Having those talks and now talking about those talks after the talk, really, yeah comments like this are all he speaks and people sit up, i want my people to do the same. Neil the president said he was joking but everyone is still talking about whether he was too nice to this guy so why not a word on how his administration took out this guy, hes also a bad guy, a very bad guy but you didnt know thanks to wellplanned attack, ruthless former taliban leader is also something else, a dead guy, good thing we are very much live because we thought we would tell you all about it, not some of the news, all of the news. I know its fathers day weekend and i could be at homing relaxing, that would be wrong, selfish, relax, my kids are happy not to have me, youre welcome, america, cavuto live starts now. Neil i always love the nasty tweets. Before we even start, get over yourself cavuto. That was from my wife. After the tussle, so many this past historic week, now comes the tweets, molly with the very latest from washington. Molly. Hi, neil, President Trump is praising sporters today and also praising the nations Economic Health or economic numbers, he said in a tweet, quote, my supporters are the smartest, strongest most hardworking and most loyal that we have seen in our countrys history, its a beautiful thing to watch as we win elections and gather support from all over the country. As we get stronger, so does the country, best numbers ever. The president likely will be interested in whats coming up next week when fbi director Christopher Wray and Justice DepartmentInspector GeneralMichael Horowitz will go before congress and answer questions. Congress members of Congress Also would like to hear from the the fbi agent and headlines, peter strzok, you remember him, one of the two married lovers, peter and lisa page. Now their messages are out very publicly and they are raising questions about president obamas fbi. If it was working in essence to elect President Trump and prevent donald trump from becoming president. Theres this text on august before the election. Lisa page says, trump is not going to become president , right, right, peter strzok says no, we will stop it. A few days later, somebody named andy, could be Andrew Mccabe who was fired earlier this year. I want to believe the path you threw for consideration in andys office that theres no way he gets elected, im afraid we dont want to take the risk. Some republicans in congress the messages need some explaining. Neil what do you want to find out from mr. Peter strzok . First of all, we have thousands of texts, conversations between he and lisa page that raise huge questions about the meaning of those texts, for example, he says to lisa page, we are not going let that happen with regard we will stop it with regard to the election of donald trump as president of the United States. Well, who is we, thats one big question, right, another question is does that relate to the socalled insurance policies that he references in another text. There is a ton of that we neat from mr. Peter strzok, we have been requesting him for some time now and if he is not produced we are now prepared to issue a subpoena in short order. The Justice DepartmentInspector General referred 5 fbi employees for investigation after discovering what could be politically motivated messages and we have this from the day after the president ial election, an fbi attorney, they are all numbered, they are not named. Im numb, i cant stop crying, that makes me more sad like what happened, you promised me this wouldnt happen, you promised. Im so stressed about what i could have done differently. Dont stress, none of that mattered. The fbis influence, i dont know, we broke the momentum. Current fbi director says it makes clear that it did not affect the agencys work. What you really see is bias against millions an tens of millions of my followers, thats a disgrace. And yet if you look at the fbi and you went in and you pulled the real fbi, those guys love me and i love them. I take this report very seriously and we accept its findings and recommendations. Its also important, though, to note what the Inspector General did not find. This report did not find any evidence of political bias or improper considerations actually impacting the investigation under review. The fbi report sorry, ig report calls former fbi director james comeys actions extraordinary and insubordinate in handling of Hillary Clinton email investigation. Neil. Neil mollie, thank you very much. We got another tweet from the president saying that the ig report totally destroys james comey and all of his minions including lovers lisa page and peter strzok who started with the witch hunt and im going on here to say against so many innocent people will go down in dark and dangerous period in american history. Lets get the read on all of this from attorney lisa and we have nick, also an attorney. I think you know, the former whitewater special counsel who have an act for alienating both parties. Robert, to you first and all of this that comes out of ig report. At the very least it reveals clumsy handling from james comey down but more comes up even through unnamed and unidentified parties, an an inherent by a guy that wanted to be president. Not just inherent bias but implicit bias. The groups of words today. The forkeds position, i think, has been vindicated and that, you know, thats troubling. Theres also as you all suggest the colossal failure of leadership within the obama Justice Department and the obama administration, from the president on down. President obama in october of 2015 on a 60 minutes interview essentially said theres no there there. That had an effect spiral lg through the Justice Department and you had Loretta Lynch making serious errors in judgment as report found the meeting with president clinton, of course, was huge mistake and she acknowledged and felt at the time. You have the assumption that Hillary Clinton was going to win n. The Justice Department at least inherent bias of trying to be protective of secretary clinton and that affected and people didnt exercise leadership, ironically to jim comey to sort of balance things out, hes the one who is most subject for criticism on all of this and as consequence among other things, loses his job. You know, look, if anything its a colossal mess which is going going to take a long while for the publics restoration of Public Confidence and the integrity of the fbi. The president is also right to say, look, in the main, the fbi does a great job. This is not while theres a colossal failure thats been identified, i dont think its catastrophic. I think the fbi is well abled to recover. Neil most unidentified report who harbor same views and lisa maybe you can help me out with this, this unidentified fbi worker who refers to Trump Supporters as poor, middleclass, uneducated, lazy, and that view and others who are similarly characterized, more widespread than we are led to believe in the beginning than it was the two, peter strzok lovers. So many issues to unpack with that question alone. We are learning about the digital investigation behind illustration of the messages themselves in saying the fbi didnt have access to the right tools and only now we are seeing the messages between the lovers on trumps campaign. Neil do you think any of this came to light to bob mueller before the texts came to light . Once he got those two named individual texts, peter strzok was off the case . How do we know that . Were i would be shocked to find out that he wasnt aware of any sort of bias beforehand and this just isnt indirect, direct explicit bias and the report itself, the ig is reminiscent of comeys own report that clinton herself was really it was so negative and then the conclusion itself was still no problem, no indictment and in this ig report the laundry list of all the Text Messages which im sure everybody was well aware of as employer in any kind of company, youre able to see instant messages on the company server. You better know. Neil let me get your sense of this. Right now im wondering president even getting consider interviewed by mueller or his team or they say as rudy giuliani, you should suspend the information unlikely though that is, how does this change things . I think that it gave the president a lot of talking points but there isnt as much substance to his allegations. I think the American People could take solace in the fact that the fbi did the job despite personal bias. Neil the fbi did its job and you could argue in comeys defense because justice wouldnt . The justice advocated his responsibility to fbi. Neil he show boated. What he did wrong was publicly announcing investigation and reopening the investigation, the results of investigation and reopening the investigation 11 days later. Neil you could argue that hurt llary clinton . Essentially based on reports and cost her the election. As far as any bias to trump, i think it was counteractive by neil you dont think they want light on it . The argument is they went light on Hillary Clinton when they had more than enough grounds to be much more aggressive . Its hard to say. It comes down to what your view is about the the ability to prosecute in something less than what would ordinarily be considered criminal intent. Neil the president says the whole thing proves his case, you say what . Hes got a fair argument. You know, its an important consideration. I think that you look at this and you say to yourself, initially the president s argument was unlikely to be true and then when you go through this and you actually see the blistering Text Messages you say to yourself, all right, Michael Horowitz may be right that they ultimately got the judgment call correct but along the way no one expects that you check your Political Considerations completely at the door, on the other hand, using Government Property to have this sort of a conversation in the midst of an investigation in a highprofile matter, you know, really, that just is outrageous. The president is right to say, you know what, that is not acceptable. I tried to put everything in context, some of the most common on russia. It still doesnt make sense. I would look at it a couple of ways. First of all, you have to separate out the Court Judgment using the fbi devices to communicate between two lovers. I think they exercised extremely poor judgment but as far as their personal opinions are concerned, everybody has an opinion especially in this particular election. Extremely provocative. We havent had a provocative candidate like trump since georgia wallace. The things he said provoked reaction to people. They made a bet on the fact that hillary was going to be elected president and it was a poor bet, spent more time worrying about everybody thought Hillary Clinton and im not saying she should or she shouldnt have, everybody thought she should have been president. It wasnt a poor decision, it was comeys action that changed the results. They were both poor candidates. Neil what i want to ask you, trying to get a sense, what was the context for some of the remarks about donald trump besides the fact that they might not have liked him, could give him the benefit of the doubt, could they have had information early on about the russia stuff and thats what they were referring to, a leap on my part, this is not the way i like my fbi agents and personnel to text or tweet or say anything. Thats what im asking you and whether that is a possility and whether that feeds the argument that the president is wrong on this, that there is something here. Neil, i think that is not a leap to say that the professionals involved would have seen information beforehand and that would have influenced the Text Messages and the messages we are seeing as the public in this ig report and that we have been seeing in the past couple of months only scratch the surface of whats been going on and we mention that this is on Government Property. Can you imagine whats going on in personal email although they are also using personal email to discuss Government Matters which is a whole other issue. Neil peter strzok was getting information to help mueller as was comey later on. And leaking to the press. Having relationships with the press in which apparently some are receiving they they shouldnt be receiving, tickets to sporting events. Work extra hard and rather to be lengthy report, you know what, thats a good thing. There needs to be neil delay it is release of that report . Depends how thorough its been up to this point. From my perspective and the history of bob mueller, i think hes extremely professional. Hes been quiet neil you used to say about comey. They used to say about me. [laughter] if you saw judge pirro last night, speaking with florida representatives and now we see Congress Going after all of the Text Messages, they are going after federal charges on obstruction of justice and this will play out in the next few weeks, no matter how indepth investigations are, Something Better come to light quickly. Neil thank you very much, the guy who will have a big role in understanding on where we go is the guy a lot of republicans want to make next speaker, separate issue for another day would be now house judiciary member, republican congressman from ohio jim jordan, congressman, always good to see you. A number of colleagues are trying to see horowitz next week when he comes to talk to folks and mr. Rosenstein. He will be in front of us in the next few times. Neil this is like avengers movie, this gets better and better. What do you want to hear from the Inspector General . Straight shooter, came down the middle on all of this, your thoughts . Key questions, why peter strzok still employed at the fbi. Comey has been fired, mccabe fired, faces criminal referral, lied three times under both, jim baker, former general counsel gone, demoted before he left fbi. Lisa page left fbi. Why is peter strzok still there in light of what we learned from the igs report, thats an important question for mr. Wray and rosenstein when they come in front of congress. Neil if you have peter strzok yourself, what would you want to hear of him, of course, he has very disparaging views of then candidate trump, he was providing a lot of research and early, you know, foot work for bob mueller since youre right. Neil what do you want to hear from him . Hes the key player, essential figure throughout the entire narrative. Ran the clinton investigation. Was the lead investigator in russia investigation. Hes the central character and i think those sequence of of Text Messages are important. Remember, peter strzok opens the Russian Investigation on july 31st, 8 days later we have the text message that we saw on the report. We will stop trump from being president. One week after that, we had the text message, august 15th which says we need the insurance policy to make sure trump isnt president. I would want to walkthrough the sequence all the way through september 2nd where we have another text message, potus, president obama wants to know everything we are doing. The operative word, everything. So i would want to walkthrough that sequence. You opened it up on the 31st, what happens in the next four and a half weeks in those tics messages i think tells a lot. We need to unpack that and get answers from mr. Peter strzok when he comes in for deposition. Neil a lot of democrats who are seizing on this, confusion and that the republican are divides, you are suing each other for documents, Rod Rosenstein, he will go the other way at you to simply push for the same thing. Republicans are eating themselves alive on this. What do you make of that . Rod rosenstein isnt giving us the material we are entitled to have an separate equal branch of government to do constitutional duty of oversight. Neil he is saying he has to do constitutional duty and what youre doing gets in the way of that. Rod rosensteins name was never on the ballot and wasnt elect today anything. But the house of representatives and people in the United States senate were and we are separate branch of government entitled to that information. So instead of fighting us all of the time and instead of threatening excuse me, Staff Members on the Intelligence Committee, why dont you just give us the stuff we are entitled to see so we can figure out and get answers for the American People. Neil do you think the president should fire him . I think Rod Rosenstein is scathing on thin ice and if he doesnt start giving us the information, you will see more things happen in the house we filed a resolution last week, mr. Meadows and i did, if you dont give us information, theyll be a vote in United States congress. I think that will happen sometime soon, im hopeful it will and also contempt, theres impeachment but he needs to give us that information and quit threatening, i mean, think about that, the head of the department of justice threatening Staff Members in a separate branch of government, trying to do their jobs, trying to get answers for the American People, neil,