Space. This creates prerequisites for working towards harmonization of integration processes in various regions of the world instead of trying to pit them against each other by creating new division lines. Russiaunderstanding towards the establishment of the economic union. Russia attaches importance to achieving the millennium develop goals and drafting the Global Development agenda for the post 2015 period. Its main priorities are the eradication of property and support, Economic Growth through expanding Investment Opportunities and creating new jobs. Enhancement of energy and transport infrastructure, the fight against infectious diseases. Cooperation between state should rely on efficient mechanism and a sufficient resource basis. In this context, we support the further strengthening of the coordinating role of the u. N. Economic and social council. During its presidency in the group of twenty, russia has consistently conducted its policy with if you to developing the groups international with United Nations. We consider the resolution of the General Assembly on relations between the u. N. And g20 to be a realistic program of cooperation for the long term. I firmly believe that by joining on the basis of respect and consideration of one and all, we will be able to move forward towards achieving high goals achieved proclaimed in the u. N. Charter. Thank you very much. Im sorry if i did not respect the 15 minutes, thank you. I thank the minister of Foreign Affairs that was the Russian Foreign minister giving his address to the u. N. Now our Foreign Affairs editor joins me in the studio for more on this. A bit of a Political Science lecture we got there. It was some quite dense ideas leadership. Talked about the importance of collective leadership. A barb at the u. S. Not to take unilateral action. A very short speech, much shorter than the speeches we have been hearing from the leaders of other major countries. Again, the emphasis on this issue of chemical weapons in syria, condemning the use of chemical weapons but warning about not jumping to conclusions about who used those weapons, saying that are inadmissible but the facts have to be investigated and examined by the Security Council. He said the use of force, referring to the syrian situation, that has been proved inefficient in the past. There he was referring to afghanistan, and iraq and he said over the last two years, the use of force is not worked and therefore it should not be used in syria. He also said that no state can cope alone with these problems the matter how powerful it is. Obviously a reference to the United States, and that collective leadership, as you said, is what is necessary. He then said that this collective leadership has led to the United Statesrussia agreement in geneva, which is leading to syria joining the nonliberation treating. Nuclear nonversion on, chemical weapons. He said that human rights should be based on the International Declaration of human rights. Nothing new in the speech. Some comments on the current peace efforts there. He said the syrian situation should not be allowed to overshadow the current talks between the israelis and the palestinians and secretary of state john kerry has arranged. He says the quartet involved, the United Nations, the european union, the United States and russia should play a more active role in those associations. Our International Affairs editor. Thank you very much for your analysis on the speech to the u. N. The u. N. Security council will meet at 8 00 p. M. New york time to discuss the draft resolution to read syria of its chemical. Arsenal australias u. N. Ambassador says diplomats will then vote on the resolution, which was drafted following agreement between the five permanent members. The wording would legally obligate syria to give up its chemical stockpile. And his been heralded as a breakthrough. Our reporter has more now. Russia and the United States have just introduced to the Security Council a draft resolution on the illumination of chemical weapons in syria. After months of political deadlock, and a growing reached. One an agreement reached. One that could be voted on friday evening. But the draft resolution first needs to be approved by the world, the weapons watchdog, the opcw, a 41 member council. Theyll convene at 10 00 p. M. On friday. This is the First Time Since the syria conflict began to a half years ago the Security Council has imposed binding obligations on syria. The drafter solutions is the use of chemical weapons constitutes a threat to peace and security. It bans syria for possessing weapons and any other country from obtaining the technology to produce them. The document demands that all syrian parties commit to achieving reconciliation and also backs a political transition in the country. It says the Security Council decides noncompliance of this resolution, include non authorized transfer of chemical weapons, and any use of chemical weapons to impose measures. Chapter 7 allow sanctions or military force if there is a threat to peace or acts of aggression. But these measures would require a second boat, and there is the risk of syrian allied russia exercising its veto once more. Irans president rouhani has given a press conference at the u. N. He described highlevel talks this week on Irans Nuclear program as positive. The u. S. Secretary of state and the foreign minister after wider talks, to address concerns about Irans Nuclear ambitions. Hassan rouhani also welcomed the positive overtures. In speaking with senior european officials and also hearing mr. Obama, the president of the United States, it seemed that based on the difference compared to the past. I view that as a positive step and settlement of the differences between the islamic revolt of iran and the west the Islamic Republic of iran and the west. A report says that scientists are 95 sure that humans are the cause of Global Warming since the 1950s. It outlines physical evidence, arguing on the ground, in the air, and in the oceans, Global Warming is unequivocal. Kat3ee moody has this report. A report detailing the deepening reports of Global Warming and why it exists. The panel on Climate Change said temperatures were likely to rise as much as 4. 8 degrees celsius by the end of the century. And that sea levels would rise a minimum of 26 centimeters or 10 inches. The panel also said it was more certain than ever that humans are responsible for the study changes to globals overtures. It should serve as yet another wakeup call that our activities to date would have a profound impact on society, not only for us but for many generations to come. The experts call for concrete commitments on carbon emissions. The u. N. Chief said he would convene a summit next september with a goal on Climate Change by 2015. The goal is to generate the political commitment to keep global temperature rise below the threshold. The ipcc confirms that each of the last three decades has been successively warmer, probably more than at point in the last 1400 years. And it pointed to extreme wather patterns and natural disasters, including heat waves, droughts, and floods as a warning of what is to come if immediate action is not taken. That is all the news for the moment, but we will cross 30 view to our world this week. In the newsroom. It is time for the world this week. 7 days. Four correspondence, one hour. With us, how are you, sir . Ok, francois. He is fresh off the train from berlin. Tony from Catalan Television station. Francosyrian photo journalist and paris traffic could not keep her away. Ceoome on in. Hamdan. I am making an instance an entrance. I bring you a sample of the worlds best from newspapers around the world. And translating into french. We have a sites that work in english. The world this week, where you can always join the conversation on facebook and on twitter. Our twtw. Too early to say if the world is a different place after u. N. Week in new york, but you could make the argument, irans new president courting western media, disowning Nuclear Weapons ambitions. While Hassan Rouhani may have ducked out of a handshake with his u. S. Counterpart, his foreign minister hit the mark with an unscheduled bilateral meeting and the promise of a fast track Nuclear Disarmament negotiations announced in the company of the u. S. Secretary of state. Needless to say, one meeting and a change in tone which was welcome does not answer those questions yet, and there is a lot of work to be done. Agreed to jumpstart the process so that we could move forward. Now we have to match our words with action. And thats i hope not the challenge. In french, there is an expression, once there are does not make the spring. It is crazy with the change of style can do. It is nice the people smiling and shaking hands. I do not think it is enough yet, but it is really nice that this year the president s discourse that they u. N. Was more friendly than what i put in a judge of the 8 years a up and dibefore. The political prisoners, one of them a very famous lawyer who was there some time. There are some things happening. There are new newspapers opening. There is a bit of fresh air. Im not sure we will solve the Nuclear Issue easily. What surprised you the most from this week . Maybe all the of the holocaust with the cnn interview with the iranian president who did an interview with cnn, and kind of recognize the holocaust. That means he didnt say it was the most important it was a massacre. So its strange for me to see how people focus on that. The same week he announced that he wants to solve the Nuclear Situation in a few months. Maybe that is more important. It is really strange. The way every word he says is collected and commented like hes going to change the world, but it is true, we have to wait and see what they do. He was the center of attention. Lebanese daily headlined obama extends his hands to rouhani and hollande shakes it. Hollande did get that handshake in. What do you think looking at those images . Francois hollande, why did rouhani duck out of these handshakes with obama . When they go to new york and sure if there and serve their shish kebabs to anyone who will serve it. People are going to parse this in so many different ways. But i think you put your finger on it you mentioned two words. Holocaustisrael. I think this chemical weapons thing is an important sideshow, but nonetheless a sideshow. There is going to be no traction anywhere on any of these issues until two things happens the iranians recognize the right of the state of israel to exist. But Hassan Rouhani in his speech on that point said, im going to follow the palestinians lead. He said, i will follow the palestinians. The past 35 years on that. The israelis have to stop building settlements, and no matter how much nice talk you might want to make about the radiance the iranians and this new regime, they still have centrifuges running down there, they are Financing International terrorism, and the issue comes back to making a bomb. So this is all really nice. I think obama should have tracked this guy down and shook his hand. But you know they would have to keep their diplomatic niceties. I think it is way too early to tell, and these people who are prognosticating what is going to happen, because we have warren beaty playing the new president of iran. He looks great. We have seen this before. There is so much distress. The americans during the cold war trusted the russians more than anyone does now this new regime in iran. Iran controls on global regime of satraps, terrorist cells. Look at kenya. You are putting a link it is not the same. I agree that they are doing that, but i do not agree you do not think the money these guys are getting is coming through some of these systems . I believe it is. It is not isolated to one situation. It is not only iran. If it is all qaeda, we know where the money comes from. It comes from the saudis. The u. S. 15 years ago. Its not iran. There is enough responsibility to go around, but at this point in time, it does not matter which faction is funded by shias or sunnis, it does not matter. It does to a certain point. Its too simplistic to say because they met in new york in better terms in their negotiations, that does not mean that everything is done. I agree that would be simplistic, even though the headlines the last today seems to indicate. I think that is alive. We will see in the next months how the Nuclear Factor will still be there. At the same time, i would not mix that with what happened in kenya or al qaeda. And we will talk about what happened in kenya. On facebook we have a comment the ayatollah, not the present controls the country. Rouhani is putting on a good case for the world, and the ayatollah still seeks Nuclear Weapons. I am wary as well. Why that handshake did not take place is actually important to some people. And the new iranian president said these things take time to prepare. We need to prepare for that sort of thing. Thats what he told american television. The iranian president cagey on his motives for missing the tuesday lunch sponsored by the u. N. Secretarygeneral. The Tehran Bureau reports that one idea floated was that he was put off by the fact that wine was served at the lunch. I am not sure if that is the case. But David Ignatius in the Washington Post said that he did not want expectations to be too high. That is too much for the first time he comes here. There they have calling the u. S. The great staatan for 35 years. It is a bit sudden to do that. In iran, theyre trying to say, sacred union between a hard line conservatives and the foremost. Reformists. Even to start shaking american president hans, it is too much. Hands, it is too much. I think the international situation, it would explode somehow if to the problems in syria, we would add increasing of the heat in iran. I think it was absolutely necessary to calm down, even though it is just for a few months, the issue of iran. Even at the same time, that does not mean that iran is going to change a single thing about their Nuclear Weapons program. What i think it would be, it would be too much just not to calm down the issue on the eve of u. N. Tony, the rhetoric. Your facebook reader was right. In iran, we know the president is a kind of windowdressing. To the regime. And the supreme guide is the real man in power. This week happened at the same time within u. N. Happened very little micro story that iran is maybe not that ready to they did the news agency, an interview with the french teacher, a political scientist teacher to talk about syria and about the supreme guide and things like that. It was totally fake. He never gave this interview. And its funny because these are really very odd moetethods. It is very different from the what we might expect from the will the real iran please stand up . Last time in iran, you were saying, hes rouhani, the guy who calls the shots is the ayatollah. That is interesting. After this week, do you get a sense there is an internal tussle going on . No, i do not think so. Rouhani does that because iran has to put on a nice face, because the only other alternative would have been war. There is already war in syria. Another front would have been too much. Now they need time. How much leverage is the new, allegedly new administration in tehran actually going to exercise to deescalate the g lobal and regional issues . I am not sure very much, but i think heres your coat. See you later. Get the formalities right, but you know, forget, lets nevermind about the morales. Moralities. Is too easy to always criticize. They want to speed up negotiations. Saying you want to destroy israel, everybody is like, we do not talk to iran. When he says, we want to talk. Lets try it at least. They are making efforts. Let them. The other question is an internal issue. It is a way to disarm the opposition, that it was ahmadinijad was never easy. Now, is it like dismantling part of this young, educated people that at some point were asking for the arab spring . Its very counterintuitive as well, because look who the new administration in tehran has put the pressure on . The israelis. The israelis are the ones here who are having to come out and try not to look like the bad guys to say, do not trust these people. We have heard this before. And everyone is really w illing, they want to embrace this overture. By the way, good will among men extending to the u. N. Security counsel. Russia and china agreeing to a resolution obliging syria to abandon chemical stockpiles, forcing damascus unfettered access to u. N. Inspectors. There you see the draft resolution as it was worded. We know that already the u. N. Chemical weapons Inspections Team says that theres 7 sites, no longer four, that are purported to have chemical weapons. Again, are we being too cynical that we will say that this will all come to nought . Maybe we should say, wait and trust. To be honest, it is true. In the last month, there were plans with the arab league, the eu, a lot of people coming and a lot of promises and plans with six or seven or eight points, and everybody signs it and everybody is happy. But at the end of the day, nothing changes. It is the same, killings every day. Use of chemicals and with airpl