Among the 30,000 already made public. The messages show conversations between a Top Executive at the Clinton Family charity and clintons closest aides at the state department. Including an urgent appeal to help a controversial foreign businessman, and a request to find a job for a mystery person whose name is being kept secret. Then, just hours ago, as we have seen repeatedly during her run for the white house, mrs. Clintons missteps forcing the Obama Administration to handle the time, at a contentious state department briefing. Watch. Can you tell us why the state department redacted that name . And whether or not this person wound up getting a job or not . Okay, well, i cant speak to a specific case, cases. I need a little help understanding why this persons name cannot be shared. I cant speak to specific cases. Would it be wrong to assume that, then, that this is a case simply of nepotism or Something Like that . I cant speak to specific cases. Justin. You dont feel like there was impropriety in the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the state department . We talked to a wide range of people at my level, at various levels. Has the department looked into this and determined there was no impropriety . The department is regularly in touch with people across the whole spectrum. Thats not the question. Am i not speaking english . The question is whether or not you have determined there was nothing improper here . We feel confident that all of the rules were followed. In moments, we will be joined by the man who quite literally wrote the book on the Clinton Foundation, Peter Schweitzer is president of the Government Accountability institute and author of the New York Times best seller clinton cash. But Trace Gallagher has the latest developments on this. When she was appointed secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton took a pledge to remove herself from any Clinton Foundation business. But these emails raise serious questions about whether the foundation and state department were instead working hand in hand, providing jobs for associates and favors to big donors. Frampt, in 2009, dug bend, a long time adviser to bill clinton and former head of the Clinton Initiative emailed secretarys senior aide, huma abedin and sheryl mills asking for a, quote, favor, because an unnamed associate needed a job. He writes, quoting, its important to take care of blank. Abedin responds, quote, we all have him on our radar. Personnel has been sending him options. Today, the state department refused to identify the person or say if they got hired. But days later, doug band emails abedin again, requesting a bigtime Clinton Foundation donor be put in contact with the American Ambassador to lebanon, quoting again, we need gilbert to speak to the substance person reference lebanon. Abedin assures doug band he will speak with the ambassador. Records show gilbert, a nigerian citizen of lebanese descent donated between 1 million and 5 million to the Clinton Foundation and is known for his association with nigerias military dictator, but the Clinton Campaign says, quote, neither of these emails involve the secretary or relate to the foundations work. They are communications between her aides and the president s personal aide, and indeed, the recommendation was for one of the secretarys former staffers who was not employed by the foundation. Today, donald trump responded to the release of the new emails. Watch. A couple of very bad ones came out. And its called pay for play. And some of these were really, really bad and illegal. If its true, its illegal. Youre paying, and youre getting things. And Judicial Watch, the conservative watchdog that obtained these emails accuses mrs. Clinton of hiding the documents because she knows they contradict her pledge, and show a conflict of interest. Thanks, trace. Here now, Peter Schweitzer is the author of clinton cash which has now been adapted into a graphic novel. Peter, what did you learn by looking at these 44 new emails . Well, i think Judicial Watch did a great job of getting them released. What it does is its further confirmation to what we have been talking about for more than a year. Theres been pay to play at the Clinton State Department related to the Clinton Foundation, and the clintons have failed to deal with any of the substance of these issues. Heck, trace talked about the agreement that Hillary Clinton had when she wept in to become secretary of state. Part of that agreement was that they were supposed to disclose all donors to the Clinton Foundation. They still havent done that. Theres more than 1,100 foreign donors that we dont even know the names ability. This is further confirmation and the new noose is tightening. They put those 30,000 emails out there and said thats it, nothing else to see here. Here, 44 new emails that reveal a lot about what was going on at that time. Where is this going to go . Are we going to see more of these . Are there more emails where these came from . Yes. I know there are more emails. There are emails that are being produced almost on a weekly basis for both Judicial Watch and citizens united. You have Julian Assange saying were probably going to see more emails. Look, heres the bottom line. You saw a little bit of it today with the state department, but the media has to hold Hillary Clinton accountable and ask her to answer these questions. Heres why this is so troubling. This is not a typical money in politics story. Were used to wall street oil companies, et cetera, giving donations to politicians, getting access. But federal law prevents foreign businessmen and governments from doing so. The Clinton Foundation is a gateway around that. Gilbert is a perfect example. Hes getting access to the u. S. Ambassador. Hes not a u. S. Citizen. Hes not a u. S. Businessman. Hes getting access because he gave money to the clintons. And to have foreign oligarchs talking to our ambassadors about policy is simply not appropriate, and its probably illegal if it was pay to play. Then the state department, and even going to the clinton response on this, i mean, theyre basically saying that mr. Band, who was working as an aide to bill clinton at that time, was acting in his capacity as former president bill clintons personal assistant. Not in his role overseeing the clinton global initiative. Theyre going to have to spin this for some time if it actually stays in the news cycle, i should say. Look, if you look at their statement, my first question was, how stupid do they think we are . Because bill clintons top aide talks to Hillary Clintons top aide. Thats not the secretary of state talking about Clinton Foundation business. So theres nothing to see here. Come on. This is how it works in washington. This is the role that aides play. Theyre gate keepers. Doug band knows who is important to the clintons. In this case, a nigerian billionaire who has given them a lot of money, and cheryl mills knows hes important to them as well. Thats the role aides play. Their response is a total non sequitur and has absolutely nothing to do with the substance of this. What about the state department response, in addition to saying we talked to a wide range of people, but being asked, who was that associate who was looking for a job, a favor . What was their name . Who are they . Why has that been deleted and why wont they comment on that, and if this person was ever given a job . Thats a great question. And why is the state Department Struggling and resisting on the release of other emails . Look, you talk to Judicial Watch and citizens united, the state department is fighting tooth and nail to prevent any emails from coming out. Federal judges are forcing them to do this. The state departments not doing the bidding of the American People. Theyre doing the bidding of the clintons, and it has to stop, and god bless these federal judges for forcing them to release this material. Peter, you have always been in charge in your book of not having the smoking gun. You had the story and you had a lot of details. Was this your smoking gun . Well, i never had access to the emails. Now that were getting access to the emails, yes, the smoking guns are appearing and the pattern of evidence is overwhelming. And again, two things to point out. Number one, the clintons, no one at the Democratic NationalConvention Never mentioned the word Clinton Foundation. Its toxic. Theyre running away from it. And coincidentally, all 44 of these newly released emails had to do with the Clinton Foundation. Thank you very much, sir. Good to have you. Here now, richard fowler, nationally syndicated radio host. Good to see you. How will the Clinton Campaign continue to defend this smoking gun, as peter just labeled . I dont think peter has a smoking gun. I think, you know he doesnt. The emails that were just released are. And sandra, i dont think those emails are a smoking gun, either. They point to some causation, but causation doesnt equal correlation. Or correlation doesnt equal causation in this case at all. These are emails that are not from the secretary. Theyre from close aides to secretary clinton and close aides to bill clinton, who let me remind you, are married. They communicate just like Michelle Obama aides communicate with the president s aides. I know that is going to be you your talking point, that this didnt directly involve Hillary Clinton. What are the optics of this . Whether its illegal or unethical, what are the optics of the 44 emails that were just released . The optics, the more and more people bring up the email thing around Hillary Clinton, we have seen this over and over again. She testified for almost 12 hours on the hill about emails. I think republicans for some reason think this is the field go or their pot of gold, but im here to tell you theres no rainbow on this one. When they keep focusing on emails and the American People are worried about jobs and regrowing our economy, theyre worried about their kids going back to school in a couple weeks, they dont care about emails. And donald trump has not pointed to any real substance with his campaign. Anything hes going to do for the American People. Hes a narcicisstic maniac lets get back to the story, that is were talking about the emails. And lets talk about the lebanese businessman, that he pledged a billion dollars as part of his commitment to the clinton global initiative. He donated between 1 million and 5 million to the Clinton Foundation. Then he asks for a favor, richard. What does that tell you . He asked to be put in contact with the ambassador from his home country. Is that okay . Here, listen. Anybody who has worked in politics say if you have a friend in politics, you ask them to help you out. If im trying to reach out to the ambassador and the friend knows the ambassador to jubuddy, im going to ask them to reach out. It happens all the time, democrat, independent, republican. So if its just any old thing, how about the associate who asked for a job . That also happens all the time. We saw it happen in the Bush Administration when george bush hired dick cheneys daughter to work for him. I mean, isnt that not the definition of nepotism . Theres no problem here, then . Heres the thing. I think the emails overall are problematic, but i think republicans are overplaying their hand. Theyll keep doing it over and over again. Theyll lose this election because of it. Talk about issues. Talk about how you close the gap for the American People. Thats what they want to hear. They dont want to hear about emails. And donald trump knows it. He can continue talking about it, though, and hell lose, and it will be funny and well laugh. I wish we could. Richard fowler, thank you for joining us tonight. Thanks, sandra. Theres also breaking news today in the leak of internal emails from the dnc, as we hear suggestions that seth rich, who was mysteriously murdered back in july, may have been leaking or about to leak information to Julian Assange and wikileaks, and while assange says wikileaks doesnt comment on its sources, his unprovoked comments about richs death are raising some serious questions, as the clinton camp deals with yet another embarrassing email headline. Correspondent rich is live with us from washington. Hey, rich. Good evening, sandra. The wikileaks editor is coyly implying a young Democratic NationalCommittee Staffer shot and killed last month may have leaked information about the dnc and may have lost his life over it. Late last month, wikileaks released nearly 20,000 pages of stolen dnc emails. The embarrassing content showed dnc favoritism to Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders and forced resignations including that of then chair Debbie Wasserman schultz. Now, Julian Assange, unprompted, brought up the murder of seth rich, the 27yearold worked for the dnc for two years before he was shot and killed around 4 00 a. M. July 10th in washington, d. C. The dutch anchor then asked assange if rich was one of wikileaks sources at the dnc. Assange said he refused to comment on any wikileaks sources. The anchor following by asking why assange would even raise richs case. Because we have to understand how high the stakes are in the united states. And our sources are, you know, our sources face serious risks. Thats why they come to us, so we can protect their anonymity. Wikileaks then announced a 20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction in seth richs murder. Local reports claim Police Officials believe richs murder is the result of a botched robbery. In a statement, the Washington Metropolitan Police department says, quote, at this time, there is no indication that seth richs death is connected to his employment at the dnc. Assange critics say hes promoting a conspiracy theory. Back to you. Rich, thank you. Growing questions over a doj investigation into one u. S. Police force, as the Department Releases a scathing review of the baltimore pd just two weeks after all charges were dropped against the officers accused in freddie grays death. Plus, Hillary Clinton fires off a sharp reaction to Donald TrumpsSecond Amendment comment. Words matter, my friends. And if you are running to be president or you are president of the united states, words can have tremendous consequences. Since words have consequences, we look back at a controversy causing remark Hillary Clinton made back in 2008 and discuss whether the media is treating both incidents equally. Howard kerts and Katie Pavlich howard kerts and Katie Pavlich your Car Insurance policy is 22 pages long. Did you read every word . No, only lawyers do that. So when you got rearended and needed a tow, your Insurance Company told you to look at page five on your policy. Did it say great news. Youre covered on page five . No. It said, blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah. The Liberty Mutual app with coverage compass™ makes it easy to know what youre covered for and what youre not. Liberty stands with you. Liberty mutual insurance. Mapping the oceans. Where we explore. Protecting biodiversity. Everywhere we work. Defeating malaria. Improving energy efficiency. Developing more clean burning natural gas. My job . My job at exxonmobil . Turning algae into biofuels. Reducing Energy Poverty in the developing world. Making cars go further with less. Fueling the global economy. And you thought we just made the gas. Energy lives here. One day, the worlde wonder came together. Games. A dog, talked. Were decedent from the mighty wolf. A voice was heard. If you build it, he will come. A girl discovered magic. A revolution began. Welcome, to the wonders that happen, everyday. Welcome, to it all. Comcast. Fallout from Donald Trumps offhanded remark linking gun rights to his democratic oppone opponent, Hillary Clinton. The controversy spilling onto to the campaign trail, where his opponent called the comments out of line. For more on that, we turn to carl cameron following mr. Trump and this sto