Watters found out. Caution. You are about to enter the nospin zone. The factor begins right now. Hi, im bill oreilly. Thanks for watching us. Tonight, can Hillary Clinton protect us from villains overseas . Thats the subject of this evenings talking points memo. Secretary clinton laid out her Foreign Policy vision, much of it attacking donald trump as a primary enemy of the state. Donald trumps ideas arent just different. They are dangerously incoherent. Theyre not even really ideas, just a series of bizarre rants, personal views and outright lies. This is not someone who should ever have the Nuclear Codes because its not hard to imagine donald trump leading us into a war just because somebody got under his very thin skin. Now, on monday mr. Trump will be here, and im going to give him one free shot at mrs. Clinton for running that sound bite. Hell get 30 seconds. That sound bite ran 30 seconds. But i had to do it because much of Hillary Clintons Foreign Policy speech today concentrated on trump. A few times she veered off into other territory like isis. We need to take out their strongholds in iraq and syria by intensifying the air campaign and stepping up our support for arab and Kurdish Forces on the ground. Same policy as mr. Obama, contain isis using air power and weak allied forces on the ground which cant possibly defeat the vicious terror crew. Its impossible. They cant do it. There comes a point when American Voters must recognize that policies depending on Foreign Cooperation rarely work. If we want isis defeated, we are going to have to lead the way. If we dont they will continue to murder people. Clinton also discussed russia and china but again brought it back to trump. Moscow and beiging are deeply envious of our alliances around the world because they have nothing to match them. They would love for us to elect a president that would jeopardize that source of strength. If donald gets his way, theyll be celebrating in the kremlin. We cannot let that happen. Todays Foreign Policy speech was not really that. It was an attempt to whip up antitrump feeling in california which is Clinton Campaign believes will mobilize voters to choose her over Bernie Sanders next tuesday. Hillary clinton knows the world, no question about that, but so far im not seeing many innovative Foreign Policy pronouncements. She wants to run on what president obama has done, fine. And voters will determine the wisdom of that approach. But if secretary clinton has any new ideas, theyre still being kept top secret. Now to the top story. Reaction joining us from washington Katie Pavlich and from washington mary anne marsh. Did i miss any new stuff . Did you hear any new stuff . No, but i dont think this is the day for it. Theres 160 days left in this campaign. Plenty of time to lay out policy. What she did was define the election and define trump. Her weapon of choice was words. She used words to define herself. Thats what today was really about. Thats fine if she had said it was really about that, but what she did was i got a dispatch from the Clinton Campaign that said major Foreign Policy speech. I said im interested in Foreign Policy. Ill tune in. All i got was trumps an idiot. What did you get out of it . I thought that Hillary Clinton revisited her reputation of being somewhat hawkish. It was clear to me, as mary anne stated, that she was pivoting toward the general electorate. But unfortunately she did attack trump more than she provided substance. What she said doesnt add up to her record on Foreign Policy. How did you see hawkish in there . I didnt see a lot of hawkish stuff. What do you mean hawkish . She talks in a general way about talking on isis, our enemies, but again her record doesnt show that. Pointed out in the talking points memo. I got people in my neighborhood saying theyre going to take out isis and they have water pistols. They may do a good job. But Hillary Clinton will be an extension of the obama Foreign Policy which she bragged about today in her speech. It looks that way. Mary anne, were you aware that some of the language that secretary clinton used to attack donald trump was exactly the same language that jimmy carter used to attack Ronald Reagan in his Foreign Policy statements in 1980 . Were you aware of that . Yes, i actually happened to watch you on the five and saw that. Actually did something good. Thats a whole other segment, but anyway, the fact is i think Hillary Clinton used this wisely and her real audience. Thats not the question. We know you love Hillary Clinton. You want to vacation with her, you want to go to the mall with her. We know that. Thats so not true. Talk about her using the same exact words that jimmy carter used against reagan in her speech . I think its fine she used the same words. Fine . I think it will be a different outcome. Though jimmy carter said this . I think you just did that for her. There is a little bit of that involved. I think you just did that for her, but i think it was an effective way to go after donald trump. The more interesting thing here, bill, is what is Donald Trumps response . I know you have him with you on monday night. But what does donald trump say tomorrow in california. That shes been crooked and shes always been crooked and whatever country she went to she was crooked in. I dont think thats going to be enough. Mary anne, you may be right, it might not be enough. Who knows . Whoever wins the debate in september is going to win the presidency, thats how close its going to be. But the fact of the matter is i would like both candidates, respectfully, to give me more than what theyre giving me. Im not getting anything. Shes gibbi igiving more tha has. It will be in a time in the news cycle where the deals have been proven to old to americans and the world on the basis of lies and shes touting the iran deals a a success. She cant say shed take on the russians when the iran deal has a direct connection to giving the russians what she said was there was no other alternative but war to this iranian deal that trump says hes going to throw away. Thats her point. Its speculative, but its a legitimate point in the sense that, okay, you dont take the deal. Then its this big israels going to do this and the United States is going to do that. Who knows . But the point of the matter is at this juncture im asking both candidates respectfully to stop with the nonsense, all right, and say this is what im going to do to protect you from these villains. Increasing air power and asking the kurds to fight them, mary anne, is not going to protect us, okay . Its not. And anybody with an iq over 90 knows it. She ought to stop saying it. And calling Hillary Clinton crooked, katie, isnt going to protect us either. Its not. So both of them. That is true. Deep breath. Letting it out. And getting policies that we can actually embrace and discuss. Ladies . I would agree. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Next on the rundown, an amazing story. The state department deletes a question from fox news correspondent james rosen about the iran nuke deal. Rosen will be here. Then later Mitch Mcconnell says i, your humble correspondent, does not know what im talking about. Dont let dust and allergies get between you and lifes beautiful moments. With flonase allergy relief, they wont. Most allergy pills only control one inflammatory substance. Flonase controls six. And six is greater than one. Flonase changes everything. Like bundling home and auto coverage, which reduces redney. Tape, which saves money. When they save, you save. Thats home and Auto Insurance for the modern world. Esurance, an allstate company. Click or call. Introduces new, easytoswallow tablets. So now, there are more ways, for more people. To experience. Complete protection from frequent heartburn. Nexium 24hr. The easytoswallow tablet is here. Personal story. Fox news chief washington correspondent james rosen had this exchange with state Department Spokeswoman jen psaki. I have no new information for you today on the timing of when there are any discussions with any iranian officials. Let me try it one last way and i appreciate your indulgence. Sure. Is it the policy of the state department where the preservation of the secrecy of secret negotiations are concerned to lie in order to achieve that goal . James, i think there are times where diplomacy needs privacy in order to progress. This is a good example of that. Now, after that exchange, somehow, it disappeared from the state departments website as well as youtube. A portion of the state departments december 2nd, 2013 press briefing was missing from the video that we posted on our youtube account and on our website. That missing portion covered a sear roifs questions about u. S. Negotiations with iran. Here now to explain further is james rosen. We didnt show the whole thing that disappeared. They took a lot more out of it than we were able to show for time. I think they did this just because they dont like you, am i wrong . Youre not wrong that im not well liked among the senior counsels of the Obama Administration. Ive not suffered from any lack of attention from them over the two terms. But i think the real reason, the motivation behind this deliberate censorship of this key exchange, the only known instance of such censorship of any state department or White House Briefing in the obama terms that we know of, was because of the content of it and the fact that jen psaki had essentially acknowledged that her predecessor at that poed xwr podium ten months earlier that lied to me and my colleagues about the what exactly was the lie . Theres victoria neuland. I asked her in february 2013, we hear reports of direct secret bilateral talks between members of the Obama Administration and the iranian government, true or false . And she said, the kind of government level contact youre talking about, no. At that time, those direct secret talks were going on for more than a year. Why is that important . Look, theres no question they did not tell the truth. Okay. Why is it important . Why would they go to the extent of trying to get that off youtube and get that out of their files . So you lied, rosen caught you in a lie. So what . I mean, then you just nobody here asserts that the person that issued this order for this censorship was thinking or acting rationally, bill. So theres no real reason to do it other than you caught them in the lie, but that was transported all over the country. Everybody knew it. Who did it . On the five i said i was going to beat it out of you tonight. Yes. You must have some i dont want you to say this person did it. I want you to say, as Sherlock Holmes might, heres what im deducing happened. Go. Well, bill, i admire your dogged investigative zeal in trying to rubber hose me. Thats well placed, i think. Look, im not prepared to speculate on who issued this order. Jen psaki has denied it in a very heated email exchange with me that our readers can see in detail on the foxnews. Com website. Maria harp who was the spokesperson at that time denied having anything to do with this. The state Department Says they dont know who did it but they do know it came within the Public Affairs of the state department and theyre able to rule out the white house. The state Department Also says, for example, they dont have the technology there at the state Department Building in order to trace all of the calls that came in on the specific timeframe to the person who says they were on the receiving end of this order. I find that hard to imagine because when i was the focus of the Obama Administrations attentions in 2013 including the state department, the department of justice, all of which was well publicized, they seem to have no problem accessing all the telephone records, all the metadata, all the Electronics Records they needed. So if they dont have that technology now, the state department, that would be a diminution in their capability. Well, theyre not telling the truth. Theyre trying to make it go away. Kerry was the secretary of state at that time, did he take over for clinton yet . Clinton left in february 2013, just before that Critical Exchange with victoria neuland. Kerry inherited all of this. Maybe hillary did it . I think, bill, that we are not past the season of disclosure with regard to this. I think youre going to see is it possible . Is it possible secretary clinton might have done it . She was not within the bureau of Public Affairs at that time. Look, youre going to see members of congress. Youre going to see my colleagues in the mainstream news media continue with this story. Cnn has picked up on it, the washington post. These are not right biwing zeals as far as i can tell. No. And jen psaki is misplaced in saying its just me wanting air time or fox news. Id like to know who is trying to cover stuff up. I think thats important. So well stay on it, rosen, and if anybody is mean to you, you let me know and ill take care of them. Thank you, bill. Mitch mcconnell tells a radio guy im clueless when it comes to case law. After that a factor investigation. Texting in the car, is it killing thousands . Americans . Right bac ladies, why just dream of worryfree nights . Im linda, and like millions of women worldwide i trust tena. And with new tena overnight underwear i can now sleep worry free all night. The unique secure barrier system gives me triple protection from leaks, odor and moisture so i can keep being a sweet dreamer. Tena overnight underwear and pads. Only tena lets you be you. Burning of diabetic nerve pain, these feet were the first in my family to graduate from college and trained as a nurse. But i couldnt bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. So i talked to my doctor and he prescribed lyrica. Lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. Tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. Or swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling or blurry vision. Common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands, legs, and feet. Dont drink alcohol while taking lyrica. Dont drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. Those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. Now i have less diabetic nerve pain. Ask your doctor about lyrica. Ngo to ziprecruiter. Com and post your job to over one hundred of the webs leading job boards with a single click. Then simply select the best candidates from one easy to review list. And now you can use zip recruiter for free. Go to ziprecruiter. Com. Factor followup s factor followup segment. As you know i have criticized Mitch Mcconnell for failing to put kates law to a vote. That law would make it much easier to punish illegal alien aggravated felons who defy deportation. Yesterday on the dom giordano Radio Program there was this. Bill oreilly comes on today. He has a new book. He said he thinks its personal with you and oreilly why kates law, which is great common sense and people are furious about a beautiful young woman killed by this maniac, allegedly, why not kates law . What is holding it up . Bill is having a hard time understanding how the senate works. We voted on a bill that included that. Sorry to interrupt. But why have sanctuary cities tied to that . Why not make kates law by itself . Because we cant pass it all by itself. Thats the problem. I wish we had 60 votes in the senate to do whatever we want to do. Weve explained that to oreilly repeatedly but he doesnt seem to want to listen. Joining us from philadelphia is dom giordano. Are you buying the senators explanation point of view that he couldnt get 60 i mean, he couldnt overcome the 60vote threshold to get it voted upon . Im not because he didnt even try. He didnt try to persuade anybody. I talked to Democratic Senators who told me they would look at the bill and seriously consider it. He didnt do any of that. No, thats exactly right, bill. No, im not buying it. More importantly when im in the ring with a guy like this, im trying to advance, hit, i went back with him. Im talking about anger with him. I felt nothing. He doesnt get why were so angry about this. To him this is just another thing like all the other things that are out there in washington. He cant get the specifics of it. Does this man really understand how hollywood couldnt write this. This is exactly what you talk about, i talk about, viewers and listeners are angry about every day and we want something done. This is a great step, only one step. Were not asking for a miracle. And if washington cant do this, they dont get it. They cant do anything else. I just wanted the attempt to be made. Yes. And heres why his argument fell apart. He says, if you ever stand alone kates law, you are not going to get it passed in the senate. Well, if you attach kates law to a sanctuary cities law that punishes san francisco, theres no damn way youre ever going to pass that. Mcconnell knew that, did it anyway, it went down. Why not put kates law as a standalone and see which senators will spit in the eye of all lawabiding americans are going to insult the steinle family. Let a ps see that. Exactly. He didnt see that. No, he didnt. I pursued t