cspanhistory for information on our schedule of upcoming programs and to keep up with the latest history news. Up next on American History tv, Regent University looks back at president reagans june 8, 19 82 address to the British Parliament delivered in a royal gallery and the palace of westminster in london. The speech is remembered for reagans declaration that the march of freedom and democracy would leave marxism, leninism on the ashby of history. We will hear the speech after a brief introduction, and then hear a Panel Discussion on reagans role in the soviet threat. This twohour program was part of the reynald Ronald Reagan symposium at Regent University. Thank you, dr. Patterson. In the hot summer of 1982, president reagan delivered a speech that is come to be known as his westminster address. He predicted the downfall of the soviet union at the hands of the democratic one that would leave leninism on the ash heap of sister he on the ash heap of history. Prime minister Margaret Thatcher called it a magnificent speech, but then she was expected to say such a thing. The American Press viewed it as anything but. One Prominent Network figure it really waived the speedway as vintage reagan full of reagan platitudes. Another called it naive. The president had been shot just a year earlier. Media figures thought him rather a lightweight on foreign policy. One of them characterize reagans parliamentary audience as bemused purity you are going to see it in just a moment so you can make up your own mind. American academics however viewed the president as downright dangerous. He was, as they said, strident prude, an ideological warmonger and he was very wrong about the future. The soviet union insisted in the journal of Foreign Affairs is not now, nor will it be in the next decade in the trolls of a throes of a true crisis for it boasts unused and stability. As an academic, i can only hope they had tenure when they wrote that. [laughter] of course, in less than a decade, reagan proved to be very right. By 1989, the soviet empire, he would call it an evil empire the following year, was beginning to spend apart, and the burling berlin wall came tumbling down. The revolution seem to be coming to pass, but had it . We will hear more about that in our second panel before the next 30 minutes or so, i invite you to watch and listen to president reagans westminster address from 1982, generally given to us by the reagan library. President reagan. It is my privilege to welcome to the palace of westminster the president of my mothers country, my lords, ladies and gentlemen, mr. President reagan. [applause] president reagan thank you very much. My lord chancellor, mr. Speaker, the journey of which this visit forms a part is a long one. Already it has taken me to two great cities of the west, rome and paris, and to the economic summit at versailles. And there, once again, our sister democracies have proved that even in a time of severe economic strain, free peoples can Work Together freely and voluntarily to address problems as serious as inflation, unemployment, trade, and Economic Development in a spirit of cooperation and solidarity. Other milestones lie ahead. Later this week, in germany, we and our nato allies will discuss measures for our joint defense and americas latest initiatives for a more peaceful, secure world through arms reductions. Each stop of this trip is important, but among them all, this moment occupies a special place in my heart and in the hearts of my countrymen a moment of kinship and homecoming in these hallowed halls. Speaking for all americans, i want to say how very much at home we feel in your house. Every american would, because this is, as we have been so eloquently told, one of democracys shrines. Here the rights of free people and the processes of representation have been debated and refined. It has been said that an institution is the lengthening shadow of a man. This institution is the lengthening shadow of all the men and women who have sat here and all those who have voted to send representatives here. This is my second visit to Great Britain as president of the United States. My first opportunity to stand on british soil occurred almost a year and a half ago when your Prime Minister graciously hosted a diplomatic dinner at the British Embassy in washington. Mrs. Thatcher said then that she hoped i was not distressed to find staring down at me from the Grand Staircase a portrait of his royal majesty king george iii. [laughter] she suggested it was best to let bygones be bygones, and in view of our two countries remarkable friendship in succeeding years she added that most englishmen today would agree with Thomas Jefferson that a little rebellion now and then is a very good thing. Well, from here i will go to bonn and then berlin, where there stands a grim symbol of power untamed. The berlin wall, that dreadful gray gash across the city, is in its third decade. It is the fitting signature of the regime that built it. And a few hundred kilometers behind the berlin wall, there is another symbol. In the center of warsaw, there is a sign that notes the distances to two capitals. In one direction it points toward moscow. In the other it points toward brussels, headquarters of western europes tangible unity. The marker says that the distances from warsaw to moscow and warsaw to brussels are equal. The sign makes this point poland is not east or west. Poland is at the center of european civilization. It has contributed mightily to that civilization. It is doing so today by being magnificently unreconciled to oppression. Polands struggle to be poland and to secure the basic rights we often take for granted demonstrates why we dare not take those rights for granted. Gladstone, defending the reform bill of 1866, declared, you cannot fight against the future. Time is on our side. It was easier to believe in the march of democracy in gladstones day in that high noon of victorian optimism. We are approaching the end of a bloody century plagued by a terrible political invention totalitarianism. Optimism comes less easily today, not because democracy is less vigorous, but because democracys enemies have refined their instruments of repression. Yet optimism is in order because day by day democracy is proving itself to be a notatallfragile flower. From stettin on the baltic to varna on the black sea, the regimes planted by totalitarianism have had more than 30 years to establish their legitimacy. But none not one regime has yet been able to riskfree free elections. Regimes planted by bayonets do not take root. The strength of the Solidarity Movement in poland demonstrates the truth told in an underground joke in the soviet union. It is that the soviet union would remain a oneparty nation even if an Opposition Party were permitted, because everyone would join the Opposition Party. [laughter] americas time as a player on the stage of World History has been brief. I think understanding this fact has always made you patient with your younger cousins well not always patient. I do recall that on one occasion, Sir Winston Churchill said in exasperation about one most distinguished diplomats he is the only case i know of a bull who carries his china shop with him. [laughter] but witty as sir winston was, he also had that special attribute of great statesmen the gift of vision, the willingness to see the future based on the experience of the past. It is this sense of history, this understanding of the past that i want to talk with you about today, for it is in remembering what we share of the past that our two nations can make common cause for the future. We have not inherited an easy world. If developments like the industrial revolution, which began here in england, and the gifts of science and technology have made life much easier for us, they have also made it more dangerous. There are threats now to our freedom, indeed to our very existence, that other generations could never even have imagined. There is first the threat of global war. No president , no congress, no Prime Minister, no parliament can spend a day entirely free of this threat. And i dont have to tell you that in todays world the existence of Nuclear Weapons could mean, if not the extinction of mankind, then surely the end of civilization as we know it. That is why negotiations on Intermediaterange Nuclear forces now underway in europe and the s. T. A. R. T. Talks strategic arms reduction talks which will begin later this month, are not just critical to american or western policy, they are critical to mankind. Our commitment to early success in these negotiations is firm and unshakable, and our purpose is clear reducing the risk of war by reducing the means of waging war on both sides. At the same time there is a threat posed to human freedom by the enormous power of the modern state. History teaches the dangers of government that overreaches political control taking precedence over free Economic Growth, secret police, mindless bureaucracy, all combining to stifle individual excellence and personal freedom. Now, i am aware that among us here and throughout europe there is legitimate disagreement over the extent to which the Public Sector should play a role in a nations economy and life. But on one point all of us are united our abhorrence of dictatorship in all its forms, but most particularly totalitarianism and the terrible inhumanities it has caused in our time the great purge, auschwitz and dachau, the gulag, and cambodia. Historians looking back at our time will note the consistent restraint and peaceful intentions of the west. They will note that it was the democracies who refused to use the threat of their Nuclear Monopoly in the 1940s and early 1950s for territorial or imperial gain. Had that Nuclear Monopoly been in the hands of the communist world, the map of europe indeed, the world would look very different today. And certainly they will note it was not the democracies that invaded afghanistan or supressed polish solidarity or used chemical and toxin warfare in afghanistan and southeast asia. If history teaches anything, it teaches selfdelusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly. We see around us today the marks of our terrible dilemma predictions of doomsday, antinuclear demonstrations, an arms race in which the west must, for its own protection, be an unwilling participant. At the same time we see totalitarian forces in the world who seek subversion and conflict around the globe to further their barbarous assault on the human spirit. What, then, is our course . Must civilization perish in a hail of fiery atoms . Must freedom wither in a quiet deadening accommodation with totalitarian evil . Sir Winston Churchill refused to accept the inevitability of war or even that it was imminent. He said, i do not believe that soviet russia desires war. What they desire is the fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines. But what we have to consider here today while time remains is the permanent prevention of war and the establishment of conditions of freedom and democracy as rapidly as possible in all countries. Well, this is precisely our Mission Today to preserve freedom as well as peace. It may not be easy to see, but i believe we live now at a turning point. In an ironic sense, karl marx was right. We are witnessing today a great revolutionary crisis, a crisis where the demands of the economic order are conflicting directly with those of the political order. But the crisis is happening not in the free, nonmarxist west, but in the home of marxistleninism, the soviet union. It is the soviet union that runs against the tide of history by denying human freedom and Human Dignity to its citizens. It also is in deep economic difficulty. The rate of growth in the National Product has been steadily declining since the 1950s and is less than half of what it was then. The dimensions of this failure are astounding a country which employs 1 5 of its population in agriculture is unable to feed its own people. Were it not for the private sector, the tiny private sector tolerated in soviet agriculture, the country might be on the brink of famine. These private plots occupy a bare 3 of the arable land but account for nearly 1 4 of soviet farm output and nearly 1 3 of Meat Products and vegetables. Overcentralized, with little or no incentives, year after year the soviet system pours its best resource into the making of instruments of destruction. The constant shrinkage of Economic Growth combined with the growth of military production is putting a heavy strain on the soviet people. What we see here is a political structure that no longer corresponds to its economic base, a society where Productive Forces are hampered by political ones. The decay of the soviet experiment should come as no surprise to us. Wherever the comparisons have been made between free and closed societies west germany and east germany, austria and czechoslovakia, malaysia and vietnam it is the democratic countries what are prosperous and responsive to the needs of their people. And one of the simple but overwhelming facts of our time is this of all the millions of refugees we have seen in the modern world, their flight is always away from, not toward the communist world. Today on the nato line, our military forces face east to prevent a possible invasion. On the other side of the line, the soviet forces also face east to prevent their people from leaving. The hard evidence of totalitarian rule has caused in mankind an uprising of the intellect and will. Whether it is the growth of the new schools of economics in america or england or the appearance of the socalled new philosophers in france, there is one unifying thread running through the intellectual work of these groups rejection of the arbitrary power of the state the refusal to subordinate the rights of the individual to the superstate, the realization that collectivism stifles all the best human impulses. Since the exodus from egypt, historians have written of those who sacrificed and struggled for freedom the stand at thermopylae, the revolt of spartacus, the storming of the bastille, the warsaw uprising in world war ii. More recently we have seen evidence of this same human impulse in one of the developing nations in Central America. For months and months the world news media covered the fighting in el salvador. Day after day we were treated to stories and film slanted toward the brave Freedom Fighters battling oppressive Government Forces in behalf of the silent suffering people of that tortured country. And then one day those silent, suffering people were offered a chance to vote, to choose the kind of government they wanted. Suddenly the Freedom Fighters in the hills were exposed for what they really are cubanbacked guerrillas who want power for themselves and their backers not democracy for the people. They threatened death to any who voted, and destroyed hundreds of buses and trucks to keep the people from getting to the polling places. But on election day, the people of el salvador, an unprecedented 1. 4 million of them, braved ambush and gunfire, and trudged for miles to vote for freedom. They stood for hours in the hot sun waiting for their turn to vote. Members of our congress who went there as observers told me of a women who was wounded by rifle fire on the way to the polls who refused to leave the line to have her wound treated until after she had voted. A grandmother, who had been told by the guerrillas she would be killed when she returned from the polls, and she told the guerrillas, you can kill me you can kill my family, kill my neighbors, but you cant kill us all. The real Freedom Fighters of el salvador turned out to be the people of that country the young, the old, the inbetween. Strange, but in my own country theres been little if any News Coverage of that war since the election. Now, perhaps they will say it is well, because there are newer struggles now. On distant islands in the south Atlantic Young men are fighting for britain. And, yes, voices have been raised protesting their sacrifice for lumps of rock and earth so far away. But those young men arent fighting for mere real estate. They fight for a cause for the belief that armed aggression must not be allowed to succeed and the people must participate in the decisions of government. [applause] the decisions of government under the rule of law. If there had been firmer support for that principle some 45 years ago, perhaps our generation would not have suffered the bloodletting of world war ii. In the middle east now the guns sound once more, this time in lebanon, a country that for too long has had to endure the tragedy of civil war, terrorism, and foreign intervention and occupation. The fighting in lebanon on the part of all parties must stop, and israel should bring its forces home. But this is not enough. We must all work to stamp out the scourge of terrorism that in the middle east makes war an everpresent threat. But beyond the troublespots lies a deeper, more positive pattern. Around the world today, the democratic revolution is gathering new strength. In india a critical test has been passed with the peaceful change of governing political parties. In africa, nigeria is moving into remarkable and unmistakable ways to build and streng