Twothirds theyll have 6,000 left after they had 19,500. It reduces their enriched uranium stockpile. Meaning it extends the breakout time that iran wont have enough fissile material to build a bomb for about a year. And then it also lifts sanctions against iran in phases. Think the deal has a lot more than me and my colleagues thought it was going to be in it when we were following this all week. But as we say, the devil is in the details. Now negotiators have to hammer out a deal before june. I sat down with secretary of state john kerry yesterday and i asked him what happens, because irans name is not on this actual deal. Its a fact sheet that the u. S. Put out. What happenes if iran tries to backpedal and open up the negotiations again and say they didnt agree to any of that . Lets take a listen. Then they dont get an agreement. Look. Were very clear about where we are. If they try it renegotiate, youll end . You wont give them an agreement . Were not weve agreed and were not going to renegotiate things weve been very clear about that. Now john kerry and Energy Secretary monese who was also in the negotiations have to make the hard sell to congress now, that they can make this a good deal for the United States for israel for all parties involved. Thats going to be a hard sell. Congress is looking for a say in this deal. It looks like they have a vetoproof majority to make that happen. Chris . All right. Its going to be a question of whether or not did they just agree or did they agree to agree. Theres no question president obama is facing an uphill battle to sell this iran framework to a very skeptical and as elise said divided congress. So lets bring in cnn National CorrespondentSunlen Serfaty joining us from the white house with that part of the story. The president doesnt have to go to congress to get a deal like this done it could be done by the executive. But with sanctions hanging in the balance. Practically he must yes . Thats what the white house believes. But congress is going to challenge the president on this. Theres already a series of defiant bills ready and lined up on capitol hill for him. Republicans are saying that this bill this deal has too many concessions to iran. And republicans saying that. But democrats meanwhile, theyre saying, theyre giving tepid responses at best. Now congress is back from recess in two weeks. It is then when Senate Foreign relations chair, republican bob corker says he will move forward with his bill. This is a bill that has already elicited a veto threat from the white house. Its a bill that ultimately if theyre able to get a vetoproof majority it would give congress the ability to approve or reject any final bill. Now key here will of course be Senate Democrats, will they defy the president on this . Some have already signed on to the bill. The white house has said that will undercut their negotiating ability at the table. And president obama gave a stern warning to congress. If Congress Kills this deal not based on expert analysis and without offering any reasonable alternative, then its the United States that will be blamed for the failure of diplomacy. International unity will collapse. And the path to conflict will widen. And the white house has promised that there will be briefings to congress. They promise highlevel engagement to congress. But congress does want more than that. They want a final and formal say in the deal. Michaela . Despite the hard sell from the white house, israel still isnt buying. Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been against the Iran Nuclear Deal from the start. Using his strongest language yet to condemn it. I want to turn to Oren Lieberman, live in jerusalem with reaction there. Netanyahu has been critical of the deal since the beginning and his language has only gotten stronger. In conversation with president obama in which the president tried to reassure netanyahu that Israel Security was very much in this deal netanyahu said that this deal increases the risk of a quote horrific war. Horrific war, some very powerful language coming from netanyahu. He criticized whats in the deal and not in the deal. Netanyahu wanted to make sure the deal didnt limit or change Irans Nuclear facilities but dismantle them take them apart. Netanyahu says the deal doesnt do that. He said he wanted to see the deal tied to lifting of restrictions to iran pulling back its aggression in the region. There again, netanyahus government says the deal doesnt do that. So what will netanyahu do now . We expect a statement from him shortly. He called an emergency Cabinet Meeting this afternoon. To we expect a statement coming out of that shortly. Remember House Speaker boehner was here senator Mitch Mcconnell is here working closely with Congressional Republicans to lobby against the deal. Well see more from that perhaps. Chris, certainly worth noting that intelligence minister has not ruled out the military option here. Look everybody is keeping their options on the table. The question becomes is the deal better than no deal . Thank you for the reporting. Lets get perspective from someone who understands the situation, the phone right now, former secretary of state madeline yaleeine albright an ambassador to the united nations. Shes the chairman of the albright stone bridge group. Good to have you on the phone. Is this an acceptable framework, madam secretary . Ive been looking through it and following this very closely. Day think its even more than an acceptable framework. It has done a lot of what people were demanding. In terms of the twothirds of the installed centrifuges have to be reduced. There is a way that iran has agreed not to enrich uranium over a low level for at least 15 years. Its agreed to reduce its current stockpile. I wont go through all the details of this. But it really has done an awful lot. The key part here that i think is so important, is the Inspection System that is set up for iaea. Everything has to be verified. And the sanctions, are dependant or the removal of them on that verification and i think that what it has done is in fact increase the breakout time for iran to go forward, if they did feel that they wanted to produce a weapon. So i think it has done what was promised. Now we are going to be looking at the details as the framework is not enlarged but followed out in terms of the details of it. Now a framework is not a deal itself. Everybody should understand that. And theres a big chance that not iran but the u. S. Congress may upset this process. How important is it to you, that a deal gets done . How strong a message do you want to send about that . I think its absolutely essential. Because this is one of the issues that has troubled everybody in terms of Nuclear Power here. In that particular area. The capability to do a bomb. I do think that this is an essential deal it is a good deal as we see it now. And i do think, i obviously have always believed that congress should have a voice in talking about Foreign Policy. But i think people have to be very careful not to undo something that has been worked on so carefully by experts. Who are going to be very willing to come up and explain this to members of congress. And i think that one has to be careful not to unravel something that has been so carefully designed. And as secretary kerry said and the president has said basically nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. So the next months are going to be very important. Madam secretary quickly what do you make of the paranoia or suspicion that iran is just playing the p5 1 and using this Nuclear Negotiation to garner some softness in the other areas that matter to them. Like what theyre doing in yemen. What theyre doing in syria, what theyre doing in iraq. And that they dont really have to agree to anything here theyre just buying time. I dont agree with that. I think obviously negotiations take time. But there are so much issues that involve our having a relationship with iran we havent had one since 1979. And developing that and then working on the other issues. Theres no question that what iran is doing in the region is very serious. And has to be dealt with. But i think that having this Framework Agreement in place will make that more possible. And that we obviously cant forget about the other parts, but we also i think have to be really careful in terms of having the option of force on the table. But not threatening it to such a point. That things could get even worse in the middle east. Secretary of state Madeleine Albright thank you very much for the help as always. Lets turn now to Hilary Mann Leverett the author of going to iran. Shes a former clinton and Bush NationalSecurity Council adviser and a state Department Middle east expert. Shes directly negotiated with iran over the pursuit of al qaeda. So always good to have you on the show. You understand the dynamic there very well. The major pushback that well start hearing starting this morning is you dont do a deal with the devil. Yeah. Were certainly going to hear that. And i think that these talks are fragile. This interim agreement, this understanding is fragile. Its going to be an extremely tough road ahead. But i have negotiated with iranian officials, including the current foreign minister zarif, over afghanistan and al qaeda. And those were incredibly productive constructive negotiations and discussions. We worked very well with them in afghanistan. The iranians are one ally in the region that see eye to eye with us against al qaeda and the Islamic State. Were working with them essentially hand in hand in iraq against the Islamic State. As we did in afghanistan against al qaeda. So there are areas where we have worked with them productively constructively in the past and i think this nuclear deal shows that we can also work with them constructively on proliferation, nonproliferation issues. You used the word ally in iran, you dont hear that very often around here. Thats right. Another point of push pback will be moment you let up on the sanctions, they are going to go to town and get everything that they wanted. Theyre going do show that theyre stronger than the u. S. And the p5 1. And youll never get the inspections right. You know whats so fascinating about the Islamic Republic of iran, theyve built an economy, a country, a system over the past 35 years that is really in a lots of ways selfsufficient. When they had the revolution in 1979 they were completely dependant on the u. S. Military. They couldnt produce a single bullet. But what theyve done under sanctions, on their own, is build up military industrial complex, which can protect their country. So the idea that sanctions somehow dissuades them just defies the record. When i first started arguing within the Bush Administration that we needed to deal with iranians on the Nuclear Issue back in 2003, the iranians had 164 centrifuges. As we imposed more and more sanctions, they were able to acquire more and more centrifuges. Today they have nearly 20,000 thats up from 164 to 20,000. They did that under sanctions. The idea that lifting sanctions is going to let them do x or y or z just defies the record. Or that extra sanctions will be what puts a foot on their throat so to speak. Youre saying it may not have the teeth that people expect. The last point that i want you to make here on this deal in the early stage is that congress is going to say, no way, were not giving it to you, mr. President , were going to use these sanctions effectively to frustrate your efforts in this deal unless were brought on board. As a policy expert in dealing with congress do you think that congress has a right to approve this deal . Whatday do you think the proper legal dynamic is here . The constitution sets up that diplomacy is entirely within the realm of the executive. But congress does an oversight role. Especially because so many of the sanctions were legislated. So theyre entirely within congresss role. But the critical problem here is for president obama to make the strategic sell. If he focuses on it just as an arms control agreement, my concern is that it will die on the vine just like president carters salt ii treaty with the soviets over their strategic arsenal. Weve seen failure before. We could see failure again if its a narrow arms control issue. If theres a broader strategic case like nixon and kissinger visavis china, i think that will sell. But president obama has been extremely reluctant to make that strategic case. And instead, he seems to be going down the path potentially of president carter where hes dependant on a congress to okay an arms control agreement which they may, there may not be any arms control agreement with iran that would be good enough for them. Well if the president is dependant on congress, history of his presidency shows the prospects are not good, well keep a close eye on it Hilary Mann Leverett thank you as always. In kenya, a massive search is on for a key suspect in thursdays horrifying massacre. At a university in kenya. Al shabab terrorists raiding the campus targeting nonmuslims and executing them. 147 students are dead. Were told there are still bodies on the school ground. Were going to have more for you coming up on that. We have a live reporter on the ground. Well talk to him about the scene today. We understand the university has been closed indefinitely. Well talk to him. Were going to take a short break. This morning its been just over 24 hours. Since al shabab gun men terrorized this university in kenya. Now with at least 147 dead and nearly 600 evacuated, the community of garissa in complete agony. The massacre beginning just before dawn on thursday. The terrorists descending on earlymorning prayers reportedly separating muslims from christians. And killing the christians or taking them hostage. They started jumping up and down running for their lives, its unfortunate where they are going to is where the gunshots were coming from. The gunmen then going dormitory to dormitory. Before kenyan forces eventually corner them. A standoff lasting for hours, finally at around 9 00 p. M. Officials announce the end of the operation. Garissa kenya. Were going to be giving you the latest information as we get it. Whats going on in kenya as michaela was telling you, theres still bodies on the ground its a very fluid situation. We still dont know exactly what the numbers were involved. Either for the victims or on the attackers. As soon as we get our communications up there and get better reporting, well be back to it. We have breaking news for you in the investigation into the crash of Germanwings Flight 9525. The second black box has been found. And has been downloaded and it does seem to confirm that the copilot purposely accelerated the planes descent, slamming it into a mountain in the french alps. As investigators make a disturbing find as well on Andreas Lubitz tablet device cnns will ripley zwroinsjoins us live from dusseldorf germany. Its intriguing understanding the planning that went into this horrible situation, will. The information on the tablet crucial for investigators. Because european official is telling us it essentially proves the theory that this is pre premeditated murder. Premeditated murder of 149 innocent people. Breaking just within the last hour the insights from the flight data recorder recovered in the french alps. It was buried in eight inches of debris because of the force of the impact. And now the data recorder shows that Andreas Lubitz changed the auto pilot settings bringing the plane down he set it for 100 feet a collision course with the mountain range. And at the same time he was manually increasing the speed to make sure that that plane hit the mountain completely obliterating it. Very disturbing and the evidence that was seized from his apartment reveals more insight about what he was planning. Appalling new insights into the disturbed mind of germanwings copilot Andreas Lubitz. A tablet seized from lubitz home contained chilling internet searches he allegedly made the week leading up to the crash. Prosecutors found search terms relating to methods to commit suicide. Cockpit doors, and their security measures. All which investigators say amounts to premeditated murder. Lot of pilots dont know exactly how to turn that lock off, so it may have been that he was looking it up to make sure he understood how to keep the pilot out. New details continue to emerge about lubitz rapidly deteriorating psychological health. Law enforcement source close to the investigation said lubitz suffered severe depression and stress late last year. He was doctorshopping, seeing as many as six for ongoing sleep and vision problems. Lubitz was even prescribed heavy depression medication. The source believes he was not taking the day of the crash. Medications that are treating depression sometimes they can make someone sleepy. They can be a sedating but they can also have nearly the opposite effect. It can sort of make them become more on the sort of manic side of things. He apparently told some doctors he was fearful of losing his pilot license because of his medical issues. A potentially key motive for the deadly crash. And this morning, michaela as information continues to come in it becomes more and more clear that this was a deliberate act on the part of Andreas Lubitz. The one key question remains unanswered and that is why did he do this. Michaela . Something we may never fully understand. All right, will thank you so much for that reporting. We turn back here in america, two women in new york charged with planning an isisinspired bomb plot. Authorities say one woman had repeated contact with members of