>> if you prove a quid pro quo, you might have an impeachable offense. >> to be clear what you described is a quid pro quo, it is funding will not flow unless the investigation into the democratic server happened as well. >> we do that all the time with foreign policy. >> don't forget what eu ambassador sondland said, there was a quid pro quo, everybody knew it, i delivered the message. that doesn't mean it's worth of impeachment but why ignore the obvious? judiciary committee member mike johnson of louisiana, thank you for being here after such a long day. you know it's foreign for us here to test both sides on those things. we can talk about the rate of investigation but this idea that if you show basically a prieb, if you show there is a solicitation here, that there is a pressure campaign, that's all that came up in the testimony. why do you guys ignore what happened instead of just arguing