The french tabling the motion at the Un Security Council later area the russians already insisting there should not be use of force if the Assad Government fails to comply. Is this the start of diplomatic course trading or hopes of a breakthrough already fading fast . After wondering about the feasibility of airstrikes, we look at the feasibility of stock fil stockpile. Stockpile. That is coming up during the hour, an hour that begins with chris moore. Washington warns against delaying tactics as it prepares to examine russias plans of typical weapons. And in tabling the resolution. And the Deputy President not guilty. And out on strike, stating a lockout. There said to study the plan to place chemical weapons under international control. The prepend to from pair to examine the proposal at the u. N. They prepare to float a resolution of the Security Council. Barack obama is willing to have the Un Security Council discussion on this russian proposal. This comes about after phone calls today with french president Francois Hollande and the fish prime minister. This would mean that this is something that moves very quickly, not necessarily from congress to the United Nations but the emphasis will be on the Un Security Council discussion. The proposal that the u. S. It was first floated in an offthe cuff remark by secretary of state john kerry. You have got that two track strategy. The job at hand for u. S. President barack obama. He is meeting with Senate Republicans and Senate Democrats in two separate, trying to convince them to vote for a resolution for military intervention in syria. You can he will be taking his case to the American Public in that address to the nation from the white house. Chances are the theme or the content of that speech will change drastically. There will be an attempt to convince the public that military intervention is necessary but there will be mentions of this divide pushes well. Russia has reacted saying it will put its own project to the Security Council. This is a fivepoint plan unveiled by france that kept the military option on the table was unacceptable. Make sure joining us. This resolution is being proposed under Chapter Seven and one would expect that to lead to syria being described as a threat to International Peace and security, and lease that is how previous resolutions have been used. It was certainly the way that iraq was described after Saddam Hussein invaded kuwait. It was a resolution in 1990. It was used in various complex contexts. The element in the resolution was not explicitly backing war but has been interpreted as such by the western powers. The background of Chapter Seven is making this a difficult pill for the russians to swallow. There has been an enormous announce of amount of toing and froing. The meeting is happening at 10 p. M. French time tonight. We will have to watch this in the next few hours but there is a lot of points to iron out. This Chapter Seven is used, how are they going to word it so it does not necessarily lead to war in the case of noncompliance. There will be a lot of echoes of iraq before 2003. Again that is something that is presumably not going to stick with the russians for obvious reasons. A couple of other elements is the timeframe will be crucial. What does soon as possible or without delay actually mean . There has not been a collection of information so far available in weapons inspectors arsenal. This the timeframe has been a key concern. Is this fundamentally going to be a russian controlled process in which case the western powers will be skeptical about that. A lot to talk about before the u. N. Ecurity Council Emergency session, 10 p. M. Paris time. And also facing charges in the hague. The pair accused over the violence. And facing three charges of murder, deportation, and persecution. He prayed with the president. His trial will not begin until november. Last Week Parliament voted to quit the jurisdiction of the international committal court. He said he will stop cooperating if the summons is for both men at the same time leaving kenya without head of state at home. If they want us to continue working with them, they need to know that he will be sitting as president here. He pleaded not guilty. More than 1200 people were killed. Violence when unchecked and attacks spawned reprisals. Only now is the economy beginning to recover. We thank all our witnesses. They have resisted persistent threats. And offers of four justice. Trade unions have been in strikes against tension plans. Thprevious attempts at reform he led to mass walkout in protest. There is a relatively minor disruption. Unions and students say the plan is an attack on their very way of life. People have worked their whole lives so they can benefit from the system. Just because Life Expectancy increases does not mean we should decrease pensions. These reforms do not address the needs of younger generations. They will directly impact on our rights and access to pensions. The social government is facing an uphill battle to over hill overhaul the french system. They want to increase contributions by employers and employees. Rather than attempting to raise the retirement age, the government has proposed to extend the contribution from 41. 5 years to 43. Employers will have to work longer. Analysts say the Pension System will fall into debt. A new phase has been a step down after 12 years. We have gone from the ring through western intervention and a cold warlike standoff with moscow to a potential breakthrough. The u. S. And britain set to pick up on our offer to safeguard the stockpiling of weapons and table of resolution in new york. We look at the fine print. Russia would agree to resolutions that allow the use of force if syria refuses to comply. With or without chemical weapons, the bloodletting in with or without chemical weapons, the bloodletting in syria continues. A war weary nation in prime time this tuesday. The Russian Initiative enough for the Senate House Democratic leadership to delay a wednesday vote on u. S. Intervention, even though the top cabinet members warning the u. S. Will not wait for long. Many wonder if either way databases like the one 100 kilometers away will ultimately remain idle. Will it be the victory of diplomacy or sign of weakness. Is it too late for diplomacy . The guardians correspondent is here. He was arrested before fleeing his native syria in july 2012. You can join the conversation on facebook and twitter. The latest we have on the ground is what america wouldnt have said that Syrian Chemical Weapons handover plan will work if the u. S. Rejects the use of force. The Russian Foreign minister reiterating he was on board for facilitating a deal. The complexity is factor should be taken in to consideration. The Russian Ambassador to paris confirms what the French Foreign minister told lawmakers. Moscow will not go along with a resolution that opposes the use of force. But start with you, william jordan. Whats about to happen at the Security Council, i do not know how many resolution so far regarding syria. They are setting conditions on what they will sign on to. They are a good sign that we are back to diplomacy at the forefront in terms of trying to deal with the crisis over the chemical weapons issue. Returning to do with chemical weapons as opposed to getting it mixed up with Everything Else going on in syria. I think that the International Community through the Security Council needs to be the forum for trying to figure out how to deal with this immediate thing despite the politicking that is going on in washington, the posturing that is still going on there. The possibility that the u. S. Might act in some way. Diplomacy is where we ought to be on this. We can go to our correspondent who is in damascus and has been covering the story for for us from there. A frenzy of activity going on in the western determining chancellerys and the Security Council. In damascus was foremost on peoples minds this tuesday . We have been out speaking to people and there is an enormous sense of relief. They had been fearing a u. S. Strike. I am really sensing that war was imminent. Also some skepticism. Politics goes on without us. A sense of heartlessness and a slight fear that this is one of the latest twist. People do not feel that there is war. People feel it is possible there would be a strike. And you have been in domestic the mask as you have told us that there is this is jen thought of shelling that you can hear. What is it like today . Today has been a lot calmer. We have heard the continuation of bombardment across around the domestic damascus suburbs. There is a band of darkness around the city. They are virtual ghost towns. The clashes between troops and the rebels continue. Thanks for that update. You were saying images of fighting from the north of the country from italy. Again picking up on the lessee described as people in damascus are sort of wary, wondering if this is a hiatus or whether they can breathe easier. Finally there seems to be some diplomacy that has come to the fore. Do you feel are you more optimistic than you were 24 hours ago . No, i was looking at this. I do not think the Syrian People could be brief before this regime [indiscernible] as we have no politics or guarantees, not brief. Nothing will be useful. He still has the joker card. You do not trust him to comply with anything that will take place. One of the since we have had this frenzy of activity, since there has been this thread of intervention, syria is high on everyones mind that it has forced the rest of the news into second place. Do you feel as though after so much sudden frenzy of activity of attention that something will happen, there will be some kind of breakthrough somehow russian mark rex does feel like that. The tension has built to a crescendo and it does feel as though there is something coming that will tip the balance one way or another. The city is feeling the effects of the war in syria. The belligerent rhetoric coming from a number of players here. If something does happen, there will be a fallout in beirut. I have spent most of the past weekend aleppo. In the countryside and the city itself. There is a palpable tension amongst the opposition communities in that part of the country. Theres nothing else discussed other than all the americans attack and if they will, who will their targets be, will they be going for the regime question mark it has reached some sort of a breaking point. Spokespeople for the Free Syrian Army whose headquarters the Syrian National coalitions and corners are based abroad, expressing deep disappointment that the u. S. Congress is hitting a plus but not passing that resolution. Other people who are for western intervention question mark absolutely and certainly in syria. The more mainstream rebel groups are for it. They were welcoming the prospect of it last week. They were picking up targets in helping the americans would go for some of the jihadist elements that are permanent among them. They believe that the u. S. Force air force did attack, the Ballistic Missile base that continues to missile fire missiles into the north of the country, that would give them a tactical gain. It would allow them to advance because the war has descended into a stalemate with neither side able to move forward. The potential of air strikes was seen as something that could have changed that. I do think that we are now at the moment where the stalemate might come to an end. From that perspective to the point that there are those people who were hoping for those airstrikes hoping it could change the balance. I agree. There are people who believe the strike so the answer. Whether it is the answer is a much bigger question. In the long run everyone understands the strikes are not going to resolve anything. They are way to enforce political negotiation transition to some sort of resolution. Now we are watching closely what will happen with russia prosperos land the biggest question is whether this is a delaying tactic or if theres something serious to be discussed. What would you answer to those people because you have skeptical about the concept. What was your answer to them . I have said on this platform e4 and i repeat it again. It is not up to the west or the u. S. To deliver the Syrian People from their misery, from this whole situation they are in. The west can help understanding that that is bringing help from iran, russia russia, has blood. The idea that this could be handled neatly, surgically, answer outside military intervention is a fundamental misunderstanding of the basic root issues. They belie any understanding of history and the problems in the regime and the problems that are manifesting on the opposition side in terms of trying to figure out what the future of syria is after you get past the regime would be. For the time being but is not how you say it which brings us back to the issue of diplomacy. The French Foreign minister said out with the french is being essential. We said at least three conditions after i met with the president on monday. There must be a commitment to control and destroy their weapons stock. Secondly this commitment must be binding meaning it is our inspection respected the have to be sanctions. That is where the International Rule court comes in. Exit your reaction . Actually i see the french government in trouble. Big trouble. They looked at what is going on from a particular window and a humanitarian window. Theyre looking from the political window as well as russia, the chinese. Those conditions laid out by the foreign minister. It does nothing. If they want to [indiscernible] and experts know about these. You are just back from northern syria. Does he seem out of touch with the reality you saw . Rex this certainly is an expectation that there is some kind of punishment. These are seen as something that could play some sort of a significant role. This could play out for many years. If that were the perception in the north that will do nothing to inflame what is already a catastrophic situation. Rex i think the proposal makes sense and it will be extremely difficult with the ongoing conflict. I think part of the proposal is calling out russias love. What were seeing now, the latest that is coming in is that russia is already uncomfortable with taking this to the Security Council. The accountability is probably the most important part. Click should they take out in view of what youre saying, should the resolution get rid of the part that makes it binding, the ability to use force was what they called the u. N. Chapter seven so the russian signon or do they put russia in front . I see this differently. This is the opportunity that the u. S. Has needed to get the russians to agree to the Chapter Seven applicability. We have to wait for the u. N. Inspectors to make the report. Were hoping it is not wishy washy. We have heard a statement from the office of the russian president saying we do not want it to be in that resolution. Rex maybe not the use of force but Chapter Seven does not always imply the use of force. You can make it a chapter six which is what it is now. The United States must openly reject the use of force. I think it is too soon. There is a certain amount of posturing by the different parties concerned. We have to hear the u. N. Weapons inspectors and see with that leads to. We will pick up on that point when we get back. A sample of the stories we will be following for you. The French Foreign minister warning lawmakers that russia was skeptical as to the possible use of force included in a Security Council resolution. And france, turnout lowerthan expected. Unions staging marches against the governments tension reform plan. At the International Criminal court, the landmark trial of the Deputy President begins with a not guilty plea. Four men face a possible death sentence after being found guilty of the angry been murder that shocked the nation there. Apple launching its iphone series including a bargain brand. We will have those stories for you at the top of the hour. Welcome back. Were looking at what is owing to be proposed at the Un Security Council after days of speaking about the feasibility of intervention by the west. Were looking at the feasibility of whether or not the stockpiling of those chemical weapons can be enforced. With us to talk about it, back from northern syria. We were talking before the break about whether or not it was the beginning of wrinkling over what will be in the language of the Resolution Resolution that they will stop stockpiling. Would it be doable if damascus complied fully . Many zes a n gasoing on. A point thas ambassador the winana hammered home. Express all the concerns. Regarding the possible risks. We also join strongly the Russian Federation demands and requesting analysis from the iaea. Stockpiling Syrian Chem