Transcripts For FOXNEWSW The Ingraham Angle 20180824 02:00:0

FOXNEWSW The Ingraham Angle August 24, 2018 02:00:00

Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. When you were chair of the House Oversight committee on who wrote the talking points, who were interested in the families mightve happened in new york, not to mention the Trump Organization and the trump foundation. We would have investigations in congress. Congress is hapless right now. When you were chair of that committee, you investigated. I think you would be investigating right now. Jason you know what. You know why congress is hapless . This Attorney General does nothing to provide documents that congress has issued subpoenas for. Math, come on in here and give us your perspective. This Attorney General is in name only. He i think hes one of the most feckless, ineffective Attorney Generals this country is ever had. Jason, i understand where youre coming from. I am a big fan of Jeff Sessions but i feel it for the last year and a half its been one of the most painful things to watch. The saddest thing is the president has amazing fortitude and pushing through his agenda, but theres two decisions that Jeff Sessions made that have really caused all of this drama over the course of the last year and a half. One, kicking Rod Rosenstein, someone who doesnt believe in the president and doesnt believe in his agenda is the number to manage justice. Big mistake. Personnel and policy. If he was going to recuse himself. If he was going to recuse himself from this investigation then turning it over to someone like Rod Rosenstein, you wouldve immediately known that was going to be a mistake because Rod Rosenstein by his own voice said im not really very partisan. I just want to help you run the agency. Those two decisions are why Jeff Sessions is in the position hes in. Jason, its not fixable. Theres nothing they can be done to fix the situation. We need someone running doj who can handle this situation and also have the confidence of the president. Jason david, do you believe Rod Rosenstein needs to recuse himself because his name is on the fisa document, which is the subject of the investigation . Number two, do you believe that there should be a Second Special counsel . I believe there needs to be another investigation into what happened within the Department Of Justice and the fbi. Peter strzok, lisa page, all of what happened under james comeys watch, you know, how this investigation was dealt with differently than Hillary Clinton investigation, the double standard in the political nature within the fbi. You could say it but those are the facts. Thats with the American People believe. They believe the Mainstream Media is biased against this president , because they are. Just yesterday, 225 times msnbc and cnn talked about impeachment. Its outrageous on its face, where we have gone as a country. Obstruction of justice and committing felonies are things that the congress should be looking into right now. Jason wade, chris. What is it that you think Somebody Swearing to it in court. No, no, no. Jason gentlemen, timeout. One at a time. I assume youre on the bandwagon that says we should impeach donald trump. Yes, no . No. I believe in justice. Jason so you dont think i believe in getting to the truth, and if we get to a truth that says the president committed a felony, then we can talk about impeachment. Until that time, we cant. I also say you cant have a partisan impeachment. It has to be a bipartisan thing. Republicans democrats have to agree. Jason, if i could if i could get i want to remind everybody. I want to remind everybody how this all got started. It all got started, even if you want to give officials let doj little bit of credit, it was all about finding come as fast as we could, whether or not there was collusion with putins government. We are talking about the Lifestyles Of The Rich And Famous and we are talking about bad stories they can harm a reputation. It has nothing to do with collusion. It has nothing to do with russia. The American People are repulsed by all of this. Jason david, david. Timeout. Gentlemen. Are you concerned that immunity is given to a member of the media . People will scoff at the National Enquirer and say its the National Enquirer. You dont hear very often and that the Department Of Justice grants immunity to a news organization. There are certain times, when you go and talk to your attorney, you get attorneyclient privilege. When you talk to your doctor, you expect those medical records will be when you talk to a member of the media off the record, there is some sanctity there, isnt there . They go there absolutely should be. We dont know. Its all i have pathetic or what david pecker may or may not know. Usually Law Enforcement get something in return for that immunity deal. If you look at Sharon Nelson samuelson. Hillary clintons lawyers. You remember this very well, that they got immunity in their deals and gave nothing in retur return. Jason five got immunity. The closest to Hillary Clinton and they got nothing out of it. Well, well, i think we all want to know what is in david peckers safe. It could be interesting to the American People. Like geraldo. Jason gentlemen, thank you. I appreciate the spirit of the debate. Chris, i want you to stick around. I want Everybody Else on this broadcast to stick around because this will shock you. A Bombshell Report put out by real clear investigations that says despite what james comey said, the fbi failed to look at the vast majority of the emails on Anthony Weiners laptop. Which had thousands of Hillary Clintons state Department Emails on it. Joining me now to explain further is the author of that report, Investigative Journalism real clear investigations. Com paul sperry. Thanks for being here. Actually, the letter that went to congress explaining this was a letter that came to me when i was the chairman of the oversight committee. Tell me what you found out now about the reality. Thats right. James Comey Told Congress that they had reviewed all of the clinton emails, hundreds of thousands, that were found on the weiner laptop. That was not true. They barely looked at any event. 3,000 of 700,000 were individually jason wait, wait, wait. How many . Stick with 3,000 out of potentially relevant 700,000 ems were actually individually examined for classified information and incriminating evidence. Jason i mean, it did shock us, right . It was days. They told us they were looking into it and then days later they somehow reviewed 700,000 documents . How many people, do you have any idea how many people working on this case looking at these documents . I was going to mention that peter strzok, the disgraced agent who was in charge of the investigation into the clinton emails, he personally handpicked the 3,000 sample. With two other investigators, went through the Mall Supposedln allnighter, ordered pizza, and said nothing new here. Case closed once again. Jason ive got to tell you, as the former chairman of the committee, as a former member of congress, i mean, how can that be anything other than the director of the fbi Lying To Congress and misleading us . Stick and he also swore under o, and he had this story that he had this miraculous breakthrough in technology that fbi to process the weiner laptop for evidence rapidly. Turns out that doesnt pass the smell test. That didnt check out either. There was a Technical Glitch that ported the effort. I was going to mention that, jason, when you were on oversight, youre probably wondering the same thing. How in the world can they get through this mountain of evidence in days, after comey gave you the final all clear on hillary . Jason now that you have unveiled or figured out whats going on with this information, where does this case go next . Does anybody is anybody investigating this . Michael horowitz, the Inspector General for the Department Of Justice, i wonder if hes looking at it. If you have Attorney General sessions just today said hes only operates without any political influence. Is the Attorney General himself looking at this and lying to congress . This evidence that is, really has been covered up on this laptop, this weiner laptop, it is still relevant. In the Clinton Foundation probe especially, which is still ongoing, and you know, the whole thing raises more suspicion that the fbi politicized these investigations during the election. It just begs for an outside, independent prosecutor to go back through this evidence, through these emails, and see if the fbi was trying to cover up Material Evidence in this case. Jason i really appreciate your good investigative work. We were always scratching our heads in congress, the fact that you have unveiled this, it does demand i think the Inspector General, Attorney General himself, and potentially i would advocate s Second Special prosecutor to look at this. It creates more legal jeopardy for james comey and its a second revelation that not only did they use peter strzok to look at that information with his handpicked people and they ordered late night pizza, come on. The disgraced peter strzok at this point, makes absolutely no sense. Paul, i thank you for your good work and coming on this program to share this with us. My pleasure. Thank you. Jason the attorney for theyll go and bergen alleged to have murdered Mollie Tibbetts speaks out. You wont believe it when he had to say. We will play next. We know that whats outside can change whats inside. We know the great outdoors. We love the great outdoors. Bass pro shops and cabelas bring you the fall hunting classic with huge savings on the latest gear. Like savings of 40 on redhead silent hide camo shirts and pants. And save 130 on this garmin handheld gps. Officials are saying their reports indicate. He used a false name to work for an employer. They thought he was somebody else. We know that as well. These are the facts that are being dug up in that case. Jason martha is exactly right. Joining me there were three actions are tom homan, a fox news contributor, and the former Acting Director of i. C. E. And immigration attorney alan orr. Allen, is it a legitimate question or subject for us to discuss if somebody is here legally or illegally . Stick to it is if we are dealing with a matter of immigration. But i think what the family has said in this situation and also with the law bears out in the way the cases being handled, the fact that this person is undocumented is not an essential part of his actual criminal activity. Therefore jason alan, dont you believe he was unable to get here, if he had come legally and lawfully, he may not ever come here. The fact that he was here and is illegal. Mollie would be alive if he werent in this country. Do you believe that or not . First of all, its an absolute tragedy and i offer my condolences to the family. The possibility of changing what actually happened, no one can do those circumstances. Im not going to play the game of what i have. Jason its not a game. When people are here illegally and they commit a crime, i really do believe that that crime wouldnt have been committed because they wouldnt have been here. Is that logical . A philosophy major. Its not a logical answer. There are Endless Possibilities of things that couldve happened. Its not a logical answer. Jason he wouldve been in mexico and she would have gone running. In this specific occurrence. Jason a young woman going to college about to enter her junior year is murdered. You are telling me not relevant . I am uncertain if youre asking me if the Immigration Status is relevant. It is not relevant. What is relevant is the individual and the individual actions which have been discussed. Jason his actions of coming here illegally ultimately led to her being killed by this person. That is the allegation. We will see if its true, but thats the allegation. Tom, you have dedicated is a fallacy of causation. He was here for four years with no problem. Jason we dont know that yet. Hold on. I want to bring in tom. Tom spent a lifetime in Law Enforcement protecting us and getting rid of some of the most nefarious criminals out there. Tom, what is your take on this . I think my friend alan is way wrong on this and you are right. Fact he was in the country illegally. Fact if he wasnt here, this girl would be alive today. Its just a fact of the case. Its not a philosophy. This girl is dead today because he killed her and he was here illegally. If he hadnt been here, if we had a border wall and real border enforcement, maybe he wouldnt have been to be here. Stone cold fact. Jason let me play a clip of a candidate for the United States senate. A person running against ted cruz. Sorry. Okay, we dont have this clip. You have a lot of people saying hey, we should decriminalize this. Essentially open borders. We want to abolish i. C. E. Allen, where do you stand on those issues . The abolish i. C. E. Movement as well as decriminalization of immigration are separate issues and i want to be clear. Earlier saying his Immigration Status had nothing to do with the crime. And what happened in that occurrence. What is not important jason im going to keep arguing. Im not going to let you get over that. Im going to keep arguing. If he didnt come here illegally, he wouldnt have committed this crime. And you think thats a philosophy . I think its a fact. Its a fallacy of causation. You are saying that because he was illegal, he committed the crime. Not the case. Jason if some in your home and then murders you, what do you think would happen if he didnt break into your home . Right, so if these these equivocations, the Strawman Arguments arent useful to the conversation. Jason its not a strawman. We have a dead woman. And its a tragedy for the family and theyve asked that her death not a political issues based on this because jason its the number one issue facing voters. Tom, jump in. Ans actions is not represent illegals in this country. Jason im not quite a lot you get away with that. Theres difference between immigrants and illegal americans. Tom homan explained the difference. Low, immigrants are here legally. Illegal aliens are here illegally. The Comment Allen made about the family. Illegal immigration has been a political issue for decades. Its emotional. Fact about two hours ago, i got a text, actually an email from Don Rosenberg in california. He talked about this case and talked about an l. A. Editorial where they talked about politicizing the death. Don rosenberg reminded me. He said tom, everyone of us, we want the president to speak about this. Weve been speaking mothers for a long time that we never had the voice of the top President Trump got to be president. He created the voice. Victims of Immigration Crime at i. C. E. Here is an angel dead. Saying we want a voice. Want at the American People to understand the tragedy. Children killed by illegal aliens and we need to talk about it. Jason let me alan, ive got to show some video. There are those of us to believe in the wall and believe we should lock down the border. On the southern border, theres a video which hopefully will come up on the screen, of what was going on at a kfc. There was a tunnel going into this kfc which was providing a conduit. This is the kfc. Reminds me of breaking bad and how they they are moving drunk through. This is the tunnel moving through. Do you advocate for open borders or do you think we need more resources, more fun, more resources to lockdown the border, particularly the southern border . I dont think anyone is arguing for open borders. The point, im glad we are talking about this story thats exactly the issue. I. C. E. Should be focused on these types of issues rather than separating families and children at the border. [all speaking] Border Patrol separating families, not i. C. E. I support the Border Patrol during that period numbers were down by 20 . Should have stuck with it another 30 days of the problem would be solved. Decriminalizing illegal immigration is going to result in more Illegal Immigrants coming to this country. Jason gentlemen, thank you. The reality is if you put up a wall, youre not going to separate families because they are not going to get into the country the first place. Well, i appreciate you being here.

© 2025 Vimarsana