soft on crime. don't forget. you have four potential former presidential candidates sitting on this committee. the soft on crime for the democrats seems to be something they'll use all it's somebody that republicans like to use. if they can portray here as somebody who represented, you know, detainees at gitmo. can you never have anyone who's a public defender, assigned a client to represent someone? >> jen psaki, white house press secretary, suggested that hawley has no grounds to speak on this, because he refused to say whether he would vote for roy moore, who was the republican senate candidates from alabama who had been accused of sexually harassing underage girls. i don't know that that really is responsive. certainly it's political responsive, but if one is