survivor bucket because it depends on the amount of other sources that can be applied to those Development Costs and because if you are limiting it to that specific population, you may not have the full menu of finances sources to apply to the projects so we provide a range based on other recent acquisitions the city made over the past several years. We also note the fiscal impact of these bonds. 300 million bond in either case. They are expected to carry 6 and a half Interest Rate resulting in 244 million of interest cost over the life of the bonds. In the 2019 Affordable Housing bond was for 600 million. 425 million issued, still 155 million that has not been spent, and there is another 175 million authorized but unissued according to the department that will be issued in 2024. Because these are competing proposals and only one was approved by Capital Planning committee, we consider approval to be a policy matter for the board. Thank you. I just wanted to call on director shaw to just respond to the 165 million in 175 million waiting to be issued. Can you speak on those two buckets of dollars . Y so, i have to refer to the Controllers Office on that. I know right now that we have beeni know for the 2019 bond there were some allocations for certain populations, i think educator was one that we are able now and with the cop and the Funding Availability now we have projects for that population now, so those could be incorporated in there. But i believe and not speaking for the controller, we want to time the issuing of debt when we have projects ready to receive that funding so there isnt the carrying cost, so as you said right now, in particular with the state housing accelerator fund, we are able to unlock a couple of projects. Able now to have projects ready to receive that Gap Financing this year. In that instance, state bonds financing, state financing became competitive about 2 or 3 years ago, which meant we have a series of projects because of cost or other issues are not receiving funding from the state, so the accelerator will allow that to happen. I think i do understand. Of course you wait until you have a project to issue the bond to cover the cost. I guess the question that i should have been more specific, do we now have a list of projects . Yes. With all these two buckets165 and 175 separately . Thats correct. Right now we have 1577 units that are currently within the pipeline and then we havejust issued i believe 15 predevelopment loans for the nofa projects through the cop and other projects. What you are saying that those dollars all together are well over 300 million. Are all spoken for and allocated . Yes, through previous procurements. Thank you. Supervisor safai. Thank you. Where are the list of the projects . I think we are now providing a regular report to you as requested. Is isnt included in this report. I can have those sent to you, sir. Yeah, we had asked for that yesterday to your team and got back this report but didnt have any specificity. I guess the reason i bring it up director and i appreciate your team and all their hard work, so i want to say im happy about that. I understand we have these newer stricter guidelines about high resourced areas and i think that is what will get the vast majority of the support in this bond, but i think in past bonds i worked on, there is always the ability to have flexibility in case additional projects come up. Right. I know we have a few in my district in the Outer Mission and excelsior and just outside the high resourced area but not necessarily meeting the eastern neighborhood definition so fall into nomans land and feel it is unfortunate because we will miss out on opportunities to do Affordable Housing there. I understand this is only 300 million and know we had more in the past so im excitesed about the fact that we have the opportunity to leverage these dollars, hopefully Interest Rates will come down and we utilize all the different tools in the tool kit but it does feel certain neighborhoodss in the sitsy are being left out and if there are opportunities and opportunities do arise that we can anticipate, we dont necessarily have the flexibility in the bond to do that. Right. I think for that question supervisor, we are going it to be using these resources to accelerate construction of existing pipeline and so i know that we continuewe heard your concerns around this to work with the state to understand sort of the rightsizing or the appropriate policy investment for priority equity areas to high resource areas, but those conversations are ongoing at the state level, and any new products will be added to the queue or thend of the queue. In this instance right now, many project may have been procured up to 2 or 3 years ago so received predevelopment financing, the resources will be available to provide the Gap Financing if the state financing is available, but this will help accelrate the Gap Financing needing for existing procured projects that will have had had predevelopment money invested already. Mow much is left over from the previous bond . Left over in terms of not issued . Yes, not spent. Good morning. [indiscernible] i believe the amount were 165 unspent from the bonds issued to date. There was a issuance earlier this year, series 2023c bonds issued in spring and approximately 170 million so i believe the bulk would be from the unspent proceeds from the recently issued bonds and from the 600 million authorization approximately 175 million remains to be unissued and sounds like the plan is to issue next year. What is the plan for those . What projects have been identified fortwo buckets 165 and 175, right . For the 2023 bonds recently issued the was a plan [indiscernible] i can send a list of the project. I dont have a list of the 2024 project. Presumably the mayor office of housing has that. We can follow up. That has not been determined yet . So 165 . It will not be for new projects. Now the way this works is we had procurement for the projects. Not all received predevelopment financing and we provide those resource frz the Gap Financing when they received the state and federal resources, so we dont advance that money until we understand what the gap is going to be, so there wont be 165 million for new projects, if is providing the Gap Financing for products that receive predevelopment funding through past procurement and receive state or federal money to develop their projects. Do you have that list . We can get that for you, sir. Okay. You get us a list of the 165 and then also going to get a list of what is in the pipeline for the 300 million . Correct, sir. Can i ask a question because this came up yesterday in our question time with the mayor. There is a project in hayes valley sitting for many years, the mayor said she hadnt been briefed and didnt know anything about it even though she was the supervisor for that district 7 years and made no sense. Is that one of the projects that is in the pipeline being considered that would be put out for rfp . Just so we can clarify the record. The project within the pipeline are projects that have had an rfp issued. For that one hayes valley the request for qualification isnt issued for parcel k. Is there a plan to do that . Ii know we according with oewd to understand the timing of the lease for proxy and we understand the interest now there is a call for Additional Community planning in that space so we are continuing to coordinate as a city to understand the timing for an rfq based off Additional Community engagement and the status of the proxy lease. Proxy is the lease for the site . Yes. The master lease. Okay. It would be good to get us the list of the 165 unspent that is Gap Financing and then the projects you have identified for this upcoming bond and again, thank you for your teams hard work. We are excited about this. Much needed in these difficult housing economic times. Thank you. Thank you. I see no name on the roster. Lets go to Public Comment. Thank you madam chair. Members of the public,s who wish to speak on these 4 items should line up now along those curtains to your right, my left. Thank you. [indiscernible] you are not very good with numbers. For very reason, i know that youcan you define what affordable means first . Compared to unaffordable . So, you have to define affordable. Means you have specific, because otherwise it is a absolute joke. So, [indiscernible] yeah, come on. I know you dont care, but you should because it will come at you. Wlth. So, define affordable because it has to be compared what is unaffordable. There is unAffordable Housing in San Francisco. Define numbers since you are supposed to be good at numbers. Where in the budget and Financing Committee it seems thank you. Next speaker. I just want to say on behalf of mercy housing california how much we appreciate the hard work from supervisor peskin and rest of the supervisors to advance forward. Appreciate supervisor chans cosponsorship. Deeply bipartisan if thats the right word effort here and thank the mayor office and eric and his team for fine work on this. I think obviously we are in a challenging moment the 300 million will be exceptionally pornts important and look forward working with you to make it all happen. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon supervisors. Thank you for your time today. Im juan castro, National Partnership director. M today bond proposal take a critical step moving communities like the Mission Towards greater Stability Health and opportunities for the families by allocating new funds for production and preservation of Affordable Housing. Take a moment to cite a face statistics we believe are important for strong support. In a recent meta health and equity study, 42 percent of latino respondents reported living 3 or more persons in a room that create direct Health Effects in the mission and essential worker across the city. The workers we relied on in the crisis and still do. Over what is another 7 more years. Affordable Housing Units are ready to be built with mayor office of housing there nearly billion dollars of affordable units in the pipeline waiting to move forward and lastly, since inception of the Small Sites Program in 2013 over 720 units have been preserved in the existing Housing Stock of San Francisco. The bonds further help sustain the Preservation Program providing stability to keep long time City Residents staying in place. Moving forward this local bonds along with regional and state housing bonds make a significant progress towards the larger goals we have set with the state for meeting the needs for our workforce, seniors and most vulnerable residents. Thank you. Thank you much. Next speaker, please. Hi. Im elena ingle with 350 San Francisco and the San Francisco Climate Emergency coalition. Over the last 5 days, 80 letters, including from the sierra club with 6,000 members have been sent to the bond sponsors, mayor breed and board president peskin requesting that they make an amendment to the 30 million preservation portion of the bond requiring that these existing units or buildings funded under this provision be made all electric. This would be a very small start to removing methane gas from our existing buildings. Just to review, the San Francisco Coalition Emergency coalition and our advocating for a bond measure to [indiscernible] after last winter, the supervisors unanimously recommended to Capital Planning that they include a bond measure in the schedule. This Spring Budget and Appropriation Committee proclaimed all bonds should be climate bonds. Last summer, additional money, 150 million looks like hundred Million Dollar now was added to the Affordable Housing bond and we advocated a portion of the new money be dedicated to electrifying listing low Income Housing. To date, there is no climate bond proposed for the ballot in the next 10 years on the bond schedule, there is no portion of this bond that requires the electrification of existing buildings. This past summer has been the hottest in recorded history. How much time do you think we have . Thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. Madam chair if i may, as i referenced earlier, the amendments that i am offering today speak to the citys Climate Action and adherence thereto. Thank you. Lets continue with Public Comment. Good morning. John avalos from Committee Housing organization. I want to thank the board of supervisors and in particular president peskin for your many months of work working through the technical Advisory Committee that recommended lowering inclusionary housing fee and also recommending superior amount of funding that could be moved forward to replace the loss of our Affordable Housing funds through inclusionary. Very grateful for that work. San francisco is in the dill drums economically. We are still trying to come out of the recovery and Government Investment is key with that recovery, so Affordable Housing as economic recovery should be a major theme what we are try toog do here. We also inest have in the workforce and housing our workers is the best way to insure we have workers to build the jobs that need to make our economy work and make sure Public Services are working as well. It is very thoughtful we include that. Senior housing is critical as we see funds for seniors dry up. Im very grateful to be allied with womens Housing Coalition to propose housing frl survivors of Domestic Violence and wem whoon are trying to emerge for selfindependence from domestic violent situations. Supervisor peskin mentioned there is a lack of large [indiscernible] from the state and federal government. We have to do more here. It is important we consider how we can lift our own selfimposed debt ceiling to have larger bonds to address frublt needs in the future it is good to look how we can prime the pump for larger bonds. We have a bond coming up potentially for the region, 10 billion that would bring 1. 2 billion to San Francisco. This work for this bond is in preparation for that. Show the government can work to get it right so the board approve the work you do. Thank you so much. Thank you much for your comments. Want to acknowledge that is our former supervisor john avalos. Thank you so much for joining us today. Good morning, Rebecca Jackson with [indiscernible] homeless involved women with children and cochair of the San Francisco womens Housing Coalition with broader effort advocate for need of women in the city who make up 30 percent of our documented unhoused folks. It is [indiscernible] some were on the steps last night as we rallied to bring attention to this matter. It is a historic moment for women. As the language in the bond makes it clear San Francisco is putting unhoused women and survivors in a place where we can be seen by including 30 million in this bond. There is a 2019 Community Needs assessment for survivors of violence that showed nearly 2700 women identified survivors were turned away from services, safety and housing. For every won 1 women served 3 turned away. I was turned away. After spend two nights in the park, choosing safety for my children meant i choose to be separated from them, which to thisdy caused trauma and harm and negative impacts that we can still feel. It is my daughters 29 birthday toed and when i asked if she thought about having children her answer was no. Listen to us when we tell you women need sanctuary and San Francisco hads the means to provide safety and hope deciding how to allocate the bond by stepping up and committing needs for infrastructure for women the bond gives women hope and opportunity for them to be safe and transition to housing and keep their families together. A colleague said, if you want to see how a city values its people look at its investments. This proposed 30 million allocation for victim and survival service is a important step to recognize the vital population. Thank you. We are ready. Apologies if i have to cut anybody off but we are timing every speaker at two minutes. Good morning. My name is [indiscernible] and i have spent the last 2 decades working in the homelessness sector for Workforce Development to permanent housing. Housing is the solution but the type of Housing Needs to be adequate for all populations and unique vulnerability. Data has show women exiting homelessness are [indiscernible] right now women subss are lacking only 5 percent of our transitional respite shelter beds are for women, despite 34 percent of the population in San Francisco identify as women. Inclusion of victim based transitional housing e language offers a broader base. Need the bond to have language and respond to needs of women. Women need a safe place to transition back to housing and women center can offer hope and serve as model for the united states. We have a historic opportunity to be in the National Spotlight for really good reason. Giving women hope and safety. Structurally we have not created enough room for women in all most every sector of society. Good morning thank you for opportunity to speak. My name is erica the [indiscernible] receive shelter transitional housing dropin in addition toand housing. Yes. Working at the women shelter i have seen first hand women experiencing severe Mental Illness. When i say severe Mental Illness i mean psychosis, depression, [indiscernible] most of the women look like me. In fact, 80 percent of unhoused women selfreport severe trauma and abuse as a cause of the homelessness. Again, the women of color like my self. When service exist they are hidden away. At the drop in center we serve 3 thousand women each year but under a freeway and extremely dangerous to get to. One thing i like to share is that, we have a guest that was running from a situation and the only way she feels safe, i was the only person and another staff member insuring she was safe to get to the door. This is a type of safety that we need to provide for these women. When we Work Together during the pandemic we answered the call and open shelter in place for women. 50 percent of the women were served moved to permanent housing. What was important about that was they had a chance to stabilize, heal and the women resistant to placement accepted the hotel because they trusted us and had a sense of community. [indiscernible] is not working for women. Especially women experiencing human traffic and [indiscernible] women center is the and can be a safe place. Thank you. Im the chief Development Officer for San Francisco safe house. I have been in the position in the sector for a little over 2 months now so long time listener, first time caller but shocked by the lack of services that are specific to women and survivors in our community, especially in a city like San Francisco. The bond is investment not just in women but to revitalize and reengage the Community Members and offer women for a safe independent future through services we do not have capacity to provide. This is ability to showa opportunity to show our ability to partner with get the work done. We have diverse set of stakeholders interest said in the success what the bonds can fund. Non profit from the Housing Coalition and communities residents, we have the rare opportunity to activate diverse population and engage our City Residents toward a similar goal of empowering women experiencing homelessness. No matter where the Service Location nds up i speak for all non profits in the coalition we are committed to working in close collaboration with each other and members of the community to insure women receive services they deserve and ask ing for for years. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello. My name is [indiscernible] represent San Francisco safe house and women Housing Coalition and here to support Affordable Housing bond. In the last 10 years 7 gender specific organizations and programs either shut down or gone coed and not because there wasnt demand Interest Service bullet there wasnt investment in suvs. Over 30 percent of the Homeless Population being women and [indiscernible] no wonder we are seeing increase in women homelessness in San Francisco. Reason [indiscernible] not safe. This population are survivors of Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and sex traffic and coed spaces are traumatic and trigger. There is unprecedented attack on women with [indiscernible] non binary on National Level chblt the city has to opportunity to lead and show the community they share. [indiscernible] families pr backbone of our community and time for the city to have a backbone and show the community they really care. That starts with this bond. Thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon. Thank you supervisors for this opportunity to speak about women as well as children. My name is rashida blake, director at the drop in center and been there 3 months and what i have seen with women that are dropping in and sometimes often times staying longer then the drop in is elderly women, trans, women, specifically of color and women sometimes with children. I like to changewhat i want to see with the bonds and hope the bond will create is change in that what we see. We see also women that are chronically mentally ill and chronically homeless. We are experiencing right now women especially women that are elderly and dont have families and housing, i like to be able to see that change and i believe this bond can do that. I want to talk briefly about a elderly woman we have there that is experiencing a little of dementia. She has been there now about a month and she is in her late 70. She couldnt remember where she came from. Ontime crosses the street that is very dangerous. Under the unpass, there is traffic. People heading to the highway. It breaks my heart to see an elderly person that has dementia, often times cant remember what day it is or where she is. It would be so wonderful and beneficial to see elderly people like her get sustainable Affordable Housing. Thank you. Thank you much. Next speaker, please. Good morning. Samey rainer cochair of women Housing Coalition as well as the chief impact officer at Community Forward San Francisco. Ill pick up the quote that my colleague rebecca left off on, which is from one of our mentors kimberley ellis. A city budget is reflection of its values. Right now with less then 5 percent of our city housing going to women, we dont value women. Yet, this is the group, this is the board that is going to help us change that. If we can put dollars on the budget that show we as a city value women, we can change this narrative and we can transform our city. I really appreciate theit was a big effort over the last several years to bring women issues into the light and i really appreciate the leadership of aaron peskin adding this 30 million carveout for women and i hope we will keep that in the bond going forward. Our coalition as you heard a lot of us today, you heard us many times, we are organized, we show up and we have a strategy. We have a pipeline we are developing over years that make real change for women so we hope you will vote yes on this bond and know we are going to be behind this working hard getting the message out to the public to help our city see and value women and not give up on our sisters our mothers and our grand mothers. Thank you. Thank you much. Next speaker, please. Hi. My name is [indiscernible] here on behalf of [indiscernible] veteran right organization to show support for the proposed Affordable Housing bond measure. San franciscans are living with great housing insecurity with many feeling impact of high rent displacement pressures and homelessness. The city needs to step up and invest heavily in deeply Affordable Housing and low and extremely low income residents. Veterans along with california overall population are rapidly aging. Vietnam veterans average 68 years old and individuals over 50 are at risk of homelessness in california due to lack of Affordable Housing. Operate 500 units of permanent Supportive Housing in San Francisco. Most in partnership with Community Based Affordable Housing developers. Together we opened 2 new Affordable Housing sites in San Francisco. The [indiscernible] in mission bay for veterans and family and [indiscernible] Treasure Island for veterans with disabilities. We know from our experience as a Housing Provider that some veterans continue to live in our psh units simply because they cannot afford to move out. Veterans low income but do not need intensive Onsite Service deserve independent and Affordable Housing options. The bond can remedy this [indiscernible] across the city to address our affordability crisis. Building housing is critical and so stabilizing service to keep individuals housed in Capital Funding for repairs and renovations. Ill conclude my daying veterans are seniors, women retirees and trade works and all deserve Affordable Housing choice. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi. Good afternoon. Julian ball and im representing [indiscernible] housing program. We are a Member Organization of the council of Community Housing organizations. We at bishop work with clients to help them access the Affordable Housing that is out there, so we work with them from the time they come in to find how the system works to help apply, all the way through the leaseup process, so we in my role i see clients who are homeless or doubled up. We have many families with 3, 4 people renting a room in a Single Family home or apartment from [indiscernible] many families have 1 or 2 full time income earners and still cant afford housing in srf San Francisco and we help them through the process. They have to apply for a lotteries every time there is a housing opportunity, and we teach them not to give up hope. They can apply for as many opportunities as they can and not give up and we sometimes work with clients for years at a time until they finally get selected. For every Success Story we have another family who gives up hope and stops apply who thinks the system doesnt work. This Affordable Housing bond is just a first step to changing that. There have been other first steps, other bonds and this is still just a drop in the bucket of what is needed but we have to start somewhere so this is one place to start. Especially at a time where the city is mandated to build 46 thousand units of Affordable Housing by 2031 and a time when Market Rate Developers cant make a profit in this economy, we need to invest in Affordable Housing. Thank you. Thank you for addressing this committee. Next speaker, please. I have a process question as i have a statement from [indiscernible] and another organization asking to make a statement and they were not able to attend. Can i also take the Public Comment time i will give 2 minutes to provide Public Comment. If you have something to submit ill take it. Sound good. Council of Community Housing organization. Our city can meet the moment to build more Affordable Housing. As a coalition, [indiscernible] represents Service Providers tenant advocates and non Profit Housing developers who have grown out of their communities doing decades of work on creating improving programs for the working class, bipoc, immigrants, youth seniors vulnerable groups includesing unhoused and women who are survivors of violence and trauma. Our coalition is making a full throated call for Public Investment that will create and preserve homes and strengthen the fabric of these communities. I want to speak to the need on the ground for the preservation work where non profits can acquire rental buildings, maintain them and protect tenants from the market. It is crucial to sustain our Small Sites Program and keep San Francisco residents in the housing and prevent a slew of other problems that become much more expensive later. Earlier in the year, our Member Organizations submitted projects deemed eligible by the city criteria and by our estimate totaling 124 million in needed funding and yet it is hard without Adequate Funding to keep this Housing Preservation work going. The capacity of the organizations and keep residents who face displacement in their homes especially in the equity geography. The 30 million in the proposed housing bond is crucial to maintain the preservation work and our challenges are many, so thank you for calling that to our attention board president peskin and also director eric shaw and the good challenge in front of us is how to meet the rhna goals. 46. 598 units of Affordable Housing. Together we climb up the ladder step by step. Thank you. Thank you. Good morning. My name is [indiscernible] with selfhelp for the elderly, also a member of chew chew. Here to thank you for your support to bring this measure to 2024. On behalf of our community, which is mostly senior in the asian population, i would like to urge you to understand the need for this to go forward because most seniors cannot afford the housing cost in San Francisco. Most of them have 80 percent of what the income now. One seniorone of my job is going to different communities to talk about Affordable Housing. Some seniors approach me and told me they served the community the last 30 years. [indiscernible] they serve a community, pay taxes, but now they are not able to afford the house they live. One senior say, will i be able to afford to have a comfortable retirement before she goes. That is sad to hear this statement. That is the reason i come before you to urge you to put this 2024 measure to [indiscernible] in the system to allow them to access those inventory. Thank you. Thank you for addressing the committee. Next speaker, please. Hello. Thank you for your time. Mitch [indiscernible] speaking on bemalf of San Francisco Housing Development corporation a cbo in the bayview and fillmore district and express strong support for the housing bond and great thanks to supervisor peskin. We see the needs in the streets every day, we see when the percentage of black san franciscans declined to below 6 percent. Hear from families who need more Affordable Housing options to avoid displaced from San Francisco. Especially important the bond includes preservation funding. Preservation is a tool that allows to keep san franciscans in their homes and turn market rate housing into permanent affordability. As we talk about the bond it should be clear, the size isnt sufficient to address full scale of the housing crisis. The mayor office of housing pipeline is 900 million and this is only 300 million so i dont want anyone to think the bond will solve the crisis by itself. It is important to emphasize that. But, this does provide a critical chunk of funding and does so without requiring property tax increases. As part of [indiscernible] also very important to the board, potentially punch above the weight and alieu to leverage Affordable Housing to build the housing San Francisco needs. Affordable housing is economic recovery. We need to be clear over the next few months, as Media Attention moves elsewhere the Affordable Housing crisis is most of the struggle s in San Francisco and this bond is part of the solution. Thank you. Thank you. Madam chair and [indiscernible] from china town Community Development center. Wanted to express our full support for the proposal before you. Thank you also for leadership of president peskin and mayor office. But, concretely for our organization like cdcd, we presently have 5 projects in the pipeline, 2 do not have the funding necessary to proceed without this bond. Roughly 340 units, both family units and Senior Housing and without this bond the prospect of those projects are in jeopardy. What we see on the ground and i work in the housing counseling program, majority of the tenants presently are waiting to find housing. They look on the program and basically cannot afford the units that are online. Majority of the seniors earn incomes under 1200 a month. I looked at dahlia this morning and there isnt a unit to get into the lottery mentioned before. There is urgent need for the housing and we strongly support this measure. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. Charley [indiscernible] Council Community housing organization. We represent 22 Member Organizations that are rooted in bipoc neighborhoods throughout San Francisco. In january of this year, this board adopted a housing plan that recognized that our path forward is to produce 2 units Affordable Housing for every 1 market rate housing. That calls for construction of 46 thousand units by the end of 2031. Affordable. Now is the time to set the table for conversation to augment Revenue Streams for Affordable Housing and create new ones. The item before you today should think about as our Housing Element bond. General Obligation Bonds have been the most consistent and significant local Revenue Source for the production and preservation of Affordable Housing in the city. Together with the regional and state Affordable Housing bond planned for november demonstrates all level of government can show up around housing affordable in 2024. This bond enable to get to the hard work of growing the city stock of Affordable Housing units to stabilize neighborhoods, house the most vulnerable among us, support elders, support women with housing insecurity and keep the next generation in the city. We urge your support to win the bond in march and Regional State bonds in november to create the Affordable Housing needed to build economy inclusive for all of us. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon supervisors. Mitchell with Affordable Housing alliance. As a rental Advocacy Organization we long seen our role as fighting for renters right and also for Affordable Housing. The need for Affordable Housing is never been more acute. This bond appears to be the most significant if not the only serious effort on the horizon to address that issue. The emphasis on housing for seniors, women and Workforce Housing seems spot on. In addition the citys capital plan for 18 years offered city bonds at a no property tax increase basis where the bonds are issued as the old ones are retired so there is no resulting property tax and we are happy to see that language reflected in the legislation before you today. It also makes supporting this bond not only the clear choice, but also an easy choice, so thank you for all your work on the housing bond. Thank you much. And seeing no speaker, madam chair. Public comment is now closed. With that, before i make the motioni should say, my assumption is that board president peskin, do you have concluding remark or like to make a concluding remark . I do not other then, thanking all of the members of the public for their support and for their help along the way and we still have a long way to go between now and march including putting this on the ballot, but think we are off to a aushpicious beginning. Thank you to mr. Shaw and mayor office of housing and Community Development and want to acknowledge the City Attorney office and number City Attorneys who helped in reiterate my thanks to my chief of staff sonny and to the entire board of supervisors as i mentioned earlier for rejigering the bond issue and bringing this forward. I would like to and in accordance with discussions with the mayor office make a motion to amend items 10 and 11, the resolution and ordinance with the language that is before you and incorporate those amendments, which would sit here for another week and then the budget and finance committee could take action next week to send to the full board for its first appearance in november, and then i would like to also in the same motion table items 8 and 9. Thank you. Before i move those motions, just wanted to quickly acknowledge director shaw and just especially before making the motion to table 8 and 9 that i like to want to make sure that you can articulate what mayor breed would like to be added as a sponsor to items 10 and 11. Ill coordinate with our policy team and Government Affairs team on that. They will respond to you shortly on that. I believer that will happen in the intervening week and spoke to the mayor staff about that this morning so plenty time for that. Understood. With that, supervisor safai. Thank you. Thank everyone that came out today to comment particularly from voices we have not heard in the past. Want to appreciate president peskin and the work to include voices from women in particular that have experienced Domestic Violence along with other traumas in prioritizing them and making them calling them out specifically for this bond. I think it is important step for the city and really appreciate the work that was done here today. Along with seniors. I want to also thank seniors and insure we are prioritizing them because there is never enough housing for them in the city and thank you to all advocates that came out on behalf of the working families. I like to be added as a cosponsor. Thank you. Thank you both. Thank you. With that, ill move the motion as mentioned by president peskin to amend item 10 and 11 andsummarizing just about 5 amendments that including those findings that5 categories of amendments that are labor findings, climate findings, victim and survivor housing findings, 50 percent passthrough resolutions indicating that we will also following legislation to stop the passthrough to tenants and then also the senior population findings and with that, roll call, please. On that motion to amend items 10 and 11 as just stated by the chair, member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused rchlt the motion passes. I like to make a motion to table items 8 and 9 and roll call, please. On the motion to table items 8 and 9, member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused rchlt thank you. I like to continue the item 10 and 11 to the next Board Meeting and with that a roll call, please. On the motion to continue the resolution on item 10 and ordinance on item 11 to november 1 meeting as amended, member safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. We have two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Thank you motion passes and mr. Clerk, do we have other items before us . Apologies madam chair, a little housekeepish. In item 2, the bla did have recommendation we amend to be retroactive. I dont think we took that amendment, so if item 10 . Number 2. Do we need to rescind the vote . Yeah, if you can make a motion to rescind the vote without objection and then lets amend the item number 2 and send to full board with recommendation. As recommended by the bla. Yes. Roll call. The last vote was amended and we are now amending the resolution on item 2 to add retroactive language and forward to full board as amended with positive recommendation. Vice chair safaimember safai, aye. Chair chan, aye. Two ayes with vice chair mandelman excused. Motion passes. Thank you. Thank you. And the meeting is adjourned. [meeting adjourned] for us, we wish we had our queue and we created spaces that are active. Food and drinks. There is a lot for a lot of folks and community. For us, it started back in 1966 and it was a diner and where our ancestors gathered to connect. I think coffee and food is the very fabric of our community as well as we take care of each other. To have a popup in the tenderloin gives it so much meaning. We are always creating impactful meaning of the lives of the people, and once we create a space and focus on the most marginalized, you really include a space for everyone. Coffee is so cultural for many communities and we have coffee of maria inspired by my grandmother from mexico. I have many many memories of sharing coffee with her late at night. So we carry that into everything we do. Currently we are on a journey that is going to open up the first brick and mortar in San Francisco specifically in the tenderloin. We want to stay true to our ancestors in the tenderloin. So we are getting ready for that and getting ready for celebrating our anniversary. It has been well supported and well talked about in our community. Thats why we are pushing it so much because thats how we started. Very active Community Members. They give back to the community. Support trends and give back and give a safe space for all. We also want to let folks know that if they want to be in a safe space, we have a pay it Forward Program that allows 20 to get some funds for someone in need can come and get a cup of coffee, pastry and feel welcomed in our community. To be among our community, you are always welcome here. You dont have to buy anything or get anything, just be here and express yourself and be your authentic self and we will always take care of you. Long it was in fashion, oshaughnessy water system has been sustainable. In addition to providing water for the bay area, it also generates clean hydroelectric power to run city buildings and services. And more recently, some San Francisco homes and businesses. Satellite electricity is Greenhouse Gas free, so we see a tremendous benefit from that. We really are proud of the fact that, weve put our water to work. Even with the system as well coon received as hetch hetchy, Climate Change has made the supply of water from the sierra vulnerable. And requires new thinking about where and how we use water. We have five hundred million gallons a day of wastewater being dumped out into San Francisco bay and the ocean from the bay area alone. And that water could be recycled and should be recycled for reuse through out the bay area. Were looking at taking wastewater and reading it to drink watering standards. Were also looking at our generation and looking at onsite water reuse looking at the technology and strategies we have available to us today. The very First Recycling plant in the state of california for landscape irrigation was built in San Francisco. Weve just developed a new recycled water plant in the ocean side wastewater facility for irrigation purposes in golden gate park, lincoln park and the panhandle. A century ago, San Francisco built a dam to create bunched znswer of fresh water to ensure the future and ensure the taps will flow for future generations, it will take as much vision when it reflects a fundamental change about how we think about water. I think we recognize theres going to be change in the future. So were going to have to have the flexibility and the creativity to deal with that future as its presented to us, its a matter of how to see it and say, okay, lets make wise use of everything we have. This oshaughnessy centennial moment is made possibbbbbbbbbbbb [ ] Fishermans Wharf, this is a working wharf and its part of the beauty of the San Francisco area. Before the restaurant, before the tshirt shops. At first the fishermen would go out and do the harvesting. They process the crab. It really is industrial. It is fish processors. Its a working, living, breathing place. And its a great place to visit and theres a lot of history. Im a Third Generation italian fisherman. Were one of the oldest fishing families at fishermens wharf. My familys been working here since 1908. My boats called the lovely martha. Sport fishing means when you come out and catch your own fish on the boat. Commercial fishermen come out, catch fish, it gets processed and they sell it to a store. Theyre selling crab off the boat. Theres nothing more fresh than a crab. Our crab are sweeter and better tasting. The meat is firmer. More crab. We love crab. We love the people out on the boats. Theyre awesome. What a good meal tonight. We just barely got down here in time. We would have come earlier if we knew how much fun it was. This is the place to get crab if youre looking for it. Some of these boats have salmon permits. So every boat kind of does a different thing. You can come down here and have wild caught salmon that was just caught that morning or the night before and theres nothing fresher than that. Thats the whole thing of coming out on a party boat. You can catch your own crab, lock cod, halibut, salmon, you cant get that kind of fish. Now the consumer can just buy here if they want to and take it home which is great. Or they can buy it here and take it to one of the restaurants and they can have a glass of wine and enjoy the crab we just brought in for them. Come on over. Its great. Nice and beautiful here in San Francisco and the port. Definitely come. Our fishermen are super excited. Its great to have the public come down here and interact. Its a whole experience for the family, where they bring the kids and interact and say wow, the crabs alive. Its going to claw me and everything. They really get excited theyre coming down here and posting their recipes or pictures of the food. Or their kids picking up the crab. Theyre making a whole experience out of it. It is going to give the locals a part of San Francisco that was taken away from them. Now i have a reason to come back. I had a guy the other day come and say he hasnt been down to Fishermans Wharf in 10 years. He said im going to come down here every weekend. I forgot San Francisco Health Commission secret call the role. Commissioner chung present. Commissioner christian present. Commissioner giraudo present. Commissioner green. President bernal before we start the agenda i have an announcement to make our i want president bernal led this commission though 2020 has been appoint to the chancellor at ucf f were