Transcripts For FOXNEWSW The OReilly Factor 20170420 : vimar

State sponsor of terrorism and is responsible for intensifying multiple conflict and undermining u. S. Interests in syria, yemen, iraq and lebanon and continuing to support attacks against israel. An unchecked iran has the potential to travel the same path as north korea and take the world along with it. The Trump Administration has no intention of passing the buck to a future administration on iran. The evidence is clear irans provocative actions threaten the United States, the region and the world. The Trump Administration is currently conducting a comprehensive review of our iran policy. Once we have finalized our conclusions well meet the challenges iran poses with clarity and conviction. Joining us now with reaction from washington a politics editor and a political director of abc news. Rick, what did you make of the timing of this . Last night there was a report from the state department saying iran has largely met its end of the bargain so far and then you have this very hawkish statement from Rex Tillerson in the late afternoon. Tough words, harsh words but a different set of action than youd expect from the Trump Administration. The fact theyre going ahead with the nuclear deal and putting iran on warning is a big break from what was forecast from candidate trump. The expectation was hed go back to the negotiating table. You see the secretary of states fingerprints the idea of continuing the deal and serving the notice they intend to bring this to a head. They wont let the iran issue fester like it has for so long. Josh, this was a different tone than the previous president , president obama. You noted that in something you wrote earlier today. I wonder if you can talk about it . The Foreign Policy speaks loudly and carrying a big stick. Theyre warning our international enemies across the globe whether its the missile strike against syria or the tough talk against north korea or ripping up the iran deal. The administration is talking a big game but as rick was noting what are they going to do in terms of their policy and as it still unclear. We havent heard a lot from the president on how hes going to change the administrations policy. He said the Trump Administration has no intention of pass the buck on the future administration on iran. Rex tillerson saying iran could be on the same path as north korea. Which is also true. Of course. You can look at the sponsor of terrorism. I think whats important here and josh makes this point you have to find a way to get to that end game because these things are out there for a long time. These are regime are relatively isolate and have been impervious to a lot of u. S. Pressure and now youre seeing a president and administration adjusting to the reality. Need them for certain things. Dont want iran to become a Nuclear Power or korea to be impervious to china and were seeing adjustments republicans who werent protrump they like the evolution. It sounds familiar to them i would imagine, right, josh . Its more in line with what theyre used to when it comes to a republican president. It sounds like george w. Bushs Foreign Policy the comment about iran reminds me of the bush axis of evil comments with iran, syria and iraq and its clear this administration wants to have a more muscular Foreign Policy. They want to contrast themselves with the obama foreign which every foreign hand in the Trump Administration wanted to use diplomacy and this Trump Administration is to talk a big game and threaten a military action against enemies. Another thing secretary tillerson said today he made it clear it wasnt just about the Nuclear Weapons program we think theyre trying to get but they are doing a lot more when it comes to supporting terrorists, he says theyre alarming and ongoing provocations that export terror and violence. It comes right after President Trump authorized the montreal to send in tomahawk missiles into syria and we know iran was helping them. Theyre not subtle messages. The secretary of state, were seeing him come into view hes not been public in his comments or assertive but it seems like policy he has a lot of influence over and i think youre seeing a change. Even the statements today truck me as so different than you would have seen at the beginning. You dont usually hear this at the state department you have lots of adjectives you put in. Josh, i want to ask about the timing. President trump has taken Decisive Action on Foreign Policy which is coincided while the members of congress have been on recess. When they get back together next week theres changes on the Foreign Policy front and im wondering if that helps the republicans or emboldens them in their districts. The policy unites the party with the exception of rand paul but gets more in line and supportive of the president and Donald Trumps approval with republicans has stabilized and gone higher in the last week. Hes now about above the 80 point with republicans. The base is starting to get behind him and we saw from the Georgia Election last night the republicans are showing up to vote and getting behind President Trump. Trumps numbers are still worry some but Foreign Policy is a big part of that equation. Rick, can that take that momentum and use it as a Foreign Policy win with the issues on their plate . They like trump as commanderinchief but doesnt translate to the issue in an easy way and were seeing out of the town halls and the blow back against President Trump and his Administration Policies will be first and foremost in the minds of members when they return. I havent seen a lot of evidence in progress and they have tax reform and the president scenes optimistic. We havent seen a lot of detail to say theyre suddenly on the move. It helps unify the party and gives them something to cheer for. What about the democrats . Theyve been in a just say no mode. Have they heard something that makes them want to come to the table . Theyre base is super charged. Theyre angry at trump and do Anything Possible to show the dissatisfaction and they dont know what they stand for yet and were seeing division in the moderate portion of the party. Trump is engaging democrats across the country and its a good sign for the Democratic Party but dont have a message to sway some voters. For those in the wilderness how do they get behind it . Its not by signing initiatives. Dont they need to take Something Back to their district to say i did something in washington . I dont think the democrats are feeling that traffic. Its dont help him out or give him wins. That Means Nothing gets done. There we are. Rick, josh, thank you both. Thank you. Up next Elizabeth Warren taking not such veiled shots at Hillary Clinton. Are democrats now cutting ties with the clinton legacy . Well debate when the factor comes back. In the impact segment is the Democrat Party turning its last on the clintons . Elizabeth warren seemed to take a shot at Hillary Clinton on jimmy kimmel last night. We cannot shoot at everything that moves. Remember in the movie up when he yells squirrel, we cant all go over there. We have to focus not on what he says or tweets, we have to keep an on what he does. We have a gop pollster and democratic strategist don callaway. Now that the democrats are getting the 2016 election behind them and somebody who has a book out is looking at 2020, are they trying to figure out a way to let the clinton legacy fade into the background . Ill let you go first. I cant believe im going to utter the sentence but i think theres something right in what Elizabeth Warren said there about democrats chasing after every thing donald trump that gets them upset and agitated and if they want to choose which battles they want to fight and let go. I think shes right. When it comes to the clinton legacy theyve been the leaders of the Democratic Party from bill clintons presidency and through the campaign you had the obama moment where you had a new culture and group of people at the helm of the Democratic Party but the clinton machine was ready to go and now that thats failed there were new roots in the party and someone is waiting to step up to say im the captain now. Elizabeth warren is one of those people and people lining up to fill the vacuum left. I dont think the clintons will ever be frowned upon by the Democratic Party because obviously they have so many roots over the decades but are they trying to figure out a way to move left or forward . Whats the next move. Clearly the head is tom perez and his deputy jamie harrison. We expect exciting things from them. Clintons legacy is cemented as an american and Global Leader and her history is cemented and i think when we consider the bubble of d. C. Its important to consider the leadership of our Democratic Party not only tom perez and in d. C. And in dynamic levels like individuals in south bend, indiana and thats a substantial part of the democratic message which can be an active part of the trump resistance taking place across the country we cant forget the local levels and elevating those local leaders not just in d. C. The trump resistance as they stick with it does it lessen their chance of winning back states they left like wisconsin, virginia and michigan which were different and went for donald trump. Not with a lot but decisively. Its a brand new way the way donald trump pursued a brand new map for republicans and surprised everyone going after states people thought would struggle he pulled it off. For democrats to win theyll have to decide do they want to fight to pull those states back in the blue category. Pick up in wisconsin or michigan or trying to pick up the White Working Class that rejected Hillary Clinton. Do we abandon that and try to piece together a majority in places like florida and colorado, north carolina. States where theres demographic change that may favor democrats long term. They have to make a choice which path to pursue and that will be decided in large part by who they choose to be the face and leader of the party when it comes to their primary four years from now. Do they have to choose or can they do both . I think we can do both and already made a choice. I know its a mushmouth answer but the reality is theres one one side Party Message of opportunity for all and inclusion for all and were seeing that secretary perez and in a 57state strategy with the territories and well speak to same to urban areas as the farmers in iowa. The opportunity of inclusion and equal access to the ballot box and the democrats that plagued the Democratic Party is done and well see a unified message in the party over the next ten years and in the future. In the special election both sides are claiming they won or that there were victories. Kristen why do they think it was a big win for them . Theres a chance to not just hold the seat but bring another republican woman to washington. I know personally thats why im excited karen handle is going to be moving to the runoff as the republican candidate. Look, i do think republicans need to be a little nervous. This is exactly the type of district where if democrats want to take back the house its going to be districts like this where they do it. On the other hand, i think the expectations have been raised so much by all sorts of money and interest coming in from hollywood and the democratic and progressive base around the country that tried to nationalize this one little special election for democrats who doesnt win it outright last night has to be a disappointment for them and now we move to the next phase in june where i think republicans are slightly favored to hang onto the seat. Do you think democrats raised the expectations too high for john ossoff last night in it was a huge win for the Democratic Party. Its a seat just five months ago now secretary tom price won by 61. 6 . Weve seen a 10point swing in favor of the Democratic Party and nothing my republican friends can dismiss. Its a 10point swing based on nothing but the first 100 days of the Trump Administration which charitiably has been rocky at best and disastrous at worse. Thank you so much. Thanks for having us. Immigration officials deport the first dreamer sending the left to a frenzy but is there more to his deportation than meets the eye . Well analyze that situation right after this. Dana and a personal story segment tonight the first dreamer deported under President Trump. The left experience after deportation of juan manuel montes, the 23yearold, an illegal immigrant from mexico was removed. The white house is pushing back against a volley of criticism. The goal and the focus had been on people who pose a threat to National Security or in some other way in violation. I would respectfully suggest in this case the facts are not out yet so id rather not jump to judgment on what happened. Joining me is alen gomez from usa today and broke the story on juan manuel montez. It seems theres some gray areas in his case. Gray areas its safe to say that. We heard about his case. We wrote about the case and then we started getting reaction from the department of Homeland Security. What they initially said after we published the story is juan manuel lost his status so they could deport him and today they changed their story saying he had status but violated it by leaving me country. The attorneys said he was deported. Thats the what we are facing and trying to get clarity. Theyre pushing back on the headlines and usa said it was a violation and all of the fault of dhs. His lawyers are saying he didnt leave the country without being forced to. How can we clear this up so we can get more clarity . Is the judge in the case going to get information right away so we can figure this out and understand what the policy is Going Forward by the Trump Administration . Exactly. A lot of this is going t on this federal lawsuit. Basically the attorneys for juan montes has been asking to release information and explain how he was deported and how they encountered him and on what grounds they decided to deport him on. They have not respond to those requests so yesterday his attorneys filed a lawsuit in the Southern District in california asking for the release of the records. Weve been getting a piece meal account of what happened that night but theyre trying to get the full accounting so we get the Bigger Picture and can understand what happened. Do you think that dreamers out there might not understand what the rules are . They need to make sure they have permission in order to leave and come back. Is there an education problem that needs to take place here . No, i can tell you ever document recipient knows that very well. To leave the country you need advance parole. Its basically permission from the government to come back into it. I think that point is very clear to all of them. Theyre all very protective of their status and want to maintain it. The vast majority i think know very well thats the case. Whats happened here with mr. Montes he said he was picked up by cbp and deported and a couple days later he tries to reenter the country. At that point thats when dhs said he had violated the conditions of his doca and violated so they were able to deport had him but again his attorneys say the only reason he left the country and the only reason he left was he was deported. So they say how can say he violated his doca when you deported him and said now hes in violation. The depend of Homeland Security is pushing back and well continue to follow. Thank you for coming on tonight and excellent reporting. Thank you. All right. And joining us now to analyze from chicago Fox News Contributor steve cortez and the publisher of catalina magazine. Let me start with you, cathy. Seems to me its not clear cut. Its in the clear cut but hes not an illegal immigrant. Hes here legally until 2018 and was hage a cab after going to a restaurant and at moment didnt have his papers its not a showme state and three hours later he was thrown out of the country. So he is a legal citizen and the department of Homeland Security did acknowledge he was supposed to be here until 2018. Leg legally he could be here until 2018 so they switched their party and was a legal resident deport to mexico within three hours. Dhs is saying he left and did so without permission and they were well within their rights in order to do this. What do you make of it . I would take umbrage with him as a citizen. Hes not a citizen. I have great ok, resident. I have great empathy because they were brought here by their parent. I have no such sympathy for adults who willfully break our immigration laws and i say this as a trump partisan and hispanic. Legal immigrants are a treasure to the Trump Administration<\/a> has no intention of passing the buck to a future administration on iran. The evidence is clear irans provocative actions threaten the United States<\/a>, the region and the world. The Trump Administration<\/a> is currently conducting a comprehensive review of our iran policy. Once we have finalized our conclusions well meet the challenges iran poses with clarity and conviction. Joining us now with reaction from washington a politics editor and a political director of abc news. Rick, what did you make of the timing of this . Last night there was a report from the state department saying iran has largely met its end of the bargain so far and then you have this very hawkish statement from Rex Tillerson<\/a> in the late afternoon. Tough words, harsh words but a different set of action than youd expect from the Trump Administration<\/a>. The fact theyre going ahead with the nuclear deal and putting iran on warning is a big break from what was forecast from candidate trump. The expectation was hed go back to the negotiating table. You see the secretary of states fingerprints the idea of continuing the deal and serving the notice they intend to bring this to a head. They wont let the iran issue fester like it has for so long. Josh, this was a different tone than the previous president , president obama. You noted that in something you wrote earlier today. I wonder if you can talk about it . The Foreign Policy<\/a> speaks loudly and carrying a big stick. Theyre warning our international enemies across the globe whether its the missile strike against syria or the tough talk against north korea or ripping up the iran deal. The administration is talking a big game but as rick was noting what are they going to do in terms of their policy and as it still unclear. We havent heard a lot from the president on how hes going to change the administrations policy. He said the Trump Administration<\/a> has no intention of pass the buck on the future administration on iran. Rex tillerson saying iran could be on the same path as north korea. Which is also true. Of course. You can look at the sponsor of terrorism. I think whats important here and josh makes this point you have to find a way to get to that end game because these things are out there for a long time. These are regime are relatively isolate and have been impervious to a lot of u. S. Pressure and now youre seeing a president and administration adjusting to the reality. Need them for certain things. Dont want iran to become a Nuclear Power<\/a> or korea to be impervious to china and were seeing adjustments republicans who werent protrump they like the evolution. It sounds familiar to them i would imagine, right, josh . Its more in line with what theyre used to when it comes to a republican president. It sounds like george w. Bushs Foreign Policy<\/a> the comment about iran reminds me of the bush axis of evil comments with iran, syria and iraq and its clear this administration wants to have a more muscular Foreign Policy<\/a>. They want to contrast themselves with the obama foreign which every foreign hand in the Trump Administration<\/a> wanted to use diplomacy and this Trump Administration<\/a> is to talk a big game and threaten a military action against enemies. Another thing secretary tillerson said today he made it clear it wasnt just about the Nuclear Weapons<\/a> program we think theyre trying to get but they are doing a lot more when it comes to supporting terrorists, he says theyre alarming and ongoing provocations that export terror and violence. It comes right after President Trump<\/a> authorized the montreal to send in tomahawk missiles into syria and we know iran was helping them. Theyre not subtle messages. The secretary of state, were seeing him come into view hes not been public in his comments or assertive but it seems like policy he has a lot of influence over and i think youre seeing a change. Even the statements today truck me as so different than you would have seen at the beginning. You dont usually hear this at the state department you have lots of adjectives you put in. Josh, i want to ask about the timing. President trump has taken Decisive Action<\/a> on Foreign Policy<\/a> which is coincided while the members of congress have been on recess. When they get back together next week theres changes on the Foreign Policy<\/a> front and im wondering if that helps the republicans or emboldens them in their districts. The policy unites the party with the exception of rand paul but gets more in line and supportive of the president and Donald Trumps<\/a> approval with republicans has stabilized and gone higher in the last week. Hes now about above the 80 point with republicans. The base is starting to get behind him and we saw from the Georgia Election<\/a> last night the republicans are showing up to vote and getting behind President Trump<\/a>. Trumps numbers are still worry some but Foreign Policy<\/a> is a big part of that equation. Rick, can that take that momentum and use it as a Foreign Policy<\/a> win with the issues on their plate . They like trump as commanderinchief but doesnt translate to the issue in an easy way and were seeing out of the town halls and the blow back against President Trump<\/a> and his Administration Policies<\/a> will be first and foremost in the minds of members when they return. I havent seen a lot of evidence in progress and they have tax reform and the president scenes optimistic. We havent seen a lot of detail to say theyre suddenly on the move. It helps unify the party and gives them something to cheer for. What about the democrats . Theyve been in a just say no mode. Have they heard something that makes them want to come to the table . Theyre base is super charged. Theyre angry at trump and do Anything Possible<\/a> to show the dissatisfaction and they dont know what they stand for yet and were seeing division in the moderate portion of the party. Trump is engaging democrats across the country and its a good sign for the Democratic Party<\/a> but dont have a message to sway some voters. For those in the wilderness how do they get behind it . Its not by signing initiatives. Dont they need to take Something Back<\/a> to their district to say i did something in washington . I dont think the democrats are feeling that traffic. Its dont help him out or give him wins. That Means Nothing<\/a> gets done. There we are. Rick, josh, thank you both. Thank you. Up next Elizabeth Warren<\/a> taking not such veiled shots at Hillary Clinton<\/a>. Are democrats now cutting ties with the clinton legacy . Well debate when the factor comes back. In the impact segment is the Democrat Party<\/a> turning its last on the clintons . Elizabeth warren seemed to take a shot at Hillary Clinton<\/a> on jimmy kimmel last night. We cannot shoot at everything that moves. Remember in the movie up when he yells squirrel, we cant all go over there. We have to focus not on what he says or tweets, we have to keep an on what he does. We have a gop pollster and democratic strategist don callaway. Now that the democrats are getting the 2016 election behind them and somebody who has a book out is looking at 2020, are they trying to figure out a way to let the clinton legacy fade into the background . Ill let you go first. I cant believe im going to utter the sentence but i think theres something right in what Elizabeth Warren<\/a> said there about democrats chasing after every thing donald trump that gets them upset and agitated and if they want to choose which battles they want to fight and let go. I think shes right. When it comes to the clinton legacy theyve been the leaders of the Democratic Party<\/a> from bill clintons presidency and through the campaign you had the obama moment where you had a new culture and group of people at the helm of the Democratic Party<\/a> but the clinton machine was ready to go and now that thats failed there were new roots in the party and someone is waiting to step up to say im the captain now. Elizabeth warren is one of those people and people lining up to fill the vacuum left. I dont think the clintons will ever be frowned upon by the Democratic Party<\/a> because obviously they have so many roots over the decades but are they trying to figure out a way to move left or forward . Whats the next move. Clearly the head is tom perez and his deputy jamie harrison. We expect exciting things from them. Clintons legacy is cemented as an american and Global Leader<\/a> and her history is cemented and i think when we consider the bubble of d. C. Its important to consider the leadership of our Democratic Party<\/a> not only tom perez and in d. C. And in dynamic levels like individuals in south bend, indiana and thats a substantial part of the democratic message which can be an active part of the trump resistance taking place across the country we cant forget the local levels and elevating those local leaders not just in d. C. The trump resistance as they stick with it does it lessen their chance of winning back states they left like wisconsin, virginia and michigan which were different and went for donald trump. Not with a lot but decisively. Its a brand new way the way donald trump pursued a brand new map for republicans and surprised everyone going after states people thought would struggle he pulled it off. For democrats to win theyll have to decide do they want to fight to pull those states back in the blue category. Pick up in wisconsin or michigan or trying to pick up the White Working Class<\/a> that rejected Hillary Clinton<\/a>. Do we abandon that and try to piece together a majority in places like florida and colorado, north carolina. States where theres demographic change that may favor democrats long term. They have to make a choice which path to pursue and that will be decided in large part by who they choose to be the face and leader of the party when it comes to their primary four years from now. Do they have to choose or can they do both . I think we can do both and already made a choice. I know its a mushmouth answer but the reality is theres one one side Party Message<\/a> of opportunity for all and inclusion for all and were seeing that secretary perez and in a 57state strategy with the territories and well speak to same to urban areas as the farmers in iowa. The opportunity of inclusion and equal access to the ballot box and the democrats that plagued the Democratic Party<\/a> is done and well see a unified message in the party over the next ten years and in the future. In the special election both sides are claiming they won or that there were victories. Kristen why do they think it was a big win for them . Theres a chance to not just hold the seat but bring another republican woman to washington. I know personally thats why im excited karen handle is going to be moving to the runoff as the republican candidate. Look, i do think republicans need to be a little nervous. This is exactly the type of district where if democrats want to take back the house its going to be districts like this where they do it. On the other hand, i think the expectations have been raised so much by all sorts of money and interest coming in from hollywood and the democratic and progressive base around the country that tried to nationalize this one little special election for democrats who doesnt win it outright last night has to be a disappointment for them and now we move to the next phase in june where i think republicans are slightly favored to hang onto the seat. Do you think democrats raised the expectations too high for john ossoff last night in it was a huge win for the Democratic Party<\/a>. Its a seat just five months ago now secretary tom price won by 61. 6 . Weve seen a 10point swing in favor of the Democratic Party<\/a> and nothing my republican friends can dismiss. Its a 10point swing based on nothing but the first 100 days of the Trump Administration<\/a> which charitiably has been rocky at best and disastrous at worse. Thank you so much. Thanks for having us. Immigration officials deport the first dreamer sending the left to a frenzy but is there more to his deportation than meets the eye . Well analyze that situation right after this. Dana and a personal story segment tonight the first dreamer deported under President Trump<\/a>. The left experience after deportation of juan manuel montes, the 23yearold, an illegal immigrant from mexico was removed. The white house is pushing back against a volley of criticism. The goal and the focus had been on people who pose a threat to National Security<\/a> or in some other way in violation. I would respectfully suggest in this case the facts are not out yet so id rather not jump to judgment on what happened. Joining me is alen gomez from usa today and broke the story on juan manuel montez. It seems theres some gray areas in his case. Gray areas its safe to say that. We heard about his case. We wrote about the case and then we started getting reaction from the department of Homeland Security<\/a>. What they initially said after we published the story is juan manuel lost his status so they could deport him and today they changed their story saying he had status but violated it by leaving me country. The attorneys said he was deported. Thats the what we are facing and trying to get clarity. Theyre pushing back on the headlines and usa said it was a violation and all of the fault of dhs. His lawyers are saying he didnt leave the country without being forced to. How can we clear this up so we can get more clarity . Is the judge in the case going to get information right away so we can figure this out and understand what the policy is Going Forward<\/a> by the Trump Administration<\/a> . Exactly. A lot of this is going t on this federal lawsuit. Basically the attorneys for juan montes has been asking to release information and explain how he was deported and how they encountered him and on what grounds they decided to deport him on. They have not respond to those requests so yesterday his attorneys filed a lawsuit in the Southern District<\/a> in california asking for the release of the records. Weve been getting a piece meal account of what happened that night but theyre trying to get the full accounting so we get the Bigger Picture<\/a> and can understand what happened. Do you think that dreamers out there might not understand what the rules are . They need to make sure they have permission in order to leave and come back. Is there an education problem that needs to take place here . No, i can tell you ever document recipient knows that very well. To leave the country you need advance parole. Its basically permission from the government to come back into it. I think that point is very clear to all of them. Theyre all very protective of their status and want to maintain it. The vast majority i think know very well thats the case. Whats happened here with mr. Montes he said he was picked up by cbp and deported and a couple days later he tries to reenter the country. At that point thats when dhs said he had violated the conditions of his doca and violated so they were able to deport had him but again his attorneys say the only reason he left the country and the only reason he left was he was deported. So they say how can say he violated his doca when you deported him and said now hes in violation. The depend of Homeland Security<\/a> is pushing back and well continue to follow. Thank you for coming on tonight and excellent reporting. Thank you. All right. And joining us now to analyze from chicago Fox News Contributor<\/a> steve cortez and the publisher of catalina magazine. Let me start with you, cathy. Seems to me its not clear cut. Its in the clear cut but hes not an illegal immigrant. Hes here legally until 2018 and was hage a cab after going to a restaurant and at moment didnt have his papers its not a showme state and three hours later he was thrown out of the country. So he is a legal citizen and the department of Homeland Security<\/a> did acknowledge he was supposed to be here until 2018. Leg legally he could be here until 2018 so they switched their party and was a legal resident deport to mexico within three hours. Dhs is saying he left and did so without permission and they were well within their rights in order to do this. What do you make of it . I would take umbrage with him as a citizen. Hes not a citizen. I have great ok, resident. I have great empathy because they were brought here by their parent. I have no such sympathy for adults who willfully break our immigration laws and i say this as a trump partisan and hispanic. Legal immigrants are a treasure to the United States<\/a>. Illegal immigrants are a surge on our land and hes delivering on his promise and deportations are up and illegal crossings are down. In the case of mr. Montes, the facts are disputed. Hes going to have his day in court. Lets just say hes right and i happen to believe Homeland Security<\/a> but lets say hes right. That would be one person out of 800,000daca people we mistakenly deported. Thats a good record. Its clear President Trump<\/a> is not targeting him but three have been ke detained. This is scary not just for hispanics but everybody should be afraid if we dont have papers on us well be thrown to mexico. Maybe there has to be some tightening up of the process because if youre going to ramp up and enforce the law there could be situations where you have case wheres its murky or unclear. When you say he will have his day in court thats true and i hope its quick. As cathy was saying he should have been allowed to i guess hes saying he should have never been deported. He didnt leave willingly. That the the crux of the issue. Right. Let me also say this in defense of President Trump<\/a> who comes under constant criticism that hes somehow antihispanic and thats not true, he preserved daca and got no credit for that. He showed great heart in preserving daca. They were brought here as children and hes working on the Campaign Promise<\/a> he ran on but hes not in the business of looking for children brought here to kick them out without reason. If that is true he did not keep his Campaign Promise<\/a>. Hes not the one making the arrests. People feel compelled they can do this under a Trump Administration<\/a> . Thats scary. People jump to conclusions before people have the facts. Can i switch topics. Theres a report in the Washington Post<\/a> talking about a meeting in miami where theyre trying to figure out should we be a sanctuary city or not and just the threat of taking away federal funds is spurring action. Studies show sanctuary cities are safer than other cities because people feel they can report crimes. They feel theyre part of their communities. So immigrants assimilate faster if they feel theyre part of the community. If they dont report crime and people start shutting their doors and not talking to police theyre not as safe so sanctuary cities are historically safer than other cities. But it is against the law. I hate even the term of sanctuary cities. They should be called renegade cities. Its not sanctuary for the victims of crime or for cops dealing with immigrants who shouldnt be here in the first place and dangerous to communities. And the communities theyre most dangerous to are latino communities example. A young beautiful hispanic mother was mowed down in cold blood by a man that had been deported five times. One of the reasons i think he was able to remain atlarge in los angeles is because its a sanctuary city. I know that is one example. There are so many men who commit crimes are we going to say lets get rid of all the men in the United States<\/a> . But theyre here illegally thats one horrible example. You dont have the right to be here in the first place. What about those paying taxes and most are lawabiding citizens residents. Sorry, residents. If i have a party at my house is uninvited showed up and on top of that start breaking things guess what, get out. Cathy, steve, thank you so much. Interesting issue. New polling on President Trump<\/a>s handling of syria and north korea. How can it effect the administrations handling of the crisis . Stay tuned. In the factor follow up a new survey by Harvard University<\/a> and harris polling asked registered voters of President Trump<\/a>s handling of the syrian strike. 60 approved and 40 disapproved and asked if theyd support airstrikes on a korea. So voters often send mixed messages when it comes to use of force. In syria it already happened and the sarin gas was used so that seemed warranted. In north korea nothings happened yet but if something were to happen the polls would change. President s have to lead by nature americans dont want to use force and what he did in syria got 60 overall approval. 66 in the polls of 2000 registered voters said he was justified in what he did but theyre approaching north korea slightly differently. Theres a bit of trepidation. Theyre not optimistic diplomacy will succeed and if they use a military strike i think theyre nervous about him. Nervous about the consequences too. What about the overall rating for President Trump<\/a> . We have it at 48 . A slight tick down. It was probably down after health care and came back up after syria. Whats happened is a widening gender gap. Only 41 of women approve of the job hes doing, 57 of men. Theres a big split and i think men were impressed more by the strike that happened on syria and his use of military. In general were looking at an increasing gender gap and thats a concern. 41 approval among women is a problem when women are the majority of voters in his country. When you put on your strategy hat you were advising the president or his team how to improve the numbers for women do you have advice . I think women are looking to see the president not just dealing with bread and butter issues of concern to them, education, health care, but theyre also looking to see him reach out to democrats and the other side. 80 , 90 of voters want to see him reach out to the democrats on tax reform. Theyve said that consistently. If americans are saying one thing, they want their parties and their president to put America First<\/a> in the sense theyre going to put their party second. Thats interesting whoever does that will get significant political support. In the first block we had rick klein from abc news and feels the democrats dont feeling any pressure to meet President Trump<\/a> halfway so if they reached out would there be any willing to work with him. Just taking the position consistently and earnestly i worked with president clinton and gingrich and he attacked each other all day but they worked together. Its unmistakable in the polls while theyre mayor take a partisan split from the election they want someone to breakthrough the partisanship. One thing you said people like, 71 of people want tax reform. Can they get together on that one . Theres where theres an opportunity. They went through the polls and the outline of trumps plan, fewer rates, cap rate of 33 , getting rid of the capping deductions. 71 favor that plan. Can he make it a political reali reali reality. He failed on Health Care Despite<\/a> those wanting modifications on obamacare. Hell have to reach out to democrats if the doesnt hell have a repeat of health care. So we know there wasnt a lot of support for the Health Care Bill<\/a>, repeal and replace bill as designed a month ago but still a Strong Majority<\/a> want the president to address obamacare. Do they want it repeeled repealed and replaced, where are they on that . They want him to do something on health care. They want lower premiums and more choice and concerned about the cost increases. They like the greater coverage and medicaid expansion. The program was the worst sold program it threw people off and didnt bring premiums down in any reasonable time. I think that was poorly sold. Even if he gets that done now i dont know what good it does him compared to driving through tax reform and infrastructure. What about another topic the president talks about a lot. We just did a segment on immigration and his tougher stance on it well when it comes to illegal immigration and criminals in particular. Also he still says hes going to build that wall. What do people say . Remember, American Public<\/a> opinion is textured like they favored syria but opposed going too far in north korea. They think sanctuary cities doesnt make sense. 80 said that in the poll. But 57 also think there should be a path to citizenship for people that are here and paying taxes and doing the right thing. Opinion you can find an opinion on each side. They want comprehensive Immigration Reform<\/a> at the end of the day. What about the wall . People do not like the. 62 oppose the wall. They think even democrats would be right to hold up the budget if he doesnt take out the wall. Its a poison pill. Its probably his least liked proposal when hes got a Great Potential<\/a> for tax reform both on the corporate and personal side. Tax reform it is. Well take tax reform behind door number one. Mark, thank you so much. Next on the run down a study exposes how much the main street media despises President Trump<\/a>. Mike huckabee will be here to opine. Dont go away. Dana thanks for staying with us, im dana perino. In the unsolved an amazing study shows how deep the main street media d despises President Trump<\/a>. This ends with a cemetery and American Flag<\/a> engulfed by flames it was met unsurprisingly with applause. Joining us is mike huckabee. Your thoughts on that video, sir. One of the things i think we have to learn from history, dana, is if you have somebody as a leader of a country and keeps telling you hes going to do something thats outrageous you better start believing him because thats the danger when you think thats so crazy nobody would ever do that. We learned that from people like hitler and we need to learn it from kim jongcuckoo who and delusional history. Somebody has to take him history. I think the Trump Administration<\/a> is taking seriously the threat he poses to south korea to japan and frankly to the United States<\/a> and the rest of the world. Do you think governor that his military is more rational than he is . I know theres the wild applause and i cant tell how much of that is an act or force or if theyre so brainwashed they believe it. Well, i think theyre brainwashed. Keep in mind and ive been to the border and looked into the eyes of those soldier and they look back at you with sheer hatred because they dont have the internet they dont have a free press. They have only what theyve told. They have been brainwashed and by the way if they want toese to eat anything other than grass clippings they better be obedient to their leader. They probably had a big long drink of the koolaid and believe everything hes saying. What do you think of the changes in chinas behavior after the meeting they had in maralago. There was more push behind the scenes and the troops along the border china put with north korea. What do you make of the negotiating skills of President Trump<\/a>. It seems to me he was able to push china to a place previous president s in the past decades hadnt been able to do yet. Well, its clear he built a relationship with the chinese president and i think the other thing is just before dessert when the president said by the way we just put 59 tomahawks in syria the chinese realize theyre dealing with a serious person. They have to just realize each means what they say. Its significant the chinese have left north korea in isolation. Its huge or as donald trump may say huge but its a very big thing, a big thing and gives north korea a sense of being utterly isolated from anyone else in the world and thats a positive development and one that frankly bodes well for being able to do something that will contain north korea and its utterly fanatical leader. You keep in mind the people there too because as you said hes willing to starve them. If hes willing to starve his people you cant put enough economic sanctions on him but if you can choke off his military capabilities then you have a conversation. Lets move to the second topic because news busters had a piece i guess you wont be surprised the Mainstream Media<\/a> doesnt really like President Trump<\/a>. In fact in this report it says the coverage on the network news the broadcast networks has been 89 negative. Contrast that with president obama and he had quite a glowing review in those honeymoon months. Your thoughts. First of all, i think right now the worlds oldest profession is get great deal of more respect among the American People<\/a> than the socalled profession of journalism. Journalism has died in this country. There isnt any. It used to be left to the viewer and reader to determine what they thought about it and today news casters are giving their opinion as in covering Donald Trumps<\/a> immigration proposal it was 93 negative and in dealing with obamacare it was 94 negative and in the tweet they suggested the Obama Administration<\/a> surveilled trump tower it was 99. 5 negative. I want to know what was that half percent that was positive because i must have missed that. Everything i heard was utterly negative. You cant spit into the wind, you cant climb a ladder leaning toward you or kiss a woman leaning away from you. Add one pore more to the list if youre donald trump you, you cant get a share fake fair shake from the media. Hes fairly accessible to some of the media especially the New York Times<\/a> and Washington Post<\/a> and talking about the Health Care Bill<\/a>. Thats different and he does have respect for them in some way dont you . Well, i do and the fact he engages them. Its interesting. I saw the News Conference<\/a> where he called them out and went after them. I thought it was delightful. It showed a president living outside the tight bubble with the palace guard instead he was knocking them up one side and down the other. I think most americans were on his side. Lets face it the media right has the reputation as popular as cockroaches and the influenza virus. The best way to deal with media bias is results and the putting points on the board. Governor huckabee, thank you so much. Thank you, dana. A retail apocalypse and are storm clouds ahead for the u. S. Economy . Well be right back with that. Dana finally tonight, it tens of thousands of americans are losing their job as a result. The industry wells are feeling concerned that the contract on the economy as a whole. Joining us to analyze its fox news anchor Cheryl Casone<\/a> he. Im so glad youre here. I have been worried about retail and the job loss and there is a reason for a guest from technology, consumers changing their preferences. You are not as worried as i am. Speak up now, what we are seeing is the retail economy that is changing. Im going to call that because its whats happening. Youve seen a lot of jobs be lost in the Retail Industry<\/a> just in october 2016. He saw that these jobs are disappearing, its that they are changing. The t economy is changing. Technology is ramping up. Where houses are being built all across the country. We are Syndrome Companies<\/a> grow. Retail businesses that are thriving while others in your sears and your radioshack companies are actually going out of business. While you are seeing losses and section of the economy, your scene games and the other. Frankly, retail jobs are lower paying jobs. I worked at the mall at chickfila when i was younger. I worked at the chicken place. But its a lowpaying job, a teenager or ary college kid for the mostt part. Theres a lot concerned now about the overall effect of this on the economy. When you have lower paying jobs like this, those arent really jobs that are going to have meaningful m input into the economy. Because they are lower wage jobs. I really do think we are seeing an increase and a better job, a push towards t technology and a push of bringing back in the Trump Administration<\/a>, manufacturing jobs and auto jobs for example. Dana also happens to the rent incomes of places where retail shop or most and are cw retail is going to change so much, what happens there . We have seen this happen or the last ten years that the good oldfashioned mall, that i knew when i was a kid, is disappearing and a somewhat falling apart. I guess what you are seeing is a growth in urban centers. Weto are seeing the population actually moving back into the urban centers. The idea of suburbs from a real estate perspective has been changing. Its also been changing when it comes to commercial real estate, and of those are those mall facilities. While you are seeing that mall outside of you are seeing a new type of retail atmosphere as a result, restaurants, bars, coffee shops and everything. An youre saying that and merge. Thats the connection that i see. Dana that some good news. I didnt anticipate that today because ive been having anxietn about people working in retail. This is good. There might be other jobs for them elsewhere. Another question for you is the u. S. Confidence. I was surprised today to see that it is down, at the lowest its been in five months. I thought this last month it was up. At the number in particular is 12 points lower than it was rightt after the election in november. That doesnt surprise me whatsoever. That certainly is the administration and congress and the health care fight and the concern about tax reform. All wall street cares about right now, all we want to see it as tax reform more rhetoric we hear about as he neared the end of the 100 days without any Meaningful Movement<\/a> on health care, which is a concern that will delay tax reform, that hurts investors, that hurts thee american consumer. Dana when somebody says in a survey is how they are feeling at the h moment, so they may hae the same job they have back in november, but they dont feel as good about the economy. They are watching like we all are the hiring in d. C. , can President Trump<\/a> get the republicans on board to further his policy . To get action that will actually help the American Family<\/a> . And that is tax reform. Speak out this survey was done when the Health Care Bill<\/a> was failing. It was in middlemarch towards the end of march into april. Theres always a lax period as well. The surveys theres a lot ofa them. The government surveys Different Companies<\/a> and a gala one that is eyecatching because its the drop and if you look at the time frame right after the election tor now. I would say i wouldnt want the viewers to worry. I would want lawmakers in washington to worry. You need to Pay Attention<\/a> to this when people are saying they are doubting what youhe are doig or not doing. That really is frankly the Republican Party<\/a> getting on board and getting some Common Ground<\/a> with the president. Dana does it usually go up up . R out and about, people probably arent answering those in the summer because they are at the beach. Or hiking in the mountains. Dana cheryl, thank you. When we return, some personal thoughts about the dramatic changes here on the factor. Dana pilots met, it is in and here at the fox news channel. As you mentioned earlier, bill oreilly is leaving this chair and this network after more than 20 years. He has been the undisputed king ofee cable news, and for good reason. He is an incredibly talented broadcaster who raised the bar for interviewersse everywhere. He has also held the staff to exacting standards and his quest to put the best possible program on the air and p they are great. And you, his audience, respondent and record numbers making the factor the number one news showha for more than 16 years. Youve also been well and we cant tell you how much that means on the factor. In the memo to the fact to today, Rupert Murdoch<\/a> described bill this way. In fact, his success by any measure is indisputable. We wish him the very best. Watching us, ill be here again tomorrow, good night. Tucker good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson<\/a> tonight, the question is can democrats win anything these days . Jonathan ossofff got a tremendous amount of free publicity, a lot of hype from the press for his campaign toe win in the house seat in a six the district of georgia a place he doesnt actually live. He received more than 8 million, and much of celebrities showed up to help a him, the National Press<\/a> anointed him repeatedly a rising star and yet a verdict from the district actual voters, no thanks. He received 48 of the vote about what Hillary Clinton<\/a> got in november and he was defeated by the combined support for8 te almost countless number of h republicans running in that race","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia601506.us.archive.org\/9\/items\/FOXNEWSW_20170420_030000_The_OReilly_Factor\/FOXNEWSW_20170420_030000_The_OReilly_Factor.thumbs\/FOXNEWSW_20170420_030000_The_OReilly_Factor_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240617T12:35:10+00:00"}