Executive action. Executive order. I will go as far as i can come even beyond president obama john will the Supreme Court keep these wannabes dictators in check . Who will be on the Supreme Court . This president predicts five Supreme Court justices. John that will shake policy for decades. Are your rights at risk . Thats our show, tonight. And now, john stossel. John our rights are at risk. Its partly because the two leading president ial candidates both want to take away some of your rights and also because Many Americans are confused about what they write is. Bernie sanders said things like this. Health care is a right of all people. John its a right, health care . He also said education, decent housing and childcare our rights. Politicians around the world agree. U. N. Bureaucrats claim plot to things or human rights. Protection from unemployment, rest and leisure, food, clothing, housing, necessary social services, Free Education and periodic holidays with pay. Those are human rights . I guess Mark Zuckerberg abe lincoln and thomas edison, they were deprived of basic human rights. Bernie sanders and the u. N. Busybodies are wrong. Health care, housing and food are not the kinds of rights americas founders wrote about it because he to give one person for housing or education you have to take money from somebody else. Thats a violation of those peoples rights. In our bill of rights every single right is a right not to be meddled with. In other words a right to be free from government, the right not to have your speech abridged or your religion band. Thats a big difference from the uns rights or bernies are hillarys. They would take other peoples stuff and give it to people they say deserve it more. But at least the rights the founders care the most about it have often been protected by the Supreme Court when politicians try to go too far. But will they in the future . Donald trump says, thats why you have got to elect me. This president predicts five Supreme Court justices. If Hillary Clinton gets in she is now so far left that we are never going to have a country again. John while the next president will appoint scalley as replacement and five judges are more than 65 years old with mate mate Stephen Breyer 78 so whats going to happen . Lets ask senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano. I think they are both likely to pick people whose views would favor the expansion of the government. John im surprised that this guy obama proposed merrick garland. He has described in the media says popular centrist and yet he is centrist left and right but he is antilibertarian. He always sides with the government, every single case in which he ruled as a federal appellate judge because we did the research, he has sided with the government. Often democratic nominees side with individual liberty when it comes to the fourth amendment, search and seizure. This is a democratic nominee who always, underscore the word john sides side with the police and the government. On twitter and facebook i asked you what rights do you fear the next rights will take away candy posted both president ial candidates have no respect for freedom of speech. The First Amendment would be gutted. I do not think that any significant change will come about during the presidency of donald trump or Hillary Clinton with respect to freedom of speech. I do not understand your viewers apprehension but i would suggest on that line, not on the other spot on that can relax. John look at the candidates. Hillary once tried to ban to be a game sales to minors. They both talked about cutting off parts of the internet. They both want to ban flagburning. Remember the Supreme Court can only hear cases that are properly before it. There are no cases before the Supreme Court right now in which any of those traditional First Amendment liberties are likely to be overturned. John good. Here is one thing Hillary Clinton told the Democratic Convention that she wants her Supreme Court pick. Expand voting rights, not restrict them. John and you are for that . Im for the right of people to vote. I am not in favor of nitpicking requirements at the ballot box. But im also not in favor of voting fraud. She is saying you shouldnt have too have a photo i. D. The requirement for photo i. D. S has an effect on people in inner city who dont have drivers licenses than the laws unconstitutional. I dont accept that but thats what the law is and this court is uniformly enforced it. John in this time i have to show a photo i. D. To buy a cold pill and you have to you have to have to drive, to fly in to get food stamps. Doesnt seem like an unreasonable thing to asks for to prevent voter fraud. On this you and i are in the same page but the court has so elevated the right to vote that you can barely ask the persons name. Heres Something Else that the new Supreme Court may rule on. This year president obamas attorney general made this announcement. Today we are filing a federal civil rights lawsuit against the state of north carolina. This section is about a great deal more than bathrooms. John more than bathrooms but they are going to reach from washington to every bathroom. Show me where the right to use the bathroom is a federally protected right. Its a property right and it should be determined by whoever owns, leases and manages or controls a property and the federal government should have nothing to do with it. John on Facebook Tasha Moore writes she worries clinton and trump will try to use the court to widen government spying eye on private citizens. The scary part is average people will be convinced its okay and its the right thing to do. This i am terrified about. We are one vote away from unleashing the nsa to more unbridled spying than we now have. John why are you terrified . Is much less intrusive than being stopped at the airport. Most of her information is out there anyway. Its true they cant prove they have stop anything from what they have done so far but its logical to think gathering this data might stop the people who want to kill us. Except it doesnt work. When people are afraid its human nature to opt for rather than freedom. Should the government be able to listen to every phonecall and knock on every door and arrest anybody it wants . Who would want to live in that environment . John thats much more intrusive than gathering information quietly. When the government gathers information about acid knows too much about us and it chills our being and it deters us from being free and happy people. John do you worry more about the Clinton Court or a trump court . I worry equally john. John will it be the difference . Theres very little difference between the two. John trump has his list of people who sound pretty good. Air for the most part with the exception of one of them Big Government republicans who would almost always side with the government on issues like surveillance and with the federal government in its disputes with the state. John thank you judge andrew napolitano. If americans have rights i would think one right is the freedom of association which means a right not to do business with people. A couple asked the colorado avery owner Jack Phillips to design a wedding cake for them. Jacket was declined saying he has no problem selling premade cakes but he couldnt do a wedding cake due to his deeply held religious beliefs. The couple complained arguing they had been discriminated against. The state Civil Rights Commission agreed and ordered phillips not only to make cakes for samesex celebrations but to reeducate his staff about colorados antidiscrimination act and to make quarterly compliance reports to confirm he has not turned away customers. John he has to file compliance reports. This reeks of totalitarianism. Its his private business. Some bakers and photographers have been put out of business by these antidiscrimination laws but they are necessary so democratic consultant jessica its an intrusion into it privacy. No its not. At ensuring that people get equal protection under the law. John there are other bakers around. Absolutely and that has become the greatest counter case to this is to say very few towns will only have one baker. The point is the slippery slope argument here. Its not that they are conveying support for samesex marriage. They are just abiding by the law so yes i understand that i feel for him but we have to treat people equally in this country. John so should the black Student Association have to take whites and should the womens club have to take man . Should the jewish baker have to put a swastika on a nazi k. . As a jewish person i would want to make a swastika cake. Yes, you would have to. John is a good thing . Is a good thing we treat everyone equally . We cant make exceptions for people who treat others unfairly on the basis of race gender sexual orientation. John lets go into one other area that you and i will disagree, the hobby lobby case. He was 54 so this could change with the next court. The court says this company did not have to offer insurance. The issue there again is the slippery slope. There was another case that showed the slippery slope where a company privatelyowned, family owned not only did not want to provide contraception or Abortion Related Services but they also want to restrict counseling. They didnt want women to talk to their doctors about their reproductive choices on their health insurance. Come on. John this is where you and the left drive me crazy. They didnt want to restrict it, they didnt want to pay for it. A person was free to get counseling. If you have health care why should your health care cover all aspects of your help Claire Claire care . That saying our reproductive is not part of health care which is categorically wrong. John it doesnt carry your toothpaste or your toothpaste. People go to the doctor for all sorts of reasons. I have to go annually and i will have to go regularly for a mammogram when im older. Those are things that women need to ensure that we are healthy and have a long life. We have a different set of stuff. We have got to go more. John in the hobby lobby case itd want to pay for Birth Control for women. And thats their belief. Why not say okay i will pay for it myself . Some people dont have the money and under the equal protection clause john we went to walmart and they cost 10, 9. 99. Whats your point . It is a right now to have that. John its what the law says and we have to obey. Yeah, think so. John what if the Congress Agrees with a President Trump and he says everybody has to dye their hair orange. I really dont think thats the same thing. I take your point and its important we have these debates but at the end of the day the Supreme Court is there as a National Referee and its important the Supreme Court has the ability to set a standard of civility for the nation. We need to make life as easy as possible for people and thats the job of government to alleviate our anxieties and to make sure that every person has the right we are constitutionally guaranteed. John the governments job is to leave us alone and keep a safe. We have different definitions. John thank you jessica dicarlo. Coming up more arguments about guns come again empower and did you know that president obama has been overturned by the Supreme Court 90 more than any other president . Will that change next term . I doubt it is both leading candidates are eager to overreach. Another great thing about executive orders i dont have to go back to congress. sfx starter pistol shot music we lose our way, we get back up again its never too late to get back up again one day, youre gonna shine again, you may be knocked down, but not out forever tafind stuff under there . D. What about jobs . No . Now try your closet. Still no jobs . Just more. Stuff . Well, you really have both. See, stuff is defined as household articles considered as a group. Sometimes this stuff is no longer needed. Wait, no longer needed . That cant be right. Because remember those jobs you were looking for . Those are really needed and theyre the stuff inside your stuff. Our job is to unlock those jobs. And it starts when you donate your stuff to your local goodwill. Heres how we do it when you donate to goodwill, we sell your stuff to provide job training for people right here in your community. So just by teaming up with goodwill, you help create jobs. And isnt that worth parting with the leftover keytar from your 80s coverband . Goodwill. Donate stuff. Create jobs. John even nbc clueless comedy writers realize something is happening with president obamas executive orders. The presence that i will get benefits like Social Security to some Illegal Immigrants and even the writers understood thats not normally the way laws are made. Legislation is congresss job at the president was doing something different. Theres an easier way to get things done around here. Its called an executive order. John lost every president who issues executive orders that they are not legal if they are just a way to get around congress and thats pretty much the case with president obamas orders. [laughter] wait a second, dont you have to go to congress at some point . Thats adorable. You still think that the government works. John is how government ought to work. There are three branches of government and all must agree before prison gets to impose force on us but often thats not what our president says. I have got a pen and i have got a phone and i can use that 10 to sign executive orders. John are likely next president said she too is going to ignore congress. If Congress Wont ask i will ask the Treasury Department to use its Regulatory Authority if that is what it takes. [applause] john they applaud. People like that. Said they say thats how things get done. There is when Congress Wont act the president gets the powers clause in the constitution. John but theres gridlock. Its a feature. The founding system was not to make government more efficient. It was meant to pass policies that had a large agreement that sustained across time. John and dont infringe upon our rights. They were concerned about charity. John president obama has made two executive orders so far but president bush at the end of his term had more and if we are many more. He issued executive orders that executive orders as a saturday night live clips that can just. In the part. John obama is bigger. If donald trump wins in november its not like the constitution will suddenly be respected. Trump promised to impose the Death Penalty on anyone who kills a Police Officer and of course he said this about supporting Illegal Immigrants. Day one i first our in office those people are gone. [applause] john mackey say one of those is okay and legal. Well the president can reallocate resources and priorities for immigration deportation as he wants. John its already illegal to be here illegally. Thats right and just like the police chief says that go after murders raben jaywalkers the president says we will spend more money and resources on deportation. The executive does not command judges let alone in the state courts where the vast number of death penalties are given. John three years before president obama issued his immigration executive order he spoke at the la raza conference force a member asked why they just legalize us . Thats not how our system works. That is not how our democracy functions. I went to Chicago Law School and he was teaching there and hed knew what they president propose to do. The opposite of what donald trump proposes. He issued a exit border in the Supreme Court stopped it. Takes a lot to change a lot. Here are an affirmative legal status temporarily that triggers all of these benefits, thats what caused the lawsuit. John it takes a lot to change a lot meaning the congress has to pass a law. The president cant just say lets do this. The president has discretion over priorities who to go after rather than someone else and allocate resources to the northern rather than the southern border and things like that. John the Supreme Court rejected the executive order but it was closed so lets say hillary is elected and she gets to appoint and she says. If we cannot get comprehensive immigration rep warm as we need and as we should then i will go as far as i can, even beyond president obama. John beyond president obama. What she means is to give temporary legal status to everyone here regardless of whether you have a child or what have you. Thats astonishing lead alone say giving a permanent status. John the what she said sounds good to people. They applaud and she goes on to say we need to make sure lawabiding decent hardworking people are not ripped away from their families. I agree is a matter policy but when you look at the executive actions many times you have to think what if my biggest enemy was in the white house and have this power . What i want Sarah Palin Donald trump Hillary Clinton bernie sanders, whoever your worst political nightmare might be would you want them to have this awesome power . John they were elected. They were but t