Lawsuit. By comparing her official calendar to her aides planning schedules, among those that she was meeting with, Clinton Foundation donors, corporate contributors, campaign operatives, the campaign maintains, though, that nothing is awry. Quote, if the different schedules refer to simply reflect a more detailed version in one version compared to another. Meanwhile, the state department has little to say on this matter. Watch. The state department maintained and preserved extensive records of secretary clintons calendars, and thats evident from the records provided by the department to the Associated Press in this case. Its a matter of ongoing litigation, and as such, im not going to offer additional details. So theres that. Lets bring in fox news senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano. Theres not much the state department can say about this one. I almost dont blame them for being so quiet. She is a public official, was a public official subject to the public records act, which requires that all of her, quote, official acts be recorded. Official acts are one in which she engages the government to address a government, or the government engages her. If she met with anybody in that category in those meetings with the names dropped, then she violated the official records act by deleting the names. Now, lets say she met with her hairdresser and she didnt want that name in there. Her obligation is to put it in and then go through a procedure to get it removed. Just like she did with the emails thats kind of silly, isnt it . If its a personal dinner or a friend meeting, why should she need to disclose that . Because thats what the statute says. The statute puts the burden on the covered person, which is her as secretary of state, to make the case for why something should not be there. She enforced that statute against people who worked for her in the state department, but she didnt enforce it against herself. In her own case, she unilaterally decided what would be removed from the records. So now we dont know investigators dont know if she was engaged in, quote, official acts or not. So heres what her side says. That there were 75 meetings and 114 people who were deleted. They say that she had her official calendar and then her staff would give her, you know, sort of the shortrun version of what she was doing that day. And one had the list of the people that were going to be there, and the other one didnt. An example is when she rang the bell at the new york stox exchange. They didnt talk about the breakfast prior to that. It included corporations, ceos, that kind of thing. Who would trust her after all we know about her to decide with intellectual honesty that her behavior was not covered by the official acts law . Nobody would trust her. The statute doesnt trust her. The federal government says you record everything, and then if you want it kept from the freedom of information act or kept from the historical records, you make the case, and others decide. She obviously knows that trust is a problem for her. Heres what she had to say about it in an appearance that she made today. Watch. Trust is the glue that holds our democracy together. But its no secret that ameri n Americans Trust in government as eroded. I personally have work to do on this front. A lot of people tell pollsters they dont trust me. Now, i dont like hearing that. She has a federal judge, judge emmett sullivan, who was appointed by her husband, who doesnt trust her to tell him the truth. She certified under penalty of perjury that she delivered all of her emails to the state department. This afternoon, 165 emails between her and her aides in the state department were released that she never delivered to this judge. And in one of them, she talks very specifically about, im not really sure how my information is being saved between the state department and here, and we need to make sure we know how thats working. And in another one, then talks about youve been hacked. Weve got to shut down the clinton server for a while. That defies her statements that she never was hacked. The vip had to sue to get the information on her personal calendar and compare it to those records, and there is a reason why they wanted that information, and it lays out here. Thank you very much, judge. Youre welcome. Good to see you. Good to see you, martha. For her part, Hillary Clinton spent the day with the woman who may end up being her Vice President ial candidate, a woman who donald trump is accusing of being a fraud and a raftd. Those are his words. Today for the first time, liberal massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren joining Hillary Clinton on the campaign stage. Look at this picture here today, folks. With the senator wasting no time going squarely after donald trump. When donald trump says hell make america great, he means make it even greater for rich guys just like donald trump. And watch out because he will crush you into the dirt to get whatever he wants. Thats who he is. Wow. A short time later, mr. Trump responded calling out senator warren over her unproven claims that shes part native american, cherokee to be exact. Heres what he told the reporter. Quote, she said that shes 5 native american. She was unable to prove it. Elizabeth warren is a total fraud, he says. She made up her heritage, which i think is racist, says donald trump. Joining me in moments, governor mike huckabee, who is a former president ial candidate of course and a Fox News Contributor, and mark hannah, a former Campaign Aide to president obama. But first lets go to trace gallagher, who has the back story on this whole thing. Hi, trace. Reporter hi, martha. After years of identifying as white, in 1984, Elizabeth Warren contributed recipes to a native american cookbook called powwow chow, claiming she was cherokee. Then from 1985 to 1995, warren identified as a native american in the association of american law schools desk book. Thats a directory of law professors. If fact, when warren was a harvard law professor, the university was criticized for not having enough diversity on the faculty. The school defended itself by touting warrens lynnage. The senator strongly rejects any accusation that she benefited by identifyings a minute ort, saying things like its always been part of her family story. And remember this . Watch. I still have a picture on my mantle at home, and its a picture my mother had before that, a picture of my grandfather. And my aunt bea has walked by that picture at least a thousand times, remarked that he that her father, my papaw, had high cheekbones like all of the indians do. She went on to say that we grow up on what our families tell us. Experts point out that it would be nearly impossible to prove that she doesnt have some native american blood in her family and some have said at most, she could be 1 32 cherokee. But after some fairly exhaustive research, the New England Historical geneio Logical Society says it has found no proof of her selfproclaimed native american lynnage, and that her family is not listed in 20th century census of major tribes. We should note that warren stopped identifying as native american in the directory of law professors in 1995, right after she accepted a tenured position at harvard. Martha. Thats interesting. Thank you, trace. Mark hannah joins us now, former Campaign Aide for president obamas president ial campaign and the author of the new book the best worst president , what the right gets wrong about barack obama. That is just out. Mark, good to see you this evening. Thanks for being here. Thank you for having me. Its a little weird. I mean when you go back and listen to the whole back story, weve all heard the back and forth between the poe cohon tasz from the trump side and her claims that she is part cherokee. But its weird that she identified not that way for such a long time, and then she identified as cherokee. And after a while, she dropped it. Well, i think theres been an enormous amount of media scrutiny when she ran for senate in 2012, you had right wing radio hosts in my home state of massachusetts sort of lambasting her on this. Obviously the voters of massachusetts didnt care because they elected her to senate. And i dont think if this is the card donald trump wants to play is going after Elizabeth Warren, who basically doesnt have any real relevance to this campaign for this. I dont think its a winning strategy. I think donald trump got knocked off his game a little bit. Hes supposed to be making substantive attacks on Hillary Clinton. But by calling her racist for even acknowledging that she might have some Cherokee Heritage is like calling somebody sexist, a man sexist because he has its the same logic as calling a man sexist because he acknowledges he has a mother, because he has a grandmother. I mean i think and im far from speaking for him. But i think if i understand correctly what hes saying, hes saying if shes not cherokee, then to go through all this and talk about the high cheekbones in the family and all of that is you know, is disingenuous. People can defend Donald Trumps comment that Elizabeth Warren is somehow racist, but that is coming from a man, remember, who the republican speaker of the house just days ago referred to and basically scolded for his racist comments. So it looks like donald trump is bringing all the maturity and strategic sophistication of an, i know you are, so what am i kind of approach to political campaigning. Its just it doesnt i mean shes calling him a thinskinned money grubber. I mean she goes after him the same exact way. Sure. But they make substantive attacks at the same time. But donald trump seems unequipped to make substantive attacks. Margaret thatcher, the conservative broimt of Great Britain once said, i cheer up immensely when people make personal attacks at me because it shows me they have no political argument left. Donald trump is a master of political attacks. Hes called this president the worst president ever. It shows he basically is vac yewous, is empty handed when it comes to actual substantive criticism. If he wants to win 51 of the voters in 2016, he needs to come up with substantive criticism. I got a half a minute left. Give me the headline of your book, and it comes out tomorrow, right . Sure. A lot of your viewers see me on this liberal spouting in defense of the Obama Administration. If youre wondering how anybody their right mind could still think this president is a fantastic president , buy this book. For any openminded conservative or for liberals that might have a conservative uncle or neighbor they want to, you know, have a Ready Response for when theyre talking about benghazi or the syria debacle, but you follow the news but you dont have all the information, this is a fun, lighthearted take, a good way to bring family together on the 4th of july weekend, right . Over the cookout. The bespresident. Mark, good to see you. Thank you very much for being here tonight. Best of luck with your new book. Appreciate it. Here now to respond, governor mike huckabee. Hes a Fox News Contributor. Governor, good to see you again today. Welcome. Good to see you, martha. So you heard all the back and forth there. Im wondering if marks book, is it in the fiction category . Im wondering because from what he said, i think ill look for it under fiction. Well, i guess your response is duly noted, but he hopes that many people dont agree with you. But tell me something here. When you hear this back and forth, she calls him a thinskinned money grubber, and he calls her pocahontas, and it does raise a valid question, which is does any of this namecalling beget anything that is worth while to voters on either side . I think everybody understands that if youre going to call donald trump something, hes going to come back at you. And i think Elizabeth Warren has opened herself wide open for this. Look, she called donald trump a racist, called him a money grubber, all sorts of things, very personal attacks. Then for her to pretend that shes so righteous, soholy, she would never do Something Like that. I just think its absurd. But, look, the scene today was just classic. You had Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren. Elizabeth warren, who is always talking about how horrible it is for these wall street people, and shes standing there with the poster child of wall street political funding, Hillary Clinton. The one thing they do share is a very leftwing philosophy. Ive said this was the beginning of left and lefter. Hillary and Elizabeth Warren on the same stage, pure left. I mean how did these two come together . I mean, you know, certainly what you say about the background between them and the things that shes called Hillary Clinton, its absolutely true. So what do you see here in the making politically . Is this the v. P. Candidate . Is this what weve got in terms of a pairing in november . Well, it would be a fascinating ticket because id love to see how Elizabeth Warren goes out there and defends Hillary Clintons being a wholly owned subsidiary of wall street. Id love to see how shes going to talk about Hillary Clinton getting all this cash from foreign governments who jail people who are gay and who put them to death, and somehow that hillary is the champion for diversity and womens rights. I mean this is absurd. But its part of this narrative that democrats can just ignore the realities and speak about how pure they are, how devoted they are. A lot of americans have been hurt by their policies. But if you have a candidate who has trouble with women voters, which donald trump does when you look at the polls, and youve got two women, one who is going to bring in the Bernie Sanders vote, and the other who is going to bring in the stability and continuation of the obama white house, that could be a pretty formidable team. I dont know. I mean im not sure how stable the Obama Administration is. Youve got obamacare thats made it very difficult for a lot of families to afford Health Insurance. Double the National Debt to nearly 20 trillion. Our place in the world has been decimated. Nobody respects us anywhere in the world anymore. You know, you got putin flying fighter jets over Navy Destroyers and taking hostages by the iranians. Im not sure hillary wants to latch onto that and say, give me four years, and ill just keep that great stuff going because i think people looking objectively cant hardly embrace that as terrific. See her separating when she feels its worth while from the administration and embracing them when they thinks it serves her well. Governor huckabee, thank you very much. Well see you soon, sir. Thanks, martha. So when the Supreme Court today ruled against new Safety Standards for abortion clinics, some on the left were elated. In fact, one latenight show talk show host suggested going out and celebrating by, quote, knocking someone up in texas. Seriously. Trevor noah said that. Ben shapiro, and Ebony Williams up next on that. Plus bombshell new revelations have some lawyers asking if the baltimore d. A. Intentionally misled the grand jury that charged Six Police Officers in freddie grays death. This is a kelly file exclusive that you must here in this case. Straight ahead when we come back. To the youth of this city, i will seek justice on your behalf. This is a moment. This is your moment. Sir, this alien life form is growing at an alarming rate. Growing fast, you say . We cant contain it any long. Oh you know, that reminds me of how geicos been the fastestgrowing auto insurer for over 10 years straight. Over ten years . Mhm, geicos the company your friends and neighbors trust. And deservedly so. Indeed. Geico. Expect great savings and a whole lot more. Wwell you dont want to live with mom and dad forever, do you . She says. Bazang ok, good one. Uh, how do i check my credit score . Credit karma, its free. Credit karma. Give yourself some credit. Developing tonight, new fallout after the Supreme Court issued one of the courts most sweeping decisions on abortion rights in more than a decade. Today the court determined that texas had gone too far with new rules that state described as Safety Standards for abortion clinics. Shanna bream reports live tonight from washington. Reporter Justice Kennedy was once again the key vote in a critical case. This time siding with the liberal wing of the court to strike down portions of a texas law the authors say was meant to safeguard the health of women seeking abortions. Critics said that was just a sham and that the real motivation was to shut down the majority of clinics in texas. They argued that women in that state would be left with few options, likely being forced to drive hundreds of miles to get to a doctor or clinic who could comply with the standards. In striking down the regulations, Justice Breyer expressed real doubt they would actually benefit womens health. With Justice Ginsberg writing in a concurring opinion that it is, quote, beyond rational belief that the law would genuinely protect women undergoing an abortion. The dissenters said the court bent over back wards to get to that result. Thomas writing that the court actually reworked the rules, benefiting, quote, judicially created rights like abor