, dear viewers of the khabar channel. I hope that we have passed the happy hour and happy hours are waiting for you. We will talk to the judiciary that this document was issued by the order of the head of the Food Department with the aim of revising and updating the Food Transformation document, if you remember. It was announced in 2009 and it is expected to be implemented by the end of 1405. Among the indicators that have been updated in this document , the identification and elimination of corrupt structures with a focus on the monetary and banking systems, the discussion of privatization , the discussion of broad taxation the government of special education is one of those axes that are mentioned in the tradition of transformation and excellence of the judiciary regarding the changes that were made in the notification document of the year 9. 9 happened and what happened to the title of an updated document has been notified. Today , we will talk to mr. Sahibkar , the honorable deputy of rahbadi, the judiciary. I would like to say hello and welcome to the program on the first page. Well, thank you , it was the year 2099, mr. Doctor, when the first document on the transformation of the judiciary, i think at that time, it was called tadamin and was notified, correct. In any case, during the presidency of mr. Amoli larijani and our food authority, Transformation Plans were formulated and announced, but during the time of mr. Raisi in 2019, well, in a special way, this the document was compiled and notified and it had been implemented for the past 3 years, but since the 3 years had passed, we came and announced a new document at the beginning of this year. It was during mr. Larijanis term, how successful was he in the implementation or what mr. Raisi was fooling about, how successful was he during the time of the judiciary. What does it mean anyway, because we should be able to talk to our people about what we mean by the document . The transformation document is a set of real issues. Which is now in the food system and the general public. They are faced with the problems they have and the various cases they have and solutions for these problems , fortunately, in the transformation document that was written in 2019 , the same document that was recently announced by mr. Ijee, this model and this model of the transformation document is problem oriented. We wrote that there were a series of problems and a series of solutions. Well, the number of problems had been prioritized. I even remember that it was painful to know which part was which. In what period of time should the money be, that is , very precisely what the new document in 2019 was used in the same way, so for each one of these the tasks that are written, for example, usually about 200 tasks are written for a threeyear time game, that is, in the previous document and in the new document , we had about 200 activities and 200 transformation actions in that document. For each of these 200 transformation actions. There are a series of daily tasks that everyone must do, but there are a series of tasks that must be changed , the mechanism must be changed, a new system must be activated, a new law must be written, new regulations must be formulated, those things will be the transformational tasks that must come. Strategic deputy also, honorable head of the judiciary, the main work we have been doing for the past few years and we will do it in the future, god willing, is this package of solutions written against these issues. We can monitor in a proper way and then determine what problems exist for each of them, and god willing, we can specify this. On what basis were you monitoring these problems, and you came to the conclusion that now it is an issue in the judiciary. In order to be able to identify a problem, it is a priority to use several methods. The most important problem is the people, that is, the people who refer to the food system, the judiciary , the judiciary, the sabzeman Forensic Organization , different departments, ask them what exactly is your problem , what do you feel more than others that it is necessary for a change to happen and that it is a priority for you, so it is important. Our biggest problem is these people, experts and experts who are inside the food system, well, we have a lot of experienced judges in the food system itself, in the Supreme Court of the country , in various departments, those who have been doing serious judicial work for years, as well as in our University Professors are law schools we have very good people in policy management and seminaries, and we got different opinions from them. In general, based on the opinions of the judiciary and the general public, the comparative studies that we had in other countries of the world, we reached a series of issues. Now, each of these solutions has been partially implemented, there are some cases where, for example, 30 has been implemented, 50 . Now, its not possible at all because the weight of the tasks is different from each other, that is , for example, some tasks are very small, some tasks are very big. For example, it is a multiyear process. A multiyear process , for example, we have to go through the process of drafting and approving a new law. This process of drafting and approving sometimes takes several years. It will take a long time, so in the period of time, for example, a year ago, when it started, it has progressed for example 2030, but it has to move in order to reach 100, so that people can fully see these results. What we have is to be able to specify each of these solutions, his status, his colleague, his responsibility , in which game, when, what should be done. We have these data and your opinions, and now i can provide you with some examples if necessary. In general, you, the judiciary, were satisfied with the implementation of the 99 document. In these years that we have served them, during the judiciary week, their biggest demand has been the implementation of the transformation document, and that is because it regulates the work , that is, some work may be done , for example, in the various types of work that exist, for example. It can happen or, for example, it will be forgotten , things will be disciplined and we will move forward according to this order we ourselves, who are observing, this work is really a very valuable work, writing the document, submitting the document , editing the document and following up on the document, and god willing , we will be able to continue on this path. Here are some of the statements of the Supreme Leader of the eminence regarding the transformation of the food industry. We will go and continue our conversation, experts. In the past few years, talking to me about this plan or giving a written report, everyone says that this plan is a good plan, a reasonable plan. These songs are at your disposal, at the disposal of gods power. I also made this fragment last year. This project must go forward. It has not progressed well. It must progress. It must be implemented. Of course, the implementation of the Transformation Plan and the transformation document of the Judicial Branch must proceed. It needs the budget that the Parliament Government should help. It needs efficient forces, which in some places are efficient forces, thank god. In some places, it should be strengthened a bit. The discussion of efficient and strong force should be trained. Probably some things should be changed. After all, every document that is not permanent and eternal should be updated. This is another point. Look at the document and see where it needs to be completed and where it needs to be updated. Update it. But it must be done. The good thing about this document and every Program Document is that it regulates the work and prevents the work from being scattered. Whether the document has not been fully implemented , has it been diagnosed, what was the reason for it not being fully implemented , should a strategy be defined for it . Complete implementation. Let me give some examples. For example , we have a phenomenon because we have these examples that maybe our audience is better. For example, we had a phenomenon in the past called professional witness what does it mean . That is, if you want to attend a court, you have to take two people with you to testify that yes, on such and such a day, for example, we saw a problem whose situation was such that the judge could find Knowledge Based on which to vote. Well, in the past, because we didnt have a coherent system that would be a database for all of these professional witnesses , what happened was that there were people who were active around our judiciary and said, mr. Shahid, if you want, we are ready. Lets testify that we made arrangements with each other a few minutes before they were telling us what to say and what not to say. Really , inside the court session, sometimes they misled our judges , that is, there was a phenomenon called a professional witness who gets paid to testify. We had written that it was to create a system under the name of witness witness system, that is, anyone who came and said, sir, i want to testify, his name and National Code are in that system. If he comes again, ask him to let him go again. If yes , this person has a history of coming to a Certain Branch on a certain day and working, and if the number these testimonies or the information that people say, sir, we were aware of this matter , if it goes beyond a certain limit, it will become unhealthy, and it will become clear to our judge, to the person who is handling the case, that yes, this person is an individual who must probably, a problem is happening to him a lot, so one thing that happened was that we had a simple discussion. For example , we gathered professional witnesses in this field with a system that i think is a very special work, one of the functions that we wrote there in that transformation document, alhamdulillah , was implemented, and alhamdulillah, my people are seeing it. Doing the work now has the ability to be verified by you, that is, for example , your reporters can go and see if there is a similar phenomenon around the communities that we now have in the food system, if there are too many of them in the past years. They were really complaining about the issues that i told you. That people are protesting, for example, they have a demand that they say you should organize this, well, for example , we were able to solve the phenomenon of professional witness, for example , or for example, we had a phenomenon in the past under the title of bad background certificate in many places for for you to go, for example, to get hired , to do something you want to do, you should have given a certificate. Thank you for not having a bad background. For example , it would take several days or a few weeks for a farhandi to consult with people and have different cases. Well, what happened is that because we were able to put these databases or these systems together in a proper way, we informed now it has turned into a process that takes a few hours or a few minutes, sometimes it means a few hours of work. You can easily enter the process with the same mobile phone that you have at your disposal. Therefore, these items are fully activated now, we did not include these items in this new development document, because it was a work that has been implemented 100 times, our people are seeing and using it, we did not include these items. We have done a part of the work in the past few years, but for Different Reasons i would like to share with you these reasons, sometimes we could not implement and complete this in the form of 100 d. I will give you an example to make it clear that you are entering into a legal process, you are going to file a lawsuit against a person, and at the end of farhand, you will file a lawsuit. You get a ruling, for example , it is said that yes, for example, mr. Sahibkar must give mr. Khosravi a certain amount of money, then the property of mr. Sahibkar must be identified and put up for auction. This auction will sell your property and your money, for example , they will remove this property identification process. A very important process in the past is the process of identifying property this was the way we used to send a letter to the person who wanted to go, for example, to identify the property , he had to go to 20 to 30 banks, for example, to visit, for example , he had to go in person. For example, does your bank, mr. A , have this account or not, or how much balance does it have . A good thing happened that we should really thank the central bank and the banking network. Due to the fact that the databases are placed next to each other, the query that maybe it would take two or three weeks that if a person fell behind and went to visit, he would attend within a few days. It can be done in seconds, which means you can easily see which person has accounts in which banks within a few seconds. Lets say that the confiscation of that property, for example, is from a property, it is identified that , for example, this property exists in the name of, for example, this person , the seizure of this property can also be done online , which means that our judge can go to the same branch. People should feel the sweetness of this work. The first thing is to refer my intelligence to the expert. Now we will prepare a report. He has been complaining for a long time , because the handling of his case was delayed for several months. The answer that the expert should give is up to the judgment and the judge should vote against it. We stayed the same. The lengthening of the time to send Expert Opinions to the court was due to the method of dividing cases between experts. In the cases that we review, it is necessary that the opinion of an expert. The experience we have and the knowledge we have from experts we are working with experts, but it may be more difficult for some experts. Referral of cases to experts with this traditional method had caused peoples work to be blocked in the court corridors. Expert when handling 50 cases at the same time. He is doing his masters degree and the other expert is unemployed, well , naturally, peoples work is delayed. The judicial reform document considered the solution to be smart in the process of referring to an expert, a solution that will be implemented for a year. It started when respected judges want to select an expert for a case, according to the number of tasks that have already been assigned to this expert, the system intelligently brings the expert to the judge. We asked the judge to intelligently refer one of his todays cases to an expert. We will submit it to a threeperson panel of experts. We will enter the case number. The system chose mr. Bakhshi as an expert in this case. The courts didnt do anything for us, mr. Bakhshi says that electronic referral of cases is also a problem of division it has solved the injustice and peoples worries are easier. It is clear that this expert was chosen through a lottery and has no relationship with the parties or the judge. This gives more confidence to the party that the opinion given by the expert is more logical and principled. Official experts should be added to this system so that the experts who send their reports of poor quality will not be filed any more. Mehdi javadiar of sed and sima news agency. One of the complaints of the official expert was that there is no proper explanation for the cases. Now this when was the rating after it was added to this system . Yes, this report was a very complete report, that is, it had raised all aspects of the problem. An important point is that people have problems and solve problems that refer to us, sir. When we enter the judicial process, it takes a long time , for example, for example, under them, it is said that the delay of the proceedings is the same as the prolongation. Well, one of the most important things that causes the process to be prolonged is that our judge, who does not have expertise in any field, has to refer this issue to an expert in the field, for example, and the building in the field, for example for example, in the field of computer problems , it is very important to refer this person to an expert and get an answer from him based on which our judge can give an accurate opinion. What has happened is that until now we were able to do the lottery , but our judge does not recognize that, for example, he does not determine exactly which person will be given or which person will not be given, it has nothing to do with the quality of work and background and experience. Based on the lottery , what we want to do in the future will happen lets say this is it. Every judge of ours who has received this experts opinion, reads the experts opinion and says , for example, this score is positive, for example, yes, very good, or for example, good, or for example, weak based on. The basis of this is when the number of these votes that are given, the number of comments that are given about these official experts, it is precisely determined which official expert has done a good job and completed his work on time , and we should give him more work accordingly. The work of an individual may be long and weak, the report of his seniority, the judge who reads this, will tell us the questions that i had. Why didnt you answer . You said something else. My question was this. So, god willing, we will be able to do this in the next few months. This is the ranking of the official experts. Therefore, now the priests lottery has started electronically, almost a large part of the country is also active. Going under the load, but we are helping the ranking, and we will start the ranking, which, god willing, will be based on the judges points. Yes, it is the judges points. Our judge can give an opinion about an expert, maybe a judge, for example say yes, for example, because he was my friend, or for example, give an expert report and send it to different judges to make judgments about this. The opinion of different people about a Single Person can be very confusing. This expert is really a good expert. Is it or cant it be done , is manual referral still there or not . Now it is completely on this smart system. Because this is a process and a routine that our judges should act based on this , i dont have accurate statistics to read in this. Let me give you the background, but the statistics are growing month by month, because our judge feels that he can do the work in a more appropriate way, do the work faster, so they use this lottery and do it. In general, they think that with the implementation of that blue document in 2019, the time of receipt has been reduced, that is, you can see this assessment based on the statistical studies we have in the past few years, when a case was started, that is, you for exampl