After these attacks, having been there. There had been a manhunt put out globally at this point for him. One brussels source now saying that they have apprehended the third suspect. Police have also confirmed that the two men on the left are the brothers khalid and ibrahim ael bakraoui. The man on the right, again, is alleged to have assisted the two suicide bombers. Police sources also told nbc that the man is a suspect in the paris attacks as well. As part of that manhunt, a police raid in brussels led to the discovery of a nail bomb and an Islamic State flag. Isis has claim the responsibility for the attacks that have killed at least 31 people. Lets take a quick check on the markets, debt yget you caug on how Global Markets have been reacting overnight. Dow looks like it would open 15 points higher. Nasdaq up about five points. The s p 500 up about two points. European equities thus far have been in the green. I get anxious that events like this have just become either so common place or so expected or we think the Economic Impact is so little that it has not had a huge impact on the markets. Oil prices, lets take a look at whats happening to wti crude right now. Youre looking at 41. 09. Take a quick look at the tenyear yield right now. Youre looking at 1. 942. Lets get over to get more on the aftermath of the attacks in brussels. Ayman javers joining us from washington this morning. Good morning, andrew. As youve been saying, were learning a lot more now about the attackers who planned that deadly bombing attack yesterday in brussels at the airport and on the subway. Belgian authorities have released this photo taken from airport surveillance pictures. Take a detailed look at the two figures on the left. According to authorities, thats khalid el bakraoui, 27, and his 30yearold brother, ibrahim. Theyre believed to be the suicide bombers in this attack. Each wearing a single black glove on their left hand. Not clear what the significance of that is necessarily, but it may be a clue as to how they plotted and staged this bombing attack. Both men had been convicted of Violent Crimes in the past and were known to police. Police sources say the man on the right in the lightcolored clothes wearing a hat and glasses is Najim Laachraoui, 24. Hes a suspected jihadist who was suspected also of involvement in the paris attacks. There has been some media reporting that the manhunt searching for Najim Laachraoui over the past day may have come to an end. Were going to be very careful in reporting on that. Its just one report as of the past two or three minutes thats come through on that. Police had been searching for him. They say he survived the attack, whether that was intentional or some kind of misfire of a suicide bombing attack, not necessarily clear in the early goings here. Meanwhile in brussels, the city is trying to bring itself back to normal, getting some businesses, schools, and daily activities back to normal after a horrific and scary day yesterday as authorities comb the city looking for the one remaining attacker from that airport suicide bombing attack. So thats what we know now in brussels. Here in the United States, security has been stepped up at airports and in cities in Public Transportation throughout the city. Authorities here say theres no specific threat of any kind of followup activity. What theyre worried about, though, are the socalled lone wolves, the people not connected to isis or to be a broader terrorist ideology who see this and say thats the kind of thing i want to be involved in and carry off attacks on their own. Thats the concern here in the United States. No indication of a specific threat. Theres a lot of chatter, supposed supposedly. Now theres so much chatter, that they dont know what chatter to Pay Attention to and not Pay Attention to. I saw the head of the Homeland Department in congress. He said there are lots of communication between people that are in isis in syria and people in the United States. They know theres communication, but theres so much chatter, nothing definitive, yet theres definitely communication. We know the fbi has suspected people with isis contacts under surveillance currently here in the United States. Not clear exactly how many. But the fbi is watching as many people as they can here who might have these kind of connections. The concern in brussels is that european authorities seem to be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of people that they have to keep under surveillance at any given time. Thats how it may be that these three slipped through the cracks can, even though they know after the arrest of one of the paris attackers last week that there might be an attack coming in the coming days. Since friday theyd been on very heightened alert, looking for potential attackers. They were not able to stop these guys from carrying out this attack at the airport and in the subway. Yeah, and i keep hearing people say someone knew about it, someone should have said something. Its in a neighborhood where people might have known about it, but they might have known about it and not been totally opposed to it. Absolutely. You have a community here that appears to support some of these activities, support these individuals. I want to draw your attention to the idea here now that were seeing another pair of brothers involved in this suicide attack. Thats the third situation over the past couple of years that i can think of, of brothers being involved in ament menbomb inin. We had two brothers involved in boston. Two brothers involved in the paris attacks. Now two brothers involved in the brussels attacks. That might tell us something about the recruiting. We have brothers with violent criminal records with sort of nowhere to go in life, possibly looking for an ideology. Maybe the psychology of this is that it takes two to sort of egg each other on or support each other or simply for operational secrecy, as youre talking about, joe. The kind of people who wont rat each other out because of those deep family ties ahead of some devastating attack like the one we saw in brussels yesterday. I remember growing up and reading about world war ii and kamakazis. I couldnt understand someone doing that. Life has to be pretty bleak or you must believe the afterlife is pretty great to really be able to do it. If you look at that picture again and you look at the expressions on the faces of the two men who are said to be the suicide bombers on the lefthand side of that picture, youre looking at people who look very calm. Thats what i said, i wouldnt have looked twice at these guys. They dont look panicked. Theyre not muttering phrases. These are people who seem to be totally in control of themselves, who know theyre just minutes away from their own death. How somebody psychologically composes themself for that kind of moment and what preparations they use to do that were going to learn a lot more. But thats an indicator of the type of person that theyre able to recruit. Fervent in their belief, i would imagine. Absolutely. Thank you. For more on the reaction in belgium a day after the attacks, lets bring in politico europe reporter tara palmeri. Shes joining us live from brussels. I think we had to phone her yesterday. We can actually see you today. Good morning. Reporter morning. Im standing in front of a makeshift vigil where there is actually a lot of movement, but in the rest of the city, its pretty quiet today. European officials have been told not to go to work. European parliament shut down. Were still at level four terror alert. The belgian officials have learned there are deep ties between salah abdeslam, the paris attacker, and the two el bakraoui brothers. Theyre all of moroccan descent. They all had close contact in their hub, which is molenbeek. So definitely some correlation in planning the attack. Tara, thank you, once again for your report. We have ambassador burns here so were going to move on. We appreciate it. Thank you. As i said, for more reaction in the attack, former u. S. Ambassador to nato as well as an undersecretary of state. Hes currently a professor at the Harvard Kennedy school of government. Im going to take this somewhere in a moment unless you want to start with your general feelings and comments on whats happened. Thank you. I think what were seeing is a long struggle. Weve seen a series of terrorist attacks over the last four months, over the last 15, 16 years since 9 11. The first thing we have got to do and what our Law Enforcement is doing is try to get with Law Enforcement in europe and do the work of police. Try to track down terrorist suspects, use intelligence to try to find out where they are, then process them in our judicial system. Its knot dplnot glamorous, bute most important work thats got to be done. Theres a lot of cooperation between our authorities and the eu authorities. The larger struggle here is going to be in the entire expanse of land. There are terrorist groups that are aligned with the Islamic State all throughout there and the middle east. Thats a bigger conflict. Our military is trying to get ahold of it. Problem is were trying to contain it. We dont have the resources in place or the strategy in place to try to defeat it. At some point, the United States, the european governments, the arab governments have to decide were going to defeat this group. They havent made that decision yet. Our strategy is contain, not defeat. To continue a conversation i had with the anchors on the previous show, just in the journal, theres global jihads deadly calendar. In this piece, they point out date by date multiple attacks that didnt get as much attention. Amazing how many there were. Then in the op ed part, they talk about the president s and i think theres something to not being too affected by what happens with terror because thats exactly what theyre looking for. Theyre looking to inspire fear. Theyre looking to have us frozen in fear. So you dont want to think that theres a terrorist around every corner. The president apparently, you know, has frequently said, you know, theyre not coming here to cut our heads off, so lets relax, and more people die by falls in bathtubs than from terrorism. I just wonder which is do we walk a fine line between both of those, or do we need someone to tell us, you know, they may get a dirty bomb, they may get biological weapons, they may put smallpox in the water system. I mean, do we wait for that before we say, wow, i really should Pay Attention here. Well, this is the number one threat to the United States. Its not global warming. Global warming is a threat to the United States, but this is a major threat to the United States. This group has shown it has the capacity to act globally. It can deploy resources. It can deploy men and women, suicide bombers, in distant parts of the world. The president , of course, takes that seriously. Really . Are you seeing the type of response that you think is commensurate with whats happening from our administration . I just said i think the big policy question here is we made the assumption that we can try to contain them in place in europe. Its clearly not working. At some point, the administration, but particularly the arabs, because theyre at the heart of this, are going to have to make the decision that we have to put more resources in. What does that mean . More boots on the ground . Intensified air campaign at the source, which is in syria and iraq where the Islamic State has its major outpost. How many people you think were talking about . Now theyve metastasized into libya. Whos going to do the air attacks . The United States is leading it. But you want the arabs to get more serious. I think the United States should intensify the air attack. We should be joined by more arab states. So the saudis, the emirates. But we shouldnt leave. They need to move first. Im saying we should lead. Are we leading now . I think we are leading in that. Im saying we should intensify the air strikes. We need more arab support and more european and nato support for that. At some point you have to have forces on the ground. They can be syrian ckurdish forces. How many people are you going after . I dont know. Im not an intelligence official. The estimates of Islamic State fighters are 30,000 to 40,000 in syria, libya, and iraq. But you have people in europe. You have people who are citizens of france and belgium, not people who have just come in as refugees. And all the other groups in africa. The conundrum is theyre citizens already there. Thats really hard to defend against. Correct. For instance, these people have french and belgian passports. Theyre moving from one country to another. You cant prevent them. Then it becomes an intelligence story. It becomes an intelligence story. I think thats the broader battle. Its intelligence, Law Enforcement, and judicial cooperation. Thats how we essentially went after al qaeda. Ambassador, everyone seems to agree we need to attack this at the source in syria. The problem is no one seems to have an answer of who would be in charge there once isis is out of the way. It was complicated by russia getting involved, even though theyre stepping back at this point. We dont seem to have a clear plan as to who would lead there. I think theres a clear plan by the administration in iraq. Not in syria. There is an authority in baghdad. The next big thing to watch for at some point hopefully this year is mosul is retaken by the iraqi army with the help of the United States. The problem is much more difficult in syria. There the country is split into four or five different factions. We dont want to see president assads control extended. The syrian kurds are the group thats done the most to fight with the United States. But of course theyre the enemy of the turkish government. This is enormously complicated. I think the president and secretary ash carter are doing their best, but they need more support from the local countries. In the hearts and minds of people in all these areas, you need to change that. I dont know how you ever change that. We wont hear from this administration islamic terror, but thats what were talking about. Radical islamic terror. In this place, thats what were talking about. How are we going to change the hearts of kids that grow up and their idols are terrorists, not politicians. Ive lived in the muslim world. My sense is that the vast majority of muslims want nothing to do with this and reject it. That bears repeating this morning. The vast majority. The problem in belgium and france where these two big attacks overs last four months is, these are mosaic societies. Were a melting pot. Theyre mosaics. The young kids in these communities feel theres no escalator up for them. They cant be belgian Prime Minister. They cant get on this show in belgium. That has to change in the educational system and the sociology. Were going to talk politics in a minute with john harwood. I have a political question. Donald trump made critical comments about the muslim comment yesterday. Hes made other comments like that before. As ambassador trying to deal with this, what is the appropriate language . One way or the other. Not donald trumps. Hes done a couple things over the last several days. He repeats this call that muslims should be kept out of the United States. Thats fundamentally antiamerican. Weve got to have border security. You got to check who comes into the country, but you dont keep people out based on religion. Secondly, a day before the attack, he questioned the need for the United States to stay in nato, to lead nato. We need nato. We need these allies to help us prosecute this long, long struggle ahead. So i think hes completely off base. It shows that he has a very weak understanding, probably naive understanding of how this all works. He wants to be commander in chief. He needs to work harder at it. Okay. Ambassador, thank you. Thank you. Appreciate it. Pleasure. Our other top story of the morning, results coming in from the nominating contests in several western states. The candidates seem to have split these. Also, news just crossing that former republican candidate jeb bush has now endorsed ted cruz. John harwood is here with more. A lot of news to get through. Becky, we did have primaries last night. They continued the march of the candidate ambassador burns was just talking about, donald trump and Hillary Clinton. Lets look at arizona, which was the biggest state on the map. Winner take all primary. Donald trump easily beat ted cruz, notwithstanding that endorsement that ted cruz will get later today from jeb bush. On the democratic side, Hillary Clinton swamped Bernie Sanders. Those were the most significant results from the night. We also had caucuses in utah. Ted cruz did well in utah. He topped 50 of the vote, which means he got winner take all of the 40 delegates in utah. Bernie sanders won, consistent with his pattern of doing well in caucus states so far. Bernie sanders also won the caucuses in idaho. Again, smaller contests. Then step back and look at the delegate race for the nomination. You can see on the democratic side, Hillary Clinton has got well over half of the delegates she needs to secure the nomination. If you add in the super delegates, she does even better than that. On the republican side, donald trump has got well over half of what he needs to get the republican nomination. Now, the question is, can he get to 1237 before the convention this summer . To do that, hes going to have to win handily the winner take all states. Theres still some proportional states on the republican calendar. The ones he got in arizona last night is a positive sign he may be able to do that, guys. Better or worse based on the results from last night . I know it was 58 delegates from ariz