Beaches to wall street firms include not just embarrassing phrases but positions that seem to contradict her public pronounce mts. We begin with those hot mic moments from trumps 2005 access hollywood taping with billy bush and some is graphic. I moved on her like a [ bleep ]. I couldnt get there and she was married. All of a sudden i see her, shes now got the big phoney [ bleep ] and everything, im automatically attracted to beautiful its like a magnet. And when you are a star they let you do it. You can do anything. Whatever you want. Grab them by the [ bleep ]. You can do anything. Trump said in an initial statement that he apologized if anyone was offended but that bill clinton has said far worse to him. Then came this video. Ive never said im a perfect person, nor pretended to be someone that im not. Ive said and done things i regret and the words released today on this more than a decade old video are one of them. Anyone who knows me knows these words dont reflect who i am. I said it. I was wrong. And i apologize. But many pthe story as highl. I honestly feel like theres a pretty good chance we dont know who the republican candidate is for president by the end of this weekend. Will this kill his campaign . I think this could be it. Nobody is going to defend this. You cant defend. It is wrong, it is inappropriate, it is outrageous. Joining us now to analyze the coverage of the trump and clinton stories as well as tonights big debate Julie RoginskyFox News Contributor and a democratic strategist, Tucker Carlson cohost of fox and Friends Weekend and editor of the daily caller and Heidi Przybyla senior political reporter at usa today. Tucker, you have a Nuclear Explosion in the media over a decade old tape, republicans baling right and left. The words are disturbing, they are indefensible, but i was watching cnn and msnbc, its on hour after hour. Is the News Business overplaying this just a bit . The words are indefensible they are not inexplicable. Nobody is actually shocked by this and everyone is pretending to be. Manufactured outrage. Entirely manufactured. This was one of the recurring guests on the howard stern show. This is donald trump. So everyone knew that trump is capable of this. Everyone who knows trump knows he speaks like this in real life, not this extreme but in the ballpark. One the press has no moral standing to judge anyone who talks like this having spent 25 years in news rooms. You have heard plenty of locker room talk. I have. The other point is its misleading to pretend trump is being abandoned by the Republican Leadership because they are so outramd. John mccain is not pulling his support of trump because hes offended, its because he thinks it hurts him politically. Julie roginsky, tucker is saying hardly shocking, we have heard the whole howard stern interviews and so a lot of this is just whipped up from people in the media and politics who do not like donald trump. I agree with tucker on almost everything. The only difference between locker room talk that tucker was privy to is donald trump is not just talking about the size of somebodys breasts he is actually talking about sexual assault, he is going up to women and grabbing them by their private parts in ways that i think most people would construe as an unwanted sexual assault. So when it comes to that, thats where the lawn is drawn. Listen, i agree with tucker 100 , john mccain is not baling because all of a sudden we find that donald trump is vulgar. Theyre baling because of politics. For a lot of women this isnt about just the locker room talk, its actually about the fact this locker room talk constitutes something people are familiar with as assault. Im not trying to minimize this or defend it or make excuses for it im merely saying it came from donald trump and everyone knew he was capable of this. Thats the only point im saying. Interesting that you used the word private parts because the p word which we have bleeped cnn just showed the tape and showed the p word and s words and the New York Times printed it. Heidi przybyla, even if people are saying this is media bias, you dont like donald trump, you also have the explosive reaction to this whole tape, you know, Reince Priebus and Kellyanne Conway bowing out of the sunday shows, mike pence not making a trip saying he cant defend it, trumps wife saying this is offensive but accepts his apology. Hugh hewitt and bill bennett saying he should drop out of the race. In part is the press covering the reaction to this even if its an overreaction . Absolutely. Granted, tucker is absolutely right that a lot of these republicans who are baling have been critical of trump all along, but a lot of them havent. Like bill bennett who had been out there essentially speaking talking up trump, like deb fischer in the senate. Theres really only one female gop senator who hasnt called for him to step aside which is joni ernst. So im hard pressed as are all of the political comment caters to come up with any kind of a historical precedent for what weve seen over the past 48 hours. Not only just in terms of the lewd comments that are also frankly predatory in nature, but also just in terms of what were seeing with this civil war erupting in the Republican Party with republicans down the ballot now as well panicking and it is relevant and it is significant to play this up because this comes at a time when it appeared according to the polls that trump was really consolidating the gop base for all of the ranker that had taken place throughout the primary, he was consolidating. Let me come back to you on this, tucker. A couple trump tweets, the media and the establishment want me out of this race so badly, he said hes not dropping out, he also told the Washington Post and wall street journal. So many self righteous hip ritz. My question is you say there is a lot of hypocrisy in the News Business. Is there going to be a gap between the public which may some of whom may not like this at all and some of whom may think that this is just, you know, trump showing off with boys will be boys, and the pundits who are saying who are actually talking about whether he could be replaced as a republican nominee . Look, i dont think anybody likes what trump said, its gross. I mean, its disgusting. On the other hand there could be a rubber band effect where the outrage is so phoney and so overdone that some people say knock it off. I dislike you more than im offended by trump. I would just say this, here is the dishonesty is that the people who are opposing trump now have real reasons to oppose him, i think, they are totally legitimate but theyre preexisting, the same people abandoning him now didnt want him to be the nominee. They have preexisting reasons for opposing him and thats fine but we should just be honest about it. Julie, let me read you excerpts from the coverage, cnn said its over for him, he is like some Central American dictator. Politico, no candidate has entered a debate so cloaked in disgrace, New York Times this turned a borish man into an outright predator. I have the impression there is a lot of glee in this, a lot of people in the media who never liked trump, said he was never going to win the nomination would kind of like the, quote, vikts ri of seeing him pushed out of the race. Theres two things going on and then i will make a personal observation. One is trump is a complete creation of the media. No, he is not. He is, im sorry he got millions of republicans votes. He did because the media rode this horse all the way to the nomination, they covered his press conferences, they never broke to go to ted cruzs press conferences he. He gave more interviews than the history of anyone in television. They didnt break for ted cruz or marco rubio or jeb bush, they did it for trump because his ratings were good and they were good because he would say crazy stuff and people wanted to tune in. Thats one. Two i will say to you that reporters love Nothing Better than to build somebody up and tear them down and thats a fact. To some extent you have a point there. On that one i agree with you. The third observation i would make is as a woman we all know this guy. It may not be a big deal to male reporters, every woman out there knows this kind of guy. I dont think theres going to be a rubber band effect among women because women know this guy, weve seen him and experienced him and thats what women dont want to see in their president. How about billy bush who is now a cohost of the today show, he is seen playing along on this im at that. He has apologized, he is embarrassed and ashamed that he did play along. Is he going to take a hit in terms of his nbc career . There are reports that nbc is not even planning to reprimand him. Charitable interpretation, he is just kind of an overseeinger sink a fant who was rooting trump on, but the damaging part is when they get off the bus and he knows whats been going on and the talk and donald trump has put the tick tack in and pushes him on to this woman. So i think based on the reporting that ive seen this could be a real problem just given not just what happened but also the demographic graphic of the audience that the today show reaches which is mostly women and also the fact that this could make a lot of his female coworkers as well uncomfortable and who knows, i guess we will find out on monday when he was supposed to be cohosting again what actually happens. A lot of times in these cases when Something Like this happens the host or the personality will go into a hibernation period. I guess we will find out on monday. Right. Whats interesting is that megan kelly who just criticized donald trump and Hillary Clinton said on her show donald trump with all due respect to my friend at 10 00 will go on hannity and pretty much only hannity and will not venture out to the unsafe spaces these days and hannity tweeted back you should be mad at Hillary Clinton, clearly you support her, they have since made up, sent out a picture but trump is staying off of any nonfox outlet. I know some people out there and i see some of this online are saying, well, what donald trump said is just talk, but bill clinton he actually had affairs including with an intern in the white house, there is an allegation of rape. They hate trump, they are not going to buy into that argument. Is it a lejtment argument . I dont know. I think he is better served by talking about what he believes. I think its worth preserving this distinction, there is a difference between talking and doing, there is, if i say i dont like you thats different from hitting you in the face. Im not defending anything that trump said and i didnt like it. Ive got three girls, i dont like that stuff. But to call it assault is to devalue assault. It wasnt assault, it was something different. It was. Its not the same as physically attacking somebody talking about it its just not. Brief response that he has talked about having done this, not just talk. Okay. And thats a big difference. Okay. Then he can call what he did assault, give me the specific time that he did and i will say thats assault. He is boasting about it you dont want me to take his word on this particular issue. Im not defending the guy. Dont devalue the word assault. If somebody says im going to grab you by the you know what or kiss me without my consent that to me is the definition of assault. We will just be shaking hands at the end of this segment. You can give me a hug at any time. Let us know what you think, mediabuzz foxnews. Com. When we come back this is going to be some debate tonight the leaked documents against Hillary Clinton. These have practically been blown off the screen by the tramp saga. The reporter that got ahold of the trump and billy bush tape gives us the back story. Picking up for kyle. Here you go. You wouldnt put up with part of a pizza. Um. Something wrong . So when it comes to pain relievers, why put up with just part of a day . You want the whole thing . Yes, yes live whole. Not part. Aleve. Now that fedex has helped us we could focus on bigger issues, like our passive aggressive environment. Were not passive aggressive. Hey, hey, hey, there are no bad suggestions here. No matter how lame they are. Well said, ann. Ive always admired how you just say whats in your head, without thinking. Very brave. Good point ted. Youre living proof that looks arent everything. Thank you. Welcome. So, fedex helped simplify our ecommerce business and this is not a passive aggressive environment. I just wanted to say, you guys are doing a great job. Whats that supposed to mean . Fedex. Helping Small Business simplify ecommerce. Did you or anyone in your household work around asbestoscontaining gaskets, packing, or equipment . If you or a loved one have an asbestosrelated disease, you may have a right to vote on a plan to reorganize and pay claims in the garlock coltec bankruptcy. Garlocks and coltecs products were used in industrial and maritime settings, including where steam, hot liquid or acid moved in pipes. Votes must be filed by december 9, 2016 call 844garlock or go to garlocknotice. Com undoubtedly face a new line of questioning at tonights debate here in st. Louis about her highly lucrative wall street speeches, parts of which were made public in hacked emails obtained by wikileaks. While running to the left against Bernie Sanders she had said in these speeches that she favored, quote, open trade and open borders, a stunning contradiction with her public position. She also called sanders supporters a bucket of losers and despite her tough on big banks rhetoric clinton said this in one speech, wall street insiders are what is needed to fix wall street. Clinton spokesman said the, quote, stolen documents could have been orchestrated by russian officials trying to help donald trump but would not say they were fake. The media treating this also as a bombshell . I dont think they are treating it at all. This goes to one of the most frustrating pieces of this whole debate or nondebate is the lack of attention to the actual issues. What would it mean to carry through on trumps trade policy, what would it mean to have open borders . Hillary clinton in the last two weeks we have found out that obamacare has basically collapsed. Hillary clinton is calling for extending obamacare benefits to Illegal Immigrants in this country. What would that mean . The media interest on these subjects . I havent read a single story on this. Julie roginsky, open borders, thats a radioactive phrase and seems to district everything clinton has said on trade and immigration. I am not going to defend these speeches, if she was even contemplating running for president to go out there as soon as she left secretary of state to go out there and start doing these speeches was completely inn comprehensible to me. And suck up to wall street. Yes, exactly right. She didnt need the money, she didnt need to suck up to wall street, she was going to get their support and did not need the money. Im not defending that. Having said that the difference here is its sort of what you expect of politicians its not as salacious as the trump tapes. In her luck and its really dumb luck in this case this tape got leaked at the same time as her wikileaks stuff got leaked, the news cycle will go up with trump up until tonights debate and starting tomorrow the news cycle will pick up where the debate left off. This is getting lost in the news cycle she has donald a bullet on these speeches. Heidi przybyla, on any other day, i mean, these john Podesta Emails would have been the lead story everywhere. Is it simply not just that its being overshadowed by the trump saga but they are not salacious as julie says and is that the Media Standard for whether we cover something intensively . I think theyre plenty interesting enough. There is a lot in there. This has been some of the most sought after information in this cycle about Hillary Clinton ever since the primaries when bernie was hammering her to release these speeches but to julies point the timing was so forth tuesday for her that i literally thought it was a joke when i saw it come across on twitter i thought this is a joke and then i realized that it wasnt. This is essentially the campaigns own audit of some of the worst stuff that she could have said in these speeches and i think, you know a lot of it has to do with the way the networks play this because the papers did give a full write up to the extent that i saw Hillary Clinton surrogates accusing the New York Times of writing a smear article, but the way the networks operate the gop is in crisis right now and they dont have their surrogates out there pushing this because everyone is playing defense on this trump story. Very much its completely due to the timing. Right. You dont have democrats running away from Hillary Clinton over this story the way you do have many big name republicans at least publicly distancing themselves from donald trump. You could do separate stories just on Hillary Clinton saying only wall street insiders can fix wall street this after all the outrage at the banks in the wake of the fiscal crisis. Or do 11 stories on how billy bush may be culpable for american sexism. The trump access hollywood story left an absence for journalists to write real stories. I dont think the New York Times ought to need prodding from partizans to cover a story. You make a completely fair point about the lack of surrogates but that shouldnt affect our business. We should be, what is this, go write a story on it but no one for months and months the press was hot on the 675,000 from Goldman Sachs to take just one example Hillary Clinton was paid, the failure to release her speeches, the refusal, that seems to have cooled in the general election. Im sure some critics are saying now youre giving Hillary Clinton the pass because shes close to winn