The Marine Corps' Force Design 2030 Is Regression, Not Progr

The commandant’s vision seeks to prepare the Marine Corps for the contingency of a war with China in the Western Pacific, but committing the Marine Corps to a specific, unlikely conflict at the expense of the ability to meet a wide variety of other, more likely contingencies is a bad bet.

Related Keywords

Bangladesh , Afghanistan , Iraq , Kuwait , Mogadishu , Banaadir , Somalia , China , Italy , Vietnam , Republic Of , Saudi Arabia , Italian , Iraqi , Davidh Berger , Asea Angel , Walter Boomer , James Mattis , Erik Khzmalyan , Ii Marine Expeditionary Force , Us Embassy , Us Navy , Department Of Defense , Ground Task Forces Spmagtfs , Fleet Marine , General David , Nichols Act , Marine Corps , Integrated Priority List , Fleet Commander , Planning Guidance , Navy Marine Corps , Gulf War , Force Design , During Operation Desert Shield , Marine Expeditionary Force , Operation Desert Storm , Marine Expeditionary Brigade , Desert Storm , Operation Eastern Exit , Marine Expeditionary Unit , Operation Provide Comfort , Operation Sea Angel , United Nations , Operation Restore Hope , Operation Continue , Italian Marines , Fleet Marine Forces , Vietnam War , Naval Support , Operation Enduring Freedom , Task Force , Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Forces , Western Pacific , Force Design 2030 , Us Marine Corps , Gen David Berger , Amphibious Warfare , Indo Pacific ,