argument about the toenails aside, the defense argument that this is a quiet neighborhood, these people were in fear of their lives, and based on the initial encounter of travis mcmichael when he thought ahmaud arbery had a gun in a previous incident they later -- the defense was trying to say that was all contextual about what was occurring on that day. you can't divorce what travis mcmichael knew when he confronted ahmaud arbery a second time and then came running at him. i think the jurors will want to look at that video to make the determination, who is the aggressor here? is ahmaud arbery going after travis mcmichael or is it travis mcmichael introducing a gun in a fight with an unarmed man who had nothing in his possession. of course, we know there was no crime committed by ahmaud arbery on that particular day, which goes directly to the citizen's