this case. but mr. bryan is not responsible for that. that breaks the chain. the causal chain. it's no longer substantial and necessary. it's no longer direct. likewise, when mr. travis mcmichael closes the distance from -- to the left of the truck as you're looking at it on the screen towards the middle of the truck or exactly where -- i'll let you all figure that out. but when travis mcmichael does that, regardless of whether travis mcmichael is justified in doing so, doesn't that also break the direct causation? does it not also break the substantial and necessary part of mr. bryan in causing the death of mr. arbery? i would submit to you that mr. bryan cannot be the direct and