at strathclyde university. so, former prime minister done enoughin so, former prime minister done enough in order to convince that he wasn�*t to being reckless, that this wasn�*t to being reckless, that this was not intentional, it wasn�*t deliberate when he misled parliament? i deliberate when he misled parliament?— deliberate when he misled arliament? ~ ., , deliberate when he misled arliament? ~ . , ., parliament? i think the answer that auestion is parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe _ parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. _ parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. it's - parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. it's of- parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. it's of the l question is maybe not. it�*s of the two criteria. 0ne question is maybe not. it�*s of the two criteria. one of which it is to do with intentionally misleading the house. the other is to do with it recklessly doing so. if that second criteria in which, by the end of his session, where the former prime minister began to look vulnerable. 0ne argument there is that, and giving such categorical assurances, the guidance on social distancing was always followed. the prime minister perhaps knowingly