The pros and cons of opting for a 60/40 balanced portfolio s

The pros and cons of opting for a 60/40 balanced portfolio strategy


Blake Wolfe
While the typical balanced fund is becoming a rarity among pension plans, a segment of plan sponsors continue to utilize these funds — albeit with added diversification.
Traditionally, such funds have invested 60 per cent in equities and 40 per cent in bonds. But with investment options for pension plans expanding over the last 20 years, institutional investors have become more sophisticated, looking beyond the balanced fund to diversify their asset classes and increase returns, says Erwan Pirou, chief investment officer for retirement solutions in Canada at Aon.
“The problem [with balanced funds] is you miss out on the risk of alternatives, which can give you a good diversification and protect you from equity risk to a certain extent. Most balanced funds tend to be heavy on equity risk, because it’s the only lever they use to add value.”

Related Keywords

Canada , United Kingdom , British , Canadian , Orla Cousineau , Ian Riach , Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions , University Of British Columbia Faculty Pension Plan , Franklin Templeton Investment , British Columbia Faculty Pension , கனடா , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் , பிரிட்டிஷ் , கனடியன் , ஆர்லா உறவினர் , ஈயந் ரியச் , பிராங்க்ளின் கோயில் முதலீடு தீர்வுகள் , பிராங்க்ளின் கோயில் முதலீடு ,

© 2025 Vimarsana