Chris then the fbi raids the president s personal lawyer Michael Cohen raising questions whether mr. Trump will fire Robert Mueller. Well, i think its a disgrace whats going on, we will see what happens. Chris we will discuss the latest developments with congressman trey gowdy, chair of the Oversight Committee. Plus, former fbi director james comeys new book lashes out at President Trump and the white house responds. The Intelligence Community does intelligence, the white house does pr and spin. Comey will be forever known as disgraced hack that broke trust with the president of the United States. Chris we will ask sunday panel if there are bombshells in the new book or just a political food fight all right now on Fox News Sunday. Chris and hello again from fox news in washington, strikes on syria by u. S. , france and britain are a show of western resolve meant to punish Bashar Alassad for his latest chemical weapons attack on his own people. The pentagon describes the strikes on three targets as overwhelming and effective. But what happens if assad uses chemical weapons again and where does this leave u. S. Policy for dealing with civil war and Terror Threat in syria . In a moment with we will speak live with u. S. Ambassador to the United Nations nikki haley, but first to National Security correspondent Jennifer Griffin with the latest on the military operation. Over 100 u. S. , french, british missiles all hit targets successfully landing simultaneously within a few minutes despite being launched from military assets deployed from the mediterranean to the persian gulf. Clearly the assad regime did not get the message last year. This time our allies and we have struck harder. The three targets included Research Center near demascus, chemical Storage Facility near homes and weapons bunker a few miles from the second site, russian and syrian state media claimed they shot down dozens of the allied tomahawks and missiles but the pentagon says the russian guns remained silent adding syria fired 40 surface to air missiles wildly into the air after the u. S. Missiles had already hit. What happens next has everything to do with what the assad regime decides to do. I spoke to the president this morning and he said if the Syrian Regime uses the poisonous gas again, the United States is locked and loaded. When our president draws a red line, our president enforces the red line. U. S. Intelligence has only concluded at this time that chlorine was used in the most recent chemical attack, they suspect sern but dont have the proof yet having many to wonder if use of chlorine in syria is new red line and possibility for future meltrary actions, chris. Chris jennifer, thank you, joining us from new york u. S. Ambassador to the United Nations nikki haley, ambassador, i want to start with President Trumps tweet after the military action against syria, here it is, a perfectly executed strike last night could not have had a better result, Mission Accomplished. A lot of people say that echos president bushs 43 premature claim of Mission Accomplished back in 2003. Isnt President Trumps claim of success just as premature . Well, first of all, Mission Accomplished is a military term and as a Military Spouse i know that Mission Accomplished means you have one task currently in front of you and when its completed it is Mission Accomplished. Politically, Mission Accomplished means something broader and i think that the president was referring in military terms. We, of course, know that our work in syria is not done, we know that it is now up to Bashar Alassad on whether hes going to use chemical weapons again and should he use it again, the president has made it very clear that the United States is locked and loaded and ready to go. Chris i want to pick up on that because obviously you have no idea how assad is going to respond to this attack although i suspect you think he got the message and to add a little bit to this confusion, President Trump and defense secretary mattis sent very different signals on friday night about the campaign, take a look at both of them. We are prepared to sustain this response until the Syrian Regime stops its use of prohibited chemical agents. Right now this is a onetime shot. Chris so which is it, a onetime shot or a sustained response . That is totally up to assad, what i can tell you is the president has made it very clear that when it comes to weapons of mass destruction, we have no tolerance for it. We are going to watch out for the best interest to have American People and so he made a point and hopefully assad gets it. If assad doesnt get it, its going to hurt and i think what general mattis was saying was these strikes happened basically responding to their continued use of chemical weapons, but, of course, if assad continues to go forward, there will be more and it will hurt and i think that he has a lot to think about. Chris i want to pick up on that because there were certainly indications since the first strike in april of last year that assad had used chemical weapons an there had been no u. S. Response, this particular case last weekend was especially egregious and horrific, but are you saying that Going Forward that any use of chemical weapons by assad will trigger immediate u. S. Response . Well, i think first of all you said it, this last one was egregious, it was barbaric and it was disgusting and so i think what you saw is there had been a cumulative wave of constant use of chemical weapons, assad knew that russia had his back, assad knew that russia would cover for him at the United Nations and assad got reckless and used it in a way that was far more aggressive. We have to be very conscious of the fact that we cant allow even the smallest use of chemical weapons, thats why you saw the president strike this past weekend, thats why you saw him expel 60 russian spies after the attack in salsbury, this easily could happen in the United States if we are not smart and if we are not conscious of whats happening and so this was a message sent to assad, we will see how smart he is. Chris but to press my point, if i may, are you saying that Going Forward theres zero tolerance of any use of chemical weapons will trigger military response . I dont think theres any way that i can answer that. We dont know what hes going to do, the level of what hes going to do or anything else. I will tell you that the president is watching and the National Security team is ready, so basically we will watch his actions. He now dictates his life and he dictates what happens between the United States, our allies and his regime and so hopefully hes gotten the message. It was a pretty strong message, not only did we go after absolute strongest research facility, we went after storage unit where they hold the products and after production so we put a heavy blow into Chemical Weapons Program and setting them back years and taking a lot to recover from it. Chris here is a lot of questions that people have, you have spoken very movingly about the slaughter of civilians in syria and we are seeing pictures right now of the attack in duma, but doesnt the president s policy allow the mass murder of women and children to continue as long as its carried out with conventional weapons and not chemical weapons . Well, i think thats just a very unfair question. In what respect are you asking that . Chris well, what im saying is that we are saying that any use of chemical weapons we are going to respond to but we are not saying that about conventional weapons and assad has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of his people, why are are we drawing a distinct to assad saying its okay to do with conventional weapons but we will object if you do with chemical weapons . I dont think weve ever said its okay, period. There is no way that any american or the president would ever say its okay to kill women and children. I think that we have a lot of issues in the world and i think we are trying to put out as many fires as we can, but we cant control what a country does to its people. We can condemn it, we can acknowledge it, we can try and do everything at the United Nations, i think what you have seen the president used a lot of sanctions whether its been venezuela, whether its relate today syria or related to russia and human rights, theres been a lot of things that we have done and taken action. We have never sat back and watched bad things happen, we do wait and use military force as last response to that, but weve always acted in every way related to every incident, in some form, just to let them know how much the United States condemns it. Chris i want to ask you about the u. S. Actions and how we are responding, though, when it comes to the displacement and torture of the syrian people. I want you to look at some state department numbers on how many refugees have come into this country over the last three years, in 2016, more than 15,000 Syrian Refugees came into this country. Last year, 3,000. So far this year 11. On humanitarian grounds how do you justify that . Well, i will tell you we have spent well over 6 billion on the syrian conflict. I personally went to the refugee sites in both jordan and turkey. I spent time with refugees whether they were in camps or whether they were out and i talked to them about the situation at hand. I will tell you from a humanitarian standpoint, the United States has been a massive donor to this situation but also when i talked to the refugees, what i talked to them about, they wanting to home and theres a mountain that they look over and they know its on the other side and they know that syria is in shambles and they are prepare today rebuild it. But not one of the many ever said that we want to go to america. They want to stay as close to syria as they can so that when god willing this fighting stops and when theres finally stability and peace in that area, they wanting to rejoin family members, they wanting to back to what they remember. The kids talked about about where they used to play and what they used to do, the adults talked about the fact that thats where they were born, thats where they were raised. There was a real emotional string to syria and i think we need to be conscious of the fact thats really where they wanting to. Chris lets talk about the overall strategy for syria because a couple of weeks ago President Trump talked about a very fast pullout of troops there, take a look. We are knocking the hell out of isis, we will be coming out of syria like very soon. Let the other people take care of it now. Very soon. Chris President Trump reportedly we wanted to get all 2,000 u. S. Troops out within 48 hours and had to be persuaded by folks at the pentagon to keep them there for a couple of months which raises the question what is our goal in syria and what is our strategy to get there. Well, i can tell you because i was in the National SecurityCouncil Meetings with the president when it came to discussing russia and he had three major goals that he we wanted to accomplish, he one, we wanted to make sure that chemicals chemical weapons were not used or weapons of mass destruction were not used in any way that could harm American National interests, he we wanted to make sure that we defeated isis completely and wholly to make sure that all of that threat was going gone because it is threat to National Interest and he want to make sure that we had good grounds to watch what iran was doing and they werent making a lot of aggressive headway in terms of that because iran is a National Threat to american interests and so i think that no, he never thought he would get out in 48 hours, yes, it is all of our goal to see american troops come home, but we are not going to leave until we know we have accomplished those things, what he has done is talked to allies and said, they need to step up more, they need to do more and it shouldnt just be us doing it it. And i think thats the right approach. Be very clear, if we leave, when we leave, it will be because we know that everything is moving forward. We are very invested in the political process in geneva, we are invested in political solution and those talks continue. Chris one area where there has been a dramatic escalation in the last week has been in the direct verbal attacks in the administration on russian president putin, here is a tweet from President Trump this week, president putin, russia and iran are responsible for backing animal assad and here you are at the un. History will record that on this day russia chose protecting a monster over the lives of the syrian people. Chris ambassador, has our relationship with putin and russia changed this week . Well, i think its been changing over time. This is a very strain time between the United States and russia. I mean, if you look at what russia is doing, you know, they continue to be involved with all the wrong actors. Whether its their involvement in yuik ukraine, they are supporting maduro in venezuela, you look at syria in the way of propping up assad and working with iran, that continues to be a problem and theres multiple issues that we have with russia right now on what they are doing, whether its the chemical weapon use in great britain, thats another issue. We are letting russia know this is not something that we want to be a part of, its not something that we want to tolerate and they have to make a decision, right now they dont have very good friends and right now the friends that they do have are causing them harm. I think they are feeling that whether its been with the fact that weve sanctioned just recently the russian oligarchs which made stock market plummet and their life is about to get harder in the region, whether its us sending 60 spies home to let them know that we are not going to put up using chemical agent anywhere or whether its the sanctions that are continuing to happen which you will see again on monday that lets them know this is not good behavior, so everything that has strained this relationship has been on the side of russia. The military strikes did not have to happen if russia had not covered for assad, six times they vetoed chemical weapons resolutions related to syria and this last resolution that they had they only had 3 votes out of 15. The International Community is telling russia that either you make a decision on how you act and when you act or the rest of us will make a decision in isolating you. Chris in 15 seconds, how would you characterize u. S. Relations with putin and russia right now. Very strained right now but our hope is always to make sure we can get a better relationship with russia. Its in our interest National Interest to do that but we are not going to put up bad behavior to get it. Chris ambassador hailey, thank you, thanks for taking the time with all youve got going on right now. We will stay on top of the latest developments. Great, thanks so much. Chris up next sunday group to discuss the situation in syria and where the u. S. , our allies in europe and adversaries in russia and iran go from here we accomplished our military objectives without material interference from syria. Id used three words to describe, precise, overwhelming and effective. Chris Lieutenant GeneralKevin Mckenzie describing fridays strikes on syria and its time now for our sunday group, Jonah Goldberg of National Review and author of new book suicide of the west. Charles lane of the washington post, fox news National Security correspondent Jennifer Griffin doing double duty today and former press secretary to Vice President pence mark latter. Ambassador haley and the new National Security adviser bolton wanted a tougher more aggressive response that defense secretary mattis wanted, quote, a show of strike and prevailed with the president , is that true . Was there a difference in terms of how they should respond on friday night . I think theres a natural tension between pentagon officials, mattis being in the lead and other National Security officials. The Defense Department doesnt want to broaden this, they want to know when they present their options, they want to know what is the strategy, are we now going to step up into the Syrian Civil