Transcripts For FOXNEWSW Outnumbered 20201119 : vimarsana.co

FOXNEWSW Outnumbered November 19, 2020

Irregularities, all the problems in the 2020 election . The committees arent meeting this week. Why not . Why not look into this. The fundamental question. The same democrats who told us that the rioters and looters are Peaceful Protesters are the same ones who are telling us we can trust the vote. Harris meanwhile in a stunning move two republicans on the wayne county board of canvassers have rescinded their votes. Saying that democrats bullied them and threatened their families. The in wisconsin, the Trump Campaign has filed a petition for a recount in two counties claiming there were illegally altered absentee ballots and voter identification laws were broken. Youre watching outnumbered. Im harris faulkner. With kennedy. Host of kennedy. Marie harf. In the Center Virtual count steve hilton is here, host of the next revolution can you can catch sunday evening at 9 00 eastern. Good to see you, everybody. Steve, the News Conference coming up and we have heard once before from Rudy Giuliani. Whats your take on where we are with the lawsuits and how the Trump Campaign is handling it. Steve well see the details in a moment but the big picture for me is that cent of republicans according to a survey recently do not believe that the election was free or fair. And my question is who are the 30 who do . Because for so many reasons i would agree with that proposition. Three reasons if being it. First of all, the fact that we had massive late changes made to the Voting Systems to make it something that most americans would now agree is completely broken and dysfunctional. These changes were pushed by the democrats not because of the virus as they claim. Back in 2019, as soon as the democrats took control of the house nancy pelosi, the first bill that they published had all of those changes that she now says were necessary because of the virus. Mass mailin voting. Reducing the security requirements. All of that. That was all in the first bill. The democrats have been wanting to make these changes for years. They took their chance with the virus. They pushed it all through. As a result, what have you got . Mass mailin voting combined with voter rolls that are completely plagued with errors according to the Pew Foundation and combine that with ballot harvesting i a practice i cannot believe we still have in this country. It is all so dysfunctional. Two more things. The fact that in the election you had almost the entire media ranged against President Trump. That is not a Fair Election. On top of that, the third point. Silicon valley and big tech suppressing information that could hurt their candidate. Put all that together and whatever the outcome of this legal process, well see that shortly, its right to conclude that this election was not a Fair Election and thats why so Many Americans are angry today. Harris kennedy, i come to you next for your top line thoughts as we,a wait this News Conference with the Trump Campaign attorneys. I dont think that steve is wrong about most of that. And hes really, really good at doing his research. What i will say is the president probably shouldnt have demonized mailin voting as much as he did because i think he could have gotten more republican votes through mailin voting and the problem was and one of the aspects of Voter Suppression that people have talked about within the polls particularly and i keep going back to this, and some people dismiss this as an outlier, the the Washington Post abc nides poll that had biden up 17 points in wisconsin, if you had a majority of Republican Voters going out to vote in person and they see Something Like that a couple of days theyre supposed to vote theyre going to say whats the point . Hes going to lose. Why am i going to wait in the enclement weather. I think that was a mistake on the part of the Trump Campaign. As far as the president s unforced errors which we talk about many times on this show, he could have done a better job at personal comportment and that could have made the difference in places like georgia and wisconsin. Harris molly, im curious. Was it broken reasoning to make changes right before an election or talent . Or thereabouts for covid . When you look at the situation now, im sure if the election were held now, wouldnt they be changing rules trying it keep people in their houses with the mailin . Im curious to know what you think. Marie i think covid waslet excuse given this year for rampant changes to how we vote. We have known for a very long time that mailin balloting is ripe for fraud. Why france banned it. Why gerry nadler said it was ripe for fraud. You had elections where 20 of mailin ballots were thrown out for failing to pass scrutiny, why people were indicted in new jersey for mailin ballot fraud corruption and it is obvious to everyone. Everybody knows that mailin balloting is less secure than inperson balloting. We didnt just move to rampant mailin balloting, we also decreased the scrutiny we applied to mailin ballots, achieved by lawsuits from democrats and its completely reasonable that people would look at these changes and say this not something i have confidence in. Whats important right now is not just that you have integrity with this election but that moving forward never again do we have a situation where we have rampant mailin balloting and no scrutiny. No signature checks. No witness requirements. Kicking people out when it matters. It cant be rushed. I think people need to slow down. Calm down. If they care about people having confidence in this election. Harris thats really good advice for all of us. Youve got to take a deep breath. The reason im curious about the point is you look at the 26 lawsuits that have been brought by the Trump Campaign and 25 of them have not been successful and many of them have challenged some of the notions that you are bringing up, mollie, i wonder why theyre not. You have to be patient and ask good questions. While you were talking, news was made there. You see that multiple pathways to victory . One of the people in the room came up and took down the cover on that and these are the multiple pathways to victory perhaps that the president was tweeting about with less than specificity a few hours ago ahead of the News Conference with mayor giuliani, with all of the lawsuits pressed now by the Trump Campaign in 2020 and jenna ellis who is a senior legal advisor, as they step to the lectern we can see more about what theyre thinking in terms of legality. Your reaction to what we see on the screen. Breaking news. Marie the reason almost none of those lawsuits in the Trump Campaign have been successful is there is no evidence to back up their claim. There are a lot of a assertions by trump supporters. There is no evidence that there was widespread problem with mailin votes. People can say i have a feeling there was but we need evidence in this country and in our legal system you city republican appointed and democrat appointed judges throwing out lawsuits and at the end of the day there are no pathways for donald trump, joe biden is going to be the next president and there is Something Different saying you need to make sure mailin balloting is secure and the president saying he won, it was a rigged election. This was a free and Fair Election. For all of us stoking fears that donald trump had this taken from him unfairly harris marie harf, i have to step in. The president s legal team is here and going live and that is Rudy Giuliani. Lets watch. Representatives of our legal team. Representing President Trump and were representing the Trump Campaign. When i finish, Sidney Powell. And then jenna ellis will follow me. And we will present in brief the evidence that we have collected over the last i guess it is two weeks. Also, Joseph Digenova and Victoria Toensing are with me. There are a lot more lawyers working on this but i guess were the senior lawyers, and boris epstein. The best way to describe this is when we began our representation of the president , we certainly were confronted with a very anomalous set of results. The president way ahead on election night. 700 or 800,000 in pennsylvania. Somehow he lost pennsylvania. We have statisticians willing to testify that thats almost statistically impossible to have happened in the period of time that had happened but of course thats just speculation. As we started our investigation, brave american citizens who have come forward. Extraordinary number of people. Extraordinary number of witnesses. What emerged very quickly is this is not a singular voter fraud in one state. This pattern repeats itself in a number of states. Almost exactly the same pattern. Which to any experienced investigator, prosecutor, would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized place to execute these various acts of voter fraud to specifically focus on big cities, and specifically focus on as you would imagine, big cities controlled by democrats, and particularly focused on big cities that have a long history of corruption. The number of voter fraud cases in philadelphia could fill a library. Just a few weeks ago, there was a conviction for voter fraud and one two weeks before that, and i have often said i guess sarcastically but its true. The only surprise i would have found in this is if philadelphia hadnt cheated in this election because for the last 60 years theyve cheated in just about every single election. You could say the same thing about detroit. Each one of these cities are cities that are controlled by democrats which means they can get away with anything they want to do. It means they have a certain degree of control over certainly control of the election board completely and they control Law Enforcement and unfortunately they have some friendly judges that will issue ridiculously irrational opinions just to am can out in their favor. Lets start with the specifics. Pennsylvania. In pennsylvania, the margin of victory now for biden, which is a not a victory, its a fraud. 69,140 votes. The reality is that we are now at a count of 682,770 ballots for which we have affidavits that there was no inspection of that ballot at the time that it was entered in the vote. It was a mail ballot. Mail ballots are particularly prone to fraud. We were warned about that by president jimmy carter and secretary baker in a report about a dozen years ago. In which they said that mail balloting is particularly susceptible of fraud, that we should very carefully consider ever doing it and that it can be taken advantage of. Justice suterwarned us justice suter warned us in an election case. Its the first time we ever did it en masse and i think we proved that all three are prophets. Its not only susceptible to fraud, it is easily susceptible to fraud particularly if you have a plan which sounds eerily similar to what joe biden told us a few days before the election that he had the best voter fraud team in the world. They were good but i dont know if they were that good because they made significant mistakes like all crooks do and we caught them. One of them was pushing out republican inspectors. Every state. Almost every civilized country. Even tanzania and places you wouldnt think of have rules about inspectors particularly for mailin ballots, and why particularly mailin ballots . Because they can easily be defrauded and you cant check on it. People who have never done a mailin ballot im going to show you why its so easy. You fill out an envelope like this. You put your in new york your Assembly District and the precinct in which you are voting, fill out your name and address and you sign it. You then use an inner envelope and you put the ballot inside the inner envelope, you seal it all and you send it in. When its being counted, almost invariably in the United States up until the mass cheating that went on in this election a republican and a democrat inspector as well as others if there are other parties is allowed to watch the unsealing of this ballot. It used to go on all over america when we conducted honest elections. Because the only time you can ever find out if its a fraudulent ballot is when it is looked at. The minute you approve this, its thrown away, gone for eternity. The only thing left is the vote. Thwack have been mickey mouse. That could have been a dead president. That could have not been filled out properly. That could have been the same person 30 teams. All these things have happened, by the way. That could have been nothing filled out. We would never know. The recount done in georgia will tell us nothing because these fraudulent votes will be counted again because they couldnt supply the signatures to match the ballots so is Means Nothing to have counted these ballots because for example in pennsylvania, where we have probably our most precise, 600,000 of these ballots were cast, put in and they werent inspected which renders them balthe ones that are null and void. Cannot be counted. Have to be removed from the vote. Why . For several reasons. Not the least of which is that was basically only one of two places in the state where it was done. In the other parts of the state there was a legitimate inspection of the ballot. If you have two different standards in davenport parts in different parts of the state, thats a classic violation of the equal protection clause of the United States constitution, bush v. Gore being the most recent case that teaches that. Thats not the only fraud that went on in pennsylvania. All the other frauds carried out by the democrat bosses happened there as well. For example. If you made a mistake in that ballot, and you lived in philadelphia or in pittsburgh, you were allowed to fix the mistake. But if if you lived in what would be considered more republican or trump parts of the state, you were given no such right. One of our plaintiffs, mr. Henry, cast an absentee ballot and he failed to put it in the secure envelope inside. He just put it in open. Naked. That ballot was cast aside. Because it was invalid. Because that breaks the privacy of the vote. In pittsburgh and in philadelphia, the state noticed if there wasnt an inner envelope they would contact the voter and allow him to vote again or if he didnt fill it out completely or if he made a mistake and didnt sign his full name he was allowed to cure it. The democrat secretary of state made that up in order to maximize the votes in philadelphia and pittsburgh and to minimize the votes in the other parts of the state. Clearly illegal. Clearly voter fraud. Easily proveable. Hundreds of witnesses. Maybe thousands. Ill give you another example. We have 17,000 provisional ballots cast in pittsburgh. Do you know what a provisional ballot is in a provisional ballot usually happens this way. About 15,000 of the 17,000 hatched this way. You walk in and you say im here to happened this way. You walk in and you say im here to vote today. They say mr. Giuliani, you already voted . I did . I dont remember voting. Yes, you cast an absentee ballot. No, you didnt. Yes, i did. No, you didnt. Why did that happen 17,000 times in pittsburgh . People walked in thinking they actually, 15,000 to be precise, why did it happen 15,000 times that people in pittsburgh walked in to vote and they had already voted according to the democrat election machine . Did they forget . That many people with bad memories in pittsburgh . Or is the following correct that as will testify they were instructed by the democrat bosses when they had a ballot in which there was no one registered, just assign it to somebody. Just assign it to Rudy Giuliani. So when Rudy Giuliani maybe Rudy Giuliani wouldnt show up to vote. And if he does show up to vote well give him a provisional ballot. That is what we call circumstantial evidence of the fraud. The direct evident of the fraud are people who will testify that in fact thats what happened to them. As well as the 50 to 60 witnesses we have to the way they were treated and not allowed to inspect the ballots. They werent just not allowed to do it. They were pushed. In a few cases they were assaulted. In all cases they were put in a corral. So far away, probably the closest they got is from here to the back of that room. We could do like a did you all watch my cousin vinnie . One of my favorite law movies because he comes from brooklyn and when the nice lady said she saw and he says to her how many fingers do i got up . And she says, three. She was too far away to see it was only two. These people were further away than my cousin vinnie was from the witness. They couldnt see a thing. I dont know. Are you going to tell me that 60 people are lying . They didnt just tell me this. They swore under penalty of perjury which is something new democrat has ever done. You dont even ask biden about this. He doesnt get asked questions about all the evidence of the crimes that he committed. These people are under penalty of perjury. Their names are on an affidavit. They swear that they werent allowed to carry out their function as inspectors and its not just a technical thing. There is a reason they did it. Why would you not allow people to carry out the function they have been allowed to do for 50 years, 60 years . Why wouldnt you allow inspections of those ballots . Because you knew you were going to use those ballots to catch biden up. And you had a big road ahead of you. You had to catch him up for 700,000800,000 votes he was behind and the only way you were going to do it was with the mailin ballots. You couldnt have a democrat and republican inspector around. They dont even have democrats watching. They would be afraid there were honest democrats who would say youre cheating. That takes us to michigan where there

© 2025 Vimarsana