Presumably to do business with him and then this man doug band says there is a lot of money involved. This is a million, somewhere between 1 million and 5 million involved that the Clinton Foundation is going to receive, right . Yes. The name of the man is mr. Chagoury a billionaire. He gave between 1 million to 5 million to the Clinton Foundation. Gave to the Clinton Global Initiative which is also part of the foundation. The Clinton Foundations top operative doug band communicates with the clinton top aide at the state department he wants to talk with someone the top guy about lebanon. He says he is important to us. Which translates to most normal people as is he important to us because is he a big donor to us. And so people raise the issue as why is it that mrs. Clinton who promised to stay out of Clinton Foundation business almost immediately the Clinton Foundation, her top aides are trying to take care of a clinton donor. If you read some of these emails it, sounds like this doug band is telling huma abedin in this instance is working teti moment for Hillary Clinton, telling her what he wants her to do, and she is responding saying yes, i will do that. I will get that done. That is the very definition of quid pro quo. Especially if you tie in that money, the 1 to 5 million. Exactly. And abedin and cheryl mills who is also involved in this process being closely associated with the Clinton Foundation. In fact, abedin later went to work for the Clinton Foundation while working for the state department at the same time. This is working hand in glove and mrs. Clinton promised in order to get a confirmed as secretary of state to keep the Clinton Foundation out of state Department Business and those rules and that promise and that ethics agreement was violated almost immediately. Tom, can you lock down these time lines so people are pushing back saying hey maybe the time didnt line up right. These things happened from january of 2009, when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state during her four year term, right . Yeah, this is all during her term as state department. She was at the state department. Doug band talked to her former colleagues at the state department from the Clinton Foundation, now the state department to get the favor done for mr. Chagoury, a favor, someone was seeking a job at the state department. Band wanted some followup on that and he was told there was followup. We dont know if it was a donor or just an associate or friend. Once again, if you knew the Clinton Foundation had a friend at the Clinton Foundation who were a big donor to the Clinton Foundation, you got a favor done, which was special access to the upper reaches of Hillary Clintons state department. All right. One more question. Who agreed, who thought it would be a good idea and who agreed, who signed off on huma abedin being able to work not only for the state department but simultaneously work for the Clinton Foundation. I dont know if its a conflict or corruption. Someone had to sign off on that, right . Later we found the document, we thought initially it was signed by Hillary Clinton because her name is on the form but cheryl mills, her chief of staff signed it for her. So, again, approved at the upper reaches of the state department. Wow. I mean. Mills by the way later went to work for the Clinton Foundation and is now with the foundation after the state department. Incestual relationships between these two, there is more to come im guessing. Thank you very much. Thank you. Joining us with more on the legal implications on all of this senior judicial analyst judge napolitano. Judge, listening to, this shaking our heads going how much this is almost textbook quid pro quo. If it werent so tragic it will would almost be laughable that the right hand permits the left hand tone gauge in this. What we have here not only from toms work and by the way is he a singlehanded dedicated person who exposed all this by filing these freedom of information act lawsuits. What we see here is a regular, consistent pattern of Foreign Governments, foreign entities and foreign persons coming to the Clinton State Department and asking for favors. Favors she is lawfully aloud to give. An exemption from this rule, permission to do that the opportunity to purchase this. And then after the favor is issued, formally using the formal power of the federal law gives to the secretary of state huge contributions are made to the Clinton Foundation and in some cases huge speaking fees to bill clinton himself by huge 750,000, 500,000 to former president bill clinton, the husband of the secretary of state for a 30,000 speech. Even further, these things happened after 2009. Right. Bill clinton has not been president for 9 years at that point. Right. Yet his speaking fee went from 100 to 200,000 up to 500,000 and above nine years after he left. Happens to coincide with Hillary Clintons time 11 of the 13 during her time at the state department. Of course. Because he is not only producing a speech. Is he producing some exemption from american federal regulation or some opportunity in america for these people that are hosting this speech that only his wife can give. Eric, in my view, this is an easier case for the fbi to prove than the email case was. Its easier for the public to understand. Its easier for a jury to understand. Circumstantial at this point though . You and i have this idea that yes his fee went up double and triple during her time is there a smoking gun . If the doj were serious about, this they would indict some of the people who got these favors and those people would spill the beans on what their negotiations with bill and his people and what their negotiations were with hillary and her people. This is a very, very serious allegation of public corruption. On top of that, the more of these emails that come out, the more these emails that she swore under oath thee times that she surrendered, the more opportunity there is for a future Justice Department to prosecuted her for perjury. We know of at least three so far. Three swarings under oath everything was surrendered. Every day more things show up that she never surrendered. You said something that jogged my memory you said doj should open up investigation. Should indict some of these people. We just went through the doj say they werent going to indict hillary because the fbi said the recommendation was not to. Is this going to be another james comey yeah we did an investigation, we will turn it over to you doj and Loretta Lynch saying were not going to indict . Im sorry to say that i fear that two months ago i did not fear it because jim comey two months ago had that stellar, subpush, pub person lifelong reputation straight shooter. Im sorry to tell you not new and no longer saying he no longer has that reputation. There are a lot of good fbi agents working. There are a lot of good. People in the field. Very unhappy with the decisions of the Justice Department, their bosses, or of director comby. Their ultimate boss. Not to bring this information to a grand jury. And, so, he takes the information, says did a lot of work. I probably have enough here to recommend an indictment by the doj and chooses somehow not to. Whats the motivation there . To elect Hillary Clinton president. Not on jim comeys part but on the part of the higher ups in the doj. Look, this meeting with bill clinton and Loretta Lynch at the phoenix airport. This was not an accident. Everyone said like you just said is he honest, straightforward, great lawmaker. Is he the top cop in the fbi. What happened i am as frustrated with you as with forgive me. Im at frustrated as you are with the state department. We may not know until history is win. Next on the run down, quite a different view of the Hillary Clinton email revelations. Well be back in a moment. You can run an errand. music playing push it real good. announcer vo or you can take a joyride. Bye bye, errands, we sing out loud here. Siriusxm. Road happy. No. They feel good . You wouldnt put up with part of a pair of glasses. So when it comes to pain relievers, why put up with part of a day . These are not useful. Live whole. Not part. Aleve. I am totally blind. I lost my sight in afghanistan. If youre totally blind, you may also be struggling with non24. Calling 8448442424. Or visit my24info. Com. announcer vo you can go straight home. howard stern on radio welcome to show business. announcer vo or you can hear the rest of howard. Bababooey announcer vo sorry, confused neighbors, howards on. Siriusxm. Road happy. New details in the Hillary Clinton email scandal. Author of clinton cash which exposed a lot of questionable dealings around the Clinton Foundation recently claimed an fbi investigation into the foundation is already underway. I cant go into detail, but i can tell you on personal experience that i know the fbi is investigating the Clinton Foundation. Theyre doing it now . Theyre doing it today. Have they questioned you, if you dont mind me asking . I would rather not talk about that. But they are doing it at present. Joining us now with reaction from washington, former state Department Official david do you tufuri. If you did this in the Business World what we understand has been done with the Clinton Foundation, you would go to jail. Well, i dont know about that, you have to mention specifically what you are talking about. Here is what i am talking about. Things related to. Dropping money on a group to you have access to someone else so you can do a business deal and ingratiot yourself and make money off that business deal. Add in that the state department is the broker of this im not at the doj but i want to know a lot more about what goes on with the Clinton Foundation. Talk about emails. And two, is there anything wrong. Either unethical or illegal about these two emails . The answer to both questions is no. These emails show almost nothing that is new. These are the type of things that we already knew were happening. These are the type of things that comey and the fbi have already locked at and investigated and concluded. There is no problem here. There is nothing illegal about them here. So you are saying there is nothing illegal about putting money in a politicians pocket to gain access to a Foreign Government or Foreign Corporation that they have business dealings, u. S. Business dealings with . Thats entirely okay . Lets be precise here. Money did not go no a politicians pocket. Right. Thank you for saying that. Thats the important distinction here, right . Is it . Is it . Because you can make a link between the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton and bill clinton becoming very, very wealthy. Well, make that link because nobody has been able to make that link. This is a Charitable Organization that does charitable activity. Heres the link. Heres the link. There is another thing thats very important. A lot of their travel, a lot of their expenses, a lot of their housing expenses are paid for in the Clinton Foundation. Its like saying im going to put money in this pocket but i am going to take money out of this pocket therefore i didnt spend as much money because i still have the money in this other pocket. Wrong, you are still spending the money. The pool of money. Look, the irs form for this Charitable Organization are public. People have combed through them. You can look at the expenses. That show come up with any that the clintons got reimbursed for travel or anything else that wasnt related to charitable activity. We need to be precise when we talk about this rather than just throw out allegations without precise evidence. Again, the fbi has looked at all of this. Lets trust the fbi and its director who is above any scrutiny and trust their conclusions about this. Okay. I will give you another one. Ready for this one . During the time that Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, her husband, bill clinton, nine years removed from office, all of a sudden doubles and triples his speaking fee. Now, what would cause that . I mean, president bill clinton is probably one of the most sought after speakers. No doubt. In the country and the world. You may not like that. No, no, no. Im not disputing that. You may not want to attend one of those speaking engagements and listen to him. But there are people willie to pay him. I have been to them and find him extremely engaging. When he left the white house and shrouded in some of the scandal with the lewenski situation, i would think he would be more sought after in 2000 than 2009 when he is nine years removed from office. I mean, you are asking me to talk about a market that i dont know very well, which is a speaking market. You know, i find you very engaging. I would go to an event where you got paid to be a speaker. If my fee went up by triple, i would say, kind of coincided with these emails showing that there was some access provided by my wife, i would say maybe there is some sort of, you know, monetary benefit by myself from her state department job. Now again, you are throwing out allegations without precise evidence to support them. You have to look at what evidence we have. Now, look at these two new emails because the previous. Quickly. There is a quid pro quo. This is the worst quid pro quo i have ever heard of. In one case the quid pro quo is meeting with an ambassador. I have got to go. To lebanon which is what the ambassador does. David, thank you, i have got to go. Next up. Donald trump responds to the backlash over the Second Amendment comment. How big of a deal is the controversy for his campaign . That debate moments away. Real is touching a ray. Amazing is moving like one. Real is making new friends. Amazing is getting this close. Real is an animal rescue. Amazing is over twentyseven thousand of them. Theres only one place where real and amazing live. Book a seaworld vacation package and eat free. Introduces new, easytoswallow tablets. So now, there are more ways, for more people. To experience. Complete protection from frequent heartburn. Nexium 24hr. The easytoswallow tablet is here. In the impact segment tonight, the left not letting up on Donald TrumpsSecond Amendment comments. Liberal outrage at a fevered pitch following his remarks yesterday. Hillary wants to abolish essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, if she gets to pick. [crowd booing] if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people maybe there is, i dont know. Trump has made it clear he was talking about political action, not violence. Mrs. Clinton isnt buying that explanation and said so today. Yesterday we witnessed the latest in a long line of casual comments from donald trump that cross the line. And now his casual inciting of violence. Every single one of these incidents shows us that donald trump simply does not have the tampment temperament to be president and commander and chief of the United States. So the stakes have never been higher. Clinton supporter ought to flashback to 2008 in the president ial campaign when clinton herself was accused at hinting at violence directed at her primary opponent then senator barack obama. My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the california primary somewhere in the middle of june, right . We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in june in california. Joining us now with reaction from dallas Trump Campaign spokesperson Katrina Pearson and republican stat vista ashley pratt. Ashley im going to put you on the spot. I know you are not hillary person but you are antitrump person. Thats right. I listen to do Hillary Clinton and in 2008, remember, she was in she was up against barack obama and she was losing. This was may and she was losing. And the question was should she drop out in the interest of party unity . She said im not dropping out, basically im paraphrasing, im not dropping out because anything can happen. And then she cited a month later in years back Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in the month of june while they were in the month of may. There was still time for Something Like that to happen. Please tell me how is that any different than what donald trump said the other day on the Second Amendment . Its a lot different. Im not going to defend something that she said as well as im not going to defend what he said last night. Look, eric, a president s words are incredibly important. They can start words. They are important for global, you know,