question, i hopefully would have been told it is adequate for other respiratory diseases as well, because indeed it was, because we used it. did because indeed it was, because we used it. , , ., because indeed it was, because we used it. , ., ., because indeed it was, because we usedit. ., ., used it. did you ask whether or not the anti-virals. .. _ used it. did you ask whether or not the anti-virals. .. yes. _ used it. did you ask whether or not the anti-virals. .. yes. in _ used it. did you ask whether or not the anti-virals. .. yes. in the i used it. did you ask whether or not the anti-virals... yes. in the main, the anti—virals... yes. in the main, a brand anti—viral called tamiflu, which was supplied and available in large quantities, whether that was suitable for a non—influenza pandemic? i suitable for a non-influenza pandemic?— suitable for a non-influenza tandemic? ., ., ~ ., pandemic? i do not know whether i was asked whether _ pandemic? i do not know whether i was asked whether i _ pandemic? i do not know whether i was asked whether i was _ pandemic? i do not know whether i was asked whether i was briefed, l pandemic? i do not know whether i i was asked whether i was briefed, but i was aware it was only useful against a flu, not a coronavirus. did you ask or were you made aware that the diagnostic testing which was in place was on a very small order, and of course was testing designed to deal with a limited, high consequence infectious disease, primarily one involving an outbreak in health settings? yes. primarily one involving an outbreak in health settings?— primarily one involving an outbreak in health settings? yes, i knew that the testint in health settings? yes, i knew that the testing system _ in health settings? yes, i knew that the testing system was _ in health settings? yes, i knew that the testing system was small, i in health settings? yes, i knew that the testing system was small, and l the testing system was small, and the testing system was small, and the reason that i explained the