They got to jeff. How is it possible protesters never got to lindsay . Kavanaugh was despicable. [inaudible] today, how protesters, they get to one another will not budge. Why are markets ignoring the kavanaugh drama entirely . By the way not just this one, from Rod Rosenstein and the trade wars and whether they stick into consumers. Stocks continue to sizzle. Wait until you hear why and how long. Appreciating the bulls. In appreciating the awesome power of mother nature. And the desperate search for survivors after a massive earthquake and tsunami strike indonesia. All live, all here, all now, starting now. We are moving forward exactly how much . Very happy to have everybody welcome to cavuto live, i am neil cavuto. We have chat on capitol hill. Leland kaiser has just sent a letter to the Judiciary Committee saying she is willing to talk to the fbi but the council says she does not know kavanaugh or members of the party or being with Christine Blasey ford. She says that she is unable to corroborate the account of the party. They are still days away from a confirmation vote on the kavanaugh nomination. The original goal was for them to debate the nomination this weekend and close the debate on monday. And have a roll call vote on tuesday. It is hard to see how they vote before next friday on kavanaugh its not next weekend or the week of october 7. It is a fourday process. Senate Majority Leader Mitch Mcconnell moves to close the debate. One thing is clear, Brett Kavanaugh would not have had the necessary votes had mcconnell not agree to this delay. Who to watch, Susan Collins of maine, Lisa Murkowski of alaska, bill manchin, West Virginia and Heidi Heitkamp of north dakota. Kavanaugh needs a yay from one of them. So, talk about the timing. This has the potential of going well beyond the original would republicans go along with that of democrats say we are learning a lot more. We have to learn more . Jeff flake said the process may not win votes for kavanaugh. But everyone will feel better about the process handling it and just before we went on the air bernie sanders, the independent senator from vermont indicated that he wants the fbi to probe whether or not kavanaugh lied to congress and said they should not put descriptions and how long the fbi investigation should take. Again, every time you introduce a new variable, it could be dangerous to the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. You just dont know how long it could take once you open that. One thing ive noticed is that sanders wants them to look into the additional accusations. But ramirez and swetnick, it was not the understanding, they want the testimony. It could bog down the fbi for quite some time. Actually. But look back to what the democrats on the Judiciary Committee asked for. Just before they took the vote yes richard blumenthal, from connecticut wanted a week delay. And democrats on the committee have pushed for. Sanders is not on the committee, but again, the fbi will take as long as they take. And thats why some think this could go deeper into october and maybe start to drift to the midterms and no one knows which party that could affect positively or negatively if you have a vote close to the midterm elections. Thank you my friend. Outstanding work as you follow this on capitol hill. Lets go with the fbi has in their hands are not performing deputy assistant. Can you explain, they will collect interviews from individuals associated with this, right . That is right. They will be no conclusion but i think it is pretty apparent that the investigation will be conclusive in that they will lay out unfettered by emotion or politics or hysteria, the facts as they develop them. I think it is really important here. Theres a lot to be done that, remember, Christopher Wray has almost unlimited resources. There are thousands of agents and analysts he can assigned to this if needed. I do not think it will take more than one week, frankly. There are some things to be done, interviews to be done, we will see, be careful what you ask for. You may not like the result. Thats what we need to keep in mind, the fbi will do this again, unfettered by emotion. And politics. We will see what happens. I think that it will be very interesting and i dont think everyone will be happy with the results. Particularly some democrats already concerned about the investigation it would not include interviews with Deborah Ramirez and julie swetnick. Theyve gone on to say that the fbi director is ties to the judge because they both graduated from yale. How does this go . You just go as far as is logical. Frankly, i would interview both individuals. I used to run the interviews. It is not going to make it any longer because again, the fbi has plenty resources, for all of these things simultaneously, collect all the evidence, which includes in my view, they should take the calendar and have it dated to see where these notations on the calendar are last week or if they are done many years ago. It is one aspect. It is not by adding more duties do you add crime. The fbi has tons of agents, tons of analysts, they can do all the simultaneously. I think the concern will last long, the fbi will not come to any conclusions as he said. They will interview people, appropriate witnesses. And whatever. No one can perjure themselves since there is nothing criminally on the line here, right . It is against the law to lie to the fbi. I think that having them do this, frankly, it should have been done weeks ago. As opposed to dragging this out and going through that roman circus that was indicating it was a senatorial hearing. It didnt have to happen like that. Both of the individuals, dr. Ford and the judge, would have been spared some of the hysteria. It is kind of a shame. Bottom line, understand this, youre going to get differing accounts. You might find any real cooperation of the charges that dr. Ford made. Someone would be getting information that hes either been consistent with allegations or outright lying. Not necessary. I believe shes telling the truth and as she sees it. Something traumatic happened to her. Maybe it did occur. But there is no substantiation of that. There is not any corporation. The people she brought forward to say that they could corroborate it, do not. It is not very positive for the cause and her belief. I dont think shes lying. I just think that you have different interpretations, even a polygraph doesnt a reality. It tells you what you believe with regard to the truth. I think it will be very specific, very graphic. Again, i think the value of this is that there is no politics involved in this. Now the james comey is gone, they will not be partisan on part of the bureau. It is what it is. Good seeing you my friend, thank you. You too, always great. And Molly Hemingway on all of this. We are here right now, simply because this letter, this allegation, they are playing catch up, i will ask the same question that i asked danny. Is it going to move the needle . If you are a no vote we remain that and if you are a yes vote and inclined to approved the judge. I think it comes down to a few people. We already know we have a lot of evidence and is in the public record, there is a senate hearing. I doubt fbi investigation will find anything else. It will just be the same people giving the same statements that they already gave. A penalty for lying to the senate, the same as a penalty line for the fbi. Do not expect to see much difference between the testimony. There are a few senators that do seem to want this investigation in good faith. There are a few republicans and a few democrats. It is those votes are really key. A lot of people thought that this request for an fbi investigation is just a delay tactic. I think is true for the vast majority of the democrats when they were calling for it. It might be uncharitable but i think they were trying to delay. For a few people it will ease their minds and the possibility that we will find confirmation that Brett Kavanaugh really was running a serial gang rape cartel which i think is unlikely. The conclusion of this we can proceed. Thats why what happened yesterday was so important. They got it out of committee and are moving the ball down the line. When the fbi report comes back and it should not take more than a couple of days, they can go ahead and vote to confirm or not. And whats crucial, joe manchin iii, Heidi Heitkamp and north dakota, both up for election and in a state that the president won. Then Lisa Murkowski of alaska, Susan Collins, even jeff flake. Is it your sense that this could potentially provide cover for those individuals that have been very reluctant to commit themselves . Is reasonable to be concerned about multiple issues. Please as Americans Care about due process and should not be able to destroy mans life based on allegations without evidence. We also care deeply about Sexual Assault and want to make sure that we are investigating and taking care of that as well. This is one of those issues where the allegations have not been corroborated or verified. If the fbi finds Something Else it would change the matter that is another thing. But i dont see things changing that much from what we already know. If there were more evidence to bring out, im pretty sure the accusers would have brought it out by thursday. Real quick on this, molly, republicans and democrats had two different interpretations of what the fbi is looking into. Democrats think its about accusations of dr. Ford. And republicans say deb ramirez and julie swetnick. They have an excuse to say this is not good enough. I think the danger for democrats they appear to want to delay at any cost. Anytime they start coming up with outlandish, you should investigate whether britt governor was running an underground cartel that makes the democrats look unreasonable. If they want to broaden as they should look at how it was at the allegations came forward and whether there was a coordinated effort there. Or how it was that the letter sent to Dianne Feinstein was leaked to the media. If they want to expand it might not go into areas they would prefer. But any attempt to expand beyond the initial allegation, when each subsequent allegation that more and more ridiculous, a lot of people were critical of even the second allegation because it was so little support for the claim and a lot of reputation. I think whats important is the countries actually done with this circus. Theyre willing to give it one week so that the fbi can conclude things. But anything beyond that is difficult for the people to endure. All right molly, thank you very much. Then the role of protesters. They moved one senator black and another senator to ignore. A contrast in the face of criticism. In the u. S. Its really this constant juxtaposition when youre a mom and an entrepreneur. With more businesses starting every day, how do they plan for their Financial Wellness . I am very mindful of the sacrifices that i make. So i have to manage my time wisely. Plan your Financial Life with prudential. Bring your challenges. With proskin technology. For two times faster absorption. So you can have worry free nights, and wake up feeling fresh and free. For a free sample visit tena. Us and free. With tripadvisor, finding your Perfect Hotel at the lowest price. Is as easy as dates, deals, done simply enter your destination and dates. And see all the hotels for your stay tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites. To show you the lowest prices. So you can get the best deal on the right hotel for you. Dates, deals, done tripadvisor. Visit tripadvisor. Com you know, we forget what pressure the sinners republican and democrat were under but i want to focus on two republicans in particular and how they responded. To the protesters that were 24 7 on them. Take a look. Thats what youre telling all women in america, to keep it to themselves because if told the truth you are just going to help the man to power anyway. That is what you are telling all of these women. Thats what you are telling me right now. Look at me when im talking to you. Youre telling me that i dont matter. What happens to me doesnt matter. And that you were going to let people do these things into power. That is what youre telling me. Whether you vote for him. Dont look awayfrom me. Look at me and tell me it doesnt matter. [inaudible] here is the deal. [inaudible] what they did to kavanaugh was despicable. They will not i believe him absolutely. Lindsey graham as you can see ignoring protesters and jeff flake from arizona, some republicans say he caved by agreeing to this extension that would include the fbi investigation. In the end it might provide cover for those on the fence to vote for the judge anyway. Regardless of your interpretation those are two clearly different responses to the same groups. And we have a democratic strategist and gop pollster, how is this tracking with people that you pull . It seems everyone has already made up their mind on the left and the right. Independence right now are left in the middle trying to say i dont know what to make of this. Democrats look at this, and i ran some tests this week. Democrats look at this not just as a test of how we will treat doctor ford. This is how we are going to treat all women that had been sexually assaulted. On the right there saying, this man never did it. We believe in him no matter what. Everybody else is saying, someone help me make sense of whats going on. Its really hard for folks. I want to be clear on this, jeff flake was moved by this woman enough to say im going to vote the judge out of Committee Recommendation but a caveat that we have an fbi investigation that would delay a full senate vote. We are going to delay a week. We will known nothing more than we knew this week. Most of the people that will be interviewed like mr. Judge, have already submitted a statement under penalty of perjury. He is not go change his story. Youre talking about mark judge. Correct. He has given everything he knows. I dont think it will do nothing but waste taxpayer money and time. Right now people are hungry with congress, unhappy with democrats and they are saying hey, democrats are not just going to lose this in court they will lose more. What do you think . I think was happening now is i think there are people who heard the testimony and they think wait a second, i think there are a lot of independents that feel we do need an investigation. What is there to hide . The nominees testimony, what he said opened a big box and there are a lot of questions that people have in regard to his veracity, his candor. He is even honest in his interviews. He provided those that have corrected background checks all of that they need. What if the fbi through the series of interviews can find no carbonation for doctor ford s charges . Something will happen to her but the fbi could find no carbonation that was indeed the judge . I think what youre seeing is a great point. Do we need corroboration . And regular allegations yes. [acustoma what type of corporation do you meet and how do you define corroboration . The argument of july 1, not something that has come out that maybe she mentioned three people. There is a date on the calendar of july 1. There were three people named. Someone makes a charge against you, you want something more than someone saying there is no way to corroborate it. Exactly but i think for a lot of people he watched everything on television, the issue now becomes, i think they found her credible but i think there is an issue with him and how he responded. What we have to go on, fbi can reach no conclusion. The fbi can come and say we talked to a number of people who simply cannot corroborate or support the story. That obviously will not satisfy everybody but should a boat go on after that . Bernie sanders says where do think it goes . Foolish, complete hypocrisy. No one would want to be treated the way they are treating him. This woman has given no time or place. She hasnt been able to get any warrant off of this. It is not something, 36 years ago if this was made it would not be something the fbi would investigate. Were wasting taxpayer money and time. They looked at the allegations in the past. This is going back a little further but you know im wondering in the end, [multiple speakers] in the end, does it really move the meter . Outside of the other individuals on the fence mentioned you know joe manchin iii, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, jeff flake. Would be enough for them to say the fbi didnt come to any conclusion we will vote for the judge. If there is no corroborative evidence of the end of the weekend they cannot find anything else, then i think their permission to go ahead and vote. The form fbi, the calendar of the judge. The items added after 1982, that would be a big game changer. I think big Game Changers could be an inconsistency. If they were able to find out that the judge had change anything in his calendar, if therefore able to find out that they can in fact put them at the place. Locate the home, do anything that allows more investigation, then this could be dragged on. I am not the one thing raised is that if you can find more proof that the judge as a highschooler like to drink a lot, would that be supportive of an argument . Is it the kind of stuff that you look for . That would say, he must have done this. People will say, he did drink to excess and might have blacked out. I think they were trying to say he wouldnt remember and act like this if he drank as much as they charge. And i think is a question for a lot of people. There are a lot of people that thought this was a done deal. He was going to get the votes he needed and be the next Supreme Court justice. But would it be enough for you to stick it to him . He drank a lot in high school and in excess. The issue of candor, if you would help yourself out and said look, i was a choir boy, i was going to Church Meetings and i may be drink a few beers but then you have someone that says that is not the person we knew i want to be very clear, someone