Creating Nuclear Material for their stated purpose of creating a Nuclear Weapon to use to wipe out not only israel, but to wipe the United States of america off the face of the map. And if theres anything that history has taught us, mr. Speaker, it is this it is that when a madman speaks, freedomloving nations should listen. The leader in iran is called the supreme leader. Hes not called that for no reason. It isnt the president of the country who is truly the throne in iran. It is the religious leader named khomeini. The president s the president s come and go but khomeini, the supreme leader, remains the same. His announced intentions are completely clear. Iran seeks to be the hedge mono. In other words the hegemon. In other words, iran seeks to be the dominant power not only in the mideast region but they have evidence of dabbling in the far east, in china. In philippines. In south america. They intend to have their fingers in places all over the world because they intend to dominate. They intend to dominate with shia religion, they intend to dominate through the use of Nuclear Weaponry. Through the most vile form of violence that there is in the world. In order to achieve their objectives. So again, lets look at what iran would have gotten had the nation of france not intervened and put a stop to this disastrous bill, thor disastrous effort and agreement or this disastrous effort and agreement that would have had the potential of changing the course of human history. Heres what iran would get. 3 billion in cash, minimum. Some report upwards of 50 billion in cash. 9. 6 billion in gold reserves for the iranian regime. Over 5 billion in petrochemicals for the nation. 1. 3 billion in automobiles. Iran is heavily engaged in the production of automobiles and this would have given them that revenue. Enriched uranium for one bomb. Why in the world would p5 plus one, the nations that met in geneva, switzerland, allow iran to have enriched uranium from one bomb when theyve already stated their intention if they have that bomb . We also know that iran has plans to be involved in having intercontinental ballistic missiles. In other words, they not only want to bomb they not only want a bomb, mr. Speaker, they want a Delivery System and they need a Delivery System that goes just so far to be able to get to israel but they seek a Delivery System, mr. Speaker, that could take their bomb to United States targets as well. United states targets here in the homeland, but United States targets as well overseas. And it does it just doesnt end with iranning, mr. Speaker. If iran gains a Nuclear Weapon, what the world must know, is that the weapon will not simply remain within the boundaries and in the hands of a nuclear iran. That would be bad enough. What we do know is that saudi arabia has already had to make plans to defend herself. He already has a preorder into a nuclear pakistan, forward order for a for an order for a Nuclear Weapon because saudi arabia knows they will be a target from a nuclear iran if irap obtains that weapon. So therefore, well see another nation, saudi arabia that will have to have a Nuclear Weapon. But it wont stop with saudi arabia, mr. Speaker. We know that egypt, then, will be seeking a Nuclear Weapon. And lets not forget, prior to ly 4 of this year, 2013, the violent terrorist organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood was the legitimate government of the state of egypt. Imagine the violent terrorist organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood with a Nuclear Weapon. Also imagine turkey with a Nuclear Weapon. Imagine then that we are no longer talking nation states. Now what we could be talking about very well with iran having a Nuclear Weapon would be some of its umbrella protect rats. I. Re , his boll lark the terrorist organization primarily located in lebanon just north of israels border. Also would in all likelihood have access to a Nuclear Weapon or have one located on israels northern border. Syria could also have a Nuclear Weapon. And from there we could be talking about, mr. Speaker, al qaeda having a Nuclear Weapon. With miniaturization. Perhaps the al nuss rah front. Al nusra front. Or any of the other myriad terrorist organizations that there are around the world. You see, mr. Speaker, the entire paradigm of the worlds structure could change. Quite literally. And for what . What is it that we would have gotten out of this very bad deal that the United States was about to enter into . It makes no sense. You see, we would have gotten zero centrifuges dismantled. Whats a centrifuge . Thats whats used by iran to enrich uranium, the fissile material thats required to create a nuclear bomb. We would have gotten zero dismantled. Iran would have continued to maintain not only control and ownership of their centrifuges, lets face it, lets not kid ourselves, those centrifuges and have continued to run spun enriched uranium. We would have gotten zero ounces of iran of uranium shipped out of iran. Thats the whole ballgame, mr. Speaker. The estimate today as we stand here is that iran has enrichude rain yum to the tune of nine to 10 tons, well over the amount needed to have a nuclear bomb. You see that must be the first condition, not the last. Not one thats off the table. Thats the fers season to lift any sanction. First condition to lift any sanction. Iran must first make sure we must first make sure that all the enriched uranium leaves the nation of iran because again, we know their stated intention. That must go. We also get out of this deal zero facilities closed. We know theres multiple facilities against and in violation of u. N. Resolution after u. N. Resolution after u. N. Resolution. Iran has continued to be one of the biggest violate yoffers u. N. Resolutions that there are in the world today. One Nuclear Facility after another, including a plutonium facility, a heavy water reactor or some pronounce it araq. Why would we do this . Why allow them to continue the means of production for Nuclear Weapons, we get nothing in return. They get 3 billion. Some say 50 billion. We get nothing in return. Are we mad . Thank god for the french. Thank god for the French Foreign minister who said this was a suckers deal. Who the Prime MinisterBenjamin Netanyahu said this was a very, very bad deal. Its the deal of the century. Why would we continue to reward bad behavior and a bad actor . Why would we allow no delay on the plutonium reactor . Why would there be no stop in missile testing. Lets face it, what do they want the missiles for . Who is attacking iran right now . And yet we would allow them to continue to test missiles, the Delivery System for a Nuclear Weapon . No stop in terrorism . Who is the exporter of terrorism . Its iran who exports terrorism to lebanon . Its iran. Through hezbollah. Who exports terrorism in syria alassad has killed over 100,000 of his people. It is iran. Imagine iran with a Nuclear Weapon. And the terror that would be exported once they have that Nuclear Weapon. And no stop in the human rights abuses. All this they get they get a plutonium reactor, 3,000 new centrifuge the enriched uranium for a bomb. While we were over in israel this last week, we heard from the Prime Minister that there are well over 18,000 centrifuges running today. The first level of purity that is reached in uranium is 3. 5 . The second level that is reached is 20 . From there it is a hop and a skip, literally, only weeks, to get to 90 purity which is what is required for a nuclear bomb. We are virtually sitting on the edge of a nuclear iran with no wiggle room left. Finally, finally, finally were beginning to see the beginning of the economic sanctions coming to work. Just when theyre coming to bear, just when iran is about to buckle at the knee, come to the table and actually agree to something over here on this side of the scorecard, you see, mr. Speaker, its a big goose egg on this side of the scorecard with the freedomloving people of the world seek, what the American People seek, what the jewish people of the state of israel seek. We cant zero we get zero on this scorecard. While the iranian while the Iranian Nuclear program is allowed to continue apace. Moving forward toward the ultimate goal of the Nuclear Weapon and the means of delivery. And all the while, working on miniaturization, miniaturization, so that the Nuclear Warhead can deliver its deadly, lethal target to the most Vulnerable People in the world. And wouldnt it be horrible and wouldnt it be sick if a city here in the United States would be a recipient of one of those nuclear war heads. Why . Because in the midst of foolishness, the p5 plus one thought it would be a good idea to let the iranians continue their Nuclear Program. May it never be. There was an article that was just published and it was published by someone that i have Great Administration for in the wall street journal. Very smart guy named Brett Stevens. Brett had a column that came out, id like to quote from his column, he talked about, again this last weekend and the fact that the world dodged a bullet, just barely, not because of the Obama Administrations efforts, im sorry to say, and not because of the efforts of the united kingdom, im sorry to say. But because of the french. And we have them to thank. The talks, and i quote, unexpectedly fell apart at the last minute when the French Foreign minister publicly objected to what he called a suckers deal, meaning that the United States was prepared to begin lifting sanctions on iran in exchange for tentative iranian promises that they would slow their multiple Nuclear Programs. Now this is very important that i read this, mr. Speaker. Because Brett Stevens goes on to say in his article, not stop their Nuclear Program, not suspend their Nuclear Program, mind you. Much less dismantle them. But merely reduce their pace. From troun jog. When theyre on mile 23 of their nuclear marathon. He said it says a rot about the administration that they so wanted a deal that they would have been prepared to make one. And what this deal would have meant, quite simply, mr. Speaker is that we would have seen an iran with a nuclear bomb very soon than means to deliver it and put the world on edge. May it never be. Thank god for the french. Thats what happens when the a game ween politics as of perception and policy as the pursuit of National Objectives disolved. I think this is a very important weekend and its important to know that this isnt over. You see, what happened is that there was a delay. A delay, i suppose, what, to buy the vote of the french . To take their arm and twist it bheender that back . Because now the pressure is on france and the in the p5 plus one. The pressure is on france. Seven days from today, mr. Speaker, there will be another meeting. Our secretary of state, john kerry who insists that there that this deal and that he and the United States arent blind and arent stupid with this deal, he insisted this on meet the press last sunday, hes stating that he believes that there will be a deal with iran and that there will be one quickly. And my question, mr. Speaker, to the secretary of state or to anyone in the Obama Administration thats in the process of working on this deal with the nuclear iran, my question would be, is this what the deal is that youre intending to strike . We get zero, and iran gets the ability to develop a nuclear bomb. Whats the deal . Whats in that . Enge we need to ask the lead negotiator, whose name is Wendy Sherman, this is president obamas lead negotiator, chief Nuclear Negotiator in this very crucial negotiation, which has the potential to change the course of history. 19 8, she worked on a president ial campaign and Democrat National committee, this is the person who is striking this deal right now on a nuclear iran and c. E. O. Of the Fannie May Foundation and charity that was shut down 10 years later for using a taxexempt contribution to advance corporate interests. She went to the state department and served as a point person in cluke collar negotiations and met with kim junk il. She thought he was smart, engaged, knowledgeable, selfconfident. She called him a regular guy. She was found working for her former boss before she went to the number three spot at the state department. From there, the arc of her career has gone to be now in charge of this effort of giving away the ability to iran to be able to continue on a pace and develop a nuclear bomb. Again, may it never be. When we were in israel on friday evening, we found out, mr. Speaker, that the Obama Administration had gone much further in this effort than we had thought, because a story came out in the daily beast, in an article by eli lake and he said in this very bad deal that once the current president was elected in june, rouhani, that the Obama Administration began then to already ease the sanctions on iran. Its something that none of us could even begin to imagine, that even without consulting congress, the Treasury Department issued notice in june that they wouldnt be checking on those who violate the sanctions deals. In other words, there wouldnt be the type of sanctions going out and the type of punishments, if you will, for bad actors that were doing trades with iran. In other words, the Obama Administration already beginning past june, according to the article that came out on friday, were already evening out the scorecard. Bonusese already giving to iran, and why . Because rouhani was seen quote as a moderate. Even in september, president obama himself wanted to be able to meet and talk and discuss without any precondition at all with the leader of iran. There is a read that happened in the leadership in iran. They looked to the United States and they tested the pulse of the Obama Administration and they w that they could get what Benjamin Netanyahu called a very, very, very bad deal for freedomloving people across the world. The leadership in iran saw something else. They thought they could get a suckers deal, in the word of the french diplomat and negotiator. Thats not what the American People want. They want to know when they tuck their children in bed at night, that the world will be secure for them and they wont have to worry about a Nuclear Weapon coming within the borders of the United States of america, or of any nation. No one wants to see a nuclear nightmare. But if the Obama Administration needs to recognize that in order to alleviate the burden of a nuclear nightmare, we must never ever, ever allow iran to have a nuclear bomb and the means to deliver that bomb. You see, when we were in israel, mr. Speaker, we were told by some of the leadership in israel, that there are 25 nations that have civilian capability of having Nuclear Power, but only five nations enrich uranium in order to have the fissile material. When you have a responsibility, you have to act responsible. And those nations have acted responsibly with the fissile material. The argument from iran is different. A say they have an in right to enrich. All nations dont have the right when they have spoken irresponsibly and in violation of u. N. Resolution after u. N. Resolution and said no to International Atomic energy inspectors coming to iran to check on what iran is doing in regards to uranium enrichment and in regards to Nuclear Reactors or the plutonium heavy water reactor, the door is slammed in the face of the inspectors. They are told maybe some other time. Think of that with your teenager and want to check your teenagers room, said, not this time, maybe tomorrow. Does that raise a few suspicions in your mind . Usually it does. And in the case of the security of the people of the world, that should definitely raise our concern. So why would we give the benefit of the doubt to a nation that has thumbed its knows at the United NationsSecur