no collusion. -- testified there was no evidence the trump campaign colluded with russia. next it was obstruction of justice, but after searching diligently and find trying to find any evidence, democrats abandoned that theory. by comparison, clinton's impeachment in article ii had seven different incidents of obstruction of justice supported by the evidence collected by an independent council. then out of the blue after coordinating with democratic staff on the intel committee, a whistle-blower filed a carefully scripted complaint based solely and completely on hearsay. democrats' theory now turned to a quid pro quo, which i'm assuming because one of their own candidates for president clearly admitted to a quid pro quo on national television, and there is no evidence of a quid pro quo in the phone transcript president trump released, that they abandoned that theory as well. the process that ensued was anything but open, transparent, bipartisan or equitable, abandoning all past historic due process afforded the minority