The interest of a child, again, fatally bungled : vimarsana.

The interest of a child, again, fatally bungled


The interest of a child, again, fatally bungled
Updated April 7, 2021, 2:30 a.m.
Email to a Friend
Case offers window into multiple systemic problems at DCF
The Office of the Child Advocate’s report on the Department of Children and Families’ role in 14-year-old David Almond’s life and death is a tragic window into flawed decision-making and lack of transparency in the agency (“DCF, others failed abused boy, report says,” Page A1, April 1). The agency’s internal foster-care review process, staffed by DCF employees, reviewed the case two times after David and his brother Michael were returned to a troubled home. A truly independent foster-care review process outside of DCF is critically needed, though, shockingly, not called for by the report of the Office of the Child Advocate.

Related Keywords

Brookline , Massachusetts , United States , Boston , Fall River , Jamaica Plain , Jack Loiselle , Maria Moussaides , Judy Hershey , Maxine Dolle , David Almond , Office Of The Child , Juvenile Court , Governor Baker , Child Advocate , புரூக்லைன் , மாசசூசெட்ஸ் , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , போஸ்டன் , வீழ்ச்சி நதி , ஜமைக்கா வெற்று , பலா லொய்செல்லே , ஜூடி ஹெர்ஷே , அதிகபட்சம் பொம்மை , டேவிட் பாதம் கொட்டை , அலுவலகம் ஆஃப் தி குழந்தை , இளம் நீதிமன்றம் , கவர்னர் ரொட்டி சுடுபவர் , குழந்தை வழக்கறிஞர் ,

© 2024 Vimarsana