Transcripts For FBC The Intelligence Report With Trish Regan

Transcripts For FBC The Intelligence Report With Trish Regan 20170623

Fbi investigated the alleged communication. Were on it for you. Plus four republican senators say they can not support the bill in it is current form, the Health Care Bill that is, here is the thing. No bill you know will ever be perfect. No bill can possibly undo the damage down by obamacare to the health care and an our health care system. It is only getting worse. Will republican lawmakers work out their differences . Well talk about it. President trump expressing serious concerns over the makeup of special counsel Robert Muellers team. Here on the Intelligence Report weve been saying this all along. Weve been raising concerns. Ive been concerned. I dont know why mueller cant go out to find impartial people for this investigation . Do you need to have a guy who is buddies with james comey . Does he need a team that basically has a bunch of people that have donated to democratic campaigns and Hillary Clinton supporters . Well talk about all of this. First i want to go to adam shapiro with this breaking Loretta Lynch story. Fill us in, adam. Reporter right. I will read to you that the letter that the Judiciary Committee sent to Loretta Lynch. Detailing what you talked about. Did she at the same time to stifle the investigation of the Clinton Campaign and email scandal that erupted. First part of the letter this say specifically, the fbi is reported to obtained an. Mail, memo, written by a democratic operative who expressed confidence miss lynch would keep the clinton investigation from going too far. It goes on to talk about james comey, former fbi directors testimony in congress, talking about matters he could not discuss but when we learned that Loretta Lynch had told him to refer to this as a matter, the already then goes on to get specific these contacts between lynch and the dnc and the Clinton Campaign. I am going to read to you what it says. More specifically the russian intelligence document reportedly quote, referred to an email supposedly written about it then chair of the Democratic National committee, representative shults Debbie Wasserman schultz and sent to leonard bernardo, according to article appeared in the new york times. Because merman shults claimed lynch had been in a private conversation with a senior steveer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated that lynch told renteria she would not let the fbi investigation into the clinton go too far. The committee ask as series of questions, such as anyone from the fbi, discuss or mention to you, emails, memos or reports such as described to those in the media reports . To the best of your knowledge have you communicated with amanda ren it rea . If so when did you discuss the clinton investigation. If you did, please provide all communications rooted to them. There are several questions the committee wants answers. Loretta lynch has not yet responded. They say thank you for this prompt attention to this matter. Trish trish wow, adam, thanks for bringing that to us. The senate is launching an investigation into Loretta Lynch, exactly what she may have known what she didnt know, what she may have tried to influence. Joining us for more analysis, Fox News Contributor deroy in murdoch. What do you think of this. Hi time, high time. I think this Hillary Clinton investigation stunk to high 11 all along. We have to look at business, calling matter as opposed to investigation. Coincides with the Clinton Campaign rhetoric. Hillary clinton came in trish good question. That was not done under oath. You have massive investigation. She goes in to talk to the fbi. They dont put her hand on the bible to tell the truth, whole truth, nothing but the truth, so help her god. No grand jury was convened. You had immunity agreements fbi gave to Clinton Campaign. You got immunity and hand us your laptop and well destroy the laptop for you. Trish she said in the letter or correspondence there was apparently a clinton aide had touch with Debbie Wasserman schultz and the clinton aide was told by Wasserman Schultz that lynch said she wouldnt let it go too far . Thats correct. Trish too far meaning . Politically embarrassing. Might derail the president ial campaign. We had james comey testify before the Senate Intelligence committee i think just last week n private testimony he said he had a document or some communication indicating that Loretta Lynch said look, dont worry. No matter where the evidence goes were not going to indict Hillary Clinton in so many words. That was behind closed doors. Who knows if that report was exactly correct. Would coincide what weve seen, fbi, department of justice going through basically sham investigation of Hillary Clinton. They did provide information ultimately embarrassing to her. Putting her in handcuffs which should have happened, that never took place. Trish where is this going to go, this kind of investigation . Will Loretta Lynch be brought in to testify . Will Hillary Clinton be brought in to testify . Will james comey be back . Absolutely should happen. Congress is supposed to do a couple things. Religion late and repeal obamacare, cut our tax, et cetera. Another thing congress is supposed to do provide oversight of the fed ral government. That includes oversight of corruption. This looks like corruption. Appropriate oversight committees bring in Loretta Lynch, james comey, Hillary Clinton. Special counsel investigating. Trish devils advocate, there is sort of a path we often see new administrations, particularly when theyre in a Different Party give old administrations because the fear always is, you increasingly find yourself looking like a Banana Republic frankly were looking like right now, given all a lot of bananas out there. Trish all the inwend he dough. But you run that risk. Is this sort of pot calling the kettle black . Do we run risk of trump basically and his team turning around doing exact same thing that he is being subjected to by democrats right now . There is difference between criminalizing political differences. We dont like Hillary Clintons ideas and throwing her in jail. There is difference what she has done, multiple violation of espionage act, witness tampering, destruction of evidence, destroying emails. Difference between not liking somebodys political views and persecuting and people breaking federal law over and over again ultimately paying a price. This country is based on idea of equal justice under law, ifwe dont prosecute people breaking the law we have a Banana Republic with people making Different Levels of justice. Trish you bring up an important point. In the case of Hillary Clinton, you can count out exactly that incidents that were wrong. Yes. Trish whether youre destroying evidence. Felonious. I use the word felonious. Trish whether you are engaged in what appears paytoplay type scandal. Exactly, correct. Trish you get access basically to the secretary of state of the United States by giving money to a charity. So there are specific examples you can point to. In the case of donald trump, they have been, they have been chewing at this now for months. Before he was sworn in. Before donald trump had any opportunity to do anything wrong they were already talking about impeachment before he was sworn in. Trish so there is distinction. Hillary clinton for example the uranium one deal, gave a permission for Company Called uranium one, turn over 20 to the uranium supply, russian government, vladmir putin, exchange of 145 million of donations to the Clinton Foundation based on investor in uranium one. Nobody talks about that. Nobody investigating that. This is looks like case of bribery in exchange for security information and this trish is this obstruction of justice type thing or refusal to investigate something for political reasons . I think at least dragging feet if not some type of obstruction of justice, politicization of department of justice. We have to get to the bottom of this or otherwise were a bana florida republic. Trish deroy, thank you. President trump admitting he has no tapes of his conversations with fbi director james comey. In a interview, exclusive interview with fox and friends this morning, he explains why he ever suggested there hay be any tapes. You watch here. When he found out there may be tapes out there, whether it is governmental tapes or anything else, and who knows, i think his story may have changed. I mean you will have to take a look at that because then he has to tell what actually took place at the events, and my story didnt change. My story was always a straight story. My story was always the truth. Trish so it was a tactic to make sure comey tells the truth . And it may have worked, right . Comey finally admitted he told the president three times that he was never under investigation. Meanwhile President Trump also expressing some concerns over the makeup of special counsel Robert Muellers team. Watch him here. It is very, very good friends with comey, which is very bothersome. I can say that the people that have been hired are all are all Hillary Clinton supporters. Some of them worked for Hillary Clinton. The whole thing is ridiculous if you want to know the truth from that standpoint. Trish is this not what i said yesterday . . Joining me with his thoughts, fox news anchor and former defense attorney gregg jarrett. You did say yesterday. Trish i have been saying for a while. I dont get it. If i were him, i would sure as heck, and he doesnt like the idea that Robert Mueller is buds with james comey. James comey of all the people he goes out to hire, he cant find people that havent donated to democratic campaigns . The whole thing kind of stinks, doesnt it . Here is the deal, if mueller is looking at obstruction of justice, there is star witness and only one, it is mull letters good close, long time personal and professional friend, james comey. You cant be sitting judgment of the president when the only witness against the president is your good close personal friend. That is a conflict of interest. It is in the special counsel statute that says you must disqualify yourself and step aside, get somebody who is fair and impartial instead. But you know, mueller hasnt done that. So it invites the question, maybe there is no obstruction investigation of the president. The alternative, is there ulterior motive nefarious . Are comey and mueller acting in concert to retaliate against the president for the firing of comey and trying to trish but the fact were even going there, right, tells you this is bad. You shouldnt have to be even questioning these kinds of things because everyone that is involved in this should be above reproach. I dont care what you think of donald trump. You may think he is the worst president we ever had but this particular set of circumstances, this should not sit right with anyone, regardless of what political side theyre on, gregg. Kind of makes you wonder, are comey and mueller colluding to a create a false case of obstruction, one they could never he prove in a court of law, for the sole purpose to try to trigger an impeachment debate in congress . You know the constitution in article 1, section 3, you cant indict or prosecute a sitting president. What is mueller actually investigating . Well, you can investigate and level a meritless accusation against the president , triggering a an impeachment. That is what happened against bill clinton. The case ken starr put together for obstruction against the president was totally without merit, in fact, i can prove it because after clinton left office, he was never indicted and prosecuted. Trish let me go back to sort of the origins of all of this. They have been around this whole russia thing as we were saying with Deroy Murdoch for about a year, right . Right. Trish basically since donald trump was campaigning, there were allegationses being made that he was in cahoots, some kind of a manchurian candidate. None of this is prove zen out. Right. Trish james comey who may have been doing some digging. James comey hadnt found anything. He was sitting there basically in that position at the pleasure of the president. The president has the right to fire him. What does he do . He is worried he is going to get fired. He starts taking all these memos. He does get fired. After the fact, i get fired i go and now want a special counsel to investigate the whole thing . You know james comey has a lot to answer for. For example, why did he sit on that information about Loretta Lynch that happened a year ago . Never uttered a word to anybody. Why was he concealing this memo apparently that he presented to senators behind closed doors that further implicates lynch beyond what he testified to in public . I mean, concealing that kind of information is actually a crime. Trish now its, its crazy to me if he really believed that there was some kind of obstruction of justice going on. Sure. Trish whether it be with donald trump or whether it be with Barack Obamas administration, via Loretta Lynch, it was his duty to say something. This is a guy who just stood by and went with the flow so to speak until, until push came to shove and he was out. And the law i mentioned, comeys possible crime, the law imposes a duty on a Government Official to disclose this information. If you cant go to doj, you take it to congress. Failure to do that is it is called misprism of felony. A crime punishable behind three years behind bars. I cant understand comeys justification for with holding this information. Trish everybody check out your column. Foxnews. Com. Go on to the opinion section. Thanks. Trish gregg, thanks so much. Nancy pelosi finding is surprising backer as fellow democrats turn her fury on her. President trump is her new backer. She said, quote, it would be sad for republicans if she decided to leave. What do you think . We asked you in a poll about this. I want to get your last minute responses. Well share it with you after we come back from commercial. Go to my twitter page at trish underscore reagan. We have the reports right after this. I use whats already inside me to reach my goals. So i liked when my doctor told me i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating whats within me with onceweekly trulicity. Trulicity is not insulin. It helps activate my body to do what its supposed to do release its own insulin. Trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. I take it once a week, and it works 24 7. It comes in an easytouse pen and i may even lose a little weight. Trulicity is a onceweekly injectable prescription medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. Trulicity is not insulin. It should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. Do not take trulicity if you or a Family Member has had medullary thyroid cancer, if youve had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to trulicity. Stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms such as itching, rash, or trouble breathing; a lump or swelling in your neck; or severe pain in your stomach area. Serious side effects may include pancreatitis, which can be fatal. Taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. Common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite and indigestion. Some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may make existing kidney problems worse. With trulicity, i click to activate whats within me. If you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a noninsulin option, click to activate your within. Ask your doctor about onceweekly trulicity. With a noninsulin option, click to activate your within. [ no[ laughing ] an ] its driving me crazy come on. [ spitting from tongue ] time for my secret weapon. Sports, movies, tv, ah, show me music to distract a minion. [ voice remote click ] oh [ pharrell starts to play ] [ minion so happy to see screen ] ahh im pretty smart. Ahhh [ lots of minions ] [ mooing sound ] show me unicorns. [ click noise for tv ] ahhh that works too. Find your awesome with the xfinity x1 voice remote. See despicable me 3. In theaters in june. Trish do republicans benefit as long as House Minority leader nancy pelosi stays in power . Watch them here. I hope she doesnt step down. I think it would be a very, very sad day for republicans if she steps down. I would be very, very disappointed if she did. I would like to keep her right where she is. Our record is, extrordinary against her. Well see what happens. There has been a lot of talk about her stepping down. Well see what happens. Trish in other words he is no fool, right . Comes amid calls from some within her own part for her to step down, make room for new leadership. The democrats certainly in disarray following a string of special election losses. Of course Hillary Clintons loss and learning their antitrump message isnt enough. And you at home, well, you got mixed views on this. Some of you disagree with the presi

© 2025 Vimarsana