that's not what i was told. >> are you rejecting the concon conclusions or accounts in this army report? >> yes, i am. >> they're not true? >> i'm rejecting them. >> the reporting questioned a 2,000-page government document obtained by "the washington post" after a freedom of information act request, reportedly containing sworn testimony from multiple commanders involved in the operation. "the post" has since published more reports from the pentagon that appear to affirm the accounts from these commanders. according to "the post," the report concludes senior white house and state department officials failed to grasp the taliban's steady advance on afghanistan's capital and resisted efforts by u.s. military leaders to prepare the evacuation weeks before kabul's fall, placing american troops in greater danger. but it doesn't stop there. the report even contains allegations from one senior commander that the mission to evacuate u.s. citizens and allies was hampered by outside