searching now. is that right? >> that's what the aviation spergts said the fuel consumption would be so phenomenal at that altitude it would have to go back to cruising altitude to get any kind of distance which would negate what the inmarsat satellite says. it doesn't say how far it went but it said it was in the air for all these extra hours. in order to stay in the air it would have to be economical with its fuel consumption, burning fuel going up and down from 12,000 to 45,000, back up and down. if it's doing any kind of acrobatics in the air it's sucking fuel in a big way. i don't know how it can stay in the air. >> you agree? >> yeah. absolutely, i do. but then remember the inmarsat information about those axrcarcs calculated if it stayed at 35,000 feet. again as tom pointed out we had