agreement with iran, you explained your reasons in a nearly 1,700 word statement that is thoughtful in substance and civil in tone. and yet, in the end, i found it unpersuasive. i believe that the agreement is flawed, but it is the most intrusive, demanding and comprehensive set of inspections, verification protocols and snap-back measures ever negotiated. you failed to take note of what must happen at the outset before iran gets any widespread sergeants relief. iran must destroy 98% of its enriched uranium. 5 to 20%, remore and restore two-thirds of the centrifuges, terminate all enrichment at the fordo nuclear facility and render inoperable the key components of its iraq plutonium